[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1958267] Re: wpa can't connect to servers using TLS 1.1 or older

2022-09-23 Thread Chieu MinHui
Thank Kuradakis (p-alexandrosz) #51, I can connect to Hotspot in ubuntu 2204 
LTS from my android 11
phone, originally my phone connect error message: connect time exceed - try 
later, now its ok at all. 
p.s: I had to edit minor correction at #51: original deb 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ impish . to deb 
http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish .) and downgrade work 
perfectly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958267

Title:
  wpa can't connect to servers using TLS 1.1 or older

Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in wpa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in wpa package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  * Impact
  wpa built with in openssl3 fails to connect to TLS 1.1 or lower server

  * Test case
  try to connect to a TLS <= 1.1 access point

  * Regression potential
  the patch lowers the security level in some situation for compatibility, it 
shouldn't prevent connecting to newer hardware, still try to connect to 
different type of wifi with different security levels

  ---

  those uses MD5-SHA1 as digest in its signature algorithm which no
  longer meets OpenSSL default level of security of 80 bits

  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/hostap/2022-May/040563.html

  Workaround are described in #22 and #36 by basically using
  CipherString = DEFAULT@SECLEVEL=0

  which lowers the security level

  ---

  With the current jammy version of wpasupplicant (2:2.10-1), I cannot
  connect to the WPA Enterprise network eduroam, which is used by
  Universities worldwide. I get a "Connection failed" message or a
  request to re-enter the password.

  - I've re-tried the credentials: no fix ;-)

  - Tried a 21.10 live session on the same machine: works fine!

  - Manually downgraded wpasupplicant to the impish version
  (2:2.9.0-21build1): connected normally.

  - Upgraded wpasupplicant to the latest version: fails to connect
  again.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: wpasupplicant 2:2.10-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-17.17-generic 5.15.12
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-17-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu75
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jan 18 09:56:23 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-30 (48 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20211130)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: wpa
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1958267/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990709] [NEW] package firefox 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-09-23 Thread Kris B.
Public bug reported:

Snap fails to install during do-release-upgrade from 20.04 to 22.04.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: firefox 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-126.142-generic 5.4.203
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-126-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  kristv  802 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  kristv  802 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20220818191623
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Channel: Unavailable
Date: Fri Sep 23 22:01:11 2022
ErrorMessage: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
 # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-28 (1518 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
IpRoute:
 default via 192.168.1.1 dev enp2s0 proto dhcp metric 100 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev enp2s0 scope link metric 1000 
 192.168.1.0/24 dev enp2s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.10 metric 100
NoProfiles: True
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
 apt  2.4.7
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
Title: package firefox 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit 
status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-09-24 (0 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 02/21/2012
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 080015
dmi.board.name: NC99D3
dmi.board.vendor: Jetway Information Co., Ltd
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Jetway Information Co., Ltd
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr080015:bd02/21/2012:svnJetwayInformationCo.,Ltd:pnNC99D3:pvr1.0:rvnJetwayInformationCo.,Ltd:rnNC99D3:rvr1.0:cvnJetwayInformationCo.,Ltd:ct10:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: NC99D3
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: Jetway Information Co., Ltd

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990709

Title:
  package firefox 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Snap fails to install during do-release-upgrade from 20.04 to 22.04.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: firefox 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-126.142-generic 5.4.203
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-126-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia
  AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  kristv  802 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  kristv  802 F pulseaudio
  BuildID: 20220818191623
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  Channel: Unavailable
  Date: Fri Sep 23 22:01:11 2022
  ErrorMessage: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
  ForcedLayersAccel: False
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-28 (1518 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180426)
  IpRoute:
   default via 192.168.1.1 dev enp2s0 proto dhcp metric 100 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev enp2s0 scope link metric 1000 
   192.168.1.0/24 dev enp2s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.10 metric 100
  NoProfiles: True
  PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
   apt  2.4.7
  RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
  SourcePackage: firefox
  Title: package firefox 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 1
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-09-24 (0 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/21/2012
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2022-09-23 Thread Martin D. Weinberg
Another surprising observation: Wayland seems to work just fine for me,
it's only X11 that has the maximization shrinking bug.   'headerbar' can
be true or false on Wayland with 22.04.   I tried it on two different
installs with the same behavior.

Okay then.   I guess I'll use Wayland.   I liked to have the restart
feature which Wayland doens't have, but I think I'd rather not have this
gnome-terminal bug more than 'r'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

Status in GNOME Terminal:
  New
Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  1. Open a gnome-terminal window (from the launcher or by pressing Ctrl + Alt 
+ T)
  2. "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 24; columns 80;"
  3. Maximize the window (by clicking on the maximize button, or double 
clicking the title bar, or dragging the window up to the panel)
  4. Do the same again to un-maximize the window
  5. Now "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 23; columns 79;"

  Each time I do this, the window keeps getting one character shorter
  and one character narrower!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar  6 10:22:46 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-04-15 (1421 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (128 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1975487] Re: zsys not installed during Kinetic ISO install with ZFS option

2022-09-23 Thread Brian Murray
The package zsys is no longer installed by default in Ubuntu and the
test case needs updating. This is something I'm currently working on and
will get sorted.

** Also affects: ubuntu-manual-tests
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to zsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975487

Title:
  zsys not installed during Kinetic ISO install with ZFS option

Status in Ubuntu Manual Tests:
  In Progress
Status in zsys package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After following the instructions at:
  
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/433/builds/248685/testcases/1716/results
 
  on the 20220523 daily build of Kinetic, I used the command

  zsysctl show

  and was met with the message:

  ~$ zsysctl show
  Command 'zsysctl' not found, but can be installed with:
  sudo apt install zsys

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: zsys (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon May 23 12:33:24 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-23 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Alpha amd64 (20220522)
  SourcePackage: zsys
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1975487/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990705] [NEW] Doesn't autoconnect to wifi using iwd

2022-09-23 Thread Heather Ellsworth
Public bug reported:

If you create your wireless connection with wpa_supplicant, then the
/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/.network lists the
"interface-name". But then when you install iwd, it becomes the handler
of wireless networks and changes the network interface name without
updating the name (or removing it) from the .network file.

The upstream bug is
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/1091

Filed the launchpad bug in iwd because an iwd post-install script will
be the proposed solution.

** Affects: iwd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  If you create your wireless connection with wpa_supplicant, then the
  /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/.network lists the
  "interface-name". But then when you install iwd, it becomes the handler
  of wireless networks and changes the network interface name without
  updating the name (or removing it) from the .network file.
+ 
+ The upstream bug is
+ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/1091
+ 
+ Filed the launchpad bug in iwd because an iwd post-install script will
+ be the proposed solution.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to iwd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990705

Title:
   Doesn't autoconnect to wifi using iwd

Status in iwd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  If you create your wireless connection with wpa_supplicant, then the
  /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/.network lists the
  "interface-name". But then when you install iwd, it becomes the
  handler of wireless networks and changes the network interface name
  without updating the name (or removing it) from the .network file.

  The upstream bug is
  https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/1091

  Filed the launchpad bug in iwd because an iwd post-install script will
  be the proposed solution.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iwd/+bug/1990705/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2022-09-23 Thread Martin D. Weinberg
@peterx14   I did a few more experiments.   One needs a new gnome
session altogether for the 'headerbar' false change to work.   I tried
this a few times to confirm.  Just killing all the terminals is not
enough.  However, when I login/out or kill gnome-session to restart the
session manager, the problem is fixed. The side effect is that one loses
all the nice gnome-terminal decoration (hamburger menu, find button,
etc.).  Oh well.  Take your choice.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

Status in GNOME Terminal:
  New
Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  1. Open a gnome-terminal window (from the launcher or by pressing Ctrl + Alt 
+ T)
  2. "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 24; columns 80;"
  3. Maximize the window (by clicking on the maximize button, or double 
clicking the title bar, or dragging the window up to the panel)
  4. Do the same again to un-maximize the window
  5. Now "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 23; columns 79;"

  Each time I do this, the window keeps getting one character shorter
  and one character narrower!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar  6 10:22:46 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-04-15 (1421 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (128 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 462564] Re: [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table

2022-09-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462564

Title:
  [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table

Status in LibreOffice:
  Fix Released
Status in OpenOffice:
  Invalid
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in openoffice.org package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: openoffice.org

  1)  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 11.04
  Release:  11.04

  2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
    Installed: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2
    Candidate: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2
    Version table:
   *** 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

  3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

  cd ~/Desktop && wget
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/462564/+attachment/894856/+files/test.odt
  && lowriter -nologo test.odt

  is when one highlights the second column of the table -> secondary
  clicks -> Column -> Delete is only that column is deleted. Please see
  movie for more details:
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/462564/+attachment/894864/+files/out.ogv

  4) What happens instead is the whole table is deleted.

  Reproducible in:
  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu precise (development branch)
  Release:  12.04

  apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
Installed: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  WORKAROUND: Split the table then delete the column.

  WORKAROUND: Use Word via WINE.

  Microsoft Office Word 2003 (11.5604.6505)

  apt-cache policy wine1.3
  wine1.3:
    Installed: 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1
    Candidate: 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1
    Version table:
   *** 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1 0
  500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.3.15-0ubuntu5 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe i386 Packages

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Oct 28 09:43:20 2009
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
  SourcePackage: openoffice.org
  Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/462564/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 399765]

2022-09-23 Thread Qa-admin-q
Dear Matthew Paul Thomas,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open,
confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked
on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has
been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really
appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still
present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of
LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information 
from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to 
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help 
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular 
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a 
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your 
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from 
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: 
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399765

Title:
  [Upstream] Ctrl Q doesn't quit when a combo box is focused

Status in LibreOffice:
  Confirmed
Status in OpenOffice:
  Invalid
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  OpenOffice.org 3.0.1, Ubuntu 9.04
  LibreOffice 3.4.3, Ubuntu 11.10 beta

  1. Focus any combo box, e.g. the style combo box in Writer, or the font or 
size combo boxes in Writer or Calc.
  2. Type Ctrl Q to quit the program.

  What should happen: The application quits.
  What actually happens: Nothing.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/399765/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 462564]

2022-09-23 Thread Justin Luth
Proposed basic fix at http://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/140455

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462564

Title:
  [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table

Status in LibreOffice:
  Fix Released
Status in OpenOffice:
  Invalid
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in openoffice.org package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: openoffice.org

  1)  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 11.04
  Release:  11.04

  2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
    Installed: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2
    Candidate: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2
    Version table:
   *** 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

  3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

  cd ~/Desktop && wget
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/462564/+attachment/894856/+files/test.odt
  && lowriter -nologo test.odt

  is when one highlights the second column of the table -> secondary
  clicks -> Column -> Delete is only that column is deleted. Please see
  movie for more details:
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/462564/+attachment/894864/+files/out.ogv

  4) What happens instead is the whole table is deleted.

  Reproducible in:
  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu precise (development branch)
  Release:  12.04

  apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
Installed: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  WORKAROUND: Split the table then delete the column.

  WORKAROUND: Use Word via WINE.

  Microsoft Office Word 2003 (11.5604.6505)

  apt-cache policy wine1.3
  wine1.3:
    Installed: 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1
    Candidate: 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1
    Version table:
   *** 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1 0
  500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.3.15-0ubuntu5 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe i386 Packages

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Oct 28 09:43:20 2009
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
  SourcePackage: openoffice.org
  Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/462564/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 462564]

2022-09-23 Thread Libreoffice-commits
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/bb47ffbc9d36e83695aa0d01767d3f83533c04e0

tdf#46733 sw: don't double-select column during deleteCol

It will be available in 7.5.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462564

Title:
  [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table

Status in LibreOffice:
  Fix Released
Status in OpenOffice:
  Invalid
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in openoffice.org package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: openoffice.org

  1)  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 11.04
  Release:  11.04

  2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
    Installed: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2
    Candidate: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2
    Version table:
   *** 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

  3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

  cd ~/Desktop && wget
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/462564/+attachment/894856/+files/test.odt
  && lowriter -nologo test.odt

  is when one highlights the second column of the table -> secondary
  clicks -> Column -> Delete is only that column is deleted. Please see
  movie for more details:
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/462564/+attachment/894864/+files/out.ogv

  4) What happens instead is the whole table is deleted.

  Reproducible in:
  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu precise (development branch)
  Release:  12.04

  apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
Installed: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  WORKAROUND: Split the table then delete the column.

  WORKAROUND: Use Word via WINE.

  Microsoft Office Word 2003 (11.5604.6505)

  apt-cache policy wine1.3
  wine1.3:
    Installed: 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1
    Candidate: 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1
    Version table:
   *** 1.3.28-0ubuntu1~ppa1~natty1 0
  500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.3.15-0ubuntu5 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe i386 Packages

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Oct 28 09:43:20 2009
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
  SourcePackage: openoffice.org
  Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/462564/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900454]

2022-09-23 Thread Otis5842
Calc - AutoCalculate malfunction, always F9 (ReCalculate) necessary
Product: https://amongus2.io LibreOffice Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Master
Hardware

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900454

Title:
  Calc doesn't recalculate formulas on cell content changes

Status in LibreOffice:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  libreoffice-calc 1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 (Groovy)

  The problem is better explained via steps to reproduce:

  1. Start calc; you'll get a new spreadsheet.
  2. Fill in the following in cells A1-A3:

A1: 1
A2: =A1+1
A3: =A1-1

  As expected: A2 is calculated as 2, A3 is calculated as 0.

  3. Change A1 to 2 and press enter.

  A2 is autocalculated to 3, but A3 remains at 0 (wrong!).

  Now for the fun part: switch to a different application so LibreOffice
  window loses focus, the put it back in focus. A3 is now recalculated
  to 1.

  (Partially taken from:
  https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/271324/calc-v7022-cell-
  autocalculate-not-working-while-window-has-focus/)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1900454/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1971001] Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, Focal and Jammy

2022-09-23 Thread Jeffrey Hawkins
typo in my comment, recommendation is to build tiff with libjbig
disabled... sorry..

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to tiff in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971001

Title:
  Multiple vulnerabilities in Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, Focal and Jammy

Status in tiff package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  The versions in Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, Focal and Jammy may be
  vulnerable to all CVEs below.

  Debian released an advisory on March 24.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiff/+bug/1971001/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1971001] Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, Focal and Jammy

2022-09-23 Thread Jeffrey Hawkins
Can Ubuntu address CVE-2022-1210 similar to other Linux Distros (RHEL,
SUSE, YOCTO,...) with not building tiff with JBIG disabled since the bug
is really in libjbig (build with --disable-jbig) .   See Fedora Bug
Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072615

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #2072615
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072615

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to tiff in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971001

Title:
  Multiple vulnerabilities in Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, Focal and Jammy

Status in tiff package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  The versions in Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, Focal and Jammy may be
  vulnerable to all CVEs below.

  Debian released an advisory on March 24.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiff/+bug/1971001/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2022-09-23 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
22.04 fresh install, even worse, the window shrunk by 3 lines each time
:-O And now even shrinks by 3 rows ... I use toggle full screen back and
forth, since this is what I really use a lot, not the  maximize. But
maximize has the same effect, just checked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

Status in GNOME Terminal:
  New
Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  1. Open a gnome-terminal window (from the launcher or by pressing Ctrl + Alt 
+ T)
  2. "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 24; columns 80;"
  3. Maximize the window (by clicking on the maximize button, or double 
clicking the title bar, or dragging the window up to the panel)
  4. Do the same again to un-maximize the window
  5. Now "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 23; columns 79;"

  Each time I do this, the window keeps getting one character shorter
  and one character narrower!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar  6 10:22:46 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-04-15 (1421 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (128 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990669] Re: Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2022-09-23 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Changed in: libwnck3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990669

Title:
  Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Please sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

  Changelog entries since current kinetic version 43.0-1:

  libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

* Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262)
  (LP: #1990263)

   -- Dmitry Shachnev   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49
  +0300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990669/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1964036] Re: Firefox icon missing from panel following Kubuntu upgrade 20.04->22.04

2022-09-23 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I just rebuilt ubuntu-release-upgrader to omit the firefox entry in
deb2snap.json, i.e. so that the upgrade would not manually install the
firefox snap or remove the firefox deb. I used this version to test an
upgrade from focal to jammy in a regular Ubuntu VM, and it did not
resolve the issue. I still did not have a firefox icon on my dock after
the upgrade. I have attached the main.log from that upgrade.

I do agree that ideally ubuntu-release-upgrader should let the firefox
deb handle the snap transition, but this deb2snap behavior does not
appear to be the cause of this issue.

** Attachment added: "main.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1964036/+attachment/5618455/+files/main.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964036

Title:
  Firefox icon missing from panel following Kubuntu upgrade 20.04->22.04

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  1) lsb_release -rd

  Description:Ubuntu Jammy Jellyfish (development branch)
  Release:22.04
  (Kubuntu Jammy live session in QEMU VM)

  2) apt-cache policy ubuntu-release-upgrader-core
  ubuntu-release-upgrader-core:
    Installed: 1:22.04.6

  3) expected

  (upgrade from Kubuntu 20.04.3 -> 22.04. Reboot.)

  * Firefox icon on panel to be intact.
  * Clicked icon launches browser.
  * Icon tooltip/mouse hover to describe application.

  4) happened instead

  * Icon is missing/replaced with a generic icon
  * Icon click produces error notification "Plasma Workspace - 
preferred://browser"
  * Icon tooltip/mouse hover appears, though is blank.

  Additional info:
  * firefox is still installed, works as expected.
  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu78
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-07 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819.1)
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-18.18-generic 5.15.12
  Tags:  jammy dist-upgrade
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-18-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-03-07 (2 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  VarLogDistupgradeXorgFixuplog:
   INFO:root:/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running
   INFO:root:No xorg.conf, exiting
  _MarkForUpload: True

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1964036/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990689] Re: Cannot connect to Google account after upgrading to 22.04 LTS

2022-09-23 Thread Paul White
** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) => gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990689

Title:
  Cannot connect to Google account after upgrading to 22.04 LTS

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After upgrading from 20.04 LTS to 22.04 LTS, my Google accounts were
  disconnected.

  In the "Parameters/Online accounts" window, a double-click on each
  Google account opens a window indicating "authentication data expired.
  Please login to use this account".

  A click on the "Login" button opens a blank window, the only thing I
  can do is closing the window.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubiquity (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-47.51-generic 5.15.46
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-47-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Sep 23 21:00:36 2022
  InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-29 (268 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20200203.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  Symptom: installation
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-09-11 (12 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1990689/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1961910] Re: Ubuntu 22 crash when updating, broken network manager and cannot report bug

2022-09-23 Thread wolfgang
crash during full-upgrade: (that removed bunch of packages, see below...)
Start-Date: 2022-09-23  00:16:10
Commandline: apt full-upgrade

black screen, no network.

reboot.

configuring network: (from history)
1093  ip a add 192.168.178.100/24 dev enp37s0
1094  ip link set dev enp37s0 up
1095  ip route add default via 192.168.178.1

/etc/hosts:   129.143.116.10 ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de (for my
sources.list)

apt update
apt --fix-broken install
(problem remains: no gui no net)

apt install ubuntu-desktop .. gui is back.

found Removed packages from faulty full-upgrade. a bunch of. -> file
atached: Removed


cat  Removed | tr , \\n| awk -F: '{print $1}'|grep -v Remove|xargs apt install 
-y

did the job. online+working OK
End-Date: 2022-09-23  01:23:51


** Attachment added: "The Removed packages from faulty full-upgrade"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1961910/+attachment/5618454/+files/Removed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961910

Title:
  Ubuntu 22 crash when updating, broken network manager and cannot
  report bug

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  A new day, a new struggle with Ubuntu 22.04.

  So, I decided to get my daily updates and in the middle of the process the 
system just crashed, leaving me at the login page. When I got back, the wifi 
was no longer there and the network configuration was reporting an error about 
the network manager having problems.
  I shut down and restarted, the wifi came back.

  Went to the var/crash folder to report the bug with

  $:/var/crash$ ubuntu-bug _usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash

  and it started complaining about older packages that need to be
  upgraded. I run `apt upgrade`, one of the packages is `dbus`, I tried
  `apt install dbus` and another even uglier crash that left me with a
  black screen from which I could only come back with a forced shutdown
  and restart.

  Now, how do I get out of this mess and report the bug?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1961910/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990689] [NEW] Cannot connect to Google account after upgrading to 22.04 LTS

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

After upgrading from 20.04 LTS to 22.04 LTS, my Google accounts were
disconnected.

In the "Parameters/Online accounts" window, a double-click on each
Google account opens a window indicating "authentication data expired.
Please login to use this account".

A click on the "Login" button opens a blank window, the only thing I can
do is closing the window.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-47.51-generic 5.15.46
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-47-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Sep 23 21:00:36 2022
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-29 (268 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20200203.1)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubiquity
Symptom: installation
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-09-11 (12 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubiquity-18.04.14.14 wayland-session
-- 
Cannot connect to Google account after upgrading to 22.04 LTS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990689
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop 
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990293] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately?" on EXT4 partitions on ubuntu 22.04 et Linux Mint 21 ( trash work perfectly on ubuntu 20.04 )

2022-09-23 Thread Dan Bungert
Thanks for the report.

> do you think this bug will be corrected soon ? or i change parent
directory name of mountpoints ?

Probably better off changing the parent directory name, I'm afraid.

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990293

Title:
  Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately?" on EXT4
  partitions on ubuntu 22.04 et Linux Mint 21 ( trash work perfectly on
  ubuntu 20.04 )

Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in glib2.0 source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi , when i delete a file where is in another partition than " / " or
  mounted in /media/ , i obtain the message in title.

  how can i use trash again please ?

  iznobe@iznobe-PC:~$ cat /etc/fstab
  # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
  #
  # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
  # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
  # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
  #
  # 
 
  # / was on /dev/nvme0n1p2 during installation
  UUID=eb18366b-2ac9-4a7e-8f93-ba2caa30e90e /   ext4
noatime,errors=remount-ro   0   1

  # /boot/efi was on /dev/nvme0n1p1 during installation
  UUID=C071-9050/boot/efi   
vfatdefaults0   0

  # swap was on /dev/sdc3 during installation
  UUID=61218fe2-0bd1-4ada-9dd3-5ec996a02456 noneswap
sw,pri=10   0

  # partition de données separée comune aux OS linux
  UUID=01c9b796-0869-4ff9-a2a1-6c0f56ed5257 /datas  ext4
defaults0   0
  LABEL=WD8 /Vidéos/WD8 ext4
defaults0   0
  #/dev/disk/by-label/WD8PRO2  /media/WD8PRO2 ext4  
  defaults0   0

  LABEL=WD8PRO2   /Vidéos/WD8PRO2
  ext4defaults 0   0

  LABEL=WD8PRO1 /media/WD8PRO1  ext4
defaults0   0
  LABEL=Seagate_4T  /media/Seagate_4T   ext4
defaults,noauto 0   0

  trash is working for filesysteme mounted on /media/WD8PRO1 but not in
  FS mounted on /Vidéos/WD8PRO2 and /Vidéos/WD8 using ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
  .

  Exactly same file systeme mounted on same directory , with same trash
  directory is working fine on ubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1990293/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990263] Re: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libwnck3 - 43.0-2

---
libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262)
(LP: #1990263)

 -- Dmitry Shachnev   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49
+0300

** Changed in: libwnck3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990263

Title:
  bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libwnck3 package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

  Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at 
../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81
  81../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at 
../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81
  #1  0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591
  #2  0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192
  #3  bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137
  #4  0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #5  0x771eb8cf in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #6  0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #7  0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #8  0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290
  #9  0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, 
name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59
  #10 0x7733b905 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #11 0x772da559 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #12 0x772da783 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #13 0x77337e22 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #14 0x772da559 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #15 0x772da59d in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #17 0x77138098 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) 
at ./src/main.c:65

  Happens when running gnome-xorg/x11 session under gnome-shell 43.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990263/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987976] Re: firefox black window

2022-09-23 Thread Saptarshi Roy
This affects me too.

Memory: 4.0 GiB
Processor: Intel® Celeron(R) N4000 CPU @ 1.10GHz × 2
Graphics: Mesa Intel® UHD Graphics 600 (GLK 2)
Disk Capacity: 128.0 GB

OS Name: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
OS Type: 64-bit
GNOME Version: 42.4
Windowing System: Wayland

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987976

Title:
  firefox black window

Status in Mozilla Firefox:
  New
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  nicolas@nicolas-fixe:~$ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
  Release:  22.04

  nicolas@nicolas-fixe:~$ apt-cache policy firefox
  firefox:
    Installé : 1:1snap1-0ubuntu2
    Candidat : 1:1snap1-0ubuntu2
   Table de version :
   *** 1:1snap1-0ubuntu2 500
  500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  When I boot Ubuntu and start Firefox, the Firefox's window is totally
  black. See attachment.

  I am at your disposal to answer any question you have.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: firefox 1:1snap1-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug 28 12:42:29 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-08-25 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  Snap.Changes: aucun changement trouvé
  SourcePackage: firefox
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1987976/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989359] Re: [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntustudio-look - 22.10.2

---
ubuntustudio-look (22.10.2) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * Fix typo in .install file

ubuntustudio-look (22.10.1) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * New Kinetic Kudu Wallpapers (LP: #1989359)

 -- Erich Eickmeyer   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:59:00
-0700

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989359

Title:
  [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

Status in ubuntu-mate-artwork package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-unity-backgrounds package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntustudio-default-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntustudio-look package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The Canonical design team isn't going to have the new default
  wallpapers ready by UIF but target end of September so we are
  requesting an exception to upload those once they are available.

  
  The community wallpapers are also going to be available after UIF since the 
competition was not organized early enough
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-22-10-wallpaper-competition

  The results will be published on Sep 23th so we ask for permission to
  refresh our package with the new content by the next monday (26th)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1989359/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989359] Re: [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntustudio-default-settings -
22.10.5

---
ubuntustudio-default-settings (22.10.5) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * Point to new default wallpaper for kinetic (LP: #1989359)

 -- Erich Eickmeyer   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:20:51
-0700

** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Changed in: ubuntustudio-look (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989359

Title:
  [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

Status in ubuntu-mate-artwork package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-unity-backgrounds package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntustudio-default-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntustudio-look package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The Canonical design team isn't going to have the new default
  wallpapers ready by UIF but target end of September so we are
  requesting an exception to upload those once they are available.

  
  The community wallpapers are also going to be available after UIF since the 
competition was not organized early enough
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-22-10-wallpaper-competition

  The results will be published on Sep 23th so we ask for permission to
  refresh our package with the new content by the next monday (26th)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1989359/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1964036] Re: Firefox icon missing from panel following Kubuntu upgrade 20.04->22.04

2022-09-23 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964036

Title:
  Firefox icon missing from panel following Kubuntu upgrade 20.04->22.04

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  1) lsb_release -rd

  Description:Ubuntu Jammy Jellyfish (development branch)
  Release:22.04
  (Kubuntu Jammy live session in QEMU VM)

  2) apt-cache policy ubuntu-release-upgrader-core
  ubuntu-release-upgrader-core:
    Installed: 1:22.04.6

  3) expected

  (upgrade from Kubuntu 20.04.3 -> 22.04. Reboot.)

  * Firefox icon on panel to be intact.
  * Clicked icon launches browser.
  * Icon tooltip/mouse hover to describe application.

  4) happened instead

  * Icon is missing/replaced with a generic icon
  * Icon click produces error notification "Plasma Workspace - 
preferred://browser"
  * Icon tooltip/mouse hover appears, though is blank.

  Additional info:
  * firefox is still installed, works as expected.
  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu78
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-07 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210819.1)
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-18.18-generic 5.15.12
  Tags:  jammy dist-upgrade
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-18-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-03-07 (2 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  VarLogDistupgradeXorgFixuplog:
   INFO:root:/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running
   INFO:root:No xorg.conf, exiting
  _MarkForUpload: True

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1964036/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989359] Re: [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

2022-09-23 Thread Rudra Saraswat
We have already uploaded the new Ubuntu Unity wallpapers to proposed
(ubuntu-unity-backgrounds), and they should be present in today's ISO
build if there aren't any issues with transition of packages in proposed
to universe today.

** Also affects: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Rudra Saraswat (rs2009)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989359

Title:
  [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

Status in ubuntu-mate-artwork package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-unity-backgrounds package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntustudio-default-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntustudio-look package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The Canonical design team isn't going to have the new default
  wallpapers ready by UIF but target end of September so we are
  requesting an exception to upload those once they are available.

  
  The community wallpapers are also going to be available after UIF since the 
competition was not organized early enough
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-22-10-wallpaper-competition

  The results will be published on Sep 23th so we ask for permission to
  refresh our package with the new content by the next monday (26th)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1989359/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990263] Re: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

2022-09-23 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Removing block-proposed tag since the fix is in -proposed now.

** Tags removed: block-proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990263

Title:
  bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in libwnck3 package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

  Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at 
../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81
  81../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at 
../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81
  #1  0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591
  #2  0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192
  #3  bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137
  #4  0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #5  0x771eb8cf in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #6  0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #7  0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #8  0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290
  #9  0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, 
name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59
  #10 0x7733b905 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #11 0x772da559 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #12 0x772da783 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #13 0x77337e22 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #14 0x772da559 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #15 0x772da59d in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #17 0x77138098 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) 
at ./src/main.c:65

  Happens when running gnome-xorg/x11 session under gnome-shell 43.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990263/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990677] Re: Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

2022-09-23 Thread Bram Stolk
** Tags added: jammy

** Tags added: upgrade-software-version

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990677

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.0/

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See Debian #788791 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. To avoid this bug, it's
  recommended to restart your computer after applying the update.

  We are adding a postinst to tell Ubuntu's update-notifier to prompt
  the user to restart.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]

  This bug is fixed in the current development release.

  Fix is released: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-
  color-emoji/+bug/1989626

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/1990677/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989359] Re: [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

2022-09-23 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
@Seb FYI
This [1] upload is in the NEW queue right now.
But it refers to the old UIFe, not this one here - so I'm not accepting it 
right now in csae you want to fix this up.

[1]: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/625301973/ubuntu-
wallpapers_22.10.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.changes

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989359

Title:
  [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

Status in ubuntu-mate-artwork package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntustudio-default-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntustudio-look package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The Canonical design team isn't going to have the new default
  wallpapers ready by UIF but target end of September so we are
  requesting an exception to upload those once they are available.

  
  The community wallpapers are also going to be available after UIF since the 
competition was not organized early enough
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-22-10-wallpaper-competition

  The results will be published on Sep 23th so we ask for permission to
  refresh our package with the new content by the next monday (26th)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1989359/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989359] Re: [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

2022-09-23 Thread Erich Eickmeyer 
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989359

Title:
  [UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates

Status in ubuntu-mate-artwork package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntustudio-default-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntustudio-look package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The Canonical design team isn't going to have the new default
  wallpapers ready by UIF but target end of September so we are
  requesting an exception to upload those once they are available.

  
  The community wallpapers are also going to be available after UIF since the 
competition was not organized early enough
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-22-10-wallpaper-competition

  The results will be published on Sep 23th so we ask for permission to
  refresh our package with the new content by the next monday (26th)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1989359/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990677] Re: Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

2022-09-23 Thread Bram Stolk
** Description changed:

- Ubuntu LTS should be capable of display all current color emojis.
+ [Impact]
  
- For instance, these new emojis in unicode 15.0
+ Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
+ Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
+ new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new emoji
+ and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest Ubuntu
+ release.
  
+ Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.
+ 
+ Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link to
+ see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.0/
+ 
+ [Test Plan]
+ 
+ The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+ Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font after
+ the font has been updated. See Debian #788791 for instance. Perhaps this
+ is a bug with font caching. To avoid this bug, it's recommended to
+ restart your computer after applying the update.
+ 
+ We are adding a postinst to tell Ubuntu's update-notifier to prompt the
+ user to restart.
+ 
+ This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
+ and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official screenshots.
+ So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs team. There are no
+ translations here so no need to notify the Translations team.
+ 
+ [Other]
+ 
+ This bug is fixed in the current development release.
+ 
+ Fix is released: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-
+ color-emoji/+bug/1989626

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990677

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.0/

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See Debian #788791 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. To avoid this bug, it's
  recommended to restart your computer after applying the update.

  We are adding a postinst to tell Ubuntu's update-notifier to prompt
  the user to restart.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]

  This bug is fixed in the current development release.

  Fix is released: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-
  color-emoji/+bug/1989626

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/1990677/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990677] Re: Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

2022-09-23 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Also affects: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990677

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.0/

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See Debian #788791 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. To avoid this bug, it's
  recommended to restart your computer after applying the update.

  We are adding a postinst to tell Ubuntu's update-notifier to prompt
  the user to restart.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]

  This bug is fixed in the current development release.

  Fix is released: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-
  color-emoji/+bug/1989626

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/1990677/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990677] [NEW] Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

2022-09-23 Thread Bram Stolk
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu LTS should be capable of display all current color emojis.

For instance, these new emojis in unicode 15.0

https://emojipedia.org/google/15.0/

** Affects: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990677

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Ubuntu LTS should be capable of display all current color emojis.

  For instance, these new emojis in unicode 15.0

  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.0/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/1990677/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990673] Re: Default paragraph style should be "Text body"

2022-09-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 41 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2012-03-13T16:46:28+00:00 Rūdolfs Mazurs wrote:

The "Default" paragraph style is not a good idea for a default paragraph
style. A "Text body" would be more suitable.

Reason 1:
If "Default" is used as base style for all other paragraph styles. If a user 
includes this style somewhere in the document and then changes it through "Edit 
paragraph style" context menu command, like adding first line indent, it 
indents all other styles. This happens quite often, almost silently, and 
usually breaks appearance. 

Reason 2:
When composing text, the normal paragraphs will have style "Default", however, 
after the first heading, the style will change to "Text body" and stay such. It 
could be argued that text before any heading is not typical "Text body", but 
not all writers set heading styles the moment they are written, especially, if 
text is copied and pasted.

The first problem can be solved by linking all other styled to something
different than "Default" or making the default style of a new document
something other than "Default" (this sounds a bit confusing).

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990673/comments/0


On 2012-06-05T03:44:03+00:00 Sasha-libreoffice wrote:

Thanks for new idea
1. Problem may be in default template, not in program itself
2. Paragraph Style dialog, tag "Organizer", field "Next style"
so again, it is in template

So, this all may reformulated as this: "Use different template as
default"

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990673/comments/1


On 2012-07-02T21:18:42+00:00 Jmadero-dev wrote:

Can you provide a document that shows this behavior and what you mean by
"breaks appearance". I'm going to mark this as NEEDINFO, once you
provide the document please mark it as UNCONFIRMED and we'll take a look
at it again. Thanks for your input on LO, we appreciate it :)

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990673/comments/2


On 2013-05-26T22:32:28+00:00 Qa-admin-q wrote:

Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6
months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if
the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA
team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located 
here: 
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the
bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be
confirmed.


Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!


Warm Regards,
QA Team

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990673/comments/3


On 2013-07-08T21:23:04+00:00 Qa-admin-q wrote:

Dear Bug Submitter,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INVALID due to inactivity and a lack
of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and
confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the
latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable
release, we need the following information (please ignore any that
you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and
the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be
present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will 
attempt to reproduce the issue. 
Please do not:
a) respond via email 
b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top 
section of FDO

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990673/comments/4


On 2017-05-29T09:53:08+00:00 Thomas-lendo wrote:

I reopen this bug because I think it's worth discussing 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1940543] Re: Show Hidden Files does not persist and even resets during the same session

2022-09-23 Thread EA
I can confirm that this happens when I use File Chooser from Electron
apps.

The bug is described here:
https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/34706

** Bug watch added: github.com/electron/electron/issues #34706
   https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/34706

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940543

Title:
  Show Hidden Files does not persist and even resets during the same
  session

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Since 20.04 has been released, the option "Show Hidden Files" has
  never lasted long. It never persists over a reboot and even during the
  same session, it will just hide the files after some random (it seems
  random) interval.

  This happens for me on 3 different computers, all different builds.
  This happens on a vanilla install too. I have never been able to make
  "Show Hidden Files" last longer than an hourish, and never over a
  reboot.

  I work a lot in hidden files, this is mostly just frustrating to me
  since it happens randomly and when I am moving around a project, I
  have to keep toggling "Show Hidden Files" to get work done.

  I did have to reinstall `gnome-control-center` after a fresh install
  and updating Ubuntu 20.04 the latest version, I am not sure if that
  could help identify the issue but I have always had this issue on
  20.04 so I am doubtful.

  I did this running:
  ```
  sudo apt install --reinstall gnome-control-center
  ```

  I had to reinstall this since Settings was no longer available after
  the system was updated (fresh install with `sudo apt update && sudo
  apt upgrade` is what broken it for me to have to reinstall it.

  I even tried using:

  ```
  gsettings set org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser show-hidden true
  ```
  but the issue still happens.

  Also, not sure why nautilus is installed, I thought 20.04 was gnome?
  Again, this is a fresh install (15 days old)

  ```
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
  Release:  20.04
  ```

  ```
  $ apt-cache policy nautilus
  nautilus:
Installed: 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:3.36.1.1-1ubuntu2 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  ```

  ```
  apt-cache policy gnome
  gnome:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:3.30+2
Version table:
   1:3.30+2 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
  ```

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-27.29~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 19 09:46:31 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1280, 1393)'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'default-folder-viewer' b"'list-view'"
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b"['name', 'size', 
'type', 'owner', 'group', 'permissions', 'where', 'date_modified', 
'date_modified_with_time', 'date_accessed', 'recency', 'starred', 
'detailed_type']"
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (15 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1940543/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2022-09-23 Thread Martin D. Weinberg
Hm, perhaps I misremembered the tweak. I do recall that 22.04 did not
work initially.  I applied the dconf menu setting and it started to
work.  I reset the dconf legacy menu setting just now and it still works
(i.e. no shrinking after maximization).  So I'm mystified . . .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

Status in GNOME Terminal:
  New
Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  1. Open a gnome-terminal window (from the launcher or by pressing Ctrl + Alt 
+ T)
  2. "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 24; columns 80;"
  3. Maximize the window (by clicking on the maximize button, or double 
clicking the title bar, or dragging the window up to the panel)
  4. Do the same again to un-maximize the window
  5. Now "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 23; columns 79;"

  Each time I do this, the window keeps getting one character shorter
  and one character narrower!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar  6 10:22:46 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-04-15 (1421 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (128 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1940543] Re: Show Hidden Files does not persist and even resets during the same session

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940543

Title:
  Show Hidden Files does not persist and even resets during the same
  session

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Since 20.04 has been released, the option "Show Hidden Files" has
  never lasted long. It never persists over a reboot and even during the
  same session, it will just hide the files after some random (it seems
  random) interval.

  This happens for me on 3 different computers, all different builds.
  This happens on a vanilla install too. I have never been able to make
  "Show Hidden Files" last longer than an hourish, and never over a
  reboot.

  I work a lot in hidden files, this is mostly just frustrating to me
  since it happens randomly and when I am moving around a project, I
  have to keep toggling "Show Hidden Files" to get work done.

  I did have to reinstall `gnome-control-center` after a fresh install
  and updating Ubuntu 20.04 the latest version, I am not sure if that
  could help identify the issue but I have always had this issue on
  20.04 so I am doubtful.

  I did this running:
  ```
  sudo apt install --reinstall gnome-control-center
  ```

  I had to reinstall this since Settings was no longer available after
  the system was updated (fresh install with `sudo apt update && sudo
  apt upgrade` is what broken it for me to have to reinstall it.

  I even tried using:

  ```
  gsettings set org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser show-hidden true
  ```
  but the issue still happens.

  Also, not sure why nautilus is installed, I thought 20.04 was gnome?
  Again, this is a fresh install (15 days old)

  ```
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
  Release:  20.04
  ```

  ```
  $ apt-cache policy nautilus
  nautilus:
Installed: 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:3.36.1.1-1ubuntu2 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  ```

  ```
  apt-cache policy gnome
  gnome:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:3.30+2
Version table:
   1:3.30+2 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
  ```

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-27.29~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 19 09:46:31 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1280, 1393)'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'default-folder-viewer' b"'list-view'"
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b"['name', 'size', 
'type', 'owner', 'group', 'permissions', 'where', 'date_modified', 
'date_modified_with_time', 'date_accessed', 'recency', 'starred', 
'detailed_type']"
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (15 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1940543/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990673] Re: Default paragraph style should be "Text body"

2022-09-23 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #47295
   https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295

** Also affects: df-libreoffice via
   https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990673

Title:
  Default paragraph style should be "Text body"

Status in LibreOffice:
  Unknown
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Summary: when creating a new Writer document, the first paragraph has
  the style "Default Paragraph Style", which leads to surprising
  behaviour.

  This bug has been reported in upstream [1], but at least some devs
  seem to believe that this is a packaging issue [2] so it might make
  sense to be fixed in downstream. Ideally fixed in upstream as well.

  [1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
  [2] even though this issue is seemingly present on all platforms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1990673/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990673] [NEW] Default paragraph style should be "Text body"

2022-09-23 Thread Rūdolfs Mazurs
Public bug reported:

Summary: when creating a new Writer document, the first paragraph has
the style "Default Paragraph Style", which leads to surprising
behaviour.

This bug has been reported in upstream [1], but at least some devs seem
to believe that this is a packaging issue [2] so it might make sense to
be fixed in downstream. Ideally fixed in upstream as well.

[1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
[2] even though this issue is seemingly present on all platforms

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990673

Title:
  Default paragraph style should be "Text body"

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Summary: when creating a new Writer document, the first paragraph has
  the style "Default Paragraph Style", which leads to surprising
  behaviour.

  This bug has been reported in upstream [1], but at least some devs
  seem to believe that this is a packaging issue [2] so it might make
  sense to be fixed in downstream. Ideally fixed in upstream as well.

  [1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
  [2] even though this issue is seemingly present on all platforms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990673/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1886653] Re: cups-pki-expired

2022-09-23 Thread Thomas Kalinowski
I tried adding the option 'AllowExpiredCerts' and setting it 'true'. It
did not change anything for me: The printer state is set to 'Stopped'
with status message 'cups-pki-expired' as soon as I send a job.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886653

Title:
  cups-pki-expired

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The printer always goes to stopped state in Ubuntu 20.04. Print
  properties window has status message saying: "cups-pki-expired". I
  have HP color laserjet m552, which Ubuntu discovers directly from the
  local network and configures automatically.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: cups 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-40.44-generic 5.4.44
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-40-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jul  7 14:40:00 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-03 (247 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  Lpstat: device for HP_Color_LaserJet_M552_5F80BF_: 
implicitclass://HP_Color_LaserJet_M552_5F80BF_/
  MachineType: LENOVO 81H1
  Papersize: a4
  PpdFiles: Error: command ['fgrep', '-H', '*NickName', 
'/etc/cups/ppd/HP_Color_LaserJet_M552_5F80BF_.ppd'] failed with exit code 2: 
grep: /etc/cups/ppd/HP_Color_LaserJet_M552_5F80BF_.ppd: Permission denied
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.4.0-40-generic 
root=UUID=7f92666a-65f8-485e-b998-046c2c596aa5 ro rootflags=subvol=@ quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: cups
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-03-28 (100 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/17/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: 8PCN45WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40700 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ideapad 530S-14ARR
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr8PCN45WW:bd08/17/2018:svnLENOVO:pn81H1:pvrLenovoideapad530S-14ARR:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40700WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoideapad530S-14ARR:
  dmi.product.family: ideapad 530S-14ARR
  dmi.product.name: 81H1
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_81H1_BU_idea_FM_ideapad 530S-14ARR
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo ideapad 530S-14ARR
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1886653/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990669] [NEW] Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2022-09-23 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported:

Please sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Changelog entries since current kinetic version 43.0-1:

libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262)
(LP: #1990263)

 -- Dmitry Shachnev   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49
+0300

** Affects: libwnck3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

** Changed in: libwnck3 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990669

Title:
  Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Please sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

  Changelog entries since current kinetic version 43.0-1:

  libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

* Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262)
  (LP: #1990263)

   -- Dmitry Shachnev   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49
  +0300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990669/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1969303] Re: "No package to remove" error when attempting to uninstall

2022-09-23 Thread Aslan Gencer
I have the "Handbrake" (ghb) version 1.2.1 installed. The version information 
is from the about menu of the application. 
"Ubuntu Software" application shows "Handbrake" installed and reports its 
version as 1.5.1+ds1 which is incorrect. This is happening possibly because my 
Ubuntu installation is an upgrade from previous version(s).

I am unable to remove "Handbrake" via the "Ubuntu Software" application.
It shows "Unable to remove Handbrake: no packages to remove" when the
red thrash bin icon (remove) is clicked on.

The output of "apt list ghb" is empty and "sudo apt remove ghb" returns
"E: Unable to locate package ghb"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969303

Title:
  "No package to remove" error when attempting to uninstall

Status in GNOME Software:
  Fix Released
Status in snap-store-desktop:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * The Ubuntu repository version of gnome-software in 22.04 does not
 allow a user to uninstall an application.
 For new users this could be be construed as disconcerting
 allowing only installing apps without the ability to
 remove those apps later if required.
 
 This SRU is applicable only to the gnome-software application
 installed from the repository and not the branded 
 ubuntu-store snap that is the default in Ubuntu (but not in 
 flavours such as Ubuntu Budgie)
 
 This fix for gnome-software has been backported from the
 v41 version of ubuntu's snap-store.
 
 The fixed software now checks for the status of a deb package
 installed - either manually installed or automatically as
 part of a distro install.  Previously this check was not done
 and gnome-software defaulted to not allowing the package to
 be uninstalled.
 The new status check allows gnome-software to evaluate that
 the package can be uninstalled.

  [Test Plan]

   * Choose a package from the installed list in gnome-software.
 Click the trash icon.  Note the error message that the package
 cannot be removed.
   * install gnome-software from the proposed repository. Logout and
 login.
 Repeat the trash icon click step above.  This time the package
 can be removed.  Confirm via either your distro menu or searching in
 GNOME Overview (if you are using gnome-software from the repository) that 
the
 application has been successfully removed.

   * Perform additional testing such as installing applications from the 
repository
 (change the source to "Ubuntu (deb)") and then deleting the application.
 
   * Perform additional testing such as installing applications from the snap
 repository (change the source to "Snap") and then deleting the application.

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The code changed is specific to 'packagekit' repos i.e. debian based repos.
 Thus it is sensitive to possible regressions when installing & removing 
apps.
 
   * The patch itself is well tested since it was backported to the ubuntu 
snap-store
 several weeks ago and has been rolled out.  No adverse issues has been 
reported.
 
   * The risk would be that there could be additional changes to the snap-store
 that was not incorporated in gnome-software possibly producing different
 results.
 
   * The additional regression tests in the Test Plan will reveal this.

  
  [Other Info]
   
   * There is no need to backport this to Kinetic since a revised version
 of the patch has been upstreamed (GNOME Team) and is in the kinetic 
version.


  

  
  On a fresh install of Ubuntu 22.04, ubuntu-store won't uninstall any 
application

  If you want to uninstall a software, there is an error message : "no
  package to remove"

  No problem to uninstall this same software with synaptic for example

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1969303/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989744] Re: KB/Mouse use causing short system freezes. Happens after resume

2022-09-23 Thread Erik Meitner
I can provide a Gnome System Profiler capture if that would help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989744

Title:
  KB/Mouse use causing short system freezes. Happens after resume

Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Summary:
  My laptop gets into a an odd state after resuming from sleep where, depending 
on user activity,
  the entire system freezes every 20 seconds for about 1/2 second.

  This does not happen after every resume. After upgrading to 22.04 was much 
less 
  frequent than it was with 21.10. It seems that after some recent update it is 
happening
  more frequently again. Maybe one every 4 suspend/resume cycles.

  Normal operation can be restored by rebooting or sometimes suspending
  and waking.

  The triggering event is complex:
  * The pointer or pointer and keyboard must be actively used
  * Just typing with no mouse use will not cause it to happen.
  * Just moving the mouse pointer around but keeping it inside the same GUI 
element(a 
textarea for example) will not cause it
  * Typing for more than 20 seconds and then moving the mouse one pixel will 
cause it.
  * Moving the mouse around constantly for over 20 seconds will cause it to 
happen only 
if: a key on the keyboard was hit OR the pointer moved over a new GUI 
element(window 
border, button, even frames in a web page)
  * It is not application specific. 

  
  The following is usually logged(not always though) when the freeze happens:
  ==> ~/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.1.log <==
  [1214998.964] (II) event5  - TPPS/2 Elan TrackPoint: SYN_DROPPED event - some 
input events have been lost.

  ==> /var/log/syslog <==
  Sep 15 08:23:51 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (II) event5  - TPPS/2 
Elan TrackPoint: SYN_DROPPED event - some input events have been lost.

  Sep 15 08:50:34 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (II) event5  - TPPS/2 
Elan TrackPoint: SYN_DROPPED event - some input events have been lost.
  Sep 15 08:50:07 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (EE) client bug: timer 
event4 trackpoint: scheduled expiry is in the past (-317ms), your system is too 
slow
  Sep 15 08:50:07 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (EE) client bug: timer 
event4 trackpoint: scheduled expiry is in the past (-301ms), your system is too 
slow
  Sep 15 08:50:07 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (EE) client bug: timer 
event4 trackpoint: scheduled expiry is in the past (-288ms), your system is too 
slow
  Sep 15 08:50:07 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (EE) client bug: timer 
event4 trackpoint: scheduled expiry is in the past (-278ms), your system is too 
slow
  Sep 15 08:50:07 krug /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[3264]: (EE) WARNING: log rate 
limit exceeded (5 msgs per 360ms). Discarding future messages.

  System Information:

  Lenovo Thinkpad P15
  Model: 20YQ-003WUS 
  OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
  Kernel: 5.15.0-46-generic

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  515.65.01  Wed Jul 20 
14:00:58 UTC 2022
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Sep 15 10:13:26 2022
  DistUpgraded: 2022-06-30 16:37:37,968 DEBUG icon theme changed, re-reading
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   virtualbox/6.1.34, 5.15.0-43-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/6.1.34, 5.15.0-46-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation TigerLake-H GT1 [UHD Graphics] [8086:9a60] (rev 01) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo TigerLake-H GT1 [UHD Graphics] [17aa:22d8]
   NVIDIA Corporation GA107GLM [RTX A2000 Mobile] [10de:25b8] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo GA107GLM [RTX A2000 Mobile] [17aa:22d8]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-03 (195 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223)
  MachineType: LENOVO 20YQ003WUS
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990526] Re: [FFe] UDI snap no longer strictly needed for WSL OOBE

2022-09-23 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Same as the other one - a bit late, but let's go with it. Approved
(since it's just a seed change).

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990526

Title:
  [FFe] UDI snap no longer strictly needed for WSL OOBE

Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Ubuntu Desktop Installer (UDI, for short) package implementing the WSL
  OOBE has been ported to Windows and the WSL application is able to
  launch the OOBE running as a native Win32 application, instead of
  relying on WSLg to display the OOBE.

  That implies in the possibility of replacing UDI by Subiquity snap,
  which results in a smaller rootfs image (besides an enhanced
  experience due native rendering on graphics - instead of depending on
  RDP as it is currently with the OOBE running inside Ubuntu).

  Fixing this would require:

  - replace UDI by Subiquity snaps in the WSL seed;
  - updating the wsl-setup package to the latest upstream (which is able to 
mount and launch Subiquity from its snap) LP: #1990426 .

  Following the approach above won't have effects outside of WSL.

  Kinetic being not an LTS is a good release to receive the fix for this
  first, as it affects a small audience of Ubuntu WSL community, giving
  us time to learn from them before backporting this to Jammy early next
  cycle.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1990526/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990423] Re: gnome-shell >> 43

2022-09-23 Thread Marcos Alano
I'm having the same problem. I checked and the extension itself has
support for GNOME 43, that's just a problem with package relationship
(depends on).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990423

Title:
  gnome-shell >> 43

Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Wondering if will it be still supported for gnome-shell version 43 and
  above? especially in kinetic kudu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1990423/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990423] Re: gnome-shell >> 43

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990423

Title:
  gnome-shell >> 43

Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Wondering if will it be still supported for gnome-shell version 43 and
  above? especially in kinetic kudu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1990423/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1988484]

2022-09-23 Thread Nate-b
I can't find it anymore, sorry. :/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988484

Title:
  Holding down volume keys sometimes crashes xorg

Status in X.Org X server:
  Won't Fix
Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Running KDE 5.24.4 on Ubuntu Jammy. On a few occasions, I've been able
  to trigger a complete desktop crash by pressing and holding the volume
  keys on my laptop.

  Steps to reproduce:
  1) Have something play audio - typically youtube in a browser
  2) Hold down Fn+F3 or Fn+F2 to increase/decrease volume. 

  Crash.

  
  More information:

  You may find more detail in crashes from this machine at
  
https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/39741994cfebc02a360b6373cda1e148b8bca640b31a1aec7727d4862d5bbdf25251b0221ae0686ac25e1f415fd9a5a73a8a95d904dac3ba9a31985bb2ec824d

  The last time this happened was a week or so back - here's the crash
  report
  https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/8bd96e8c-2540-11ed-97b9-fa163e993415

  Todays crash hasn't finished being processed yet so I can't link to
  it.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xserver-xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Thu Sep  1 23:16:03 2022
  DistUpgraded: 2022-03-29 22:59:20,069 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: 
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   akvcam/1.2.2, 5.13.0-30-generic, x86_64: installed
   akvcam/1.2.2, 5.13.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
   akvcam/1.2.2, 5.15.0-43-generic, x86_64: installed
   akvcam/1.2.2, 5.15.0-46-generic, x86_64: installed
   akvcam/1.2.2, 5.15.0-47-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 [8086:1616] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo HD Graphics 5500 [17aa:5034]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-11 (812 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  MachineType: LENOVO 20BV001BUK
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.15.0-46-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash intel_idle.max_cstate=4 
vt.handoff=7
  RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-03-29 (156 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/14/2019
  dmi.bios.release: 1.37
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: JBET73WW (1.37 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 20BV001BUK
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: 0B98417 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: None
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.4
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrJBET73WW(1.37):bd08/14/2019:br1.37:efr1.4:svnLENOVO:pn20BV001BUK:pvrThinkPadT450:rvnLENOVO:rn20BV001BUK:rvr0B98417WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20BV_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadT450:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T450
  dmi.product.name: 20BV001BUK
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20BV_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad T450
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T450
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.5-0ubuntu0.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 22.0.5-0ubuntu0.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.17-2build1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/1988484/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990382] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic

2022-09-23 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release

   * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744
     and a test build is currently available at
   https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages

   * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418

   * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently
  released in bionic.

  [Scope]

   * Backport of
  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1

   * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official
  build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_023821_f6636@/log.gz
  * [arm64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_015824_12ef6@/log.gz
  * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220922_104328_3c444@/log.gz
  * [i386] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/i386/libr/libreoffice/20220921_150152_8877b@/log.gz
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220921_140441_6e26b@/log.gz
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220921_134627_506c7@/log.gz

   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite
  were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented
  by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice

  [Regression Potential]

   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as
  described above should provide reasonable confidence that no
  regressions sneaked in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1852911] Re: CriticalPowerAction=Suspend should be supported

2022-09-23 Thread Andrea Gadotti
I have found a (dirty?) workaround for this. The idea is simple: use a
udev rule to suspend the laptop before UPower shuts it down. This can be
done by creating a file /etc/udev/rules.d/99-lowbat.rules with the
following content:

# Suspend the system when battery level drops to 5% or lower
SUBSYSTEM=="power_supply", ATTR{status}=="Discharging", 
ATTR{capacity}=="[0-5]", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl suspend"

You can of course tune the threshold.

This method seems to work well for me. If you want to use a threshold
that's lower than the UPower one, *I think* you could set the
PercentageAction parameter to 0% or 1% in /etc/UPower/UPower.conf,
although I'm not 100% sure this is a good idea (the disclaimer at the
beginning of the file seems to discourage users from directly modifying
the file).


Reference: 
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/laptop#Hibernate_on_low_battery_level


On a side note, I definitely wish this bug could be addressed. It's not normal 
that a computer just shuts down and makes you lose your work when there's still 
battery. Also note that afaik there's currently no way to enable hibernation 
with full disk encryption, so this limitation of UPower will become 
increasingly serious as more and more users will make the (right) choice to use 
FDE.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852911

Title:
  CriticalPowerAction=Suspend should be supported

Status in Upower:
  New
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The action to take when the battery is critical can only be one of the
  following:

  # Possible values are:
  # PowerOff
  # Hibernate
  # HybridSleep

  Adding Suspend to that list makes perfect sense. My laptop is
  currently powering off on low power which is useless as I'll be losing
  my work anyway. Might as well suspend and allow me to notice that and
  connect a charger. If the thinking is that suspend uses power I can
  set a high enough threshold to give me some margin.

  The failovers are:

  # If HybridSleep isn't available, Hibernate will be used
  # If Hibernate isn't available, PowerOff will be used

  I'd argue Suspend should actually come before PowerOff in that list.
  For most laptop users having their computer suspend because they
  didn't notice the battery was running out is very easy to fix and
  takes no time. They'll just connect the charger. If however the
  computer needs to be completely rebooted, not only does that take a
  lot more time it will very likely cause lost work.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: upower 0.99.10-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-32.34-generic 5.0.21
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-32-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Sun Nov 17 14:32:13 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-05-09 (191 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: upower
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/upower/+bug/1852911/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990207] Re: "Night Light unavailable" in Settings (but the quick settings toggle for it works)

2022-09-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-control-center
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990207

Title:
  "Night Light unavailable" in Settings (but the quick settings toggle
  for it works)

Status in gnome-control-center:
  Fix Released
Status in Mutter:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  "Night Light unavailable" in Settings (but the quick settings toggle
  for it works).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1990207/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2022-09-23 Thread Peter Ryan
@martin-weinberg-5 I tried the dconf write as you suggested, and I did
alt-F2 and "r" to restart Gnome, but it doesn't seem to have changed
anything.

***As I wrote the above, I remembered that I'd left some terminal
windows open during the process. I've re-tested but closed all windows
before restarting Gnome and it *does* resolve the problem. However, I
now have a menu bar on all my terminal windows. (screen grab attached
for the benefit of others).

For the moment, I'll reset that entry:
dconf reset /org/gnome/terminal/legacy/headerbar

..but hopefully that will help a little in figuring out where the
underlying bug is.


** Attachment added: "Screenshot of gnome terminal with headerbar set to @mb 
false via dconf"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+attachment/5618395/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-09-23%2012-21-45.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

Status in GNOME Terminal:
  New
Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  1. Open a gnome-terminal window (from the launcher or by pressing Ctrl + Alt 
+ T)
  2. "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 24; columns 80;"
  3. Maximize the window (by clicking on the maximize button, or double 
clicking the title bar, or dragging the window up to the panel)
  4. Do the same again to un-maximize the window
  5. Now "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 23; columns 79;"

  Each time I do this, the window keeps getting one character shorter
  and one character narrower!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar  6 10:22:46 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-04-15 (1421 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (128 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1983778] Re: Major security issue in Ubuntu Desktop default config - Removable Media

2022-09-23 Thread Marc Deslauriers
I personally don't think the reasons you've listed above are good enough
to change the default setting, but please file a bug with the upstream
project and you can convince them to change them:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues

Once you've filed a bug with the GNOME project, please paste the bug
number here.

Thanks!

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983778

Title:
  Major security issue in Ubuntu Desktop default config - Removable
  Media

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  There is a MAJOR SECURITY VULNERABILITY in Ubuntu Desktop since
  release 18.04 !

  Recently I used Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and noticed that the issue still
  exist!

  
  I don’t know the reason for it, but default values for “Removable Media” are 
VERY Risky!
  It will automatically run the software which is attached to the removable 
media.
  Why? Why has Ubuntu still didn’t disable that option?

  
  The following is the default configuration (the “bad” configuration):
  https://imgur.com/XXXQlV2

  The following is the configuration which Ubuntu should be having (it is the 
fix to the problem):
  https://imgur.com/a/0JeM6ve

  Please change the default configurations for Ubuntu!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1983778/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1776800] Re: Unable to start snap applications if user's home directory is not /home/$USER

2022-09-23 Thread Alberto Mardegan
Small update: we have now merged a change that allows snaps to work on
system where the users' home directories are not /home// but
/home///https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1620771
instead.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776800

Title:
  Unable to start snap applications if user's home directory is not
  /home/$USER

Status in snapd:
  In Progress
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lxd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Users with home directories in /home/$USER can run snap application,
  but users in /home/users/$USER can't.

  nate@WorkstationC:~$ snap --version
  snap2.32.8+18.04
  snapd   2.32.8+18.04
  series  16
  ubuntu  18.04
  kernel  4.15.0-22-generic
  nate@WorkstationC:~$ echo $HOME
  /home/users/nate
  nate@WorkstationC:~$ which hello-world
  /snap/bin/hello-world
  nate@WorkstationC:~$ hello-world
  cannot create nate data directory: /home/users/nate/snap/hello-world/27: 
Permission denied

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1776800/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990384] Re: Super + L doesn't work

2022-09-23 Thread Galacticalcat
I can confirm what you said. However, I didn't have this problem after
installing my Ubuntu. It started randomly (probably after an update). Is
there a solution to it, other than reinstalling my Ubuntu?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990384

Title:
  Super + L doesn't work

Status in gnome-screensaver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
   Neither does changing the shortkey to the lockscreen.  In the
  journalctl I get this: Couldn't lock screen:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBuscreen:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
  org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not provided by any .service
  fError.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not
  provided by any .service files

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.1-13ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 21 12:04:17 2022
  GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No
  GnomeSessionInhibitors: None
  GsettingsGnomeSession:
   org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 300
   org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-08-16 (35 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1990384/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990444] Re: firefox snap took 20 minutes to update

2022-09-23 Thread Olivier Tilloy
That's fair enough, the problem appeared as being with firefox itself,
even though the underlying cause was the outage of the snap store
services.

I'm not really sure how the user experience could be improved in case of
an outage. I'm opening a snapd task for this bug though, let's see what
the snapd team thinks about this kind of situation (which I agree is
very puzzling and a bad experience from a user perspective).

** Also affects: snapd
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990444

Title:
  firefox snap took 20 minutes to update

Status in snapd:
  New
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I logged and firefox was unavailable, no indication of update, nothing.
  When I tried to launch firefox I was invited to install it BUT I klnow it's 
installed, so I tried to install it but it said to me I needed to 'snap 
refresh', I tried to snap refresh but it indicated that everything was up to 
date. I tried to uninstall/reinstall the firefox snap and at this moment, 
  I got the indication that the update was in progress since 15 MINUTES ! Then 
I tried to remove the snap because I was sure it's bugged : in 20.04 firefox 
never took more than 2 mins to update and my machine BUT after 20 minutes 
firefox launched... wtf ?

  I'm an ubuntu user since circa 2005 and I believe firefox was already
  the default browser then, this is the worse user experience I've ever
  had.

  1/ I never selected auto-update, let me update when I want : being blocked 15 
MINUTES by the OS is not a good user experience, I know this is accepted by 
Windows users but I prefer to use Ubuntu
  2/ If you want to update tell me you're updating not that the application is 
not installed : really not a good idea if you want your users to trust you

  I've waited 6 months after 22.04 release to migrate from 20.04 because
  I don't want to have this kind of bugs, I hope you do something really
  quick because this is not at the level of quality expected by your
  users.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1990444/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990263] Re: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

2022-09-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: libwnck3 (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990263

Title:
  bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in libwnck3 package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1

  Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at 
../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81
  81../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at 
../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81
  #1  0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591
  #2  0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192
  #3  bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137
  #4  0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #5  0x771eb8cf in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #6  0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #7  0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  #8  0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at 
./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290
  #9  0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, 
name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59
  #10 0x7733b905 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #11 0x772da559 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #12 0x772da783 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #13 0x77337e22 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #14 0x772da559 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #15 0x772da59d in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #17 0x77138098 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) 
at ./src/main.c:65

  Happens when running gnome-xorg/x11 session under gnome-shell 43.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990263/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990646] [NEW] Report a bug

2022-09-23 Thread Anatolii Shapchuk
Public bug reported:

Report a bug

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Sep 23 12:17:07 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 [8086:5917] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 [103c:8544]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-23 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek Bluetooth 
4.2 Adapter
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04ca:7092 Lite-On Technology Corp. HP TrueVision HD 
Camera
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 3044:eac6 MIIIW MIIIW USB Receiver
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: HP HP Laptop 14-df0xxx
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-48-generic 
root=UUID=f923f152-9747-4348-b5c2-f8d1f6320e44 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/23/2021
dmi.bios.release: 15.64
dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
dmi.bios.version: F.64
dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 8544
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: KBC Version 74.37
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 74.37
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.64:bd07/23/2021:br15.64:efr74.37:svnHP:pnHPLaptop14-df0xxx:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn8544:rvrKBCVersion74.37:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:sku4XN68UA#ABA:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV HP Notebook
dmi.product.name: HP Laptop 14-df0xxx
dmi.product.sku: 4XN68UA#ABA
dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
dmi.sys.vendor: HP
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.5-0ubuntu0.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubuntu wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990646

Title:
  Report a bug

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Report a bug

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Sep 23 12:17:07 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 [8086:5917] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 [103c:8544]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-23 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek 
Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04ca:7092 Lite-On Technology Corp. HP TrueVision HD 
Camera
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 3044:eac6 MIIIW MIIIW USB Receiver
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: HP HP Laptop 14-df0xxx
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-48-generic 
root=UUID=f923f152-9747-4348-b5c2-f8d1f6320e44 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/23/2021
  dmi.bios.release: 15.64
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.64
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 8544
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 74.37
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 74.37
  dmi.modalias: 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990647] [NEW] Report a bug

2022-09-23 Thread Anatolii Shapchuk
Public bug reported:

Report a bug

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Sep 23 12:17:07 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 [8086:5917] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 [103c:8544]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-23 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek Bluetooth 
4.2 Adapter
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04ca:7092 Lite-On Technology Corp. HP TrueVision HD 
Camera
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 3044:eac6 MIIIW MIIIW USB Receiver
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: HP HP Laptop 14-df0xxx
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-48-generic 
root=UUID=f923f152-9747-4348-b5c2-f8d1f6320e44 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/23/2021
dmi.bios.release: 15.64
dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
dmi.bios.version: F.64
dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 8544
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: KBC Version 74.37
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 74.37
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.64:bd07/23/2021:br15.64:efr74.37:svnHP:pnHPLaptop14-df0xxx:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn8544:rvrKBCVersion74.37:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:sku4XN68UA#ABA:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV HP Notebook
dmi.product.name: HP Laptop 14-df0xxx
dmi.product.sku: 4XN68UA#ABA
dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
dmi.sys.vendor: HP
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.5-0ubuntu0.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubuntu wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990647

Title:
  Report a bug

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Report a bug

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Sep 23 12:17:07 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 [8086:5917] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 [103c:8544]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-23 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek 
Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04ca:7092 Lite-On Technology Corp. HP TrueVision HD 
Camera
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 3044:eac6 MIIIW MIIIW USB Receiver
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: HP HP Laptop 14-df0xxx
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-48-generic 
root=UUID=f923f152-9747-4348-b5c2-f8d1f6320e44 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/23/2021
  dmi.bios.release: 15.64
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.64
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 8544
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 74.37
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 74.37
  dmi.modalias: 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990384] Re: Super + L doesn't work

2022-09-23 Thread Harro Mirbach
This bug affects not only the Super-L key.
Lock  screen doesn't work at all:
- resuming from hibernating will come back with unlocked session
- resuming from suspend to RAM will come back with unlocked session

It happens after the upgrade from focal to jammy and aswell after a
complete new installation of jammy.

syslog has this ERROR message:
Sep 21 14:48:37 ultrabook budgie-panel[2492]: UserIndicatorWindow.vala:379: 
Cannot lock screen: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not provided by any .service files

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990384

Title:
  Super + L doesn't work

Status in gnome-screensaver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
   Neither does changing the shortkey to the lockscreen.  In the
  journalctl I get this: Couldn't lock screen:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBuscreen:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
  org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not provided by any .service
  fError.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not
  provided by any .service files

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.1-13ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 21 12:04:17 2022
  GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No
  GnomeSessionInhibitors: None
  GsettingsGnomeSession:
   org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 300
   org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-08-16 (35 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1990384/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990384] Re: Super + L doesn't work

2022-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990384

Title:
  Super + L doesn't work

Status in gnome-screensaver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
   Neither does changing the shortkey to the lockscreen.  In the
  journalctl I get this: Couldn't lock screen:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBuscreen:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
  org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not provided by any .service
  fError.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Shell.ScreenShield was not
  provided by any .service files

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.1-13ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 21 12:04:17 2022
  GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No
  GnomeSessionInhibitors: None
  GsettingsGnomeSession:
   org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 300
   org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-08-16 (35 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1990384/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1593407] Re: Guest session cannot run snaps

2022-09-23 Thread AG-Ubrio
Hi Alberto, the audit log output when starting firefox is the following:

Sep 23 06:49:13 ub22mate audit[5486]: AVC apparmor="DENIED"
operation="mkdir" profile="/snap/snapd/16778/usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine"
name="/tmp/guest-tikhhx/" pid=5486 comm="snap-confine"
requested_mask="c" denied_mask="c" fsuid=997 ouid=997

The permissions of the created directory are:
guest-tikhhx@ub22mate:~$ ls -la /tmp/guest-tikhhx/snap/firefox/
insgesamt 0
drwxr-xr-x 4 guest-tikhhx guest-tikhhx 100 Sep 23 06:49 .
drwx-- 3 guest-tikhhx guest-tikhhx  60 Sep 23 06:49 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 guest-tikhhx guest-tikhhx  40 Sep 23 06:49 1860
drwxr-xr-x 2 guest-tikhhx guest-tikhhx  40 Sep 23 06:49 common
lrwxrwxrwx 1 guest-tikhhx guest-tikhhx   4 Sep 23 06:49 current -> 1860

And just to be clear: this seems to be a Snap problem, not a Firefox
problem, as the Snaps of Chromium, Opera and Skype show same behaviour.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593407

Title:
  Guest session cannot run snaps

Status in Light Display Manager:
  Confirmed
Status in Snappy:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in Desktop:
  New
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in firefox source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in lightdm source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I'm using Ubuntu 16.04.

  The guest session cannot execute snaps, because of a permission error.
  The LightDM's guest session AppArmor profile is not allowing access to /snap 
and other needed files and folders.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1593407/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1969291] Re: apport-collect & ubuntu-bug failing to switch to firefox

2022-09-23 Thread Chris Guiver
First install today using current Lubuntu daily..  (20220919)

Post install (not logged on QA-tracker though as not part of install
test) and I was trying to open xscreensaver to confirm Leok's bug
report... but it won't open. I explore /var/crash and crash report was
there, so used `ubuntu-bug` hoping for it to simply finding the bug
report (intending to click 'affects me too'), but

instead of opening firefox though, I get

/usr/bin/xdg-open: 882: firefox: not found
/usr/bin/xdg-open: 882: firefox: not found
xdg-open: no method available for opening 
'https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+filebug/1e63d072-3b07-11ed-b7a8-d485646cd9a4?'

FULL PASTE of terminal follows
---
guiverc@svp11216cgb:~$ ubuntu-bug 
/var/crash/_usr_bin_xscreensaver-settings.1000.crash

*** Send problem report to the developers?

After the problem report has been sent, please fill out the form in the
automatically opened web browser.

What would you like to do? Your options are:
  S: Send report (1.1 MB)
  V: View report
  K: Keep report file for sending later or copying to somewhere else
  I: Cancel and ignore future crashes of this program version
  C: Cancel
Please choose (S/V/K/I/C): s

*** Collecting problem information

The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the
application. This might take a few minutes.


*** Uploading problem information

The collected information is being sent to the bug tracking system.
This might take a few minutes.
99%

*** To continue, you must visit the following URL:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+filebug/1e63d072-3b07-11ed-b7a8-d485646cd9a4?

You can launch a browser now, or copy this URL into a browser on another
computer.

Choices:
  1: Launch a browser now
  C: Cancel
Please choose (1/C): 1
/usr/bin/xdg-open: 882: firefox: not found
/usr/bin/xdg-open: 882: firefox: not found
xdg-open: no method available for opening 
'https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+filebug/1e63d072-3b07-11ed-b7a8-d485646cd9a4?'
guiverc@svp11216cgb:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969291

Title:
  apport-collect & ubuntu-bug failing to switch to firefox

Status in xdg-utils package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In attempting to file a bug report on Lubuntu jammy ISO 
  (QA-test installed yesterday using ISO 2020-04-15)

  --
  guiverc@dc7700-2re:~$ apport-collect 1969290
  The authorization page:
   
(https://launchpad.net/+authorize-token?oauth_token=6K7rwSbKHlbLWmkK65sj_permission=DESKTOP_INTEGRATION)
  should be opening in your browser. Use your browser to authorize
  this program to access Launchpad on your behalf.
  Waiting to hear from Launchpad about your decision...
  /usr/bin/xdg-open: 882: firefox: not found
  /usr/bin/xdg-open: 882: firefox: not found
  xdg-open: no method available for opening 
'https://launchpad.net/+authorize-token?oauth_token=6K7rwSbKHlbLWmkK65sj_permission=DESKTOP_INTEGRATION'
  ---

  On attempting to file using `ubuntu-bug apport`

  ---
  guiverc@dc7700-2re:~$ ubuntu-bug apport

  *** Collecting problem information

  The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the
  application. This might take a few minutes.
  . 

   


   
  *** Send problem report to the developers?

   


   
  After the problem report has been sent, please fill out the form in the   

   
  automatically opened web browser. 

   


   
  What would you like to do? Your options are:  

   
S: Send report (5.0 KB) 
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1963264] Re: Gnome screen recorder doesn't work on dist-upgraded jammy systems

2022-09-23 Thread Stan Angeloff
Removing ~/.cache/gstreamer-1.0/ worked for me, too.
I upgraded from ‘focal’ to ‘jammy’.
Following Bojan's suggestion, ‘pipewiresrc’ appeared
in the output of ‘gst-inspect-1.0’ after the purge.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963264

Title:
  Gnome screen recorder doesn't work on dist-upgraded jammy systems

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  When I press Ctrl+Shift+Alt+R, screencast indicator appears in the
  indicator menu but disappears in about 2 seconds. No file is even
  created under the Videos folder.

  journalctl shows:

  Mar 02 09:10:29 Development dbus-daemon[2962]: [session uid=1000 pid=2962] 
Activating service name='org.gnome.Shell.Screencast' requested by ':1.62' 
(uid=1000 pid=3311 comm="/usr/libexec/gsd-media->
  Mar 02 09:10:29 Development dbus-daemon[2962]: [session uid=1000 pid=2962] 
Successfully activated service 'org.gnome.Shell.Screencast'
  Mar 02 09:10:31 Development dbus-daemon[2962]: [session uid=1000 pid=2962] 
Activating service name='org.gnome.Shell.Screencast' requested by ':1.62' 
(uid=1000 pid=3311 comm="/usr/libexec/gsd-media->
  Mar 02 09:10:31 Development dbus-daemon[2962]: [session uid=1000 pid=2962] 
Successfully activated service 'org.gnome.Shell.Screencast'
  Mar 02 09:10:32 Development gjs[5825]: JS LOG: Failed to create pipeline: 
Gst.ParseError: no element "pipewiresrc"
   
  The issue is the Gst.ParseError.

  Before upgrading to jammy (22.04), it used to work fine. Also, when
  testing under qemu/KVM it works properly. It just doesn't work when
  running directly on the PC.

  What other logs can I provide?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-shell 41.3-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-18.18-generic 5.15.12
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-18-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu78
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Mar  3 15:41:44 2022
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-12 (660 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 41.3-3ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-02-27 (4 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1963264/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990626] Re: gjs-console crashed with SIGABRT in pthread_kill()

2022-09-23 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1986455 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986455

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1986455, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618260/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: "Disassembly.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618262/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: "ProcMaps.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618265/+files/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment removed: "ProcStatus.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618266/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: "Registers.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618267/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: "Stacktrace.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618268/+files/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment removed: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626/+attachment/5618269/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1986455

** Information type changed from Private to Public

** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gjs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990626

Title:
  gjs-console crashed with SIGABRT in pthread_kill()

Status in gjs package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Apport popped up saying gjs-console had crashed

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: gjs 1.74.0-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-15.15-generic 5.19.0
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-15-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Sep 23 14:30:24 2022
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gjs-console
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-03 (415 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Alpha amd64 (20210802)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/gjs /usr/bin/gnome-characters --gapplication-service
  ProcEnviron:
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_AU.UTF-8
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: gjs
  StacktraceTop:
   pthread_kill () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
   raise () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
   abort () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_assertion_message_expr () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  Title: gjs-console crashed with SIGABRT in pthread_kill()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-08-27 (27 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip libvirt lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sbuild sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gjs/+bug/1990626/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp