> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --switched-root --system --deserialize=40
splash
Ok, --switched-root is there in PID 1, it's something I was looking to
confirm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
** Package changed: software-properties (Ubuntu) => linux-raspi (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370
Title:
Blank screen after boot in
** Description changed:
+ What's known so far:
+ - 24.04 desktop deployed with TPM+FDE shows this bug
+ - services confined with apparmor that need to access something in
/run/systemd (like the notify socket) fail to do so, even if the apparmor
profile is in complain mode
+ - only after running
I think neither rsyslog, nor cups, or sssd, are the correct packages for
this bug, but I agree that spreading out the investigation over two
different bugs is not good.
I'll mark https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088 as
a duplicate, and add cups and sssd tasks to this one
Public bug reported:
I tried using a noble VM using a "host-only" network connection (which does not
have a DHCP server).
After adding an IPv4 address manually (using the ip command),
NetworkManager retries activating the network connection, which removes the
address that was previously added.
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
translations tarball verified
help tarball verified
tarballs tarball:
@@ -14,12 +14,13 @@
tiff-4.6.0.tar.xz
libepubgen-0.1.1.tar.xz
a39f6c07ddb20d7dd2ff1f95fa21e2cd-raptor2-2.0.15.tar.gz
+libxslt-1.1.39.tar.xz
freetype-2.13.0.tar.xz
beeca87be45ec87d241ddd0e1bad80c1-bsh-2.0b6-src.zip
I downloaded the original tarballs from
https://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/7.6.6/ and:
- verified their signatures
- matched 7.6.6.orig.tar.xz to upstream's 7.6.6.3 (it's a versioning quirk to
call 7.6.6rc3 7.6.6.3 in the end):
$ sha256sum libreoffice_7.6.6.orig.tar.xz
Great!
I'm unable to reproduce the bug on my machine with the new version
(2.4.7-1.2ubuntu7).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692
Title:
cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on
Are you sure the changes were uploaded?
I'm having a hard time finding them in
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692
Title:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.7-1.2ubuntu6 is in noble-
proposed claiming to fix this bug.
Comment #6 above says there is a missing patch still.
In any case, doesn't look like there is anything to sponsor here, so
unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors.
--
You received this bug
And unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335
Title:
upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
Fix
At the moment, noble-proposed has
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/1.90.3-1, uploaded a few
hours ago:
upower (1.90.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 1.90.3
* Drop patches, merged upstream
* Bump Build-Depends on meson to (>= 0.60.0) and libglib2.0-dev to (>=
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692
Title:
cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to
Till,
Your changed only backported on of the two commits that fix this regression.
The missing commit can be found here:
https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/pull/935
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
Great!
Where did you publish the changes?
I would like to make sure the bug does not reproduce with the new package :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692
Title:
Till,
I have pushed another commit that fixes this regression.
https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/issues/934#issuecomment-2047651106
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
Till,
Thanks for the quick reply!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692
Title:
cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported
commits from 2.4.x
Public bug reported:
While checking out the latest versions of cups (2.4.7-1.2ubuntu4 and
2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5),
I noticed that cupsd crashes consistently after closing my Firefox tab / window.
The title of the crash (from the bug-report window) is "cupsd crashed with
SIGSEGV in ???()"
I'm running
I can confirm the issue (I am on ubuntu 22.04 nvidia + x11). gnome-
terminal, emacs and similar applications was lagging. Starting an
application that updated the screen continuously (such as glxgears)
seems to have alleviated the problem.
Downgrading mutter to from 42.9-0ubuntu7 (which I got in
The test failure on armhf persists:
939s # Running test: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
940s # Executing: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
941s # FAIL: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test (Child process exited with code
1)
941s not ok - mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
--
You received
The test failure on armhf persists:
939s # Running test: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
940s # Executing: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
941s # FAIL: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test (Child process exited with code
1)
941s not ok - mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
--
You received
There is an armhf DEP8 failure that I just retriggered, let's see if it
passes in the next run.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051074
Title:
Mirror mode doesn't work
There is an armhf DEP8 failure that I just retriggered, let's see if it
passes in the next run.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054510
Title:
Incomplete screen redraws
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cups has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
I noticed this SRU was prepared without the SRU Template[1] filled in.
While most of the data we want is in the bug description as is (what's
wrong, test plan), it's lacking an analysis of what could go wrong.
That boat has sailed now, and doing an analysis of the patch right now,
basically what
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Public bug reported:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/adsys/noble/armhf
I did multiple retries already, but the failures look persistent. The
tests passed in other architectures, but also needed one retry on arm64.
In armhf, there have been 5 retries already.
** Affects: adsys (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
Discussion:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dkim-
perl/+git/libmail-dkim-perl/+merge/460681
We want to ship noble with libmail-dkim-perl 1.20230212-1 which does not
have Ed25519 support, and thus does not depend on libcryptx-perl which
is in
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.5-0ubuntu0.23.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Tags removed: verification-done-jammy
** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604
Title:
Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack
Technically, the verification from prior comments was performed on
23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.1, not 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2. I think they
need to be done on the mesa package that is in proposed now, which is
.2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Lee, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Please amend the test case to test with both the GA and the (affected)
6.1 OEM kernels.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051068
Title:
GUI crashed after installed
The verification of the Stable Release Update for modemmanager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Thank you for the detailed and unambiguous verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047008
Title:
[SRU] Add Telit FN990 compositions
Status in OEM Priority
The verification of the Stable Release Update for transmission has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Public bug reported:
Wireless network was working fine with matic, but system can no longer
connect to wlan after noble upgrade.
NetworkManager logs contains this:
Jan 02 15:42:02 zeus NetworkManager[1105]: [1704206522.9854] device
(wlan0): Activation: starting connection 'example.net'
mantic verification
I used mutter from mantic-proposed:
andreas@nsnx2:~$ apt-cache policy mutter
mutter:
Installed: 45.2-0ubuntu2~really45.0
Candidate: 45.2-0ubuntu2~really45.0
Version table:
*** 45.2-0ubuntu2~really45.0 100
100 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic-proposed
The DEP8 tests are green now.
I'm going to verify this revert for mantic, which is currently in
mantic-proposed. But note I have NOT been able to reproduce the stuttering in
firefox with the mutter package from mantic-updates (45.2-0ubuntu1). I tried:
- wayland
- xorg
- native resolution
I see this was filed on the 13th. Had this been mentioned in the 45.2
mantic SRU bug[1], I wouldn't have released the package to updates on
the 14th :/
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2043000
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Hello shine, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/3.36.9-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Kai-Chuan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/3.36.9-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
> I wanted to test the updated version of mutter so a couple of days ago I
> enabled the `proposed`
> repository, but I didn't receive any updates.
Jeremie, you also have to pass "-t mantic-proposed" in the apt command
line.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Also, before release, please someone clarify this statement about a mesa
regression in noble with 45.1 presumably:
"It will get updated to 45.2 (and eventually to 46) after a mesa
regression is handled."
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
Hello Jeremie, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Gonzalo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
noble-proposed still only has 45.1-2ubuntu1, btw. It should get 45.2
before this update is released to mantic. I updated the main bug status
to reflect that noble isn't fixed nor committed yet.
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug
Hello Chuck,
thanks for the verification. Can you please confirm the package version?
The output of the command below is enough:
apt-cache policy transmission-daemon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in
I'm OK with releasing this one day short of the 7-day aging period. I
don't think there is any gain in waiting an extra day for this update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In
Marking as incomplete pending the completion of what was requested in
comment #2 above. I also added tasks for the missing ubuntu releases.
** Also affects: libfprint (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libfprint (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: High
Sponsored for jammy and lunar. Mantic has 4.0 which is not affected.
Unsubscribing sponsors.
** Changed in: transmission (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in
** Description changed:
- Transmission uses a lot of RAM in ubuntu 22.04 server (arm64) runnign on
- a Raspberry Pi 4.
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ There is a memory leak in transmission-daemon that was introduced by a
+ faulty openssl3 patch. It has been reported that it's noticeable after a
+ few hours of
The verification of the Stable Release Update for qpdf has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Noble also has 1:45.0-1ubuntu3, with the same fix. This all started
before noble was released, hence the version collision, but I'm pretty
sure that throughout the devel cycle, noble will get a gnome-control-
center version bump, so no harm in releasing mantic with this version
now.
--
You
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-control-center
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
I still get this error in Ubuntu Lunar, with kernel 6.2.0-35-generic.
Sample:
$ sudo dmesg -T|grep Atomic
[qua nov 1 05:52:03 2023] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Atomic update
failure on pipe A (start=78023 end=78024) time 305 us, min 1783, max 1799,
scanline start 1753, end 1804
[qua nov
Marius, Andrey
thanks for your contribution!
I uploaded jammy and lunar packages to this ppa[1], with amd64 and arm64
builds, with the gentoo patch replacing the one we had in the package.
Marius, I changed the d/changelog text a bit, I hope you don't mind, but
please let me know if you have
** Also affects: transmission (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: transmission (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/1973084 is
the memleak bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946215
Title:
transmission: Fail
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1051056
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051056
** Also affects: transmission (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051056
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug
Hi Nathan,
I see that the discussion on the upstream PR[1] is still ongoing, and
there isn't consensus yet.
I think it's best to put this on hold until a conclusion is reached, and
then this can move forward. I'll therefore unsubscribe sponsors for now.
Please subscribe again once a decision has
I installed ubuntu-fonts-classic from mantic on my lunar desktop (it's
not available for lunar). It removed ubuntu-fonts, but the fonts look ok
now in google docs. Got some differences in my desktop too, but still
looks ok.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This bug is ready for verification. Due to the status mantic was in when
the package was accepted, the tooling failed to add the template comment
to this bug, and add the tags, and I did all of that manually now.
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic
** Also affects:
This bug is ready for verification. Due to the status mantic was in when
the package was accepted, the tooling failed to add the template comment
to this bug, and add the tags, and I did all of that manually now.
** Also affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance:
This bug is ready for verification. Due to the release status mantic was
in when the package was accepted, the tooling failed to add the template
comment to this bug, and add the tags, and I did all of that manually
now.
** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: High
Hi Georgia, is this still pending an evince fix? Your PPA has an updated
evince package, but I don't think it was uploaded to unapproved yet,
without the recommends.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
The jammy build of 1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.6 is still failing[1] in arm64
after a retry:
FAIL: test_system_driver_packages_force_install_nvidia
(test_ubuntu_drivers.DetectTest)
system_driver_packages() force install config points to an older version.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-drivers-common
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.6 in jammy-proposed has no closing bug, and the
changes file should include version 22.04.5 too I believe. There is also
a build failure for arm64 (due to a build-time test failing). I will
retrigger it, but I'm thinking
For the next SRUs, if you have to add a patch or make other changes to
something under debian/, please document it so that the SRU review can
be quicker. In this particular case here, there is a patch being added
that has no DEP3 header, no upstream bug, no origin, etc, which makes
the review take
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.5.7-0ubuntu0.23.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Description changed:
In chromium, some documents render with an incorrect font. It looks all
"bold". I can provide a link in PVT if needed, but see attached
screenshots for chrome, and chromium.
The chromium console log also shows a lot of these 404 errors for
*.woff2 fonts:
** Attachment added: "chrome.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2037581/+attachment/5704999/+files/chrome.png
** Tags added: snap
** Description changed:
In chromium, some documents render with an incorrect font. It looks all
"bold". I can provide a
Public bug reported:
chromium snap
chromium 118.0.5993.11 2645 latest/edge canonical✓ -
In chromium, some google doc documents render with an incorrect font. It
looks all "bold". I can provide a link in PVT if needed, but see
attached screenshots for chrome, and chromium.
The chromium
Chromium played a local video just fine, and that video was recognized
like this by mpv:
(+) Video --vid=1 (*) (h264 1920x1080 60.000fps)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
I used that snap in a few long calls already, and did not experience the
Pxms leak. Closing the browser after such calls also did not leave xorg
at 100% cpu like before.
Haven't checked x264 playback yet, but as Daniel said, I doubt it would
regress because of this patch.
--
You received this
Please ping here when a new chromium snap is available in latest/edge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033433
Title:
Chromium leaks tens of gigabytes of
Upstream bug got an update:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1467689#c41
Patch?
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/42d57d016f5fb6d2a1a354743b9be911c1be87e8%5E%21/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
ACK on releasing this one day early. Given the test results, I don't see
a benefit from another day of aging, which, given the Friday rule, would
actually push this release to next monday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
This bug is easy to reproduce, what we need now is a fix ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033433
Title:
Chromium leaks tens of gigabytes of pixmaps (in the
I'm affected by this problem as well: snap shows one app which should be
refreshed, but then refuses to refresh and claims there are still
processes running. Looking into the process list, not a single of the
listed PIDs is used.
ads@diamond:~$ uname -a
Linux diamond 6.2.0-32-generic #32-Ubuntu
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.5.6-0ubuntu0.23.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
The output from `top` was always well behaved while chromium was open,
until it was closed, at which point xorg cpu's usage went through the
roof.
The test case here is indeed watching "Pxms" in xrestop while chromium
is displaying hw accelerated video.
--
You received this bug notification
Also, this but is missing the SRU template, in case the sssd upload I
mentioned in my previous comment is really addressing this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
There is an sssd package in focal-unapproved that points at this bug,
with this d/changelog snippet:
* debian/patches: Backport patches atches to support properly GDM smartcard
login (LP: #1865226)
(sic)
But there is no sssd task in this bug.
I also don't see a gdm3 upload to focal
Thanks for guiding the troubleshooting on this one, I learned a new tool
;) (xrestop)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033433
Title:
Chromium leaks tens of
So I took some screenshots of `xrestop` while chromium was in the google
meet.
There was an "unknown PID" listed, but given other characteristics of
that line, I assume that it is related to chromium.
Here are some of the columns over time:
Pxms MiscPxm memTotal
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-remote-desktop into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-
desktop/42.9-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help
1 - 100 of 1288 matches
Mail list logo
