On 08/11/09 20:43, Iain wrote:
Tracker 0.7 ships with a DBus API, Nepomuk as ontology, SPARQL as query
language, SPARQL UPDATE for inserting and updating data and finally
signals-per-classes as life search capability.
The DBus APIs are simple but very powerful thanks to SPARQL.
From looking
On 13/11/09 17:21, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi all,
So now that tracker is a blessed external dep of GN(u)OME, can
issues like these be fixed soon(ish):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601799
Its not just important from academic POV but it will also help
facilitate the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 13/11/09 17:21, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi all,
So now that tracker is a blessed external dep of GN(u)OME, can
issues like these be fixed soon(ish):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601799
Its
On 23/11/09 16:09, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 13/11/09 17:21, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
So tell me, how do I test my app if there is no data available to
Tracker for me to query?
You do know that Tracker has
Hi all,
So now that tracker is a blessed external dep of GN(u)OME, can
issues like these be fixed soon(ish):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601799
Its not just important from academic POV but it will also help
facilitate the migration of apps from 0.6 to 0.7.
--
Regards,
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 16:03 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 06.11.09 20:22, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
There is one problem with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED. If you do it on a file
the kernel will drop it from its caches. This is generally what you want
if you just
Iain wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Philip Van Hoof s...@pvanhoof.be wrote:
Sorry but, with DBusGProxy you already have a GObject that you can
immediately connect a signal to and get informed when something gets
added, removed and changed.
Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 19:11 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 17:57 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 18:53 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 09:28 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
Surely apps should ship pre-indexed help
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Rob Taylor rob.tay...@codethink.co.uk wrote:
Iain wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Philip Van Hoof s...@pvanhoof.be wrote:
Sorry but, with DBusGProxy you already have a GObject that you can
immediately connect a signal to and get informed when
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 12:51 +, John Carr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Rob Taylor rob.tay...@codethink.co.uk
wrote:
One option is that some of this code could be merged into tracker
itself, if it is deemed useful, along with exposing
TrackerSparqlBuilder (which might be
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Iain i...@gnome.org wrote:
Tracker 0.7 ships with a DBus API, Nepomuk as ontology, SPARQL as query
language, SPARQL UPDATE for inserting and updating data and finally
signals-per-classes as life search capability.
The DBus APIs are simple but very powerful
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Philip Van Hoof s...@pvanhoof.be wrote:
Sorry but, with DBusGProxy you already have a GObject that you can
immediately connect a signal to and get informed when something gets
added, removed and changed.
On Fri, 06.11.09 20:22, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
There is one problem with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED. If you do it on a file
the kernel will drop it from its caches. This is generally what you want
if you just indexed a 100 meg text file that no other app cares about
atm, since
Patryk Zawadzki schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
I get the impression that the focus is more on data storage
than indexing these days. I respect what the Tracker folks
are trying to do, but I just need a good indexer to enable
full-text search
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 20:21 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
Patryk Zawadzki schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
I get the impression that the focus is more on data storage
than indexing these days. I respect what the Tracker folks
are trying to do,
Tracker 0.7 ships with a DBus API, Nepomuk as ontology, SPARQL as query
language, SPARQL UPDATE for inserting and updating data and finally
signals-per-classes as life search capability.
The DBus APIs are simple but very powerful thanks to SPARQL.
From looking at tracker again this weekend,
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 20:43 +, Iain wrote:
Tracker 0.7 ships with a DBus API, Nepomuk as ontology, SPARQL as query
language, SPARQL UPDATE for inserting and updating data and finally
signals-per-classes as life search capability.
The DBus APIs are simple but very powerful thanks to
On 06/11/09 19:22, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 15:01 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
The seeking is hard to avoid, but there may be ways to readdir stuff
without having the result be persistant in the buffer cache, although
i'm not sure how posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) can
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 20:24 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I understand that this is not nice :(. But indeed, tracker-store isn't
system-wide, instead it's per user.
That won't work because you won't have access to the session D-Bus, and
certainly wouldn't work with, say, 1k users
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 08:47 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 06/11/09 19:22, Alexander Larsson wrote:
There is one problem with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED. If you do it on a file
the kernel will drop it from its caches. This is generally what you want
if you just indexed a 100 meg text file that
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 29/10/09 15:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
I agree it needs fixing, but there are a number of things to consider here:
- FANotify is being worked on by Red Hat and will be in the kernel for
us to use at some point - and
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 10:56 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:58 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I desperately need an indexer for help documents in Yelp. Yelp
currently has two search backends: one based on Beagle and one
that basically greps everything every time you search.
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 10:41:42AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 29/10/09 15:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
I agree it needs fixing, but there are a number of things to consider here:
- FANotify is being worked on by
On 06/11/09 09:41, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
- We changed the locations that are indexed by default from $HOME to
use XDG user dirs for documents, desktop, music, pictures and videos.
So the focus has changed slightly to the
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 15:12 -0400 schrieb Jamie McCracken:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
5) Allow for possibility of uniform services for things like
contacts
instead of them being redefined for all clients (evolution, pidgin, web
services) - this
2009/10/30 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk:
The point, really, is that Luca was incorrect in stating that we (GNOME)
unconditionally adopts dependencies that are not widely deployed or
fully baked. This was true (and in a sense, still is for some of these
components) for polkit,
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 00:08 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The problem is that to leverage the full power of
tracker, you need much deeper integration and its not practical to
make
it optional in those cases
This is a very general and broad statement concerning the key
element in
2009/10/30 Jamie McCracken jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com:
The way I see it is if Gnome wants to be in a position to challenge OS/X
and Windows 7 then it needs to make bold decisions. Playing it safe
means it will stagnate and Gnome will miss out on all the cool
technology.
This is kinda
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 11:18 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 00:08 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The problem is that to leverage the full power of
tracker, you need much deeper integration and its not practical to
make
it optional in those cases
This is a
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 20:04 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some
time to get some real world testing before putting it into the
release. Do you guys have objection to that?
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't tracker 0.7 being
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see regular (weekly) releases at
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/tracker/0.7/ I don't see an issue
at all with regard to that point.
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:27 +0100, John Stowers wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't tracker 0.7 being shipped in maemo
5? That seems like a pretty significant real world test case.
Nopes. Maemo 5 comes with Tracker 0.6.95
J.A.
___
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see regular (weekly) releases at
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see
On 29/10/09 03:04, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some time
to get some real world testing before putting it into the release. Do
you guys have objection to that?
Regarding real-world testing, yes, I think you're right. We are
expecting
On 29/10/09 09:27, John Stowers wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 20:04 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some
time to get some real world testing before putting it into the
release. Do you guys have objection to that?
Correct me if I am
On 29/10/09 11:08, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 28/10/09 23:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
I think assuming that a project has to be shipped by distros before it can
be in GNOME or visa versa doesn't make sense.
Distros ALWAYS ship what they want and they
On 29/10/09 15:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 28/10/09 23:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
I think assuming that a project has to be shipped by distros before it can
be in GNOME or visa versa doesn't make sense.
On do, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Working with 0.6 I've known nothing but pain (leaving aside
all the political pressure I've been facing for making my app so
dependent on Tracker) so please understand that I need some time to be
sure that 0.7 is completely different
On 29/10/09 18:20, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
On do, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
From a devil's advocate point of view: this might just mean that it got
worse (though I doubt it). Zeeshan raises concerns and while you go to
great lengths to explain that it is different, there
Il giorno gio, 29/10/2009 alle 01.23 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ha
scritto:
IMO right now you should push on the distros
to start shipping that (e.g Ubuntu Karmic still seem to have 0.6) and
once distro and existing apps have competely moved to 0.7, all
concerned parties will have a
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
But in previous GNOME release we accepted stuff like PolicyKit or
DeviceKit or PulseAudio while not yet officially released or widely
adopted. And those stuff was needed to be installed under /usr in order
to properly work.
I believe all
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 29/10/09 22:49, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Patryk Zawadzkipat...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:51 PM, David Zeuthenda...@fubar.dk wrote:
Not to sound like an asshole
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:51 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
But in previous GNOME release we accepted stuff like PolicyKit or
DeviceKit or PulseAudio while not yet officially released or widely
adopted. And those stuff was needed to be
Martyn Russell :
On 29/10/09 21:51, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
But in previous GNOME release we accepted stuff like PolicyKit or
DeviceKit or PulseAudio while not yet officially released or widely
adopted. And those stuff was needed to be
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:49 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I believe all of these things are (optional) dependencies, not anything
part of the GNOME desktop proper. Except for maybe PulseAudio. Solaris,
for example, don't use any of this stuff.
That's not true, we have a few Solaris people
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 19:38 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
this is all hypothetical. What matters is that people actually try it
out then make judgements based on whether the current tracker gives a
good experience. If people dont do this then the same arguments will be
made whenever tracker is
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 23:13 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 19:38 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
this is all hypothetical. What matters is that people actually try it
out then make judgements based on whether the current tracker gives a
good experience. If people dont do
So, putting this conversation back on track:
* What are the barriers for accepting tracker?
* What do the tracker folks have to do to address them?
I think we're all in agreement that an indexer is needed.
sri
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Sandy Armstrong sanfordarmstr...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/10/28 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
So, putting this conversation back on track:
* What are the barriers for accepting tracker?
* What do the tracker folks have to do to address them?
I think we're all in agreement that an indexer is needed.
Just to mention, tracker is an
Hi,
FWIW, as the maintainer of a project (Rygel) which started as a UPnP
wrapper around Tracker an year and half ago, I don't think Tracker has
yet proven itself worthy of being part of GNOME. Don't get me wrong,
Tracker has been improving a lot lately and so far I really love the
new 0.7 API
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Ivan Frade ivan.fr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
FWIW, as the maintainer of a project (Rygel) which started as a UPnP
wrapper around Tracker an year and half ago, I don't think
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some time to
get some real world testing before putting it into the release. Do you guys
have objection to that?
So the current barriers I see is:
* relative newness of the api - will it change further? You guys should
have some
On 27/10/09 03:34, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net
mailto:ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
The GNOME release-team
On 27/10/09 08:58, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 27/10/09 03:34, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
For the desktop:
* Totem - http://blogs.gnome.org/mr/2009/10/07/tracker-totem/
* Evolution
* File system (of course)
* Applications (desktop files)
I forgot to mention Nautilus and GTK+ file chooser support
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:41:19PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 17:05 +0100 schrieb Matthew Garrett:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Rob Taylor wrote:
So we discussed this at the kernel-fixing-bof at GCDS. IIRC we basically
decided that
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 27/10/09 03:34, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net
mailto:ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I
On 27/10/09 10:06, John Carr wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Maemo platform (I may have missed some cases):
* Calendar
* Bookmarks
* Image Viewer
* Media Player
* Instant Messaging (I think)
Could you expand on what this means?Is tracker being used as the
primary store for calendar in Maemo
Martyn Russell schrieb:
On 27/10/09 03:34, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net
mailto:ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
I get the impression that the focus is more on data storage
than indexing these days. I respect what the Tracker folks
are trying to do, but I just need a good indexer to enable
full-text search in Yelp.
Wouldn't it make
On 27/10/09 14:50, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
Martyn Russell schrieb:
Carlos Garnacho and I did spend 2 or 3 days writing an application
similar to spotlight - although it is just a quick mock up to
demonstrate the speed and ability of Tracker and could do with some
more love. The blog/video
On 27/10/09 16:09, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
I get the impression that the focus is more on data storage
than indexing these days. I respect what the Tracker folks
are trying to do, but I just need a good indexer to enable
Martyn Russell schrieb:
On 27/10/09 14:50, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
Martyn Russell schrieb:
Carlos Garnacho and I did spend 2 or 3 days writing an application
similar to spotlight - although it is just a quick mock up to
demonstrate the speed and ability of Tracker and could do with some
more
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:54 +0100, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
Martyn Russell schrieb:
On 27/10/09 14:50, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
Martyn Russell schrieb:
Carlos Garnacho and I did spend 2 or 3 days writing an application
similar to spotlight - although it is just a quick mock up to
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jamie McCracken
jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Whatever shell is used in Gnome 3 will at some point likely provide an
out of process applet system (especially if enough people scream!)
This is simply not consistent with what the gnome-shell developers
have
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to add, if you
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME
Hi,
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 18:51 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 17:47 +0100, Martyn Russell a écrit :
On 18/08/09 17:44, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I don't think it would be a good idea to use GNOME solely as a vehicle
to make things more popular with other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 18/08/09 12:29, Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:24 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently
On 18/08/09 23:54, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a
non-vague way and improve the communication of the project's
at low I/O priority, without unpleasantly degrading system performance.
I imagine the sheer seek cost of pulling all those dentries, inodes into
memory, and evicting all the other useful data you had around - is a big
part of the plague. Hopefully btrfs will improve the situation somewhat
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:31:04 +0200
The tracker-store is a desktop service that offers the application
developer a query capability against data that it stores. The data that
it stores must be strictly defined by a schema (which is what in RDF is
called an ontology). The schemas that we ship by
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:25 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Hey Alan, thanks for your questions.
The tracker-store is a desktop service that offers the application
developer a query capability against data that it stores. The data that
it stores must be strictly defined by a schema (which is what
Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:31:04 +0200
snip
Let me know if that was a helpful description for you. I tried hard not
to sound like an old German philosopher ;-).
One thing I couldn't quickly tell is whether you are always remembering
the source of external information,
Tracker will store this if the applications request storage of it. The
issue of protecting the user's personal data is left to the applications
using it and the underlying operating system's security features.
To a business deploying systems with this feature there are multiple
issues
- Need
Not contributing to the core discussion.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Alan Coxa...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
I think there lies a misassumption. The actual indexing has a fairly high
cost. The cost of extracting metadata while indexing ought to be
relatively low in comparison. That argues
One short coming in this approach will be, It will cause a problem
where multiple applications can be associated with a file-type, over a
period of time. For instance, for .mbox files, the applications could
vary like: Evolution, Mutt, Pine, Claws, Thunderbird, etc. And it is
common among
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 21:21 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 21:09, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
(I don't want to create the impression that I am opposed to the idea
of
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:07 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
One short coming in this approach will be, It will cause a problem
where multiple applications can be associated with a file-type, over a
period of time. For instance, for .mbox files, the applications could
vary like: Evolution, Mutt,
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
So I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
Getting this back to inclusion requirements:
- GNOME3 readiness:
Please fix http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581984
- I18N:
Please fix
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2009-August/msg7.html
The response was positive.
On 18/08/09 13:05, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
...
Dependencies about to be dropped but still needed:
gmime
lex
yacc
libraptor
I forgot to add, librasqal will also be dropped soon (mentioned below).
The git repository is here:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/
We import the
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new
GNOME module.
though I've seen the amount of work that has been done on it, I admit
I'm still ambivalent on Tracker, and the fact that nobody has come clear
with the
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
libxml = 0.6
libpng = 1.2
libuuid
zlib
dbus = 0.60
sqlite3 = 3.5 (built with --enable-load-extension)
hal = 0.5
vala = 0.7.3
pango = 1.0.0
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Luis Medinaslmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
hal = 0.5
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
deprecated soon afaik.
...or rather by libgudev, there is no such thing as DeviceKit :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Patryk Zawadzkipat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Luis Medinaslmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
hal = 0.5
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
deprecated
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:57 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
deprecated soon afaik.
Richard Hughes has already ported the battery handling of Tracker to
DeviceKit-power. It's used if available, otherwise HAL is used. The
volume handling
On 18/08/09 13:42, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new
GNOME module.
though I've seen the amount of work that has been done on it, I admit
I'm still ambivalent on Tracker, and
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate tracker-store should be considered for inclusion separately
the store does not do any
On 18/08/09 16:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The indexer part is optional
Well, right now it isn't but it will be at some point sure.
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The indexer part is optional
Well, right now it isn't but it will be at some point sure.
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If
On Tue, 18.08.09 17:20, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
Uh, generally bugs should be fixed, not worked around. Especially if
they are as crucial as this one.
Sure but getting a recursive inotify will likely take years as with
most kernel features (= development time +
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
