On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:43 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
2008-01-21 klockan 21:08 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Which brings us to the logical conclusion that either the big-letter
files should be created from DOAP file automatically, or the other way
around. I'm sure most agree that other way
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 11:24 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Hilarious. We can't also let Knuth poison GNOME with his algorithms
and datatypes. I guess it's the same for Ritchie or Kernighan with
their C.
__
/ \
/ Please
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Fink wrote:
Yes, that requires about... 5 lines in Python.
Why do you insist on belittling me? I'm doing more to protect your
software freedoms than anyone else here who are all speaking about how
MONO is fine. NO IT'S NOT!!
Talk is cheap. Show
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 15:42 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:39:57PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 15:15 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:26:55PM -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
Using childlish references (such
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 19:24 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hi,
Idea #3) Develop a tutorial for GIO/GVFS.
This would fit better in GHOP.
GHOP is over.
regards,
Étienne.
--
E Ultreïa !
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
GNOME Foundation Announces Program to Sponsor Accessibility Projects
BOSTON, Mass—February 27, 2008 — The GNOME Foundation is running an
accessibility outreach program, offering USD$50,000 to be split among
individuals. This
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 21:59 +0300, Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote:
Hello all
Nowadays it's rather hard to work with GNOME swapping on my 256 Mb
laptop even if I don't run anything serious on it, just Evolution,
Pidgin and Epiphany and sometimes Evince. Recently I decided to look on
this problem
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 01:01 +0300, Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote:
В Чтв, 28/02/2008 в 14:12 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod пишет:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 21:59 +0300, Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote:
Hello all
Nowadays it's rather hard to work with GNOME swapping on my 256 Mb
laptop even if I don't
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:32 +, Brian Nitz wrote:
For example, launching eog in the C locale (Solaris Nevada build
82,
GNOME 2.20.2) opens font files for many other locales. These may be
mapped into physical memory at times, regardless of your locale. :
4302 eog 18
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:14 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
The first step in releasing GNOME 3.0 is to dissociate the in-built
assumption will break everything from the version jump.
Sure, we can go from GNOME 2.22 this cycle straight to GNOME 24 the next
one. What does *that* buy us? That is,
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 15:32 +, Brian Nitz wrote:
But if a
feature isn't used 99.999% of the time and it consumes resources, it
should have an off switch.
No. If a feature isn't used 99.999% of the time and it consumes
resources, it's a bug and should be fixed.
Your comments and a
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 23:53 +0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 10:14 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote:
I'm fairly confident that this post is a waste of electrons, but
I'll go
on record as saying I don't think it's a good idea.
If it's a waste, please don't do it.
Just
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 09:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I'll be persistent and propose a better general experience hackfest
including better multimedia support, better system sounds and a sane
interface for printing (including automatically supporting hotplugged
printers and possibly
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 09:11 -0700, Brad Taylor wrote:
I know the Win32 and
Quartz gtk+ groups could definitely use some time to meet and
organize,
They in fact did during the GTK+ Hackfest. They can always ask, yes.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:29 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
I would so propose a docfest if I thought there
would actually be people attending.
So, you and Don then?
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:20 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Honestly, I think face time would be most valuable for new people,
and these are the people we'd be least likely to get to
come. (Plus, there's the issue of whether we'd want to
spend so much money on people without a track record.)
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 23:08 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
1. A DVCS investigation hackfest. This to understand and document what
is needed from a DVCS (please don't reply about DVCS specifics and
turn
this into a bike shed).
Fed already proposed this as a BoF for GUADEC. We can decide if we
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:09 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
A few things:
1) I don't know that Don is actually interested in the writing
side of things. Although if you offer to fly him somewhere nice,
he might become interested. :) Prior to me, the guy responsible
for the team was not the
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 18:07 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote:
Once more, a late reminder. This is so cool, isn't it?
Actually it's not. Ideally I like to see the reminder go out Wednesday
before, so I can schedule some devel hacking before the deadline.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 11:56 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le samedi 31 mai 2008, à 21:04 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 18:07 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote:
Once more, a late reminder. This is so cool, isn't it?
Actually it's not. Ideally I like to see the reminder
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:36 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
That is why we have fsync/fdatasync and thread creation...
Yeah, if they were correctly implemented. But firefox fsync'ing its
sqlite db makes the whole system unusable for up to 20 seconds.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 12:21 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Yeah, all those sites are there, but you are thinking in
this-century-enabled people. It's not a work only thing also, some
people might be happy to hang it on the wall.
Maybe it's a bit of a corner case, but the two times I
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 17:44 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
The point is XRender is close to its
tenth birthday yet still no one seems to care.
Except that it's rendering your entire desktop the way you can't do
without it?
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would give up Essential
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
* There is no GUI configuration but I personally don't know a person
who would miss the old gdmsetup binary. It was ugly and half of the
distros required you to run it manually with sudo. The settings are
there in gconf so everyone is free to come up with a configuration
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/11 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 09:01 -0400, Luis Villa a écrit :
Is anybody regularly reviewing/triaging those? I assume no, right?
'twould be a great
Luis Villa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008, à 10:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Hi guys,
it was already requested by a few people in the GNOME community to have
a quick access to all patches distros apply. Since
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we
already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that.
I think the vote should be down to the foundation members.
I actually think that, if
. 17.00 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we
already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that.
I think the vote should be down to the foundation members
Hi Emmanuel,
This is very interesting. I wonder if it's possible to share your experience
and/or teaching material with others wanting to do the same in other schools
(myself included).
d-d-l may not be the best place for that. academia-list [1] is.
Regards,
behdad
[1]
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- Continue the degnomification that is already off to a good start:
http://live.gnome.org/LibgnomeMustDie
We recently did this for gnome-settings-daemon, but it didn't help [1],
because libgnome-desktop still drags all the deprecated stuff in. To fix that
one needs to
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 03 novembre 2008, à 13:24 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- Continue the degnomification that is already off to a good start:
http://live.gnome.org/LibgnomeMustDie
We recently did this for gnome-settings-daemon, but it didn't help [1
David Bolter wrote:
Well I think the elephant in the room here is WAI-ARIA support for
accessible DHTML (i.e. accessible Web2.0 applications). Last I checked
this work is being done for WebKit by Apple engineers, and a Google
engineer. Although the Firefox accessibility hackers have trail
Owen Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:45 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 23:23 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
Hello,
2008/10/28 Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after a
vote
we would have people
Hi everyone,
Hope everyone is having a good time, many of you preparing to be stuffed over
the weekend while the rest of us hack hard :P.
To the issue: Pango currently uses ISO639 language tags to represent
languages. That has served Pango really well and there's no problem there.
However, many
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
So you already on it or you are waiting for someone to get you th
list of svn accounts? If latter is the case, It's pretty easily doable
using git but unfortunately the dates in the git repos created through
git-svn aren't correct (or it seems to be the case).
Vincent Untz wrote:
Keeping:
+ md5
GChecksum?
behdad
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Iain i...@gnome.org wrote:
Some thoughts on sounds.
People don't use sound effects on the desktop.
That is a nice way to start. Why don't you mute sound effects then?
and why do you even asked for one sound later. Why do you even
Iain * wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Oh right, that was my other point. Now that's like sayin the applications
should ship their icons, we don't need an icon theme.
Applications do ship their icons. We need an icon theme for the common
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:27 +, Iain * wrote:
These are all under the class of something has happened which you did
not specifically ask to happen and may require your attention
And so would be perfect candidates to have the sound.
So far we agree. But one sound can't rule them all. If
Iain * wrote:
But I see that no-one else cares
Or, you are not effectively communicating what you mean.
So I shall stop caring as well.
And this is my last mail on the subject
Mine too.
behdad
Enjoy
iain
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
For GNOME 2.25.3 release on Wed.
/me wants Ice Cream
behdad
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi everyone,
Well, let me first say that I'm a bit disappointed at where this thread has
gone so far. Some of the words passed around we could do without starting a
brand new year.
I want to encourage everyone to stay on topic, so we can actually do
something. Now, I didn't say so we can make
Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 22:46 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
GNOME contributors with an SVN account who had an SSH key installed on
their account were invited to fill in the survey.
[It is NOT my intention to get all negative here; I understand - and
accept - that projects
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 17:21 +0900, James Henstridge a écrit :
I'd hope that any DVCS would get a larger user base than current list
of active Subversion committers: anyone who contributes patches via
mailing lists or bugzilla could use a DVCS the same way as a core
Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
What I told
you was that because the switch does not affect those other people. Yes, if
your contributors are NOT committing to GNOME SVN, their opinions doesn't
matter. Neither does my mom's opinion matter in this case. Nothing wrong
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
From what I understand, so far there has been one proposal, from Olav, who
proposed that he and John implement John's idea of implementing a git-serve
plugin for the bzr repo server.
I wonder whether you received interesting
Hey,
My brother-in-law will be in town. I'm heading off to YYZ to pick him up, and
will be spending time with him tomorrow.
Cheers,
behdad
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Ouch, wrong list apparently. I don't think I need to resend to the correct
one anymore...
Sorry for the noise,
behdad
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hey,
My brother-in-law will be in town. I'm heading off to YYZ to pick him up, and
will be spending time with him tomorrow.
Cheers,
behdad
On 04/03/2009 10:59 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
Hi
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Schemas are nice, IMHO, so it'd be nice to have people (not necessarily
you) explore this problem space ;-)
s/nice/essential/
It is true that dconf has
On 04/03/2009 10:59 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
Hi
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Schemas are nice, IMHO, so it'd be nice to have people (not necessarily
you) explore this problem space ;-)
s/nice/essential/
It is true that dconf has
On 04/16/2009 04:58 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
The great migration to git.gnome.org is now underway.
Neato.
Once your module
shows up on http://git.gnome.org/cgit/, you'll notice that it is
described as:
Unnamed repository; edit this file to name it for gitweb.
Since you want something
On 04/16/2009 06:17 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:23 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
Callum McKenzie wrote:
Can current gconf settings be easily loaded into dconf? e.g. can someone
launching into a gnome 3.0, dconf-based, system for the first time still
have the same wallpaper
On 04/17/2009 11:46 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
B) Drop MAINTAINERS and move the information to the DOAP file.
(There would be some sort of transition period where we would
support both.)
I like B) better; I'd rather one file than a collection of little files.
+1.
behdad
- Owen
module. They should be namedmodule.doap, with
module replaced with the name of the module.
Lets said, also included in the tarball. Every file in git should be the
tarball also. The only exception I can imagine is something like a
README.git file.
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 17:42 -0400, Behdad
On 04/17/2009 10:18 AM, Dan Winship wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
Thanks to Shaun McCance there's no need to worry about how to create a
DOAP file, just find your module in:
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/pulse/web/
And select the Download DOAP template file link to get a DOAP file for
your
On 04/17/2009 01:32 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
I thought MAINTAINERS was a GNU convention, but that we had
our own quasi-format for it that we introduced a short while
ago for Mango.
My memory is that it's not a GNU convention, and indeed I can't find it in GNU
Coding Standards. Another proof
Hi,
Based on an idea from halfline, I hacked a few lines to automatically generate
.gitignore from Makefile.am. It grew to a couple hundred lines, and is
available from pango/git.mk.
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/pango/tree/git.mk
It generates perfect .gitignore files for pango, vte,
Hey,
I wonder if naming the doap file after the module name is optimal.
Wouldn't be it easier to process if the file was simply named doap or
something like module.doap?
Now's the time to decide, before too many modules add one...
Cheers,
behdad
On 04/18/2009 10:38 AM, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/NewGITRepos
I'll make sure more places link to this.
Move it under Git/?
behdad
Thanks for the feedback,
Sandy
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On 04/18/2009 08:18 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 03:51 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hey,
I wonder if naming the doap file after the module name is optimal.
Wouldn't be it easier to process if the file was simply named doap or
something like module.doap?
Now's the time
Hey,
I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on
demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in
http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog to only generate ChangeLog for make
dist. I wonder what people actually want to have, so I can work on canonical
On 04/19/2009 11:34 AM, Dan Winship wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Cons:
- Have to modify autogen.sh to create an empty ChangeLog, or pass the
foreign flag to automake
We really ought to be passing foreign anyway. No one benefits from
having people be forced to create 0-length README files
On 04/20/2009 09:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hey,
I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on
demand. Those macros have been modified
On 04/20/2009 10:00 AM, Dan Winship wrote:
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
I like the more verbose format clearly showing which changes are big and which
are small.
Well, I don't really disagree that its nice to know. However, all such
info
On 04/20/2009 02:34 AM, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
The idea is that .gitignore files are autogenerated and are NOT stored
in the repository. To use, just copy git.mk into your toplevel, add it
to git, run make -f git.mk and commit all changes it makes to your
tree
On 04/20/2009 12:37 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:24:38PM -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On 04/19/2009 05:38 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
The Tomboy applet is an extremely convenient way to access
your notes. You think of it as wasting valuable screen
real estate. But to a
On 04/20/2009 12:45 PM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:58 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git
history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need
more information than NEWS gives, but who
On 04/21/2009 07:30 PM, Og Maciel wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote:
Added to http://live.gnome.org/Git/FAQ
As per the information above:
git push origin :tags/billreminder-0.3.2
---
You are trying to delete the tag 'billreminder-0.3.2'.
On 04/22/2009 11:15 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 21:51 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Hi,
Based on an idea from halfline, I hacked a few lines to automatically
generate .gitignore from Makefile.am. It grew to a couple hundred lines,
and is available from pango/git.mk
: Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org
Date: Thu Apr 9 13:30:26 2009 -0400
Bug 577952 – Error loading {GDEF,GSUB,GPOS} table 0x6EAD
Detect TrueType Collections by checking the font data header instead
of checking for face-num_faces 1.
If I need to, I change the bug title first to make
On 04/23/2009 08:47 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009, Vincent Untz wrote:
Frédéric (fredp) is suggesting to also propose a standard scheme to
reference bugs that are fixed by a commit (so we can script things if
it's needed one day -- that's similar to what Debian does).
Something
On 05/04/2009 06:21 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] what is the point of having 'project' in the branch
name? Branches are per-repository, so you would never have a non
'gtk-' branch in the GTK+ repo.
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to use
for pango), it should be 1.2, not 1-2.
behdad
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning
On 05/05/2009 04:20 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
So do we treat Cairo as an implementation detail, or
is it something we talk up? My thoughts are that if
you're doing anything non-trivial, you're probably
going to need to do some custom drawing outside of
what GTK+ provides. Cairo is extremely
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and I don't really want to fight this fight
either. Nonetheless I think this would be good to have and the least I
can do is mentioning this on desktop-devel
On 05/05/2009 05:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and I don't really want to
On 05/05/2009 06:05 PM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org wrote:
I personally always do a git diff before commit, and look for
red-background blocks that represent trailing whitespace and fix them
myself.
Have your gnome terminal/bash
On 05/15/2009 03:37 PM, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Oopsie. Looks like the magic reminder mail that was supposed to be sent
to the release team wasn't sent :-) But we noticed it, and more
surprisingly, we noticed it before Monday! Yep: release team people are
really incredible, aren't they?
On 05/15/2009 04:24 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On 05/15/2009 03:53 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Don't you know that Monday is a bank holiday in Canada?!?!?!?!
More time for hacking :-)
But releases (specially stable releases!) are not to get hacking done. It's
to get whatever hacking you
I'm sure this is nothing new for anyone here, but thought reminding people why
it's a pain to develop for Fedora may help. When I updated my laptop couple
days ago:
- Audio stopped working (again). Looks like kernel issue (again). Used to
work last week.
- X stopped starting. Removing
Ouch. Did it again. This was not supposed to go to this list. Sorry
everyone :(.
behdad
On 06/23/2009 05:50 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
I'm sure this is nothing new for anyone here, but thought reminding
people why it's a pain to develop for Fedora may help. When I updated my
laptop couple
Hi everyone!
I finally released fontconfig 2.7.0. Any dependency on 2.6.99-* should be
upped.
Cheers,
behdad
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi,
Many modules have already been adding support for automake silent rules, but
turned off by default.
I just pushed changes to pango and vte to enable silent rules by default.
That's a much saner default, and allows catching warnings easily. I like to
suggest everyone does the same.
On 08/28/2009 02:24 PM, Luis Medinas wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hi,
Many modules have already been adding support for automake silent rules, but
turned off by default.
I just pushed changes to pango and vte to enable silent rules by default.
That's a much
On 08/28/2009 02:22 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hi,
Many modules have already been adding support for automake silent rules, but
turned off by default.
I just pushed changes to pango and vte to enable silent rules by default.
That's
On 08/28/2009 02:41 PM, Luis Medinas wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/NicerBuilds ?
Yes i it exists already, so it will be a nice idea turning into a
offical goal for the next release. Any objection ?
Nice, but please no shave and no dolt.
- shave: deprecated by automake silent
On 08/28/2009 02:41 PM, Luis Medinas wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/NicerBuilds ?
Yes i it exists already, so it will be a nice idea turning into a
offical goal for the next release. Any objection ?
Nice, but please no shave and no dolt.
- shave: deprecated by automake silent
On 08/28/2009 02:56 PM, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hi,
Many modules have already been adding support for automake silent rules, but
turned off by default.
I just pushed changes to pango and vte to enable silent rules by default.
That's
On 10/28/2009 11:06 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
Stef Walter wrote:
Not sure who to ask about this, but I was wondering if the code of the
git hooks that git.gnome.org uses are available for perusal somewhere?
They are in the gitadmin-bin module.
Available online here:
Hi,
Hope everyone's doing fine. It's been rather silent lately. Not asking for
flames, but lets get some discussion going :).
There have been many requests on various GNOME apps to switch tabs using
ctrl-tab, or at least allow using ctrl-tab as an accelerator that can be used
to switch
On 11/22/2009 07:23 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
Hi Behdad.
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:57 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
As a user, I tend to agree with that sentiment. While I understand the
usefulness of ctrl+tab, it's not as handy and useful as rotating between tabs.
So, what can we do about
On 11/22/2009 10:11 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
I don't think it's explicitly overriding it, it's just that the
innermost widget wins for key bindings; and in a TextView
Ctrl-PageUp/PageDown are start-of-line and end-of-line.
Which I found kinda weird. Currently
Home/End: start/end of line
On 11/25/2009 12:29 PM, Jud Craft wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
They have all been CLOSED WONTFIX consistently. The
reason for not doing that by default is that currently ctrl+tab is used to
change focus when tab itself is consumed by a widget (text area, etc
On 11/25/2009 02:32 PM, Jud Craft wrote:
So, if you don't mind my asking -- where exactly is the canonical
reference for GNOME GUI design? I assume you mean the GNOME HCI
Guidelines 2.2 are unmaintained? Or is it just kind of touch-and-go?
I don't know. I don't hack on any GUI. I hope
On 11/25/2009 05:56 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
thanks for the conclusion. one thing which would be very useful (for me
and may be others).
Fedora/Ubuntu is a very fast moving target, but i understood it as a
good target for gstreamer. although some people (like me) would like to
use a more
On 01/04/2010 12:53 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
Hello,
The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
with GCOV [1]
You can take a look to the GnomeGoal page here: [2] (There are also
examples to add GCOV support to json-glib and libgdata)
I was a huge fan of adding GCOV
On 01/12/2010 03:44 AM, Philip Withnall wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 03:38 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 01/04/2010 12:53 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
Hello,
The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
with GCOV [1]
You can take a look to the GnomeGoal page here: [2
operating system - between Epiphany and Firefox, Empathy and Pidgin,
Anjuta and MonoDevelop as examples.
And arguably, Firefox and Pidgin are more popular than GTK and even
other GTK applications (note that Pidgin itself is one).
Behdad Esfahbod brought this up on desktop-devel-list
Hey,
I have a minor proposal for library maintainers: Move .pc files for each
library to the src directory for the library itself.
The benefit is mostly during development. I personally do make install in
the src dir only, because if I do that in the toplevel, I have to wait an
extra hour for
101 - 200 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
