Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ

It might be better to hold off doing to much work a head of time, you want to be build a community of developers around this :) Clebert Suconic 20 August 2014 16:43 Meanwhile we are making our technical work. OpenWire is already part of our master (one of the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

+1 Gary Tully 30 January 2015 14:00 Hi folks, I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements. -note- this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from

Re: ActiveMQ 6.0.0 required Java 8?

At some point, it could well make sense to call the HornetQ release ActiveMQ 6 - but not yet. This has caused a lot of confusion- it should be called something else ?? > On 19 Mar 2015, at 19:40, Kevin Burton wrote: > > Actually, this is probably the right way to phrase it. Maybe just on the

[DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

(was: HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation) Thanks Lionel - I agree. The [VOTE] thread was getting a little verbose, and a little heated. There were a lot of opinions, and a lot of assumptions and its likely there was some miscommunication when HornetQ was donated to the ActiveMQ community. O

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

iginal Message- From: Rob Davies Reply-To: Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 AM To: Subject: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation Rob Davies <mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com> 25 March 2015 08:47 (was: HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation) Thanks Lionel - I

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

Hadrian - so the original vote was to accept the code into ActiveMQ specifically. We would have to check with the HornetQ developers to see if now going to incubator instead was acceptable to them - but it does seem to me that their desire to join ActiveMQ was borne out of consolidation of the

Re: CPU core/thread scaling test

Hi Jamie, you could look at the unit tests in the perf package: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tree;f=activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/perf;h=4562127ff13ba3a10e1cadee9b81a899b6c66a9e;hb=refs/heads/activemq-5.11.x These run clients and broker in th

Re: CPU core/thread scaling test

I'd look at the non-persistent Topic tests first. Jamie G. <mailto:jamie.goody...@gmail.com> 27 March 2015 10:33 Perfect, is one of these in particular the one to review to see the CPU core/thread limitation issue? Thanks, Jamie Rob Davies <mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com> 27

Re: CPU core/thread scaling test

I've compared ActiveMQ on the same network/machines against other Java brokers - and ActiveMQ always has a higher load on CPU. My suspicion is around thread context switching in the broker - but a fresh set of eyes is greatly appreciated! Jamie G. 27 March 2

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

This incubator line is a red herring. HornetQ wanted to consolidate communities together - they didn't need more committers - their community ( in the Apache sense of the word) was already bigger than ActiveMQ. What I don't understand is that you actually agreed to this - and backed a proposal m

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

No idea about users or install base of either ActiveMQ or HornetQ - I meant developers - that's really what Apache means by "community" isn't it? > On 27 Mar 2015, at 16:17, jgenender wrote: > > rajdavies wrote >> This incubator line is a red herring. HornetQ wanted to consolidate >> communit

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

I think your thinking about the typical open source definition of community here. > On 27 Mar 2015, at 16:59, jgenender wrote: > > rajdavies wrote >> No idea about users or install base of either ActiveMQ or HornetQ - I >> meant developers - that's really what Apache means by "community" isn

Re: CPU core/thread scaling test

he ActiveMQ broker topology * Types and sizes of messages * ActiveMQ broker configuration -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/CPU-core-thread-scaling-test-tp4693913p4693951.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies <

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

Art - I hope these are the questions you thought haven't been answered. This is my POV only. > On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:58, artnaseef wrote: > > I don't agree with the presumption that ActiveMQ *needs* a *new* broker. I implemented the architecture for ActiveMQ 1.0 (before it was detonated to Ap

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pluggable Brokers...

So I haven't had the time to research this - but as lack of instant feedback is interpreted as ignoring, I believe this has merit - but will require some in depth investigation. James Carman 8 April 2015 08:13 Pluggable *within* ActiveMQ. That is what doesn'

Re: Naming Suggestions?

+1 Hermes Daniel Kulp 8 April 2015 21:41 On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM confusion. Anybody have any suggest

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Good point +1 Artemis > On 8 Apr 2015, at 21:52, James Carman wrote: > > http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html > >> On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Rob Davies wrote: >> +1 Hermes >> >>> Daniel Kulp 8 April 2015 21:41 >>>>

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 Hiram Chirino 9 April 2015 14:06 Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the code is not ready to be

Calling ActiveMQ committers

Folks - if anyone has cycles - can they start looking at accepting some of these pull requests into the ActiveMQ code base: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pulls ?

Re: Calling ActiveMQ committers

Thanks JB! Jean-Baptiste Onofré <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> 13 April 2015 17:23 Hi Rob, yes, it's on my TODO, I gonna review some (during ApacheCon NA or just after). Regards JB Rob Davies <mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com> 13 April 2015 16:54 Folks - if anyone has cycles

Re: [VOTE] Pick a code name for the HornetQ code donation

+1 [a] Artermis Hiram Chirino 14 April 2015 16:42 Now that we have chosen to give the HornetQ code donation a code name, it's time to pick what that code name will be. Please select from one of the following options: [a] ActiveMQ Artemis [b] ActiveMQ Luna [c] Act

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ {CodeName} Must-Have Features...

I don't think we will need virtual topics if we support JMS2 > On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:29, Daniel Guggi wrote: > > correction "Message Destinations" -> "Message Groups" > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Daniel Guggi > wrote: > >> @Configuration format file >> I as a user wouldn't mind eith

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ {CodeName} Must-Have Features...

The equivalent of BrokerFilters for extension points - including using embedded Camel inside the Broker for flexible message routing > On 15 Apr 2015, at 16:56, James Carman wrote: > > In order for ActiveMQ {CodeName} to take over as the next generation > of ActiveMQ, it obviously must have s

Re: [Q] ActiveMQ coding style?

I seem to remember we used to use the CXF coding style at one point? > On 29 Sep 2015, at 13:16, Christopher Shannon > wrote: > > I don't believe there is one, but if you want to put one together I would > also use this as a reference: > https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html and see

Re: Suggestion for improvement on ActiveMQ socket buffer sizing.

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 12:56, Paul Gale wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to get some feedback on an idea I have for an improvement to > ActiveMQ. > > Currently ActiveMQ programmatically sizes the receive and send socket > buffer sizes for the TCP transport according to the transport connector > o

Re: [DISCUSS] LevelDB deprecation

I agree. > On 15 Nov 2016, at 11:45, Christopher Shannon > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I just wanted to ask what people think about officially deprecating LevelDB > in our 5.x broker and update our documentation to say that it is no longer > recommended. We can leave it in the code base for p

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console

On the “about” page - it would be polite to reference the hawtio comunity - i.e. “Artemis Management console is powered by hawtio: hawt.io ” etc - as there is no powered by logo. > On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:52, Michael André Pearce > wrote: > > Ok, > > So i think we can do this.

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6

[0] - without a clear migration path and tooling to assist existing users moving from ActiveMQ 5 to Artemis, we risk abandoning those users - who may then be forced to look at alternatives and abandon ActiveMQ all together. This could be counter productive to the original intent. > On 4 Dec

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6

(I would add this remark to the closing > vote and would add a blocking/mandatory JIRA so it wouldn’t be released > without working on it) > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:17 AM Rob Davies wrote: > >> [0] - without a clear migration path and tooling to assist existing users >&g

Re: Possible 5.3.2?

Can you do this in 5.4 - which was planned for the next release ? On 23 Apr 2010, at 18:16, David Jencks wrote: > I'm afraid I blinked at the wrong time and didn't apply the osgi versions > patch to 5.3.1 that geronimo needs to be able to run activemq in osgi > (AMQ-2637) > > Geronimo is tryin

Re: Cassandra persistence adapter

If you need a hand I'd be happy to help Cheers, Rob On 24 Apr 2010, at 14:44, Mark Greene wrote: Cool, thanks Hiram. Your right, the memory one does look very simple. I'll use that as a guide for now. On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi mark, Well the memory based

Re: Possible 5.3.2?

missed the next week bit :( - ok 5.3.2 it would need to be On 23 Apr 2010, at 21:00, David Jencks wrote: > > On Apr 23, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Rob Davies wrote: > >> Can you do this in 5.4 - which was planned for the next release ? > > It's already in 5.4, but we

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2

+1 On 27 Apr 2010, at 00:04, David Jencks wrote: > Hi, > > I've staged a release candidate for ActiveMQ 5.3.2. The main driver for this > is to get the osgi version range fixes into a release usable by the upcoming > geronimo 3.0 milestone. > > The changes since the recent 5.3.1: > > merging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS API 1.3.0

+1 On 10 May 2010, at 19:06, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of the Apache.NMS API v1.3.0. > This package contains the API for the various Apache.NMS client along > with utility classes and unit test cases against the abstract NMS API. > > This version

Re: Joint Solution with ActiveMQ + Terracotta

Hi Ari, can you point us in the direction of the code - so we can evaluate what you've done ? cheers, Rob On 13 May 2010, at 23:25, Ari Zilka wrote: > Hello all, > > I wanted to let you know we have developed Terracotta-over-the-WAN > capabilities using ActiveMQ. Was looking for AMQ develop

Re: Joint Solution with ActiveMQ + Terracotta

an svn account for the internal repo or do you just want me to > put a tarball up for FTP. I should probably walk you through what it does. > It is very kewl, actually. It makes ActiveMQ and multi-datacenter completely > transparent as a plugin to Ehcache :) > > --Ari > > On

Re: Joint Solution with ActiveMQ + Terracotta

bably walk you through what it does. >> It is very kewl, actually. It makes ActiveMQ and multi-datacenter >> completely transparent as a plugin to Ehcache :) >> >> --Ari >> >> On May 13, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Rob Davies wrote: >> >>> Hi Ari, >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.3.0

+1 On 17 May 2010, at 22:50, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.3.0. > > This version provides some much requested new feature like SSL support > and support for the QueueBrowser. > > Changes in this version include: > > * Full

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS.Stomp 1.3.0

+1 On 24 May 2010, at 23:23, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.Stomp v1.3.0. > > This version provides some much requested new feature like SSL support > and several bug fixes. > > Changes in this version include: > > * SSL Transport to p

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.1.3

+1 On 1 Jun 2010, at 18:42, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hi Everyone > > The v3.1.3 release of ActiveMQ-CPP is now open. This is a minor patch > release that fixes a deadlock issue on Windows platforms that was > introduced in the 3.1 versions. > > The source bundle for this release can be found here:

Re: test case for advisory messages

Pass it along! On 2 Jun 2010, at 03:11, Nathan Bryant wrote: > Oops! > > > > I guess it got stripped out. Anybody want? > > > > From: Nathan Bryant [mailto:nathan.bry...@linkshare.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:08 PM > To: dev@activemq.apache.org > Subject: test case for advisory me

Re: Can same message be send multiple times

Support for sending messages multiple times is mandatory for JMS compliant messaging systems like ActiveMQ. Under the hood the message is shallow copied on send to enable you to do this without side effects cheers, Rob On 2 Jun 2010, at 17:54, manua wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is it possible to s

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.2.0

+1 On 14 Jun 2010, at 18:55, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hi Everyone > > Voting for the release of v3.2.0 of ActiveMQ-CPP is now open. This > version brings several long awaited new features to the client, the > biggest of which is support for SSL using the OpenSSL library. Also in > the release is a

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.2.1

+1 Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 28 Jun 2010, at 18:41, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hi Everyone > > Voting for the release of v3.2.1 of Active

Re: Venkat Vankipuram is out of the office.

But at least we can track where Venkat is at all times :) On 22 Jul 2010, at 12:39, Hiram Chirino wrote: > man, I hate auto responders the respond to mailing lists. > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:03 AM, wrote: >> >> I will be out of the office starting 07/22/2010 and will not return until >>

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.2.2

+1 On 26 Jul 2010, at 14:20, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hi Everyone > > Voting for the release of v3.2.2 of ActiveMQ-CPP is now open. This > version is a patch release to address some additional issues with the > v3.2 release. > > The source bundles for this release can be found here: >

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.1

+1 On 3 Aug 2010, at 13:41, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > Hi, > > Voting for ActiveMQ Protocol Buffers release 1.1 is now open. > > This release contains a few minor bug fixes (such as > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2707) and is needed for > ActiveMQ 5.4.0 release. > > You can find

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.0

+1 On 10 Aug 2010, at 14:24, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 281 issues resolved. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-089/ > > The binary distribution is here: > https://repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.0

+1 On 14 Aug 2010, at 02:17, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 283 issues resolved. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-104/ > > The binary distribution is here: > https://repo

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.2.3

+1 On 8 Sep 2010, at 13:45, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hi Everyone > > Voting for the release of v3.2.3 of ActiveMQ-CPP is now open. This > version is a patch release to address some additional issues with the > v3.2.2 release. > > * Fix a threading issue when multiple connections were created > f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.4.0

+! On 13 Sep 2010, at 15:36, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.4.0. > > This version provides lots of bug fixes from the 1.3.0 release along > with some new features. > > Changes in this version include: > > * Add Message Transfo

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.1

+1 On 18 Sep 2010, at 14:56, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A maintenance release activemq-5.4.1 is out with approximately 49 issues > resolved. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-041/ > > The binary distribution is here: > ht

Re: {VOTE] Release Apache.NMS.Stomp 1.4.0

+1 On 20 Sep 2010, at 13:51, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.Stomp v1.4.0. > This release addresses several bug found in the v1.3.0 and adds a simple > failover transport to the Stomp client. > > The binaries and source bundles for the Relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.4.1

+1 On 30 Sep 2010, at 16:44, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.4.1. > > This is a patch release that addresses a critical issue found in the > 1.4.0 release that can cause an exception to be thrown when a Session is > created, also

Re: Helping out on the Web site

The whole thing ? ;) - seriously - it needs better organisation - there's a lot of information - its just not too easy to find! On 14 Nov 2010, at 19:26, Eric Johnson wrote: > I'm a committer on CXF and have been helping out with the ServiceMix > site redesign. I'm interested in helping out Act

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.2

+1 On 25 Nov 2010, at 13:15, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > Hi, > > I've just cut a release candidate for 5.4.2 release > > Could you review the artifacts and vote? > > The list of resolved issues is here (56 issues fixed) > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.2.4

+1 On 6 Dec 2010, at 13:45, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hi Everyone > > Voting for the release of v3.2.4 of ActiveMQ-CPP is now open. This > version is a patch release to address some additional issues with the > v3.2.3 release. > > * Fixes a bug in the Stomp code that prevented a connection from bei

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS API v1.5.0

+1 On 4 Jan 2011, at 23:51, Timothy Bish wrote: > Hello > > This is a call for a vote on the release of the Apache.NMS API v1.5.0. > This package contains the API for the various Apache.NMS clients along > with utility classes and unit test cases against the abstract NMS API. > > This version

Re: ActiveMQ Apollo Status Update

There's an initial JMS implementation using STOMP 1.1 here - http://fusesource.com/forge/projects/stompjms too On 17 Jan 2011, at 18:57, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Hi Folk, > > A couple of contributors and myself have be feverishly hacking away on > a leaner/meaner messaging broker core called Apol

Re: Way to know if a Consumer does not exist anymore

The client crashing is something ActiveMQ should detect - how is it connecting to the broker ? - have you disabled the macInactivityDuration ? On 20 Mar 2009, at 10:34, Harvin wrote: Hello, I'm using Active MQ and have a scenario where I have a central data store app that has been writt

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP 2.2.5

+1 On 20 Mar 2009, at 22:16, Timothy Bish wrote: Hi everyone, Well its that time once again, its time to call a vote for the release of ActiveMQ-CPP v2.2.5. This is a minor release incorporating all the current fixes. The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:

Re: AMQ-5.2 Changing destination with Message.setDestination is not working properly

Sry for not responding before - but the broker doesn't use the destination on the message for routing its uses the ProducerBrokerExchange - which you would need to copy before changing. cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://fusesource.com http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ On 23 Mar 200

Re: Network of brokers and starvation problem

The TTL parameter can be infinite - and it can be set on a network basis - e.g. every broker to broker network connection could have a different value. Its the connector where the message/subscription is generated that controls the TTL. On 3 Apr 2009, at 16:46, L.Daigremont wrote: Is it p

Re: send message to a queue in ActiveMQ

know? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/send-message-to-a-queue-in-ActiveMQ-tp23534388p23534388.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. see - http://activemq.apache.org/initial-configuration.html cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://fusesource.com

Re: svn commit: r778124 - /activemq/trunk/activemq-core/pom.xml

Working ok for me on OS-X Rob Davies Sent from my iPhone On 24 May 2009, at 13:07, gtu...@apache.org wrote: Author: gtully Date: Sun May 24 12:07:36 2009 New Revision: 778124 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=778124&view=rev Log: disable nio test pending investigation Modi

Re: Why UseDedicatedTaskRunner is true by default?

Hi Aleksi, creating lots of temporary topics is definately ok. +1 to change useDedicatedTaskRunner back to false cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://fusesource.com http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ On 26 May 2009, at 14:38, Aleksi Kallio wrote: Hi, Aleksi Kallio wrote: Because of the excessive

Re: Why UseDedicatedTaskRunner is true by default?

+1 for that Rob Davies Sent from my iPhone On 28 May 2009, at 08:37, Dejan Bosanac wrote: Maybe we can provide a couple configuration files with different setups, such as: activemq-performance.xml activemq-scaling.xml activemq-deep.xml activemq-network.xml activemq-full.xml it would give

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP 3.0 RC2

+1 On 27 May 2009, at 14:16, Timothy Bish wrote: Hi everyone, The V3.0 release of ActiveMQ-CPP has been in the works for a while and we are ready to call a vote for releasing the latest RC2 code as the official 3.0 version of ActiveMQ-CPP. The 3.0 Version of the CPP client adds the following n

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP 3.0

+1 On 8 Jun 2009, at 13:40, Timothy Bish wrote: Hi everyone, The V3.0 release of ActiveMQ-CPP has been in the works for a while and we are ready to call a vote for releasing the latest RC3 code as the official 3.0 version of ActiveMQ-CPP. The 3.0 Version of the CPP client adds the following ne

Re: ActiveMQ 6.0 Broker Core Prototype -- Flow Control / Memory Management

Hi Colin, In 5.x flow control behaves as if its binary - off or on. When its off - messages can be offlined (for non-persistent messages this means being dumped to temporary storage) - but when its on - the producers slow and stop. Also - there can be cases when you get a temporary slow con

Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?

puma gets my vote On 11 Jun 2009, at 14:36, Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Guys, So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x classes in cas

Re: ActiveMQ 6.0 Broker Core Prototype -- Flow Control / Memory Management

e-dimension the broker. Colin -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:12 AM To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6.0 Broker Core Prototype -- Flow Control / Memory Management Hi Colin, In 5.x flow control behaves a

Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?

ubject: RE: ActiveMQ 6 Codename? +1 apollo for me. -Original Message- From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:bruce.sny...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:28 AM To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename? On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Rob Davies wrote: puma gets my vot

Re: XSD update? was: svn commit: r784062 - in /activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src: main/java/org/apache/activemq/store/kahadb/ main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/xbean/spring/http/activemq.apa

oops On 12 Jun 2009, at 16:06, Hiram Chirino wrote: Don't you also need to update the xsd? On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:44 AM, wrote: Author: rajdavies Date: Fri Jun 12 10:44:50 2009 New Revision: 784062 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784062&view=rev Log: Added perf test for KahaDB and u

Re: maven build upgrade?

+1 On 18 Jun 2009, at 00:09, David Jencks wrote: The build is getting a little out of date. I'd like to update the parent to apache pom 6 and make some related changes to use the most up to date maven build recommendations. This will make it a lot easier to produce release candidates that

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP 3.0.1

+1 On 29 Jun 2009, at 23:27, Timothy Bish wrote: Hi everyone, The V3.0.1 release of ActiveMQ-CPP is now up for a vote, this release is a minor release focusing on bug fixes for issues found in 3.0 mostly in the Failover Transport. The 3.0.1 Version of the CPP client addresses the followin

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveIO 3.1.1

+1 On 13 Jul 2009, at 12:22, Dejan Bosanac wrote: Hi, we need to release ActiveIO 3.1.1 to fix AMQ-1380 ( https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1380) prior the upcoming 5.3.0 release. Staging repository with the release candidate is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/reposi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveIO 3.1.1

+1 On 16 Jul 2009, at 08:16, Dejan Bosanac wrote: Hi, since we canceled the previous vote, I'm starting the new thread to vote for the new release candidate. The change over the previous candidate is fixed (cleaned) pom that now works better with Apache version 6 and publishes the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveIO 3.1.2

de specific comments) Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net Rob Davies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [stomp-dev] Stomp Future

pen Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net Rob Davies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: ActiveMQ in Production

his - http://fusesource.com/products/enterprise-activemq/ - which is still Apache licenced, a clone of activemq but has more issues fixed I would try out that version first cheers, Rob Rob Davies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm wri

Re: [jira] Updated: (AMQ-1759) ActiveMQ 4.1.2 packaged with geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar that is not Java 1.4 compatible

Ok done! Sent from my iPhone On 4 Sep 2009, at 20:05, "David Jencks (JIRA)" wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated AMQ-1759: -- Fix Version/s:

Re: svn commit: r813525 - in /activemq/trunk: ./ activemq-core/ activemq-core/src/main/resources/ activemq-core/src/main/resources/META-INF/ activemq-core/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apac

Awesome! On 10 Sep 2009, at 18:47, gtu...@apache.org wrote: Author: gtully Date: Thu Sep 10 17:47:43 2009 New Revision: 813525 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=813525&view=rev Log: resolve https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2342 - update to xbean 3.7-SNAPSHOT pending 3.6 rele

Re: svn commit: r813992 - in /activemq/trunk/activemq-ra/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ra: ManagedConnectionProxy.java ManagedSessionProxy.java

() throws JMSException { closed = true; @@ -85,7 +90,9 @@ } /** - * + * + * @return underlying session, unless this proxy is closed + * @throws javax.jms.JMSException if session is closed */ private Session getSession() throws JMSException { if (closed) {

Re: Hudson build is unstable: ActiveMQ » Active MQ :: Core #120

On 16 Sep 2009, at 01:09, Apache Hudson Server wrote: See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ActiveMQ/org.apache.activemq$activemq-core/120/ cant seem to reproduce his failure - can anyone else ? cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http

Re: Hudson build is unstable: ActiveMQ » Active MQ :: Core #120

thx Gary! On 16 Sep 2009, at 10:22, Gary Tully wrote: think I have resolved the problem, it is a timing issue. the wait for messages in ConsumerBean would only wait for 10 outstanding messages. r815684 will have it wait for all outstanding messages. 2009/9/16 Rob Davies On 16 Sep 2009, at

Re: Hudson build is still unstable: ActiveMQ » ActiveMQ :: Core #123

/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Apache Hudson Server < hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org> wrote: See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ActiveMQ/org.apache.activemq$activemq-core/123/ Rob Davie

Re: [VOTE] AciveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.0 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 releases

source.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.0 RC3

yder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] AciveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.0 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 releases

apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.3.0/ Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://bit.ly/2je6cQ Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open S

Re: [VOTE] AciveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.0 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 releases

ue would pretty quickly fill up and block the senders using the config snippet below since it limits the queue size to 1Mb. Colin -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:25 PM To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] A

producerFlowControl

Any objections if this set back to true by default for destinations ? Now the bug in the memory limit has been resolved for persistent cursors - it would be generally safer to have this enabled again. cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My

Re: producerFlowControl

09 at 6:46 AM, Rob Davies wrote: Any objections if this set back to true by default for destinations ? Now the bug in the memory limit has been resolved for persistent cursors - it would be generally safer to have this enabled again. Would this take place in 5.3? Bruce -- perl -e 'pr

Re: producerFlowControl

Raised an issue for it - https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2403 On 23 Sep 2009, at 14:06, Bruce Snyder wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Rob Davies wrote: Any objections if this set back to true by default for destinations ? Now the bug in the memory limit has been

Re: Move the the activemq-jpa-store to the sandbox?

irino.com Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com/ Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Other dormant modules..

m Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com/ Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Horizontally scaling JMS listener/consumer application.....in Active MQ environment

.ConsumerA) - there's a lot of different ways of achieving the same thing actually ;) cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 RC4

/fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Are JIRA issue flooding your inbox?

that simply request a feature with no other info as type Wish Let me know if you have any problems or questions. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61EG;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6

Re: network of brokers internals

message in context: http://old.nabble.com/network-of-brokers-internals-tp27019011p27019011.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I&#

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >