On the “about” page - it would be polite to reference the hawtio comunity - i.e. “Artemis Management console is powered by hawtio: hawt.io <http://hawt.io/>” etc - as there is no powered by logo.
> On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:52, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ok, > > So i think we can do this. From a local build. > > Please see screenshots. > > https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03 > <https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03> > > For 1) I think we have managed to completely skin it, with all hawtio > references removed, even the favicon. > For 2) Only the artemis plugin and base jvm plugins, no extras for any other > products. > For 3) Im hoping we can come to agreement on this gets contributed in from > the rh-messaging project @clebert @martyn @andy?, if not we can probably code > up a simpler version of it for now without bells and whistles, and add in the > future features later. > > So if we sort point three, i think we can make this “acceptable” > > Cheers > Mike > >> On 29 Jun 2017, at 19:17, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Michael André Pearce >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> I believe we could make a simple activemq branding jar/war with the >>> selected new logo ;) once decided without too much trouble. >>> >>> I'd be happy to step up to try do this if no objectors. >> >> I discussed previously, what would NEED to be done for this to be >> “acceptable”: >> >> 1) All branding/links/etc… in the console need to be re-skinned or whatever >> to be “ActiveMQ”. All mentions of hawtio and links off to other sites other >> than a possible small “powered by” type thing would need to be removed. >> >> 2) All “plugins” and functionality that don’t pertain to things related to >> ActiveMQ would need to be removed. >> >> 3) The “plugin" that presents ActiveMQ related stuff to the user MUST live >> here at Apache and part of the ActiveMQ community. We cannot use the one >> they provide (unless you can convince them to donate it to Apache). >> >> Unless all three happen, it’s a no-go. >> >> Dan >> >> >>> >>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Speaking the plain truth... The issue is that the hawtio console that >>>> was used years ago.. looked like a commercial product outside of >>>> apache >>>> >>>> I think that if we clear that now.. if it looks an apache look & >>>> feel.. people wouldn't have an issue with it. >>>> >>>> >>>> That would require some cleanup.. move to a newer hawtio plugin maybe? >>>> that's when we thought about trying new routes if we would need to do >>>> a lot of work anyways. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael André Pearce >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss logging, >>>>> this doesn't have a notice file >>>>> >>>>> I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf projects >>>>> themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the asf work. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in ActiveMQ 5.x >>>>>> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many >>>>>> common >>>>>> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely a gap >>>>>> in >>>>>> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome built-in >>>>>> hawtio support as a good addition. >>>>>> >>>>>> Although the source code already contains the standard license assignment >>>>>> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for one, >>>>>> or >>>>>> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a stanza to >>>>>> the >>>>>> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package and >>>>>> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably be >>>>>> changed >>>>>> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly any >>>>>>> movement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of management >>>>>>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially as >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> picking up traction and deployment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other solution >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out there in >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> wild. (It's ASL) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with Hawtio >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis project?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any objectors? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. >>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html >>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> - http://dankulp.com/blog >> <http://dankulp.com/blog> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>
