Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-11 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, It's not a problem to make libsexy optional for PolicyKit-gnome. I will do that when I propose PolicyKit-gnome for 2.24 and PolicyKit as a blessed dependency for 2.24. Right now, neither are blessed deps meaning that apps can only optionally depend on these libraries. Which is what I want for

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-11 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 20:53 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: I think Matthias said he would look at that including porting it to use PolicyKit-gnome. At least I've been asking him about this for months and kept giving the answer that it was in your hands and he would do it when you were done

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-11 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Jan 11, 2008 6:46 PM, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Use the hand-coded D-Bus code in the clock applet for now. Do a configure-time check for PK; if it's not present, simply disable setting the time altogether (this will make distros notice). I just sent you a patch

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-11 Thread David Zeuthen
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 17:46 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: * PK-gnome is not blessed due to libsexy. Why do you think pk-gnome needs to be blessed? Just optionally depend it on and it's fine. I mean, the only difference is whether you constuct a PolKitGnomeAction or a regular GtkAction.

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: snip In, but not really new (splitted from other modules): gnome-settings-daemon (desktop suite) totem-pl-parser (desktop suite) You forgot libgweather in this list. I mentioned it on the list in the new modules discussions.

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread Brian Cameron
Vincent/Others: + swfdec-gnome (desktop) = accept if it moves to the GNOME infrastructure = swfdec becomes a new external dependency Section 3a seems of the Adobe SWF and FLV File Format Specification License Agreement seems to be pretty clear that the specification does not allow

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Brian Cameron wrote: Vincent/Others: + swfdec-gnome (desktop) = accept if it moves to the GNOME infrastructure = swfdec becomes a new external dependency Section 3a seems of the Adobe SWF and FLV File Format Specification License Agreement seems to be pretty clear that the

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread Benjamin Otte
Brian Cameron Brian.Cameron at Sun.COM writes: Section 3a seems of the Adobe SWF and FLV File Format Specification License Agreement seems to be pretty clear that the specification does not allow additional client programs, players, etc. to use the format. Even if this has been implemented

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:16 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: Oh, the use in intlclock should be optional if it isn't already. That does not equate to pull out PolicyKit deps as I believe it made Fedoric think. Sorry for the confusion. PolicyKit is not optional in intlclock :) I *think* Matthias

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 17:41 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:16 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: Oh, the use in intlclock should be optional if it isn't already. That does not equate to pull out PolicyKit deps as I believe it made Fedoric think. Sorry for the

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-10 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 18:10 -0700 schrieb Elijah Newren: On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 PM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PolicyKit PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency) several members of the release team pointed out to me that it was just an external dependency and thus didn't

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-09 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Retracted: PolicyKit PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency) Eeep. Do you think we can/should push intlclock into gnome-panel/applets/clock for 2.22? If so, we'll need PolicyKit (not PK-gnome as far as I can tell). Federico

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-09 Thread David Zeuthen
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:45 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Retracted: PolicyKit PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency) I kinda dislike the wording here. I didn't retract anything. What did happen was that several members of

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-09 Thread Elijah Newren
On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 PM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:45 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Retracted: PolicyKit PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency) I kinda dislike the wording here. I

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-09 Thread David Zeuthen
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:10 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: Blessed as far as gnome releases goes means allowed as a hard dependency for modules. PK and PK-gnome are not blessed external dependencies because you said that no hard dependencies were needed at this time. Oh, the use in intlclock

Re: New module decisions for 2.22

2008-01-09 Thread Elijah Newren
On Jan 9, 2008 6:16 PM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:10 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: Blessed as far as gnome releases goes means allowed as a hard dependency for modules. PK and PK-gnome are not blessed external dependencies because you said that no hard