Re: Can we enforce beta release for the freeze

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:54 AM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > The release team can do "non maintainer" releases, of course; the problem > is, of course, that maintainers can be *very* protective of their fiefdoms, > so the release team has to wait

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:26 AM Jordan Petridis via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:56 AM, Michael Catanzaro < > mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 1:21 pm, Christian Hergert > > christ...@hergert.me wrote: > > > > >

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:47 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:20 pm, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > Has anyone managed to get lsan/asan to work without CAP_SYS_PTRACE > > yet or otherwise have any suggestions on what would need to be done > > to support it in an

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 6:29 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:41 pm, Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list > wrote: > > Also, has anyone successfully gotten a CI job that uses lsan or asan > > to work in the unprivileged setup? (See my previ

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:18 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:46 pm, Jordan Petridis via desktop-devel-list > wrote: > > No there isn't, it was working properly when it was first rolled out. > > I've started seen this issue today and looks like it only affecting > > some

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:18 AM Bartłomiej Piotrowski < bpiotrow...@gnome.org> wrote: > On 19/02/2020 19.52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Have you tested this? I've tried many times and afaik GitLab is simply > > incompatible with podman images. I don't remember the exact error > > message

Re: GJS Docs now Hosted on gnome.org

Hi Anastasios! On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:18 AM Anastasios Lisgaras via desktop-devel-list wrote: > On 26/6/19 12:47 ??.??., Andre Klapper wrote:> Just for the records: > > > > In a perfect world, this would be onhttps://developer.gnome.org/ > > instead. > > I totally agree with you! > > On

Re: Please check your module is not using deprecated python2, gnome-common, intltool

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:54 PM Javier Jardón wrote: (snip) > Python2 (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues/103): > - mozjs60 (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388447) > I am not sure this will be possible for 3.34. It depends on Mozilla porting their build system

Re: Annual Gitlab Statistics, anyone?

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:44 PM Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente via desktop-devel-list wrote: > Hi, > > Just a kick update and just wondering if there could be someone > interesting on moving this forward. > > I have updated the GrimoireLab instance, so now, you can filter activity > by project

Re: GitLab mirror considered harmful

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:39 PM Alexandre Franke wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:58 PM Philip Chimento wrote: > > Could we take it all the way and just push the PR branch to > "$github_user_name/$branch_name" > > in the main repository on GitLab, and open a m

Re: GitLab mirror considered harmful

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:37 AM Alberto Ruiz wrote: > I agree with Michael here, > > I think a lot of people just default to github and being there has value > in itself. The Pull Request is indeed a not so great situation and I think > we should think hard about making it easy for people who

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 00:00 Debarshi Ray, wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:26:05PM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > 2. It's not

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > 2. It's not possible to discontinue support for services X, Y, and Z from > > GOA, and yank the rug out from under apps that expected (even if that > > expectation

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 4:13 AM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 10:27, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > GNOME has various core applications that depend on the same mechanism. We > actually made a point of integrating with remote

Re: [GitLab] Fast CI is now available for all projects under gitlab.gnome.org

Amazing! Thank you so much, everyone who helped make this happen! On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Philip Withnall wrote: > Great, thanks to Packet.net, OSU and the sysadmin/GitLab team! Let’s test > more things. > > On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 13:29 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > We still have

Re: This video is dedicated to all of you

I think everyone understands that users are the lifeblood of the GNOME project and that's why we're all here. However... On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 18:40 Nathan Graule via desktop-devel-list, < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > The problem is, all the public hears about GNOME is the project

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:15 PM wrote: > Thanks for this call for help, it's our chance to finally be serious > about supporting multiple platforms, instead of always fixing a > posteriori. Thanks to gitlab that shouldn't be too hard to setup. > > Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:52 AM Philip Withnall wrote: > Can anybody else provide and maintain CI runners for other platforms? > I’d particularly like to see: > • *BSD (probably OpenBSD and NetBSD) > • macOS (ideally several versions, since we support from OS X 10.7 >

Re: GNOME 3.28.2 released

Hi Matthias, On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:24 PM Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm pleased to announce the release of GNOME 3.28.2, the final planned release > for the GNOME 3.28 series. It includes numerous bugfixes, documentation > improvements, and translation

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:43 AM Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 18:01 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > If you are a maintainer and you consider some issue in the migration > > process or GitLab itself a big problem for your project... > > Hi, > while I begun

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:15 PM Carlos Soriano wrote: > Regarding the impersonation, it was me being cautious, I didn't do any > consultation or something like that. > > My take is that the consequences of X threshold of people complaining > about that would be a major issue,

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:50 AM Carlos Soriano wrote: > It could be that's a solution, could someone check? > > For context, my plan is to modify the migration tool as soon as possible > to not require admin access for running it (but admin access will still be > required for

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:36 PM Carlos Soriano wrote: > Hey Michael, > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > >> I've been rewriting this email again and again to try not to be too >> impolitic... and I don't think I've succeeded,

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 4:18 AM Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 12:10 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > On 7 December 2017 at 11:57, Germán Poo-Caamaño > > wrote: > > > > > > > Have you considered the backlash to GNOME that it may cause? > > >

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:49 AM Carlos Soriano wrote: > Hello community, > > I have good news, after few meetings and discussions with GitLab we > reached an agreement on a way to bring the features we need and to fix our > most important blockers >

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:51 AM Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > Le jeudi 30 novembre 2017 à 12:54 +0100, Alexandre Franke a écrit : > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:43 AM, wrote: > > > Bastien, do you also mean to imply that the wish to be subscribed > >

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:08 AM Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 04:21 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > This is about the migration tool for Bugzilla bug reports to GitLab > > issues. > > See, for background, issues [1] and [2].

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:48 AM Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > Le mardi 28 novembre 2017 à 14:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > > Hey, > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 04:21 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > > > This is about the migration tool for

Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

Hi list, This is about the migration tool for Bugzilla bug reports to GitLab issues. See, for background, issues [1] and [2]. Currently, the migration tool posts all the migrated issues and their associated comments as one single user; either the maintainer who runs the script, or a special

Re: Meson feedback as a user

Is it possible to add to the guidelines to write your meson file such that you check dependencies as soon as possible and fail early? I thought automatic optional dependencies were a lifesaver back in the days when I didn't have a current jhbuild tree at all times, configure took 5 minutes and I'd

Re: GNOME Modulesets migrating to BuildStream - clang completion in text editor

The way I might approach it would be to install the appropriate Flatpak SDK and point the text editor plugin to /var/lib/flatpak/runtime/.../files/include. Regards, Philip C On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, 08:00 Sébastien Wilmet, wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried a little BuildStream, but I

Re: gjs 1.51.2

e: > >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:26 AM Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 14 November 2017 at 03:20, <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:41 AM Michael Catanzaro < >>> mike.catanz...@gmail.c

Re: gjs 1.51.2

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:26 AM Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 November 2017 at 03:20, <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:41 AM Michael Catanzaro < > mike.catanz...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >

Re: User account for migrating Bugzilla issues to GitLab

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:07 AM Carlos Soriano wrote: > Amazing job Philip, those examples look really good with the review of the > patches included. > > Agree with Emmanuelle, seems Alberto won't have much time for the time > being so let's move it to our instance if

Re: gjs 1.51.2

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:41 AM Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Philip Chimento > <install-mod...@master.gnome.org> wrote: > > From now on we'll be taking GitLab merge requests instead of Bugzilla > > patche

User account for migrating Bugzilla issues to GitLab

Hi, I've spent the weekend hacking on Alberto's Bugzilla-to-GitLab migration script and I've made some nice improvements in the readability/friendliness of the automatically generated issues, in my opinion. With everything in this merge request [1] I've got it in a state where I'm happy to start

Re: GitLab: Default set of status/resolutions/labels for GNOME

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:20 PM Carlos Soriano wrote: > Hey Philip, > > > it was pretty much going to happen unless something went drastically > wrong > > Not sure I would say it with those words, but yes, we are in the same > situation as it was before and things keep

Re: GitLab: Default set of status/resolutions/labels for GNOME

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, 02:45 Carlos Soriano wrote: > Hello all, > > More projects are moving to GitLab, so it's time we make sure we offer a > sensible and appropriate set of labels by default for all projects inside > the GNOME group. Niels and me have been thinking for some

Re: Building GNOME in restrictive network environments

Thanks to Florian for remembering this trick. For those at GUADEC for the time being you can add to your ~/.gitconfig: [url "https://git.gnome.org/browse;] insteadOf = git://git.gnome.org [url "https://anongit.free desktop.org/git"] insteadOf = git://anongit.freedesktop.org On Mon, Jul 31,

Re: GJS documentation browser: follow up and hosting

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:34 PM wrote: > Hi list, > > About 6 months ago I announced a documentation browser for the GJS > bindings [1], which has lived at http://docs.ptomato.name:9292 ever since > the 2016 developer experience hackfest. > > Unfortunately I've had to

Re: Stackexchange community for GNOME/GTK+

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:02 AM Tobias Mueller wrote: > Hi. > > On Mi, 2017-05-10 at 08:04 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Looks like if you want to do this, we'd have to host it > Or use Stackoverflow. > Sri's motivation was: > > > We need to have a search engine

Re: Do not use -Werror by default in your modules without joining #testable

On Sun, Apr 2, 2017, 10:21 Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 04:52:49PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > You seem to misunderstand what a continuous delivery/continuous > > integration pipeline is for. > > > I think I understand what a CI server is for, I

Re: Final call for the 3.24 release notes!

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:58 AM Allan Day wrote: > wrote: > ... > > I'm currently writing up the release notes for 3.24, and would like to > have the text finalised next week. If you know of anything that should be > included, now's the time to add it

Re: Hello && About Maintainership of Gtranslator

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:14 PM Muhammet Kara wrote: > That said, Muhammet, if you don't have a lot of experience programming > yet, then something that might help you is to look for a co-maintainer to > learn from, or maybe even just someone(s) willing to do code review >

Re: Final call for the 3.24 release notes!

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:18 AM Allan Day wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently writing up the release notes for 3.24, and would like to > have the text finalised next week. If you know of anything that should be > included, now's the time to add it to the wiki: > >

Re: Hello && About Maintainership of Gtranslator

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017, 02:54 Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:27:25PM +0300, Muhammet Kara wrote: > > > In the meantime, I committed a few patches to the current master and the > > gtranslator-2-91 branches (thanks to Alexandre Franke for the reviews on > >

Re: Thoughs about communication

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:16 AM Alexandre Franke wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > The rest of your points are still valid, though. Sounds like they could > > be resolved by improving the Matrix website (maybe

Re: Thoughs about communication

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 07:47 Allan Day wrote: > I agree with pretty much everything you've written here, Emmanuele. Just > one comment... > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > ... > > >> pros/cons irc: > >> > >> pros: > >> > >> - is

Re: Linux Distro and coding ?

Hi Dolan, >From looking at the edit history for that page, it seems that the recommendation not to use Ubuntu is due to some things lacking maintainership on Ubuntu. So, it depends on your familiarity with the build process and willingness to fix build bugs that stand in your way. As you are just

Re: builddir != srcdir in jhbuild breaks my workflow

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:23 AM Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 08:09 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:43 AM Michael Catanzaro > g> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 21:25 +,

Re: gettext

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:54 PM Patrick Welche wrote: > Maybe "remove underscores from .desktop files" could be added to the > > "Add rules for merging translations back into non-source files" > > of the useful https://wiki.gnome.org/MigratingFromIntltoolToGettext > page? >

Re: GJS documentation browser: follow up and hosting

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 7:11 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 21:34 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > My first question is, did people find it useful enough that I should > > look > > around for alternative hosting? > > Yes. > Thanks, good to

Re: Continuous Builds in GNOME

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, 01:42 Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > Right now, the easiest and cheapest option would literally be moving > the GNOME development infrastructure wholesale to GitHub, put > everything under Travis CI, and keep a separate machine somewhere that > cranks out GNOME

Re: gettext

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:36 AM Daiki Ueno wrote: > philip.chime...@gmail.com writes: > > > After trying it out, it's very unfortunate that msgfmt doesn't have an > > argument allowing you to specify a custom ITS rule; it only detects > > ones that have been installed into the

Re: gettext

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:52 PM wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:08 AM Matthias Clasen > wrote: > >> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:36 AM, wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > I've done some work on this; I rewrote the wiki

Re: gettext

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:08 AM Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:36 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > I've done some work on this; I rewrote the wiki page titled "Localize > using > > Gettext and Intltool" [1] so that it doesn't

Re: gettext

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:05 PM wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:39 AM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 09:54 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: >> > Upstream gettext and autopoint are the recommended tools to use, >> > although

Re: gettext

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:39 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 09:54 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > > Upstream gettext and autopoint are the recommended tools to use, > > although you will need the latest versions of them in order to get > > support for

Re: Pull request template for github mirror

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:12 AM Jehan Pagès wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > > Perhaps I should jump in as I created the mirror alongside Andrea Veri. > > > > The mirror in general is quite useful, a lot of

Re: RFC: documentation browser

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:37 PM wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:31 AM Giovanni Campagna < > scampa.giova...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] >> > Also, it seems the parameter naming and listing is wrong/confusing for >> out parameters and for arrays (I haven't checked

RFC: documentation browser

Hi, I've been working on a documentation browser for documentation generated from GObject introspection files. Besides good old DevHelp on the desktop, there are several good online open-source documentation browsers that already exist, and one of them is DevDocs [1] which has lots of nifty

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Christian Hergert wrote: > On 12/24/2015 11:17 AM, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I'm really interested in participating but circumstances prevent me from > > attending in person. I just signed up as the first remote participant. >

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

Hi! I'm really interested in participating but circumstances prevent me from attending in person. I just signed up as the first remote participant. My purpose with this e-mail is to encourage other remotees to sign up; and to ask for some ideas about how remotees can meaningfully participate.

Re: Integrate ITS Tool with gettext and Autotools (Was: Re: Death of gnome-common)

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Alexandre Franke < alexandre.fra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Philip Chimento > <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For what it's worth, I break that rule for .pot files in my own projects, > > be

Re: Integrate ITS Tool with gettext and Autotools (Was: Re: Death of gnome-common)

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > I've tried to not add the generated *.pot files to Git, because > generated files should not be added to the version control system. For what it's worth, I break that rule for .pot files in my own projects, because

Re: Changing gnome-love to newcomers

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015, 12:00 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 09/05/2015 06:44 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > Yes, and we'll need to figure out how hard that would be to change. > > What would be

Re: Death of gnome-common

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote: On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 17:56 -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote: See literally the first migration item on

Re: Discouraging use of sync APIs

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:22 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: On ons, 2015-02-11 at 12:17 +, Philip Withnall wrote: I understand where you’re coming from; we should not be irritating experienced

Re: Feedback from downstreams presentation from DX hackfest 2015

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:19 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:05:00AM +, Philip Withnall wrote: It was suggested that I send the presentation to DDL, since it might be of general