Regarding the impact section:
[ Impact ]
* It will disable pressure event for i2c touchpad vid 0x06cb pid 0xcfa0
You are describing what the update will do, but not why. Why do we need to
"disable pressure event" for this device? What's going on? What happens to
users of this hardware witho
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
> It does look like that issue was another regression triggered by GTK 4.10.3
> since it seems to work
> correctly with GTK 4.10.1 but not with 4.10.3 (4.10.4 doesn't help it either).
I confirmed that. Current lunar + updates shows the ctrl-click selection
issue already, without updating to gtk
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
What's up with the lunar task that is still open? Lunar didn't have a
mesa update yet, so it can't have regressed. I understand if we want to
avoid future regressions in lunar too, of course, but the fix ("set
VERSION so that it also includes the packaging version") should be
bundled together with
evince and apparmor for lunar should be released together to fix this
bug, but there is still a DEP8 failure that needs clearing under
apparmor: libreoffice/armhf
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-
migration/lunar/update_excuses.html#apparmor
It was retried a few times already, but
** Description changed:
Impact
--
There is a new bugfix release in the stable 42 series.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/blob/42.9/NEWS
The overall GNOME project considers GNOME 42 to be end of life now and
there are no more scheduled releases for mutter 42 after 42.9
It's my understanding that this should be released together with gnome-
shell 42.9-0ubuntu2 which is currently in jammy-proposed.
gnome-shell 42.9 is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/+bug/2023913 and has been in jammy-proposed for 5 days, and is
still pending verification.
-
It's my understanding that this should be released together with gnome-
shell 42.9-0ubuntu2 which is currently in jammy-proposed.
gnome-shell 42.9 is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/+bug/2023913 and has been in jammy-proposed for 5 days, and is
still pending verification.
-
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apparmor has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
> Do we need evince to be reuploaded for jammy there since the previous
upload was rejected by Steve?
I'm trying to see what type of error we get if we load a profile with
such a rule and the target profile does not exist:
/{,snap/core/[0-9]*/,snap/snapd/[0-9]*/}usr/bin/snap mrCx ->
snap_browse
Looks like we get this if evince is update, apparmor is not, and a link
in a pdf is clicked:
Jul 06 18:36:59 j-evince kernel: audit: type=1400
audit(1688668619.304:78): apparmor="DENIED" operation="exec"
info="profile transition not found" error=-13 profile="/usr/bin/evince"
name="/usr/bin/snap" p
Till, could you please clarify if kinetic and lunar are fixed?
It seems only cups 2.4.3[1] fixed the issue, and kinetic and lunar have
2.4.2. I checked the code in the packages with patches applied and I
don't see the fix there (in kinetic and lunar).
1. https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/relea
In the test plan, can you also please confirm it keeps working with the
current and upcoming HWE kernels for jammy?
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification
Hello Ionut, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Hello Fabio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Public bug reported:
The gnutls library has an optional configuration file in
/etc/gnutls/config. This file is not shipped by the Ubuntu packaging,
but it can be created by an user wanting to configure certain aspects of
gnutls.
When the file exists, gnutls functions might trigger an access to it
Public bug reported:
chromium 116.0.5845.32-hwacc 2551 latest/edge/… canonical**
I'm getting a few apparmor DENIED messages with this snap on my lunar
system:
a) about /var/lib
[68468.147326] audit: type=1400 audit(1690201352.140:586): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="open" class="file" profile
> Other than the error messages, is there any observable misbehavior?
There is always something odd with browsers nowadays, specially with
hardware acceleration. One day it works, the next one not so well, and
life moves on :) Today it was behaving very weirdly with youtube, and I
had to restart i
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-control-center
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that yo
> (Except for the workrave extension but that was already broken when Ubuntu
> 23.04 was released and
> mentioned in every SRU since. I believed it's fixed in 23.10 so it needs to
> be SRU'd.)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/workrave/+bug/2017302 I suppose, and
https://bugs.launchpa
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
Kinetic is EOL.
** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971984
Title:
pcscd.socket is di
This is missing a lunar verification before jammy (already verified) can
be released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971984
Title:
pcscd.socket is disabled after in
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pcsc-lite has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
Apparmor in jammy-proposed has the necessary changes, we just need a new
evince upload to jammy without the recommends then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064
Title:
Public bug reported:
chromium 118.0.5966.0 2604 latest/edge
Whenever I use chromium in a video session (meet, youtube) that used
hardware acceleration, for a long time (like 20min or more), and then
close it, the whole desktop freezes, and the laptop fan turns on.
Logging
I have some straces of just before, and during, this "crash". I didn't
see anything super obvious. The logs also didn't have anything out of
the ordinary, but I'll capture it again probably today, after my 30min
meet.
That meet is in 1h15min, if you want to let me know beforehand what you
would li
> Thanks for testing and have a good crash!
:D :D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033433
Title:
Xorg 100% CPU and frozen desktop after closing chromium
Sta
strace I started manually on the chromium pid just before closing the
meet session and the app. The strace coupled with the snap run command
would have been too large, gigabytes.
** Attachment added: "chromium.strace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2033433/+att
log produced by the snap run command.
At some point during the call, around 12:16:55, I noticed the video
became a bit sluggish and xorg was already using a lot of cpu, but I
can't tell if it was like this since the start (the xorg cpu usage, I
mean). So take this info with caution, as it might be
And yes, I had to kill -9 xorg after closing chromium, because it was
spinning at 100% cpu again, and the desktop was frozen except for the
mouse cursor.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://
And here is the journal log corresponding to the ~30min long meet
session, culminating in the kill -9 Xorg
** Attachment added: "journal.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2033433/+attachment/5696529/+files/journal.log
--
You received this bug notification
And this I'm 90% sure is the xorg log file corresponding to that
session.
The pid at the top of the file, where it says the file was renamed
(Xorg.pid-958859.log), matches what I kill-9'ed.
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2
> "Atomic update failure" may also be specific to the OLED panel that it
> looks like Andreas is using. I have one of those but have never run Xorg
> on it.
FWIW, I'm using two external 4k Dell monitors via usb-c, plus the laptop
panel also at its max resolution (a bit lower then the monitors:
288
Found it, and I closed it because the screen flickering is gone:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2018448
But the "Atomic update" error was there, on pipe A if that makes any
difference. I see it on A/B/C, very much like
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/180
I attached gdb to xorg while the bug was happening (100% cpu usage after
closing chromium), and got the backtrace with symbols. I hope this
helps, but maybe it missed the loop, I don't know.
** Attachment added: "xorg.backtrace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/203343
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-remote-desktop into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-
desktop/42.9-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us
So I took some screenshots of `xrestop` while chromium was in the google
meet.
There was an "unknown PID" listed, but given other characteristics of
that line, I assume that it is related to chromium.
Here are some of the columns over time:
Pxms MiscPxm memTotal
12:09:28
Thanks for guiding the troubleshooting on this one, I learned a new tool
;) (xrestop)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033433
Title:
Chromium leaks tens of gig
There is an sssd package in focal-unapproved that points at this bug,
with this d/changelog snippet:
* debian/patches: Backport patches atches to support properly GDM smartcard
login (LP: #1865226)
(sic)
But there is no sssd task in this bug.
I also don't see a gdm3 upload to focal unappro
Also, this but is missing the SRU template, in case the sssd upload I
mentioned in my previous comment is really addressing this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
The output from `top` was always well behaved while chromium was open,
until it was closed, at which point xorg cpu's usage went through the
roof.
The test case here is indeed watching "Pxms" in xrestop while chromium
is displaying hw accelerated video.
--
You received this bug notification beca
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.5.6-0ubuntu0.23.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
This bug is easy to reproduce, what we need now is a fix ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033433
Title:
Chromium leaks tens of gigabytes of pixmaps (in the
ACK on releasing this one day early. Given the test results, I don't see
a benefit from another day of aging, which, given the Friday rule, would
actually push this release to next monday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to l
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
The test plan is a bit superficial, but it is what it is.
The build-time tests ran and passed (17 in total). There were warnings
about failing to create files/directories in the build env, but these
were there before for previous releases as well.
The package built correctly in all architectures
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nautilus has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Given comment #12, I'm adding a block-proposed tag to this bug. Is this
something we could use to improve the test plan of this package by any
chance? Since it seems to have introduced crashes on kinetic.
** Tags added: block-proposed-jammy
** Tags added: block-proposed-kinetic
--
You received
Jaap, what's needed is a verification for kinetic. Please see the test
plan in the bug description at the very top, and try out the package
from proposed as outlined in comment #24.
And we also need a kinetic verification on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1949200 which
I reviewed this SRU and it's ok to be accepted into lunar-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-characters in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016708
Title:
Characters search through GNOME Shell is bro
Hi Gunnar and others,
with Lunar just released, I'm going over the lunar unapproved queue to
pick out packages that should now become SRUs for lunar.
Could someone please add the SRU template to this bug's description, and
fill it out?
Since the package is in unapproved, and not proposed, I'm sw
Summarizing this bug from an SRU POV
We need https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-
messages/13.10.1+18.10.20180918-0ubuntu5 in lunar. Previous upload of
0ubuntu4 failed to migrate/build (see comment #24), and I guess 0ubuntu5
arrived too late for the release.
We also have
https://launch
This is in lunar-proposed at the moment. Please proceed with SRU
verification. I don't think the tooling treats lunar as a stable release
just yet, that's why there is no automated comment here. I'll add the
tags.
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-lunar
--
You received this
Hello Robert,
the [test plan] has very specific steps involving the calculator,
gsettings, and an expected result. Did you perform those specifically?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
I verified that the test was executed according to the [test plan].
I understand kinetic is not part of this SRU. The reason wasn't
explained anywhere, but I'm assuming it's because it's a) ending support
soon; and/or b) this glib update is more useful for core22 snap and core
desktop deployments,
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glib2.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Mario, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
The revert is not in Kinetic, implying it could be affected by this bug
too. Do you intend to skip kinetic, or is it not affected?
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug
Hello Kai, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
The verification of the Stable Release Update for evolution-data-server
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that y
This is still needing a kinetic verification.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983794
Title:
Evolution not deleting autosave files
Status in Evolution:
Fix Relea
Is kinetic being skipped on purpose, or is it not affected?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019751
Title:
Desktop area may get clipped to a small rectangle if the
The bug description says the problem also occurs in kinetic wayland. Is
kinetic being skipped on purpose, or will it also get an upload?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://
Oh, sorry, I just saw the kinetic upload and release, n/m.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965208
Title:
Ubuntu dock is visible too early dur
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock into lunar-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-
dock/79ubuntu2.23.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Plea
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock into jammy-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-
dock/72~ubuntu5.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Ple
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock into jammy-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-
dock/72~ubuntu5.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Ple
Hello Gab, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock into jammy-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-
dock/72~ubuntu5.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Pleas
Hello Marcelo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock into jammy-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-
dock/72~ubuntu5.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
P
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock into jammy-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-
dock/72~ubuntu5.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Pl
I installed mutter 44.1 and gnome-shell 44.1 from proposed, and a few of
other related dependencies. I don't have everything at 44.1, I don't
know if we should expect more gnome-related updates in lunar-proposed.
For example, I have
gnome-shell-extension-prefs 44.1-0ubuntu1
but gnome-shell-extens
The artifact at the border also happens across monitors. The tall chrome
window on the right of the left monitor interferes with the windows
aligned to the left of the right monitor.
This happened immediately after updating mutter and gnome shell to 44.1,
it wasn't happening before.
--
You recei
Also happens with chromium (the snap).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020225
Title:
Update mutter to 44.1
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in
Turns out I'm only seeing it with google-chrome. Tried firefox, and a
terminal, using the same reproducer, and it didn´t happen.
** Attachment added: "chrome-mutter-44.1.webm"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2020225/+attachment/5675428/+files/chrome-mutter-44.1.webm
--
Public bug reported:
I installed mutter 44.1 and gnome-shell 44.1 from proposed, and a few of
other related dependencies. I don't have everything at 44.1, I don't
know if we should expect more gnome-related updates in lunar-proposed.
For example, I have
gnome-shell-extension-prefs 44.1-0ubuntu1
I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2020674
about the above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020225
Title:
Update mutter to 44.1
Status in mu
$ gsettings get org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions
['d...@rastersoft.com', 'ubuntu-d...@ubuntu.com', 'tiling-assist...@ubuntu.com']
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020674
I disabled all extensions using gnome-extensions-app, logged out and
logged back in:
$ gsettings get org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions
@as []
andreas@nsnx2:~$
I don't know what `@as` is.
But I still see the same artifacts at the borders, and between monitors, as
before.
--
You received thi
It's particularly annoying if I have a maximized terminal window in one
monitor. Chrome on the monitor in its left "perturbs" the terminal
window, see the screenshot. It's like it's drawing beyond the window
limits, over the adjacent window.
The moment the terminal window that has the "corruption"
I can confirm that gtk4 from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa fixes the issue for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020674
Title:
Artifacts at
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk4 into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/4.10.3+ds-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
Hello Andreas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk4 into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/4.10.3+ds-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
To illustrate this bug, in this video capture I:
- selected file3
- hit the delete key
- hit the F5 (refresh) key
** Attachment added: "deleted-file-3-and-refreshed.webm"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2022851/+attachment/5677929/+files/deleted-file-3-and-refreshed.we
After some googling, maybe this is the fix?
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/5873
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2022851
Title:
Inappropriate file
At the moment, noble-proposed has
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/1.90.3-1, uploaded a few
hours ago:
upower (1.90.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 1.90.3
* Drop patches, merged upstream
* Bump Build-Depends on meson to (>= 0.60.0) and libglib2.0-dev to (>= 2
And unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335
Title:
upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
Status in upower package in Ubuntu:
Fix
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.7-1.2ubuntu6 is in noble-
proposed claiming to fix this bug.
Comment #6 above says there is a missing patch still.
In any case, doesn't look like there is anything to sponsor here, so
unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors.
--
You received this bug notifica
I downloaded the original tarballs from
https://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/7.6.6/ and:
- verified their signatures
- matched 7.6.6.orig.tar.xz to upstream's 7.6.6.3 (it's a versioning quirk to
call 7.6.6rc3 7.6.6.3 in the end):
$ sha256sum libreoffice_7.6.6.orig.tar.xz upstre
translations tarball verified
help tarball verified
tarballs tarball:
@@ -14,12 +14,13 @@
tiff-4.6.0.tar.xz
libepubgen-0.1.1.tar.xz
a39f6c07ddb20d7dd2ff1f95fa21e2cd-raptor2-2.0.15.tar.gz
+libxslt-1.1.39.tar.xz
freetype-2.13.0.tar.xz
beeca87be45ec87d241ddd0e1bad80c1-bsh-2.0b6-src.zip
openldap-
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package
I think neither rsyslog, nor cups, or sssd, are the correct packages for
this bug, but I agree that spreading out the investigation over two
different bugs is not good.
I'll mark https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088 as
a duplicate, and add cups and sssd tasks to this one for
1 - 100 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
