Re: AIRFLOW-1258

> On Jul 26, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Jawahar Panchal wrote: > > >> On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: >> >> Can you explain what is solved by the patch? It only seems to set a empty >> default value? >> >> If that solves it it also seems

What's up with PR1862?

Back in January, this PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/1862 was approved for inclusion in the 1.8 alpha, but it never made it in, and it's not clear why or what its future is. In the meantime, sql_alchemy_conn_cmd has been documented as working on the website, but does not

Re: Airflow + Kubernetes discussion

Hi Guys, sorry about the technical difficulties. I will be switching this call to zoom.us and send out a link shortly On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:07 AM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see the same thing, "The call is full" > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Wilson

Re: Airflow + Kubernetes discussion

I see the same thing, "The call is full" On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Wilson Lian wrote: > The call is full :( > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Imberman < > daniel.imber...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > The kubernetes discussion

Re: Airflow + Kubernetes discussion

Awesome, thanks! On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Daniel Imberman wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Sorry for the confusion. The meeting will take place over the google > hangout link on the event (zoom was just an early suggestion before I > realized we could just create the

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.8.2 based on Airflow 1.8.2 RC2

I need to re-package it with build instructions. I'm pretty sure this means another vote. I have time carved up to work on this today/tomorrow. Max On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > IMO, given the level of effort for 1.8.2, and how long it's

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.8.2 based on Airflow 1.8.2 RC2

IMO, given the level of effort for 1.8.2, and how long it's taken, we should not be re-voting right now unless something horrific happened to the release. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Pavel Martynov wrote: > Hi, folks! > > AIRFLOW-935 issue marked as resolved and fix

Re: [AIRFLOW-xxx] in commit messages

My 2c: * All commits should have [AIRFLOW-XXX]. * If commit is a readme/doc tweak, it's fine to literally have [AIRFLOW-XXX] (i.e. no actual JIRA number) * Any commit without [AIRFLOW-XXX] was a mistake. I've done (3) a few times--the dev/airflow-pr tool helps with this, but sometimes I miss it.