Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

I have been able to get every IT to pass at least once except the following ACCUMULO-4362 ACCUMULO-4397 These are moved back to release 1.8.0 and are blockers. On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:29

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

Great, thanks Billie. Thanks Sean for the instructions. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > Sean, > > > > I'm interested. How do I get granted more permissions? I can't see the

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

Sean, I'm interested. How do I get granted more permissions? I can't see the configuration you used, but I can launch a new build. Mike On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:47 PM Sean Busbey wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

Thanks Mike. I recall you posting that in a email but didn't find it. Rereading my email, I'd like to clarify that I'd be surprised if all ITs passed for 1.7.2 every time in one run, like a CI environment. Sean, your points about the difference between 1.8.0 being a minor release and 1.7.2 being

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

in the next bugfix, but 136 should > really be done on a minor, since it's a user-facing change in behavior, > even though it's not public API. I'd hate for it to have to wait for the > next minor to make it in. > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:11 PM Michael Wall

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

ked with > Patch Available. > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:58 PM Christopher wrote: > > > Go for it, Mike! > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > >> I just moved the last 2 tickets out of 1.8.0. Both tickets were for > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

What do others think? On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > do the referenced ITs still fail? IIRC, passing ITs is part of our > release criteria. > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > I just moved the last 2 tickets out of 1.8.0. Both

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

5:13 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > Didn't get a chance to talk to Christopher so hopefully what I understood > > from emails with Josh and him is correct. > > > > Moved issues out of 1.8.0. Here is a summ

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove directory assembly

I use it on occasion, but it is just as easy to unpack somewhere else. +1 On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 > > > Christopher wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Awhile back, when I was working on moving all our build artifacts to the >> target directory during a maven build, I cre

Re: [DISCUSS] Jenkins notifications to dev list?

I am good with that option Christopher. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Christopher wrote: > The other option is that if people really want to subscribe to > notifications, I can just add their email to the post-build notification > email list directly. Since I'm willing to grant access to Accu

Re: Board report draft July 2016

In the past 3 months, there have been 211 commits to the master branch > > > from 13 authors, 4 of whom are not yet committers. > > > > > > Version 1.7.2 has been released and we are wrapping up a handful of > > > issues for the 1.8.0 release. > > > > > > Around 15 people attended an Accumulo meetup in San Jose, where > > > Josh Elser spoke about features that have been completed for 1.8.0 > > > and Bill Slacum discussed how to build resilient applications on > > > Accumulo. > > > > > > Community > > > Michael Wall was added as a committer and PMC member on 4/11/2016. > > > No new committers or PMC members have been added since the last > > > report. > > > > > > > > >

Re: Feedback for 1.7.2 release notes

Looks good to me. Thanks Mike On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > Thanks. Changes made and notes pushed to the website. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > Follow on to > > > > > htt

Feedback for 1.7.2 release notes

Follow on to https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/962102c6c3745b759a2d94d59d40b7f213f2013bfdc7f9d6bc7ef48f@%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E Feedback for draft release notes at https://github.com/madrob/accumulo/blob/gh-pages/release_notes/1.7.2.md 1 - Should link to Jira in the third sentence be to

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.2-rc2

Mike, How do you want feedback on the release notes? Just in email? On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > This vote passes with 5 +1. > > Maven repository has been promoted. > Release tag has been pushed, but this is the wrong one. See INFRA-12153. > Artifacts have been pushed to

Re: measuring perf

Have you looking at the tracing service? What version of Accumulo are using? In 1.7, tracing moved to using HTrace, so setup and implementation will be a little different between 1.7 and 1.6. Here are some docs. http://accumulo.apache.org/1.7/accumulo_user_manual#tracing for 1.7 and http://accu

Re: Bigger Jenkins

Christopher, I'd be interested in helping. Thanks for setting this up. Mike On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Christopher wrote: > Devs, > > I set up a slightly beefier Jenkins than the one Josh had running > (hopefully, it's big enough to have tests consistently pass). I don't have > much set

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

d, I will cut an RC1. Mike On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > Christopher, > > I'd like to talk this through with you before I move the tickets to make > sure I understand what you are saying here. > > Thanks for the note, it is helpful. > > Mike

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

Christopher, I'd like to talk this through with you before I move the tickets to make sure I understand what you are saying here. Thanks for the note, it is helpful. Mike On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 9:42 PM Michael Wall wrote: >

[DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

After last weeks discussion with Josh, Christopher and others at the Accumulo Working Day, I am going to shepherd the 1.8 release. First step is to create a release candidate? Before I do that, are there any tickets that need to get into the release? I know Keith mentioned 1 or 2 and I have one

Re: Can someone review the change I made to the project RDF before I push to asf-site

; reliant on the old URLs before the people site got redirected to > home.apache.org. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:44 AM Billie Rinaldi > wrote: > > > Sounds good. Thanks, Mike! > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > > >

Re: Can someone review the change I made to the project RDF before I push to asf-site

ven.apache.org/plugins/maven-doap-plugin/ > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM Michael Wall wrote: > > > Ok, I'll fix it. Should have read this before > > https://projects.apache.org/guidelines.html > > > > Just pushed with the https, not sure how long t

Re: Can someone review the change I made to the project RDF before I push to asf-site

d just revert that now to match the other projects. In any case, +1 > > for 3154c1d. > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > > > I noticed our category was not parsing correctly at > > > > > > https://proje

Re: Can someone review the change I made to the project RDF before I push to asf-site

dy broken, I'd be okay with pushing to > see if it works, and if it doesn't then we could revert 0554092; or we > could just revert that now to match the other projects. In any case, +1 > for 3154c1d. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > >

Can someone review the change I made to the project RDF before I push to asf-site

I noticed our category was not parsing correctly at https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category Search Accumulo. I updated it in the gh-pages branch with https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/3154c1dc1386850aa9bdcee27b71045bad01623b and https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/055409

Anyone else have trouble running all integration tests on a Mac?

I consistently have issues running 'mvn clean verify' on Accumulo on my Mac? This does not happen when I build on Linux. Some specs. Maven 3.2.5 Java 1.7 and 1.8 Accumulo branch 1.6 OSX 10.10.5 16G Ram MAVEN_OPTS -Xmx1024m -Xms256m -XX:PermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m Josh mentioned making sur

[DISCUSS] Pulling out the examples

Talking with Keith and Christopher today, they mentioned it might be useful to pull the examples out of Accumulo into a separate project with it's own repo. Here are some talking points - Provide an easy means to run examples against the MiniAccumuloCluster. - Give users the ability to run examp

Delays in email delivery?

I had been having trouble tracking some of the threads on both the user and dev Accumulo lists. I realized this morning it was because emails were being delayed. For example, David Medinets posted "Accumulo Blog Posts" to the dev list 6 days ago. I got Billie's response on the 12th. Received: f

Re: Delays in email delivery?

Nevermind, see https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/mail_outage I am not going crazy. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > I had been having trouble tracking some of the threads on both the user > and dev Accumulo lists. I realized this morning it was because email

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC5

Congrats On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Christopher wrote: > VOTE passes with +6. > > The maven repo has been promoted to release. > The artifacts have been added to the svn release repo. > The tag was moved from 1.5.0-RC5 to 1.5.0. > > TODO: update download links on webpage. > > -- > Christo

Re: GIT

+1 but it is more than just changing tools. Have a discussion about a git workflow and branching model. I have seen that be a point of frustration for many projects making the switch. On May 21, 2013 6:29 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: > Everything at Apache is a work in progress. Plenty of projec

Re: asciidoc manual

I have used asciidoc for several projects and really like it. One option is http://asciidoctor.org/. It is a Ruby processor for asciidoc, but it runs in JRuby and even has a maven plugin, https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin. Github uses asciidoctor for README.adoc and README.

Re: Plumbr - memory leak detection

VisualVM is part of the JDK since 1.6, so you might already have it and not know. Look for jvisualvm in the JAVA_HOME/bin directory right beside the java and javac executables. It doesn't appear to be part of OSX or RHEL by default though. I have found this link to be useful, http://java.dzone.c

<    1   2   3