Since I've been using this in anger for my company email for the last
few months, and I haven't had cause to touch the code since the
beginning of December... I suppose it's about time I pulled my finger
out, called it a release, and tried to import it into GNOME. So...
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I wonder how people who hack on core Gnome do it on a day to day
basis.
A lot of the time, I do it by finding cases where a dependency on some
bleeding-edge Gnome module is *entirely* gratuitous, and just changing
configure.ac to
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:29 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Why Web Services and not MAPI? Web Services sounds like going
through some fragile abstraction layer, MAPI seems more direct.
EWS is the protocol they say they'll support going forward; they've been
saying MAPI is obsolete (or at least
It's syncing to download.gnome.org slowly, but for now is available at
ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/activesyncd/evolution-activesync-0.92.tar.xz
ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/activesyncd/evolution-activesync-0.92.tar.xz.asc
This is now updated to work with Evolution 3.4. As before, this package
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 08:29 +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
In GNOME 3.6 Enterprise logins was introduced. This feature is very
attractive for enterprise deployments because it makes possible to
add GNOME workstations into Windows networks with Active Directory.
My understanding of this feature
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 10:00 +0200, Juanjo Marin wrote:
Zimbra and Alfresco support are good features to promote GNOME as
corporate Desktop.
ActiveSync too. We have Evolution mail support for ActiveSync, but the
only user of the GNOME ActiveSync client for calendar and addressbook is
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 16:18 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I haven't seen an app menu (gmenu) discussion in quite some time, which
is a bit surprising as more apps add them. 3.10 will be the fourth
release featuring app menus, and by now most GNOME applications have
one. But the only
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 11:01 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Which is exactly one of the reasons why focus-follows-mouse isn't an
option we offer/isn't supported.
Focus-follows-mouse makes it worse (especially when it's a trackpad, and
a large screen, and a small application like empathy which
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 14:10 +0200, bugs wrote:
Or did I miss the obvious solution?
Well, there's always the revolutionary idea of putting the application's
menu somewhere near the application, rather than two feet away at the
opposite corner of the screen.
But if hiding it somewhere a long
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:53 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I really hope we can agree on and enforce a solution that provides
consistency between apps that retain traditional menubars. Maybe it'd be
easier to agree on duplicating the items than moving them.
That would certainly alleviate my
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 12:55 +0200, bugs wrote:
Well. That sounds pretty much like the awful implemetations of Unity
(Ubuntu) and MacOS (Apple). As far as I understand the
Application-Menu should not replace regular menues, but instead offer
a addition to to regular menues, with only some
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 12:15 -0400, Hashem Nasarat wrote:
tnks for all the job you are doing, it's really appreciate, I can
say
GNOME 3 is so easy to use that also my grandmother can use it!!
Please don't be disparaging to grandmothers who use GNOME.
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 20:00 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I think ”have not been publicised” is the exact pain point of design
process. Wider community has no insight into design until it's
finished. And it's too late for a meaningful input at that point.
you need a design first, if
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:22 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
- https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/WindowLiveMail
In short, you would be able to ... use your Windows Live (outlook.com,
live.com, hotmail.com) email from Evolution.
Shouldn't we be using EWS for at least some of those,
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 13:02 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
If you look at
http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-outlook/archive/2013/09/12/outlook-com-now-with-imap.aspx
(which is linked from the feature page), then the other alternative is
EAS or Exchange ActiveSync [1] not EWS.
Those are the
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 10:25 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Or be a better alternative to Empathy for rooms, leaving Empathy (or
eventually, Contacts + Shell, I guess) for IM.
That seems like confusing balkanisation to me. So if I'm having a
conversation in an IRC channel with someone, and we decide
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 10:39 +0100, Nick Glynn wrote:
So there's going to be Empathy, Chat and Polari?
Don't forget that some stuff appears in a notification pop-up instead,
so that's a fourth option. :)
And then there's a *separate* tool I have to fire up to check whether a
given account is
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 11:18 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
The usage patterns for IRC are different from regular IM (passive
presence in many always on channels vs. active participation in a
smaller number of temporally specific conversations). You can't
support both with the same UI (I know, I've
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:45 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
The same as it does now for XChat or some other IRC client?
Fair enough. If it's just another IRC client and isn't attempting to be
more, and isn't a core app, that makes sense.
I was confused because people seemed to be suggesting that it
On Sat, 2014-08-02 at 15:55 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
On Sat, 2014-08-02 at 15:21 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Well you could just create a branch do your release there so that you
don't have to care about what happens on master (branches are free in
git) and merge it back to master
On 08/02/2014 10:38 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
If I use git correctly and push the *merge*, however, then my original
work is preserved. Someone later trying to work out what happened has
actually got a correct version of history to refer back to, and the
problem can be correctly tracked
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 23:18 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
My guess would be to do it in 'Linux' way and avoid multiply merge
commits would be to push the i18n to separate branch and make the
maintainer, though I would imagine to be much more complicated for our
purposes.
Linux is probably
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 09:38 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
On 08/03/2014 03:38 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
- Make a whole bunch of changes all at once, some of which are
related to X, some to Y, some to Z, and some to more than one of
them, and without any indication of which changes
:)
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
¹ Specifically commits a523ac27, bd843434, f98caca8, 581c32aa.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 21:26 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 11/02/15 21:10, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
Another example: for some odd reason, GLocalFileInputStream isn't a
pollable output stream
(I assume you mean GLocalFileOutputStream.)
Why was this done? I don't know.
AIUI, because
information in it?
Perhaps. I note GOA does something like this for its account storage.
But I think I like your first option better. Thanks again.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
on the *stable* branch of
evolution-data-server, then committing blindly to master. Which is
entirely the wrong way round.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description
places_sidebar". Then I can put my *own* places_sidebar next
to it and I *can* flip to a more appropriate object chooser when it's
not a file shortcut that's selected?
Thanks!
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 21:48 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 13:08 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Tyagi is working on a GSoC project this year, implementing a
> > certificate chooser which will probably live in the GCR library.
>
> I would
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 06:35 -0400, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Only a nitpick. "Choose from PKCS#11" is very cryptic for users. I don't
> expect from someone not working in security to understand what is this
> about. "Choose from smart card" is something more approachable.
Except it isn't
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 11:47 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> If the GtkFileChooser would just allow us to use it *without* its own
> GtkPlacesSidebar, that would probably suffice...
Ahem...
gtk_widget_hide(
/* GtkPlacesSidebar */ gtk_container_get_children(
/*
ike the user experience to be as good as
possible, of course, but in some ways that can be improved later and is
secondary to the "what API does the GcrCertificateChooser offer to its
users" question, and to making those potential users actually *use* it.
Thanks for read
we find it there. Or leaving the user to go
navigating to find a key, if not. But again, UX input most welcome...
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corpor
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 14:00 +0100, Matthew Hodgson wrote:
> From memory, the sort of modern features which Matrix has which the API
> doesn't handle include:
>
> * Infinite scrollback serverside history
> * Synced history across multiple devices
> * Server side search
> * Server side
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 13:56 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Felipe Borges wrote:
> >
> > All in all, if desirable, Matrix and GNU Ring could be connection
> > managers in Telepathy instead of standalone bits.
> >
> > Specific clients could be created backed by
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 15:34 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:05 PM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > But isn't that the *point*? We have a framework with plugins for all
> > manner of different protocols, instead of a mess
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 10:21 -0500, Gary Kramlich wrote:
> > It's also a little hard to add the new features that we need, as things
> > stand. I actually ended up backporting a bunch of stuff from 3.x to the
> > 2.x branch a while back, to support everything that Lync needed. I'm
> > kind of
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 09:51 -0500, Gary Kramlich wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:59 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 15:34 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If someone cares enough to
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:43 +0100, Matthew Hodgson wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, Matrix is *not* trying to be a
> one-protocol-to-rule-them-all, any more than libpurple is trying to be
> one-API-to-rule-them-all. Matrix is just doing the same thing:
> abstracting multiple networks behind a
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 19:13 +0100, Matthew Hodgson wrote:
> Correct, it's nothing like running a Bitlbee. The typical starting
> point is to use an existing hosted bridge to the protocol of your
> choice that someone is running (e.g. matrix.org or disroot.org).
> Obviously this means trusting
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 11:42 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Is there any interest/desire to see Google Hangouts support in
> Empathy and Telepathy? Or as Telepathy is on it's way out it is no
> interest?
>
> Or we are looking forward to use more open source friendly chat
> platforms?
There
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 13:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> (This also prevents use of generated bindings; any method which a
> client wants to gracefully fall back from should be called using
> a generic D-Bus method invocation rather than a specific generated
> binding.)
>
>
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 09:03 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> If you think the D-Bus service version bump was unnecessary, then I
> will revert it. I only thought that it was cleaner, because the C API
> function will not fail due to missing D-Bus interface method (to be
> honest, I do not know what
On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 20:43 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 17:29 +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:23:51PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 17:18 +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > >
> > &g
On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 17:18 +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> On Wayland, you should use the API provided by xdg-desktop-portal:
> org.freedesktop.portal.ScreenCast. It is not directly related to X11
> though, and should work the same no matter what windowing system you
> use. Read more about it
I've just added screen sharing support to Pidgin, based on ximagesrc:
https://bitbucket.org/pidgin/main/pull-requests/330#Lpidgin/gtkrequest.cT1783
It's not wonderfully pretty, but it basically works, under X. I don't
like the fact that I ended up using XQueryPointer(), but I don't think
On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 17:29 +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:23:51PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 17:18 +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wayland, you should use the API provided by xdg-desktop-portal:
> > &g
On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 17:18 +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 01:36:48PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > I've just added screen sharing support to Pidgin, based on ximagesrc:
> >
> > https://bitbucket.org/pidgin/main/pull-requests/33
On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 23:16 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:00:06 +0100
> David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > It would be really useful if there was a library somewhere, with
> > a simple function to call f
On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 07:30 +0100, André Rodier via desktop-devel-list wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I hope I am posting on the right mailing list. I am working on a project
> that installs an email server from scratch.
>
> I am setting up DNS records for email services automatic discovery (RFC
>
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 19:13 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 at 10:39:39 +, Bob Ham wrote:
> > My colleague François Téchené recently wrote a blog post³ proposing a
> > unified UX using a "feature"-based approach rather than an
> > application-based approach. This proposal
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 23:31 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> It is telling that no one is complaining about replacing uses of
> "slave" by itself alone.
What a completely bizarre thing to say.
The word "slave" doesn't have a whole slew of homonyms with different
meanings. Only one verb.
So
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 18:13 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 00:20, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > We should go to reasonable lengths to avoid offending reasonable
> > people, but if someone is offended by innocuous phrases like Master's
> > degree, master plumber,
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You also don't get to call reasoning you don't agree with "bizarre and
> illogical" without justifying it. The reason behind this possible
> change was already mentioned in the original mail. The mail's hard to
> read, but fairly short,
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 12:12 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> It's easier to completely remove "master" to remove mentions of
> "master/slave" and to remove the non-gender neutral "master" than it
> would be to do half of that. Two birds, one stone.
Haha. I see what you did there. But no, we're not
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 13:04 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Besides, we can't use "mainline" anyway, as that is a reference to
> > intravenous drug taking and since we can't be expected tell homonyms
> > apart or pass basic primary school comprehension exercises by
> > applying our knowledge of
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 12:43 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:33 +0100, Richard Hughes via desktop-devel-
> list wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 06:21, wrote:
> > > This should go without saying, but master branches are not a
> > > reference
> > > to slavery, rather to
57 matches
Mail list logo
