Sorry if this is incorrect list. I'm trying to debug why my Gnome fallbacks
to X11. All I get is cryptic message:
Aug 07 00:33:32 babylon5 gnome-shell[3616]: g_strsplit: assertion 'string
!= NULL' failed
Aug 07 00:33:32 babylon5 gnome-shell[3616]: g_strsplit: assertion 'string
!= NULL' failed
Aug
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 08:47 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Hi all,
A new version of the HIG is in the works, to be released along with
GNOME 3.14 [1]. I'm currently looking for feedback.
I'm particularly interested to know if anything is missing, confusing,
or incorrect from a technical point of
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:04 +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 08:47:50AM +0100, Allan Day wrote:
A new version of the HIG is in the works, to be released along with
GNOME 3.14 [1]. I'm currently looking for feedback.
I've pushed an HTML version here for your
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 19:38 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On 08/02/2014 10:38 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
If I use git correctly and push the *merge*, however, then my
original
work is preserved. Someone later trying to work out what
happened has
actually got a correct
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 14:46 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Charles T. Smith
cts.private.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you suppose that kde also manages the power switch internally?
If by manage the power switch internally you mean call out to
logind via DBus,
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:24 -0500, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
I mean, copylibs have existed forever, usually by just copying files
around from project A to project B, and back from project B to project
A. Why does structuring this process in a git submodule make it
suddenly illegal in Fedora
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 19:13 +0530, Suyash Singh wrote:
Hello. I am a new developer with some experience in python and linux.
I want to be a contributor to GNOME. I wanted to know from where
should I start or If I could get some bugs assigned. Anything would be
helpful.
Hi,
The GNOME Love[1]
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 17:55 -0500, Mike wrote:
I understand we need a IDE build on top of gtk, and I also want to see
that personally.
However building a usable IDE is very hard and complex: live parsing
and indexing accurately takes significant amount of effort.Especially
indexing and
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 14:03 +0200, Stefano Facchini wrote:
Il giorno dom, 11/08/2013 alle 06.45 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre ha
scritto:
So, I wonder if it makes sense to stop generating libgtop and instead
just focus on a solid, easily understood codebase. I never really
understood why
On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 17:52 +0300, אנטולי קרסנר wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is a draft of the Quick Start part of a tutorial I'm writing for a
data definition language I made.
https://gitorious.org/peer-review/peer-review/trees/master
The language is currently called Idan. It can be
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 18:52 +0300, אנטולי קרסנר wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I've been using Gnome 3.4.2 for long time. I started using Gnome 3
because I believe in innovation and evolution through trial and error.
But I noticed a problematic recurring pattern in my usage of my laptop
(I don't carry
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 10:21 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
See:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
I'm in the process of transitioning to that page from
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DXgGEKTbC4ed1DFW3Mu-48TpHtq-xdfhDtwoUOWWcHg/edit
Comments appreciated; I have
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 12:56 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 18:49 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi,
On 04/26/2013 05:01 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 10:32 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
I want make distcheck to still run all of my tests, to
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 21:20 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Link: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674092
IIRC pygtk is no longer maintained (as is gtk+ 2) as the newer binding
are using gobject-introspection and pygobject 3 which (presumably) don't
have this problem. Last commit to it was 2
I've noticed that gedit in GNOME 3.6 prevents the log out (shut down
etc.) if it has unsaved data. While it is useful behaviour:
- It is not done by any other Gnome application I know
- The dialog shown by gedit is unhelpful as to choose an option one
needs to cancel the logout, click any
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 12:51 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
gedit is becoming more of a programmer's editor, so the gedit team
wants to keep the gedit brand while people work on a new simple
Notepad-equivalent that will be called Text Editor.
What would be a use case for such application?
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 14:17 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:31:38PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
More of a Wayland FAQ, but on which OSes does Wayland run?
I thought it is not Linux-only, but I am not sure. Anyone know?
Quick Google search shows that at least FreeBSD
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 09:26 +0100, Dan Winship wrote:
4. It's impossible to create custom Gtk.TreeIter from JS (no
constructor), so can't implement a completely custom Gtk.TreeModel.
I don't know the details of this particular issue, but if it's not
possible to do at all now, then any
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 02:44 +0400, Nikita Churaev wrote:
That's not an issue - you can put even a pointer but the problem is that
you need to pin object. You don't know (automatically without user
intervention) when you can free the resource. At any point GTK might
keep GtkTreeIter alive
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 23:26 +0400, Nikita Churaev wrote:
OK, so it seems that GNOME has a serious aim on making GNOME/JavaScript
the preferred platform for new newbies. However, there are some API
issues that make Gjs confusing, and bad for PEOPLE.
1. Some functions return useless success
Wouldn't it be better to selectively enable the -Wall -Werror rather
then selectively disabled it? People compiling the library potentially
care less about warning/errors then developers and know less about build
system (was it --disable-fatal-warnings? --disable-Werror? etc.)
Enabling warnings
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 11:12 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:18:55AM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I think that it'd be more interesting to engage with Valve to know how
the GNOME platform could help steam get a better product. It is an
interesting ISV usecase.
But
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 16:48 +0100, Henrique Ferreiro wrote:
Not sure matching in other languages, including english, is a
good idea. The typical $locale user is searching for a word in
his language, likely having no clue that english has a similar
looking word
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 10:16 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le 22/10/2012 10:09, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
I've had to close numbers of bugs in Totem, gnome-control-center, and
gnome-bluetooth over the past number of years because you barely did
updates past the .0 releases.
I'm glad you
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 19:06 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to hear some opinions about why the -s (--silent) option of
make is not being used more often in projects? I just updated the
configure.ac and Makefile.am files of a project I was working on and I
made these two
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 11:15 +0200, Xan Lopez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com
wrote:
2. While I understand that mobile is new 'shiny' so far I am sceptical
of unified interfaces (and several other things from presentation like
pre-installed
Hi,
Unfortunately I was not able to attend GUADEC this year. I tried to
catch up with it (BTW the site seems to be down - python cannot open
Liberation fonts apparently) - I got to Bright Future of GNOME so far.
Unfortunatly for me the slides were on the 'supportive, non-informative'
side and I
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:18 +0200, Philip Withnall wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 13:24 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 17:28 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Colin Walters wrote:
For compiler warning defaults, I think something similar what Dan
Winship has in
On 08/06/2012 02:45, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 16:30 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On 6 June 2012 05:19, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
desktop-devel-list isn't the best place for design discussions though.
#gnome-design on IRC, the usability mailing-list, and probably
On 18/10/2011 18:15, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
What's stopping these deprived users from using Gnome 2.X? I don't think
there's enough developers interested in keeping the 2.X series alive - it
would be a different matter if people were smashing out the features/patches
for the 2.X range but as
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:40 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great if some sort of notification would popup directly on
user's desktops, this way it can ensured that the maximum amount of
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:58 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:40 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote
On 20/07/2011 19:14, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
So the DBus port of GConf landed recently and there haven't been any
totally serious problems reported so far... would anyone object if I
changed jhbuild to use --disable-orbit in the GNOME 3.2 suites?
If that works out well I may well decide to
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:47 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Although I endorse design of the core components, I don't think it
has
to require the component to exist in gnome-cc. Furthermore, this
seems
like a fairly arbitrary limitation. Both major non-free desktops
permit
applications
On 10/05/2011 00:29, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Hi, all,
Per André's request to post features for Gnome 3.2 - here goes.
A while ago I blogged about the problem of lack of circulation in our
files, and posted a patch for Evince:
http://people.gnome.org/~federico/news-2010-08.html#19
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 16:15 -0700, bsquared wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com
wrote:
The Gentoo ebuilds may prove useful. GNOME 3 is in overlay.
Regards
Thanks, I'm not sure what that means. I have no experience with
Gentoo's
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 20:02 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
I read in changelogs that in 2.91.4 Flash plugin was blacklisted in
Epiphany. Is there any info was it unlisted? Or blocking is still in
place? I mention this because Flash doesn't work in Fedora 15 beta
using Epiphany.
Cheers,
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 19:12 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
and for 6) I
think we need to change this anyways. This leaves reason
Speaking as user of epiphany on webkit - it is now terribly broken.
Certificate handling is broken since 2009 (1.5 years now) which is
security bug as it allows to
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:38 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
One thing I'm not totally happy with is the organic growth in API in
both seed and gjs. seed for example added an os module with e.g.
fork which I think is totally wrong; it's just broken to fork() a
GNOME app, since it conflicts
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 18:31 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Just a small correction here.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com
wrote:
7) Embedding Mozilla engine stopped being supported.
https://lwn.net/Articles/436440/
https://lwn.net/Articles
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 18:07 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:33:47AM +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
Checking the last commits of the modules on git.gnome.org, I noticed we
have 120 modules which
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 20:58 +0300, Jens Georg wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 19:53 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
It should be Available or Unavailable why you're unavailable could
be a
secondary status.. but in general it should be those two statuses.
sri
Possibly also
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 10:46 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Pierre Benz benz.pie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Pierre Benz benz.pie...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de
wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 18:00 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 17:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
It would be nice to have some level of integration with web
applications
in the desktop. For instance, I would like to update my facebook
status
or tweet easily
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 23:47 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Hello everybody. _o/
I have looked at bugzilla and live.gnome.org, but I don't see any plans
about managment of 2 graphics card.
In some laptop, we have 2 graphics card: A small and a big. Recent Linux
kernel supports to ON/OFF
On 17/02/2011 13:07, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier wrote:
I agree. That has happened to me as well.
I understand the performance issues, but not to have a http acces to
the clones, could be blocker issue for some people.
Just
On 06/02/2011 14:13, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Le samedi 05 février 2011 à 11:43 -0600, Paul Cutler a écrit :
Development is not a democracy
For a personal project, no. But Gnome is not your personal project, it's
a community project.
Even if the practice shows that it is good to have
On 06/02/2011 13:46, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
All designs goes in the wiki though and most (if not all) also live in
this repo http://gitorious.org/gnome-design
As I said - there is difference between the result and process. There
have been stated that the design team studied the topic but
On 06/02/2011 14:27, Allan Day wrote:
Hi,
Maciej Piechotka wrote:
FLAMEThen show delyourdelinsdesign team/ins work! All I'm
hearing is that research have been done and the issue have been taken
into consideration during disussion but I DON'T have any references. I
cannot see logs of IRC
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 22:39 +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
I really, really, want the communication channels fixed though. It
looked like Maciej wanted to put some time into working on fixing
this
too, hence why I asked for the help.
While I fully understand why the help is expected from me
IRC channels seems to be used in gnome development. It may be just me
but I believe that recent power setting crisis show (I contrast them
to mailing lists):
- Requires presence. Many people cannot afford being on irc 24/7 - both
developers, potential developers or just interested users. The
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 11:43 -0600, Paul Cutler wrote:
You're asking to change the way things have been done for years -
which isn't an argument to not do things that way, but just pointing
it ou.
However, the GNOME Design team has regular office hours in IRC where
everyone is welcome to
On 05/02/2011 21:55, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 13:43, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
While it might be a stretch analogy but some people argue in various
companies (not every company and it may be argued how good the policy
is) to open the discussion/design
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 02:52 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
Could there be a recommendation against discussion of important
decisions on IRC? While I understand that it may slow down process
probably but it would improve developer
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 03:13 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:02:10AM +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 02:52 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
Could there be a recommendation against
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:53 +, Allan Day wrote:
Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 12:33 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
* The default font will be changing to Cantarell
Cantarell?
If Cantarell is this, http://abattis.org/cantarell/ which says
As my very first
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:03 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 12:33 -0500, Owen Taylor a écrit :
* UI will be added for displaying information about fallback mode
and forcing fallback mode when the system seems capable of doing
a full composited desktop.
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 18:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
In particular, note the following mailing lists:
* gnome-annouce-list - all software announcements
* gnome-list - discussions/questions about how to use GNOME
Does gnome-list cover the design process of user experience?
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 13:45 -0800, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
Since people from Others section also got the invitation (like
me), I
wonder, whether the results of the questions regarding making GNOME
better and
the effort taken into GNOME may become a bit inapropriate, as those
aren't
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 18:37 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
- Gnome Shell are no modular. It's need to separate the Shell from the
window manager. Each window have to be managed by the window manager
and
Shell menu and panels by the Shell. With actually Gnome Shell, the
non-modularity imposes
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 20:37 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
Emmanuele Bassi schreef op di 04-01-2011 om 00:14 [+]:
Still being able to type
weird characters
I count three ways of doing that:
• Ctrl + Shift + U + hexadecimal.
• Compose key.
• Character Map
Let me add
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 20:58 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
Maciej Piechotka schreef op di 04-01-2011 om 20:43 [+0100]:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 20:37 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
Let me add convenient for frequent use to my original phrasing and my
point still holds.
I believe
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:09 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
2011/1/3 Mario Blättermann mari...@gnome.org
Am Montag, den 03.01.2011, 13:37 -0500 schrieb Owen Taylor:
There will also be some people that want to use gnome-panel
because
they aren't ready
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:19 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
It will be important to get people writing extensions before the
release happens i think. (sorry went into marketing mode...!)
I take the liberty of saying that as person who tried to write an
extension (some time ago):
- Lack of
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:41 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Maciej Piechotka
uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:19 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
It will be important to get people writing extensions
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 08:33 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2010/12/11 Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are conceptually
actually 4 layers.
NSPR - spidermonkey - xulrunner
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are conceptually
actually 4 layers.
NSPR - spidermonkey - xulrunner - firefox
Where - is depends on. Right now at least Fedora ships like:
NSPR - (spidermonkey xulrunner
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:27 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:35 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
== GNOME Web Platform ==
There is no GNOME web platform. There are no new libraries being
proposed for use by all GNOME web modules. It feels way too early to
try to
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 10:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 19 October 2010 00:44, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
The upshot, though, is probably that quite some application that were
making use of the old GApplication have stopped working.
So... what versions of gtk+ and glib should
I am sorry if it is not correct mailing list however I didn't found
better for describing problems with testing Gnome 2.90 due to release
process.
I tried for some time keep parallel gtk+ 2.x and 3.x install testing new
packages with gtk+ 3.0. However it became increasingly hard:
- Sometimes
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 9 August 2010 14:15, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
You can release 2.90.x (not sure why you'd want 2.91 before 2.90 ;-)).
Some modules already have such versions.
90 is an even number, and thus 'stable', surely?
Richard.
On 28/07/10 15:48, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hello all,
A few release team members talked with various people during the first
few days at GUADEC to get a better feeling of where we stand on our road
to GNOME 3.0. We held a meeting later and decided that GNOME 3.0 should
be postponed to March
On 15/07/10 01:18, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi,
The new vala release contains some improvements to glib API that
breaks rygel's build so I would like to use vala 0.9.3 in the next
release.
libgee 0.5.2 will and current master do require that version.
Regards
signature.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 09/07/10 16:37, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping
the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot of people making
products with GStreamer prefer it over lgplv3.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 06/07/10 15:12, j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
Hi!
hi Vincent,
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Do you feel okay with the idea of allowing proprietary apps to use our
platform but not GPLv2 apps?
In short, yes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 11/06/10 14:28, Alexander Larsson wrote:
Any library that links to gtk+, gdk or gdk-pixbuf, that switches to gtk3
will need to have the new version be separate from and parallel
installable with the old version.
If this is not done then
On 04/07/2010 12:54, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
Am Samstag, den 03.07.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Maciej Piechotka:
First of all I'd like to say that I'm not usability specialist (I'm not
event 'normal' user - I'm closer to power user). However after some time
of using the gnome-shell (from
First of all I'd like to say that I'm not usability specialist (I'm not
event 'normal' user - I'm closer to power user). However after some time
of using the gnome-shell (from about GNOME 2.27.x) I noted a few problems -
and they are more the minor problems (I believe) in design rather that
First of all I'd like to say that I'm not usability specialist (I'm not
event 'normal' user - I'm closer to power user). However after some time
of using the gnome-shell I noted a few problems - and they are more the
minor problems (I believe) in design rather that 'bugs' so I decided to
post it
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 09:36 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 06/15/2010 09:27 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 15 juin 2010 à 08:21 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
So, my application uses libraries A and B. It takes a GtkWidget from A,
and
passes it to a function in B. If A links
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 02:24 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi Frederic,
Thanks for the very quick reply. My reply below:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
General questions first:
- Are there frequent releases of those?
The GUPnP
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 01:11 +0900, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 12:32 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
As for not wanting to use versioned symbols, could you provide
more
information why such a decision was made?
I can't speak for Matthias, but I guess it's because
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 18:11 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
hal used by tracker (?), suggested by others - drop ?
Hal is unmaintained and obsolete since some time already. Anything
should switch to udisks/upower/(g)udev (however there might be problems
with non-linux
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:01 -0500, Cody Russell wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 22:44 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Curtis Hovey sinzui...@verizon.net
wrote:
My suggestion is to support the Zeitgeist's community's culture of
code
reviews. GNOME does not
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 18:24 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
I am not entirely sure but my guess is adding support for another
language would require modifications to all the applications
individually that want its support to be included. As far as I have
read (I apologize if I am
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 16:05 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
udisks[1] and upower[2] have now a tarball release; what should we do on
2.30 external deps page[3]? Should them replace or put beside
DeviceKit-* ? Here is any official module still using DeviceKit-* ?
Plus, any idea about JHbuild? I
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 11:46 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
everyone asking for a plain text format (or even an XML format) for
*storage* should be forced to get only that on their machines, but
should also be barred from complaining why their boot process takes a
minute instead of 10 seconds.
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 15:54 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Sorry if I not made it clear - I'm against putting everything in binary
which does not mean that binary format is ultimately evil. Probably XML
is not the easiest format to parse.
I am still a bit 'scared' by idea of binary format unless it is
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:38 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 18:56 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org
wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 18:37 +, Colin Walters wrote:
*
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 00:03 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:57 +0100, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
In fact I'm not able to think about 1 application which I'd like to have
on one workspace
the only few I can think of are some that you really want 1 instance of:
* mail
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:20 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Greetings,
I am a new member of the GNOME contributors community.
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation in HTML format for easier comprehension.
Please use ASCII. Some
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:57 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 20:40 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:20 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Greetings,
I am a new member of the GNOME contributors community.
In the following message, I
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:11 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Well, I am really sorry for using HTML. I thought it would be liked.
Ups. Sorry if I was too mean. I'm just somehow old-style person who
still uses USENET ;)
AFAIK HTML in email is not liked very much among at least some old-style
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 13:20 +0200 schrieb Maciej Piechotka:
Isn't this version of poppler breaking some packages from texlive?
Any bug report ID?
andre
It was masked in portage. Now it is unmasked so It's either fixed in
Gentoo or upstream. Anyway - patch exists.
Regards
I spotted an area in which Gnome desktop can offer better user
experience.
Imagine I use VoIP (skype, empathy or anything like that) and some music
player (Banshee, Rhythmbox etc.). I listen to some music or a podcast
when someone ring.
I have to stop the music and answer the phone. However I
Sorry for posting two posts one after another. I do so as they are on
different topics. If I should do it in one post - please just say so
I'll do it such way in future.
I always found adding new startup programs a bit tricky. I need to fill
several fields to create new .desktop file.
However
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 20:11 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 13.09.09 19:18, Maciej Piechotka (uzytkown...@gmail.com) wrote:
I spotted an area in which Gnome desktop can offer better user
experience.
Imagine I use VoIP (skype, empathy or anything like that) and some music
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 07:43 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 08:03 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
the majority of GPUs, nowadays, work fine on
Linux with open source drivers[1], and provide the basic
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 17:39 +0100, Uros Nedic wrote:
Thank you for answer. When someone joined on this list for
only a month, it is very hard to track everything what has
been discussed. Some digest like this always helps.
Regarding 3D, do you plan to implement Gallium3D approach
or you
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 11:06 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
Poppler 0.12 is the new stable release. Although it doesn't add any new
API and evince builds with earlier versions, I suggest to bump the
minimum version because this release includes a lot of important
rendering and performance
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
