+1
Regards
JB
On 06/15/2015 03:28 PM, tmy...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
I would also like to see ActiveMQ support JMS 2.0. I have run into an issue
integrating ActiveMQ with WebSphereMQ related to JMS 2.0. The latest
WebSphereMQ client libraries version 8.0.0.2 are JMS 2.0 compliant. The
8.0.02
I would also like to see ActiveMQ support JMS 2.0. I have run into an issue
integrating ActiveMQ with WebSphereMQ related to JMS 2.0. The latest
WebSphereMQ client libraries version 8.0.0.2 are JMS 2.0 compliant. The
8.0.02 version addresses security vulnerabilities and provides support for
TLS
Please check the following (vote up if necessary). There's obviously
duplication.
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5383
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5736
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455
On 06/15/2015 09:28 AM,
[3] = it's fixed already... it should be closed as done!
[1] == [2]
The implementation of the JMS2 client api is trivial. you could
actually copy paste it from Artemis into ActiveMQ5 as a backport.
the only issue is the subscription modes added by JMS2 that will need
some extra reference
Hi Uli,
I support that it would be great for ActiveMQ to handle 2.0 sooner rather
than later.
OpenMQ, for sure, is the reference implementation for JSR 343 (JMS 2.0), so
of course it supports JMS 2.0.
On HornetQ: yes support is in since 2.4.0Final, but HornetQ and ActiveMQ are
*quite different
Hi,
Don¹t know if you missed this thread in this very list but HornetQ and AMQ
might be heading the same way..
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possible-HornetQ-donation-to-ActiveMQ
-td4682971.html
That may change the JMS 2.0 status of AMQ in one way or another. Time will
tell.
Petter
On 05/19/2014 06:35 PM, uromahn wrote:
Hmm, from the deafening silence I must assume that either of the two things
happened:
1. People didn't read my post for some reason (and hence I am replying to my
own post to refresh this post), or
2. There is no appetite supporting JMS 2.0 in ActiveMQ and
Hmm, from the deafening silence I must assume that either of the two things
happened:
1. People didn't read my post for some reason (and hence I am replying to my
own post to refresh this post), or
2. There is no appetite supporting JMS 2.0 in ActiveMQ and hence people
ignored my post.
Anyways,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:01 PM, uromahn ulr...@ulrichromahn.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
just wanted to throw a bone out seeing if anyone catches it and responds.
I was wondering whether ActiveMQ has any intention to support the JMS 2.0
API specification which is part of JEE7 and has been released
On May 19, 2014, at 1:35 PM, uromahn ulr...@ulrichromahn.net wrote:
Hmm, from the deafening silence I must assume that either of the two things
happened:
1. People didn't read my post for some reason (and hence I am replying to my
own post to refresh this post), or
2. There is no appetite
Hi Folks,
just wanted to throw a bone out seeing if anyone catches it and responds.
I was wondering whether ActiveMQ has any intention to support the JMS 2.0
API specification which is part of JEE7 and has been released almost a year
ago (May 21, 2013).
JMS 2.0 has some significant
11 matches
Mail list logo
