Re: Thoughs about communication

> On 3 Feb 2017, at 13:00, Alexandre Franke wrote: > > So we don't have to/can't choose channels that are bridged. Not in a > whitelist fashion. We can however mark specific channels as private > (for those with sensitive discussions). > > Matthew, anything blocking the

Re: Thoughs about communication

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list wrote: > Should we go ahead then? Sri, let's go with #gnome and #engagement for now? > If the bridge works out well, we can move more channels to it soon. As Matthew said: > There may be some

Re: Thoughs about communication

A clarification: By "moving more channels to it" I mean "implement the bridge in more channels" if we see it is successful and we like the outcome. I didn't mean to retire IRC channels at all. Best regards, Carlos Soriano Original Message Subject: Re: Thoughs about

Re: Thoughs about communication

Heya, Should we go ahead then? Sri, let's go with #gnome and #engagement for now? If the bridge works out well, we can move more channels to it soon. I believe only thing needed is Matthew to set it up in matrix.org and gimpe.net opers set it up the bridge right? Best regards, Carlos