On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 10:54 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
No doubt. But ask that same question of sysadmins, and
you'll probably get a different answer.
So - at this point, I'd like to advertise FUSE gratuitously[1]; what
with the ease of writing a FUSE filing-system, and the fact that
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
dconf brings in no new external dependencies [except, see below about
glib]. There is also a separate module, 'dconf-editor', however, that
uses Vala.
In terms of migration, is there any reason why we cannot re-implement
most of
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 11:32 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Couldn't you just make gio (or gedit or OpenOffice) notify you every
time it closes a file instead of monitoring bazillions of files? I'm
not very likely to search for files I've never opened anyway.
we could use the Gtk
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 11:37 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
dconf is very efficient. The majority case in accessing settings is
reading (think about desktop login: 1000s of settings read, none
written).
I'm sold on the efficiency win of d-conf's design; but there is at
least a
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 17:27 +, Mark Doffman wrote:
When moving to D-Bus AT-SPI how amenable are people to killing the Cspi
library? (This is a nasty one. It would require major changes to GOK)
Not volunteering of course ;-) but wouldn't it make more sense to work
out what
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:30 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
* Move Evolution licensing to LGPL v2 and LGPL v3 to let us re-use
the code more easily around the platform.
Did you mean LGPLv2 _or_ LGPLv3 here?
Yes; it's dual licensed - which gives people rather a choice of
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:12 -0400, Peter Parente wrote:
In essence, Accerciser is a next generation at-poke tool
(http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/at-poke). The primary features of
Accerciser are the following:
FWIW, from an at-poke perspective I'd very much support the inclusion
of
