On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Elijah Newren new...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a shame that hackers who contribute to GNOME projects which don't
use svn.gnome.org were excluded.
(I was told their opinions didn't matter. {shrug} that's fine,
so long as nobody tries to represent this
2009/1/6 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 17:21 +0900, James Henstridge a écrit :
I'd hope that any DVCS would get a larger user base than current list
of active Subversion committers: anyone who contributes patches via
mailing lists or bugzilla could use a DVCS
On 22/04/2008, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Elijah Newren
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:45:34AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
(At least, that's what I understand)
Indeed. This might be
On 22/05/07, Thomas Vander Stichele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Definitely a good question to mull over. I don't have a good answer.
Maybe someone else does.
Well, to me, it makes totally sense to have a multimedia framework in
GNOME since many applications are dealing with
On 22/05/07, Thomas Vander Stichele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you don't break the API in the next series, why would you make a
change that requires every application to be updated to take advantage
of the new release? Doesn't that just make work for everyone?
The applications
On 15/02/07, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 15:52 +, Rob Taylor wrote:
Can anyone with a bit more library maintenance experience give me some
advice on the best way forward? I don't want to just ignore the ABI
issue, given the rapidly growing number of
On 14/02/07, Rob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Taylor wrote:
(Changing subject appropriately, should have done this earlier..)
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Parallel install will be of limited value most likely if any *libraries*
in the typical GNOME/GTK stack use dbus-glib, because
On 08/02/07, Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Hi,
Currently I dont see anything wrong with the state of affairs at all.
I see: Many GNOME *.pc files are broken, because Libs.private required
for static linking are missing. Default configure options
On 26/10/06, Christian Persch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
please let me introduce the latest addition to the category of totally
useless software by announcing...
GNOME Network Proxy Resolver !
What it is
==
GNOME Network Proxy Resolver provides proxy lookup with
On 25/10/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would need to completely flatten the metadata as
Contact.HomeJabberID, Contact.WorkJabberID etc so that all metadata is
mapped 1:1
If you do flatten things like this, I would hope you'd still be able
to query for people by jabber ID
On 25/10/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Henstridge wrote:
While having standard names for metadata relationship types that
everyone can use is great, there are going to be cases where apps want
to experiment with relationships that haven't yet been standardised
On 19/10/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ross Burton wrote:
Also, if I search for created by ross how does the system need to know
that it should search File.Publisher, Audio.Artist, Audio.Performer,
Doc.Author and Image.Creator? The naming scheme here is inconsistant
and
On 24/10/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ross Burton wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 23:26 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
I think that the idea Ross is trying to get across here is that rather
than having a flat namespace of metadata types, you want to have
relationships between
On 25/10/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been thinking of allowimg all metadata to be registered with an
optional hardcoded dublin core type(1) so we could use maybe
dc.creator that would search all metadata registered against that type.
You would not be able to
On 08/10/06, Sebastian Pölsterl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Tromey wrote:
How does this relate to python eggs[2]? And if it doesn't, why not?
It seems to me that if there's an upstream project that handles a lot
of this, then it would be beneficial to simply re-use it.
eggs are
On 22/09/06, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 23:09 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
GARNOME does not roll or maintain source tarballs for developers.
I do not know of any stable Linux distro that currently offers a new
enough version of udev that provides
On 08/09/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your master plan implies branching early and heavily committing to
both branches for a long time. Reality check: we are still using this
archaic software called C.V.S.! Branching with that software is
incredibly complex.
On 08/09/06, Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 September 2006 08:57, James Henstridge wrote:
The real issue with handling development in parallel branches is
really complexity of merging. This is an area where Subversion
doesn't really buy you much over CVS -- you still
On 30/08/06, Thomas Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scenario 2) I go to use another machine that's mounting
the same NFS home directory, or is otherwise getting the
same GConf values. This machine is running Gnome 2.14,
which doesn't include Clarius.
The same thing would happen if you
On 01/08/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cant python be sandboxed?
not sure if it helps in this case or not as I bet you want the python
code to have full access to the system.
Not in the sense that javascript can be sandboxed. Some of the
developers are looking at restricted
On 26/07/06, Bill Haneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 19:20, James Henstridge wrote:
Havoc's summary at the bottom of his email says why the current
gnome_program_init() code is a hack:
In summary:
- if every libgtk app should do something, get that code
On 26/07/06, Fernando Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/06, James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. gnome-settings-daemon is modified to set the gtk-modules XSETTING,
based on the existing gconf key. If accessibility is enabled, it sets
it to libgail:libatk-bridge.
So if we
On 26/07/06, Bill Haneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 17:57, Havoc Pennington wrote:
...
It's just that people were too lazy to fix
it generically, and instead went on a cut-and-paste spree. That the
cut-and-paste spree included libgnome and thus got some subset of
On 16/07/06, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you tell me how? The little feed icon's gone, and I couldn't find an
rss action.
Still seems available as here:
http://live.gnome.org/RecentChanges?action=rss_rc
There is a comment at the top of that page explaining the various
options you
On 10/07/06, Sergey Udaltsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Annoying. What we do? We set a fixed width.
Of course. Even if we adopt two-letter code, we won't adopt fixed
font. So the actual width of the string cannot be guaranteed eather
way.
I think the point here is that you know what names are
On 10/07/06, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeType has been upgraded from 2.1.x = 2.2.x. Freetype-2.2.x does
*not* contain libttf.so. Applications that were linked against
libttf.so need to be rebuilt.
Unless I'm mistaken, isn't libttf.so the Freetype 1.x library? It
On 19/06/06, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ar Llu, 2006-06-19 am 18:39 +0800, ysgrifennodd James Henstridge:
If you intend to present localised license text, please provide a way
to turn it off (and probably turn it off by default ...).
Translations can introduce ambiguities or change
On 19/06/06, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you elaborate about which aspects of the drive mounter you find
to be problematic? The current design should be a lot more effective
Dont know what the original commenter disliked about the applet but I
found it annoying that the
On 13/06/06, Rousseau de Pantalon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, about the Disk Mounter Applet: Please revert to pre-2.10 or rip it
out.
This applet contradicts almost all Gnome HIG-guides: to begin with most
important guideline: being useful.
It hurts Gnome's increasing usability at a
On 5/18/06, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The checksums for the gstreamer-0.10.x tarballs on ftp.gnome.org differ
from those on http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/src/gstreamer/
How can that be?
The install-module script used to add things to ftp.gnome.org takes
a .tar.gz
Nate Nielsen wrote:
No need for compatibility on Seahorse side. The gnome-keyring feature is
only in CVS.
Let's keep it simple and do this:
openpgp-keyid: 16 char hex (upper-case) key id
The 64 bit key ids seem to be more widely available from APIs (like
GPGME) and other sources. Note
Nate Nielsen wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Alexander Larsson
Any grand and glorious plans for 2.16?
Not really. Jon Nettleton is working on pam-keyring[1], so some work
required for that is going in.
1) http://www.hekanetworks.com/pam_keyring/
That's very
Jon Nettleton wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 08:59 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Nate Nielsen wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Alexander Larsson
Any grand and glorious plans for 2.16?
Not really. Jon Nettleton is working on pam
Nate Nielsen wrote:
James Henstridge wrote:
I haven't looked at the seahorse code much, but if gnome-gpg and
seahorse are storing PGP passphrases in the keyring it would make sense
to use the same key names so that the user doesn't need to reenter their
passphrase for each app (they'd
Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes wrote:
Hi,
I'm making some modifications in the gnome-mag code and I haved to use
the round () function, but when I try to compile I get the following
warning:
warning: implicit declaration of function `round'
I don't know why the function round is
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 10:52 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
http://jhbuild.bxlug.be/builds/2006-04-16-0002/logs/gnome-icon-theme/#install
A bit of googling turned up the culprit here, but it would be nice if
the non-installation of icon-naming-utils caused a more
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Chipzz wrote:
For .gconf you should prefer root's gconf database (but I still see a
problem, that such customization is overwritten by a subsequent
packages
update, at least with the default gconf path).
It should be pointed out that for debian (and I think also
Martin Wehner wrote:
I've noticed on the wiki, that several maintainers have
already committed the hackily annoying patches.
That includes me. Are there any potential build problems with the way
described on the Wiki? Or is it just unclean?
It is yet another hack that would need to
Iain * wrote:
On 4/10/06, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we really want to do this, let's do it right and not with a hacky
workaround because people are afraid to depend on newer versions of
things for some reason.
gnome goal #3: port everything to a modern version of
Edward Hervey wrote:
revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
offer support for licensed codecs for which no legal plugins are
available.
Does that make
Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 14:29 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
It is possible to run for instance 'gst-inspect-0.10' in the postinst
script to force the registry rebuild.
Will that remove the overhead for all users
Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
- for every cvs up of gstreamer, my totem (or any app) still takes 10s
to startup with no visual feedback
This is plugin registration, right? Is it possible for distributors to
trigger plugin registration as part of their package post-install
scripts, or is every user
Andy Wingo wrote:
There is no way to manually rebuild the registry in 0.10, so no more
post-installation hooks are needed in distro packages.
I realise there is no need to manually rebuild the registry. I was just
wondering if there was a way for an administrator to rebuild the
registry (or
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:01 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:36 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dan Winship
But it seems to me now that everyone other than me (and possibly Jono) is
actually talking about Xgl, and
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 2/6/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the conversation about making g-i-t a 'platform API' - now how major
do you think this change is? :-)
If we are talking about making g-i-t part of the platform, it should
also be pointed out
that the latest
Pat Suwalski wrote:
Elijah Newren wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327335. I'm with Federico
though in thinking we should make it fast instead.
If memory serves, the background resampling and applying used to be very
snappy and got significantly slower when everything
David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:19 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
Of course, this wonderful system does not exist. Again,
gnome-power-manager is the best offering we have at this time.
Thanks! Making g-p-m very closely tied to other
Richard Hughes wrote:
Of course, this wonderful system does not exist. Again,
gnome-power-manager is the best offering we have at this time.
Thanks! Making g-p-m very closely tied to other GNOME stuff allows it
and other programs to play nice, e.g. g-p-m telling g-s to lock the
screen
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 11:17 +0100, Chipzz wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Paolo Borelli wrote:
support disabled. That said we think that python support is a really
important feature and it's having a huge success (I have seen more
plugins in the last month than in
Frederic Crozat wrote:
I have tried ~/Pictures/.directory, but it seems not to be interpreted.
It is a KDE only stuff, which is quite bad in term of performance,
because, when reading a directory, it forces file manager to try to open
each directory in that directory and tries to search
Davyd Madeley wrote:
Quoting James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I get the feeling that scons plus something like bksys might be worth
considering in the future, but it seems a bit immature right now. I'm
sure it has benefits right now, such as removing libtool from the build
process
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
1) SCons intentionally ignores most standard *FLAGS (documentation says
so). You have to edit one or more SConstruct files to force flags you
want for your platform (it's a SuSE packaging convention), not flags
decided by somebody for it. This is the simplest solution,
Luis Villa wrote:
Enough changed in the headers/etc. since the upgrade that I just
discovered that gmail is now marking all my gnome bugzilla mail as
spam. Something to look out for if you read bugzilla in gmail.
Taking a quick look at the headers, one change I noticed is that the
In-Reply-To
Andrew Sobala wrote:
Sean D'Epagnier wrote:
Isn't it true that scons requires you download and install it as an
extra program to use it? Many users may not have scons and may not
want to install it, but do want to install gnome (by compiling from
source code).
This is identical to the
Jason J. Herne wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a developer, just thought I would bounce this idea of off people
on the list. If this type of posting is frowned upon please let me know
and I'll avoid it in the future.
I am very much an eye candy person and as a long time Gnome user, I've
always been very
Daniel Veillard wrote:
whatever documentation system you use, you can still document the
undocumented things and force documentation for all new API to be
written, right?
I will have to change my tools, but yes.
Federico's mail read:
1. Document any new public interfaces since
Vincent Untz wrote:
Does it mean that the apps should depend on gnome-themes (or the modules
where the HighContrast theme is) at installation time?
No more than the checks they do for hicolor-icon-theme at the moment
(i.e. no checks). It'd just involve installing a file to the right
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
I've just sent a patch
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomecc-list/2005-October/msg00024.html)
for using -nocpp where possible.
Given the problems mentioned before with parsing Xresources without a
cpp, is this actually worth it?
From previous messages, I was under the
Ross Burton wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:01 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
I've just sent a patch
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomecc-list/2005-October/msg00024.html)
for using -nocpp where possible.
Given the problems mentioned before with parsing Xresources without a
cpp
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on a jhbuild moduleset for the modular xorg release.
It's not complete yet and it requires some bootstrapping because of
the symlink magic that's required at this point, but once 7.0 is
released this set should be as easy to use as any other
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 16.09.05 14:21, James Henstridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Alex Graveley wrote:
Does anyone have any sort of convincing argument as to why an API
abstraction in this case is *needed*?
(I like abstractions is not an argument.)
Alternatively
Alex Graveley wrote:
Does anyone have any sort of convincing argument as to why an API
abstraction in this case is *needed*?
(I like abstractions is not an argument.)
Alternatively:
If an abstraction is required, is Avahi's dbus interface a suitable
abstraction?
James.
On 25/07/05 14:33, Rodney Dawes wrote:
So,
The maintanence of gnome-common has been on the lax as of late. James
seems to be too busy or something, and I don't know what has happened to
Malcolm. He seems to just not reply at all to some bug reports.
However, there are some patches in bugzilla
On 25/07/05 20:02, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:13:54PM -0300, James Henstridge wrote:
On 25/07/05 14:33, Rodney Dawes wrote:
The maintanence of gnome-common has been on the lax as of late. James
seems to be too busy or something, and I don't know what has happened
On 21/07/05 18:19, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Did we take a round of votes, or it was just a consensus based on the
the last man standing on the thread?
I do not remember being asked to vote on this.
When was the last time you (or anyone) voted on d-d-l about anything?
James.
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 14:56 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
So this is what gives me the printer icon in the notification tray in
fedora? Ubuntu has something similar? That's gnome-cups-icon, right?
What's the story/comparison there?
Right, Ubuntu
On 20/07/05 19:17, Thomas Wood wrote:
On 19 Jul 2005, at 10:26 pm, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 22:42, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
Personally, I'd really prefer to keep distributing standalone
packages, since it allows me to do more frequent releases.
Nobody would object if gtk-engines
Dan Winship wrote:
Could we just package up the results of the jhbuild in a dumb,
completely mechanical way, such that installing the packages would be
exactly equivalent to running jhbuild? ie, it wouldn't replace or
conflict with your existing GNOME packages, it would just install
everything
Danilo Šegan wrote:
I managed once to build entire Gnome during 2.7 using jhbuild (with
features jamesh just introduced back then to build outside of your
checkout directory, basically mimicking what distcheck is doing,
without the make check part :), and I remember having only to fix a
few
Ross Burton wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 20:38 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
The fact that you are running into this but people not on Ubuntu Breezy
might indicate a problem with one of the Breezy packages defining this
in their headers or as cflags in their pkg-config files.
I've
Mystilleef wrote:
I'm not sure how to answer that since I don't know exactly what you're
referring to by gnome-print. There's no such module...
I think he is referring to libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui. It seems
your library performs almost all the function those libraries perform.
I
Diego Gonzalez wrote:
- doesn't allow to change the user's full name
In debian i can't change the full name of the user (i need to be root to
do so), show me a way to do it and i will have no problem implementing
it.
From /etc/login.defs on my Ubuntu box:
#
# Which fields may be
Rajendrakumar Malode wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a desktop application for Linux using C and XLib
functions.
My application always runs in full screen mode(no caption bar and
window decoration).
My requirement is I should be able to switch to other application
windows by pressing alt+tab
Daniel Veillard wrote:
can you be a bit more specific ? What exactly does not allow people to
run configure under Windows ? Lots of projects build fine under windows
using the standard autotools set.
The serious libxml2 contributors on Windows don't run cygwin or migwin.
Most of the
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 08:56:11PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
now s/xslt/xml/g there is the exact same mechanism for libxml2, and
it never breaks, though libxml2 module ChangeLog is updated way more
frequently
than libxslt one, why
At the moment, jhbuild requires Python = 2.0.
I was wondering if it would inconvenience anyone if I increased the
minimum version requirement to 2.2 or 2.3 at some point.
For reference, 2.2 was released on 21 December, 2001 (3.5 years ago),
and 2.3 was released 29 July 2003 (2 years ago).
Alex Graveley wrote:
Well, we can enforce no conflicts without going through a third party,
right? The UI enforces no conflicts, and the library checks that a
keybinding is not already taken at bind time (allowing the app to
prompt the user if it is).
It isn't as though a third party
Cdric Marcone wrote:
Le lundi 13 juin 2005 19:48 +0200, Cdric Marcone a crit :
eog from CVS doesn't build with jhbuild :
configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0 gdk-pixbuf-2.0
= 2.4.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.5.91 libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.5.92 libglade-2.0
= 2.3.6 libart-2.0 =
Frederic Crozat wrote:
Hi all,
I only discovered this morning by looking at James commit for jhbuild
that GNOME 2.11/2.12 is supposed to ship with GTK+ 2.8 (and therefore
Cairo) which might not have been obvious for anybody reading
http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap (since there is only a reference
Susant Kumar Padhi wrote:
I am looking for how to by pass the GDM Login page by giving the
username and password as parameter. Is it possible do that? Can any
body help me.
Run gdmsetup as root, and set either the automatic login or timed
login preferences.
For kiosk-style situations the
Susant Kumar Padhi wrote:
Hi All,
I have a Fedora Core2 and gdm-2.6 running.
I developed a my own application wich runs as a desktop. But How do I
make it as my default session. If session is not selectd at GDM Login
then GDM always look for the Gnome-Session other wise satarts a
Failsafe
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
@@ -1107,15 +1113,20 @@ peditor_numeric_range_widget_changed (GC
GtkAdjustment *adjustment)
{
GConfValue *value, *value_wid, *default_value;
+ GConfClient *client;
if (!peditor-p-inited) return;
/* We
Gavin Henry wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to read some documentation on adding items to the right-click
menu on the gnome desktop.
I have been to the devel doc site, but there is so much to read, that I have
taken the shortcut and asked here. Sorry. ;-)
I about to start work with perl-GTK2, to
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:57 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Jan de Groot wrote:
Why would you want to disable it? The make install rule would run
update-desktop-database $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/applications, which would
update the mimeinfo.cache file
Andrew Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 17:13 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Andrew Johnson
Smooth has been maintained and for now will continue to be maintained on
SF, it is in gtk-engines only too get it out of gnome-themes and
gnome-themes-extras not because I want to maintain
85 matches
Mail list logo
