DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23599] - treats extraOptions parameter as one parameter

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23600] - augmenting the "${}" property replacement algorithm

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13938] - Translate task should output the number of files processed

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/i18n Translate.java

2003-10-03 Thread umagesh
umagesh 2003/10/03 15:37:32 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/i18n Translate.java Log: Translate task logs a debug message specifying the number of files that it processed. Bugzilla Report 13938. R

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13936] - Translate task should have better behavior when a key is not found

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/i18n Translate.java

2003-10-03 Thread umagesh
umagesh 2003/10/03 15:21:49 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/i18n/translate/expected/de template.txt src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/i18n/translate/input template.txt

unsubscribe dev kzgrey@ntplx.net

2003-10-03 Thread Kevin Z Grey
unsubscribe dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23602] New: - Zip task STILL creates zip files incompatible with Winzip

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23601] New: - More than one element in task broken.

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23599] - treats extraOptions parameter as one parameter

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23599] - treats extraOptions parameter as one parameter

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23600] New: - augmenting the "${}" property replacement algorithm

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23599] - treats extraOptions parameter as one parameter

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23599] - treats extraOptions parameter as one parameter

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23599] New: - treats extraOptions parameter as one parameter

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12267] - Add ability to unzip into separate folders

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Bug 3304

2003-10-03 Thread Dominique Devienne
Funny you should say that. That was the default behavior of my submission, and Steve L. changed that when it moved to Ant ;-) --DD > -Original Message- > From: Knut Wannheden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug

RE: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Dominique Devienne
> -Original Message- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:23 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: failonerror; general solution > > Dale Anson wrote: > > What's the difference in use case between this and the try/catch from > > ant-con

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Dale Anson wrote: What's the difference in use case between this and the try/catch from ant-contrib or antelope? I'd suggest grabbing the try/catch from either, and making it a core task. Just judging from the e-mail that I get, the try/catch task in antelope is one of the main reasons people do

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual running.html

2003-10-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Conor MacNeill wrote: On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stevel 2003/10/02 18:40:48 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java docs/manual running.html Log: This is the first visible divergence ofAnt1.7 from 1.6...ant 1.7 has a -nice option that le

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Matt Benson
On controversy: A lot of your stuff, Dale, particularly the various call styles, looks very nice. Another extension I like is ant-contrib's foreach task. However, some companies will only approve a relatively limited number of technologies for use within the enterprise. The endeavor of getting

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread peter reilly
On Friday 03 October 2003 16:34, Dale Anson wrote: > > FYI, I'll be posting a new antelope distribution to sourceforge this > weekend that has been updated for Ant 1.6. > > Dale Hi, Dale, Would you be able to put in an antlib descriptor in the new antelope distribution. make a file called antlib

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Dale Anson
Hmm... I didn't know there was controversy! Does this fall into the 'Ant is not a scripting language' category? As a java developer, the try/catch seems more natural to me. I have spent some time working in a CM team, and realize that not everyone has a development background. The try/catch con

RE: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Dominique Devienne
> -Original Message- > From: Dale Anson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > What's the difference in use case between this and the try/catch from > ant-contrib or antelope? I'd say that it follows an existing pattern in Ant, and is less controversial maybe!? I'll just say I prefer an enhanced

RE: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
You could just use for antcontrib. Did we decided to absorbe these tasks into ANT-CORE? We talked about it but I do not remember any action on it. Jose Alberto > -Original Message- > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 October 2003 16:09 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Dale Anson
What's the difference in use case between this and the try/catch from ant-contrib or antelope? I'd suggest grabbing the try/catch from either, and making it a core task. Just judging from the e-mail that I get, the try/catch task in antelope is one of the main reasons people download it. Contra

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23581] - Target Attributes

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
peter reilly wrote: On Friday 03 October 2003 15:54, Dominique Devienne wrote: ... Not a bad idea! I would just make that: No new task, but simply a very useful extension to an existing task container. --DD This whould make the seqential task actually useful.. :-))) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi

RE: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Dominique Devienne
> -Original Message- > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Here is a task that does some like that: > > package task; > > import org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Sequential; > > > public class NoFail extends Sequential { > private String failureProperty; > public void

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread peter reilly
On Friday 03 October 2003 15:54, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > What about creating a container task instead. > > Like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That way all tasks automatically have somethin

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread peter reilly
Here is a task that does some like that: package task; import org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Sequential; public class NoFail extends Sequential { private String failureProperty; public void setFailureProperty(String name) { this.failureProperty = name; } public void execu

RE: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Dominique Devienne
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > What about creating a container task instead. > Like: > > > > > > > > That way all tasks automatically have something like "failonerror" + you > actually know if the part failed and can take an appr

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Feller
I agree, it is a good option in my mind. +1 :) Emmanuel - Message d'origine - De : "Jan Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : vendredi 3 octobre 2003 16:38 Objet : failonerror; general solution > There are a few new entries in bugzilla regarding handling of >

failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Jan Schroeder
There are a few new entries in bugzilla regarding handling of BuildExceptions. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23540 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23581 Also, some tasks already implement some "failonerror" attribute (e.g. ). What about creating a con

related project addition: phing

2003-10-03 Thread Hans Lellelid
Hi - I wanted to know how to go about submitting a related project for the "Related Projects" page on ant.apache.org. The related project in question is PHING (PHing Is Not Gnumake), a PHP build tools that is based on Ant. Phing's homepage is http://phing.tigris.org. I'm consolidating different

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23540] - patch task should have failonerror attribute

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ReplaceRegexp

2003-10-03 Thread peter reilly
It looks like an oversight. Peter On Friday 03 October 2003 01:57, Steve Loughran wrote: > Anyone know why ReplaceRegeExp.setByLine doesnt just take a bool value?: > > public void setByLine(String byline) { > Boolean res = Boolean.valueOf(byline); > > if (res == null) { >

RE: Antidote submissions (typo, package.html's)

2003-10-03 Thread Christoph Wilhelms
> Antidote ... > > The attached corrects a typo I made that causes a javadoc > error and also adds two package.html files ... I'll add more later. Applied! Thanx! Keep the good work going! Greetings, Christoph - To unsubscrib

cvs commit: ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui package.html

2003-10-03 Thread chrisw
chrisw 2003/10/02 23:57:16 Modified:src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/util Argument.java Added: src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/util package.html src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui package.html Log: Documentation to make Javadoc more useful Obtained from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23578] - "file" attribute omitted from FileSet manual page

2003-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes fileset.html

2003-10-03 Thread ehatcher
ehatcher2003/10/02 21:53:44 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes fileset.html Log: #23578 - added doc of file attribute Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +5 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/fileset.html Index: fileset.html ==

[Apache Newsletter Draft] News as to Apache Ant Project from Aug. to Sep.

2003-10-03 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
Dear Apache Ant Development Team, (http://ant.apache.org/) Hello, Apache newsletter is in progress of preparing the second all-Apache newsletter, news from August to September 2003, which will be published in the middle of October 2003. === What is "The Apache Newsletter"? === http://www.

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual running.html

2003-10-03 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > stevel 2003/10/02 18:40:48 > > Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java >docs/manual running.html > Log: > This is the first visible divergence ofAnt1.7 from 1.6...ant 1.7 has a > -nice option that lets y

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual running.html

2003-10-03 Thread stevel
stevel 2003/10/02 18:40:48 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java docs/manual running.html Log: This is the first visible divergence ofAnt1.7 from 1.6...ant 1.7 has a -nice option that lets you lessen or increase the priority of the main thread. Useful for

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual running.html

2003-10-03 Thread stevel
stevel 2003/10/02 18:37:44 Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH running.html Log: up to date and escaped option list Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.21.2.2 +8 -7 ant/docs/manual/running.html Index: runn

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional ReplaceRegExp.java

2003-10-03 Thread stevel
stevel 2003/10/02 18:10:22 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional ReplaceRegExp.java Log: More diagnostics. Because some of us never get regexps right first time Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +4 -0 ant/src/main/org/apache/

ReplaceRegexp

2003-10-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Anyone know why ReplaceRegeExp.setByLine doesnt just take a bool value?: public void setByLine(String byline) { Boolean res = Boolean.valueOf(byline); if (res == null) { res = Boolean.FALSE; } this.byline = res.booleanValue(); } -