Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-09 Thread Clebert Suconic
Beware that I will have to retag the release... performance-jmh were part of the source, but not part of the release, so the pom didn't get updated. I will redo and retag the release. On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:10 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > > I tested the PR and merged it. > > > Justin > > On

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-07 Thread Justin Bertram
I tested the PR and merged it. Justin On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 10:31 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > Can someone review this PR and merge it? > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3431 > > > Other than that, any other PR that needs to be merged.. I should start > the release tomorrow,

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
Can someone review this PR and merge it? https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3431 Other than that, any other PR that needs to be merged.. I should start the release tomorrow, monday on my mid morning EST time. that will give Europeans some time to work on it as well :) unless

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
The changes are rather small and local nothing real big, I'll prepare the PR tomorrow it might be easier to judge then. I'll try to provide an example demonstration SASL-SCRAM with Apache cupid client along with the PR do demonstrate the usage! Am 04.02.21 um 19:40 schrieb Clebert Suconic:

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-04 Thread Clebert Suconic
It depends on the size of the PR. If it's something simple, low risk I would say we can wait for it.. however if it's something major and has some risk, I would prefer having a lot of full testsuite runs (that I do on a CI I have access) between when a major PR is merged and a release. if you're

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
It might be too late, but I'm currently investigate in an issue related to [1] and like to provide a PR the next days that add support of providing sasl mechanism through java-service-loader is there any chance (assuming I got everything done in time) to include this in the next release?

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-04 Thread Clebert Suconic
everythign is merged... There is one final issue I'm after though.. .I have made libaio to close files asynchronously. I have seen an eventual failure on the testsuite (well, a warning to be more precise) on waiting to close files... that I am after. I will postpone this release to monday to

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Hugonnet
Hello, It would be nice if we could have https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3412 in this release :) Cheers, Emmanuel Le 29/01/2021 à 17:53, Clebert Suconic a écrit : > I plan to do an artemis release some time next week (around Wed) > > I will check on pending PRs... (please give me

[HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-01-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
I plan to do an artemis release some time next week (around Wed) I will check on pending PRs... (please give me a hand also on merging stuff) if there's anything you need my attention on a particular PR please mention it here on this thread.. I will make sure we merge the Jakarta integration