Re: svn commit: r448449 - /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/performance/build.xml

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Reilly
Strange ? was it not set eol-native ? Propchange: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/performance/build.xml -- svn:eol-stype = native On 9/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bodewig Date: Wed Sep 20

Performance

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Reilly
I was looking at a performance thread last year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11189202101r=1w=2 Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse) There was a performance slowdown between ant 1.6.1 and ant 1.6.4 For script1 I get the following numbers: ANT 1.6.1 = 11 sec

Re: Performance

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Reilly
**only** for those build files, which are extreme cases, hopefully there should be some speed up for most build files, but nowhere as much! Like I said, we need more example build files to make sure that ant can scale for large build files, multiple import files, big directory searches / copies

Re: svn commit: r448449 - /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/performance/build.xml

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Reilly
I think you are correct, I had the same problem with cvs years ago, but the cvs was part of cygwin, svn is not part of cygwin on my current system. It must be clever or confused ... sigh. Thanks, Peter On 9/21/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2006-09-20 Thread Peter Reilly
Opps, this is my fault. I noticed that we allow taskname to be set in build files, and assumed that this was a mistake.. I will fix when I get back to my svn machine. Sorry Peter On 9/20/06, Gump Integration Build general@gump.apache.org wrote: To whom it may engage... This is an

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.0 Beta 1

2006-09-20 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On 9/20/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm definitely in favor of a release but I wonder if the jar should contain the xsls for convenience. Since junitreport

Re: AW: svn commit: r447800 - in /ant/core/trunk: bootstrap.bat bootstrap.sh

2006-09-19 Thread Peter Reilly
The problem was that bootstrap.bat had oata.types.resources and bootstrap.sh did not! Peter On 9/19/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan: Thanks for catching my breakage. If Gump's happy, I'm happy. Of course there may be something else about the bootstrap layer I don't know...

Re: svn commit: r446766 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ScriptRunner.java

2006-09-18 Thread Peter Reilly
Yep, it needs one. On 9/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log: a bc file for scriptrunner Added: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ScriptRunner.java (with props) +package org.apache.tools.ant.util; + +/** + * This class is here for backwards compatiblity. + *

Re: svn commit: r446979 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java

2006-09-18 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi DD, Thanks for the comments, it is always nice for people to check the code - I mentioned that this patch was the one that I was a little worried about. 1) The code does not export the lower case version of the env variable that the user passed in, the lower case version is only used for

Re: svn commit: r446979 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java

2006-09-18 Thread Peter Reilly
I placed that there for the reson that I do not know what Windows turkish locale does for environment keys, in particular the infameos i. - i.e. does the turkish version of windows follow the locale rules for upper/lower case? Peter On 9/18/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: suggestion : Ant 1.8 full dist to include a 'scripting lang'

2006-09-17 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/17/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about, if the members of ant-contrib were to agree to this, merge ant and ant-contrib to have the if/ ... Has anybody ever asked them? jokeI think that the author

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28826] - copy uses the wrong loglevel when it fails to copy a file

2006-09-16 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/17/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, I see that you are busy fixing a few more bug reports. :-) The Beta2 will be nice. The deadline is approaching! Hopefully, I have not done anything too stupid. Most of the changes are very minor. The major change is the

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for AntUnit 1.0

2006-09-15 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/15/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I propose the following plan to release AntUnit 1.0. I also propose to be the release manager myself. * release AntUnit 1.0Beta1 next week after ant 1.7.0beta2 is out. +1 * the beta release uses the current code, maybe some

Change to available - stop searching parent directories

2006-09-14 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, I have made the change to available to: 1) stop it seaching parent directories for files unless asked 2) if asked, search all the parent directories not just the parent and grandparent. I think that this was the conclusion reached earlier, if not we can reverse the changes. Peter

Re: [AntUnit] Is extending ConditionBase really that bad?

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
It should extend ConditionBase. On 9/13/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, as I stated in another thread, I don't feel bad for extending ConditionBase but if a majority here would prefer AsserTask to stick with a simple add(Condition) in a task derived class, I'd be up for it as

Re: suggestion : Ant 1.8 full dist to include a 'scripting lang'

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/13/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been looking at a couple of Lisp-on-jvm things, Kawa, and ABCL, but Kawa is scheme not lisp, ABCL is alpha/bleeding edge and didn't actually work (at all). According to https://scripting.dev.java.net/ SCSI (http://sisc.sourceforge.net/)

Re: Roles [WAS:Re: Restricted types: Re: Location in non-Task tasks]

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I did not see the changes. But in principle I agree with Dominique that a roledef should have 3 attributes : name, role, classname or can we make the role attribute optional by finding out by introspection whether a class is a

Re: Roles [WAS:Re: Restricted types: Re: Location in non-Task tasks]

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks, this is good summing up. On 9/13/06, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry I did not read all the svn commit emails. Which classes implement these role definitions ? None, at least none that define a role. Peter has extended IH and co. to lookup nested-element in

Re: Roles [WAS:Re: Restricted types: Re: Location in non-Task tasks]

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/13/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not see the changes. But in principle I agree with Dominique that a roledef should have 3 attributes : name, role, classname Just to clarify, I like the way Peter implemented it

Re: Roles [WAS:Re: Restricted types: Re: Location in non-Task tasks]

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/13/06, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some classes thus may have multiple names associated with them, a unique top-level name and a restricted name that can be s Opps, I hit a emacs keystroke that sent the email... to continue: Some classes thus may have multiple names

Re: suggestion : Ant 1.8 full dist to include a 'scripting lang'

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/13/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to https://scripting.dev.java.net/ SCSI (http://sisc.sourceforge.net/) a scheme implementation is supported by JDK6 scripting via an engine provided by https://scripting.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList Cool, one more

Re: suggestion : Ant 1.8 full dist to include a 'scripting lang'

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
For ant 1.8, we will support jdk6 javax.script.* in some fashion. JDK 6 has javascript (a nobbled version of rhino) built in - so ant build files will get that language for free if the they use JDK 6. On 9/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also think that a lot of the

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
There is the task: I am not too sure if I am using the new ResourceCollection stuff correctly! Peter /* * Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation * * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License); * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. *

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Peter, I would add another question : does this appendcomponentpath task allow to add stuff to the classpath where we are normally hit by the delegating classloader problem ? Such as JDBC/JNDI drivers for instance. For JDBC, it

Restricted types: Re: Location in non-Task tasks

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/11/06, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Introduce a tagdef or roledef for the purpose of locating extension points as nested elements. but I looked at the code and realized that the type handling in ant would become too complicated - there I see your point.

Re: Restricted types: Re: Location in non-Task tasks

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/12/06, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Introduce a tagdef or roledef for the purpose of locating extension points as nested elements. Ok, I dug out my old code and after digging out some of the bugs and misunderstanding, I have modded IH, CH (componenthelper),

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
Datum: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:24:30 +0100 Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: classloader for 1.7 On 9/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Peter, I would add another question : does this appendcomponentpath task

Re: Location in non-Task tasks

2006-09-11 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/11/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, it is a pity that AssetTask has to extend ConditionBase ... oh well. It doesn't have to, does it? All it needs is an add(Condition) method, no? No. Most of the old

Re: Location in macrodef-ed tasks

2006-09-11 Thread Peter Reilly
I have make a change to MacroInstance to check when macrodef.backtrace = false, and if so set the location of all the copied UEs to the MacroInstance.getLocation(). With this change, your test passes. Peter On 9/11/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I pushed setLocation down to

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0Beta2

2006-09-10 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On 9/10/06, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Conor Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I propose to build a second beta on Sunday, September 17th the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B2 the version returned by ant -version would be : ant 1.7.0Beta2 Regards,

Re: Location in non-Task tasks

2006-09-09 Thread Peter Reilly
I think that Location handling should be at the project component level, being there could make better reporting of nested elements. So +1 for handling of Location in ProjectComponent. However, it is a pity that AssetTask has to extend ConditionBase ... oh well. Peter On 9/9/06, Stefan

Re: [VOTE] New Release Candidate for .NET Antlib 1.0 Beta 1

2006-09-09 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On 9/9/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: apache-ant-dotnet-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip - /LICENSE:190: * Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] No year, no copyright owner? (same inside the jar) This is

available searchs parent and grandparent directory for files

2006-09-06 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, I have been looking at bugzilla: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39549 The available task/type searchs for files in the parent and grandparent directories (but no higher) as well as the directories specfied. (when type = file). I cannot think of any reason why this is

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35436] - AntClassLoader returns false loader in getParent()

2006-09-05 Thread Peter Reilly
No, one would have to change the class itself, not the use of the class. Well.., we could do this, but it would mess up the JDK rt.jar file. Users call classloader.getResources() to get the resources. As ClassLoader.getResources() is final in java 1.4 (but not in java 5), AntClassLoader

VOTE: add an antlib (and optional task) loader to ant 1.7

2006-09-04 Thread Peter Reilly
Sorry for asking for another vote on the Classloader for ant issue, but I think that the last vote was very half-hearted in slight support of including the (new) classloader task. However, I think that there was not enough support. In the meantime, I have been looking at Jesse's idea to have a

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-09-01 Thread Peter Reilly
differently in the different IDEs, embedded ant and ant called from ant(.bat). A number of projects set up ant using the java api, in this case we do not have control of which classes of ant are used in the project classloader context On 8/31/06, Jesse Glick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: I

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-09-01 Thread Peter Reilly
the language. Peter On 9/1/06, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not want this to be too complicated. The component classloader should delegate everything to its parent classloader (the Project.class.getClassLoader()) except for ant's optional tasks and types. Ant code has no control over

Re: svn commit: r439014 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition: ConditionBase.java antlib.xml

2006-08-31 Thread Peter Reilly
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mbenson Date: Thu Aug 31 12:04:12 2006 New Revision: 439014 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439014view=rev Log: Auto-discover built-in conditions added = 1.7 from the accompanying antlib so we can stop adding junk setters to

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-08-30 Thread Peter Reilly
On 8/30/06, Jesse Glick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: So what would be the hier for the secondary class loader? if it is bootstrap-ext-system-project-secondary,Yes. it would meant that the classes in project would not be able to see the secondary classes.Correct. Why

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-08-29 Thread Peter Reilly
On 8/25/06, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that a solution that limits mutation to the system classloaderprovides the potential solution for all requirements - I think it is thesafer next step (i.e. update the class in SCN to handle a URLClassLoader, with formal documented

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Reilly
by the benefits. Peter, perhaps you could explain why the current task does not work. I must admit the proposal seemed quite complicated. Conor Peter Reilly wrote: The one in 1.6 does not work. The proposed one is totally different. see http://enitsys.sourceforge.net/ant-classloadertask

Re: svn commit: r434226 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/MacroInstance.java

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Reilly
Opps, I forgot.. I will do it when I get back to my svn machine. Peter On 8/24/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a problem with utf8/latin1 encoding and auto conversion at one time. The solution was to mark

Re: svn commit: r434226 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/MacroInstance.java

2006-08-24 Thread Peter Reilly
There was a problem with utf8/latin1 encoding and auto conversion at one time. The solution was to mark the file as binary. Peter On 8/24/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CONTRIBUTORS is marked binary ? Mvgr, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: peterreilly Date: Wed

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-08-23 Thread Peter Reilly
The one in 1.6 does not work. The proposed one is totally different. see http://enitsys.sourceforge.net/ant-classloadertask/ Peter On 8/23/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it is not a little too late, I would like

Re: classloader for 1.7

2006-08-23 Thread Peter Reilly
be solved independently, but this means that each type of classloader problem would be solved differently - hard to understand and remember. Peter On 8/23/06, Jesse Glick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: If it is not a little too late, I would like to get a vote on including

Re: FileSet inside MacroDef causing ClassCastException

2006-08-23 Thread Peter Reilly
This is a different problem to MATs. This problem is due to the resolution of references. The build script can be reduced to: project macrodef name=my-macrodef sequential fileset id=fs dir=./ /sequential /macrodef script language=beanshell/ my-macrodef/ /project When the

Re: [VOTE] Release of first beta of Ant 1.7.0

2006-08-22 Thread Peter Reilly
Yes [x] On 8/19/06, Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, Since the alpha release last month, there has been little feedback concerning required changes/fixes. I know that most people will have trunk + minor revisions on their machines, and it's time

classloader for 1.7

2006-08-22 Thread Peter Reilly
If it is not a little too late, I would like to get a vote on including classloader into ant 1.7. (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28228) I have been playing with it the last week or so. It really makes working with antlibs, and scripting different languages very nice. For

Re: classloader and delegating classloader problem

2006-08-22 Thread Peter Reilly
I do not know if it solves this problem, but I think that it does. (but at a cost - this is not standard use of classloaders, the code uses reflection to access protected methods of URLClassloader). Peter On 8/22/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter and other, does

Re: Default excludes and Subversion on Windows

2006-08-21 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 (include _svn in list of default excluded) Peter On 8/19/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kev Jackson wrote: On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we reject automatically handling _svn directories

Re: echo no conditional attribute

2006-08-16 Thread Peter Reilly
I think that we should go for 2) adding if/unless to all tasks. It should have the same support as the if/unless in targets. I do not see the need for more complicated condition support (at least at the moment). There would be some snags (what about tasks that do not derive from Task, what about

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 for ant98 plan. Peter On 6/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think like Dominique. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500 Von: Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Peter Reilly
I suppose a problem would be to support this ant98 file. On 7/11/06, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for ant98 plan. Peter On 6/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think like Dominique. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum

Re: [Vote] remove Xalan1 dependencies from codebase

2006-06-21 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On 6/21/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still, I'd like to remove these classes and the dependencies towards these classes unless someone objects, so please vote +1 Stefan

Re: OT - want to join other projects, any recommendations?

2006-06-20 Thread Peter Reilly
I had meant rake! Peter On 6/20/06, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19 Jun 2006, at 21:12, Peter Reilly wrote: Ruby my friend ruby look at rant or rake which is also very very nice But I know ruby and I want to learn something different, hence my original question. Kev

Re: OT - want to join other projects, any recommendations?

2006-06-19 Thread Peter Reilly
Ruby my friend ruby look at rant Peter On 6/19/06, Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kev Jackson wrote: Hi all, This is totally off-topic, apart from in a meta-sense of Ant being an open source project... My favourites at the moment are: WebTest - an Ant extension with many

Re: QName in DynamicAttributeNS

2006-06-13 Thread Peter Reilly
Internally in ant the uri:name form is used (rather that {uri}name) for a stringized versions of xml namespaced names. In dom it seems that the prefix is used in the qualified name. so e.setAttributeNS(uri, qName, value) should be of the form: e.setAttributeNS(http://example.com;, abc:hello,

Re: QName in DynamicAttributeNS

2006-06-13 Thread Peter Reilly
The prefix for elements (as against attributes) are retained. ProjectHelper2 called UE.setQName(qName) with the name it receives from the sax. Something needs to be done for attributes.. Peter On 6/13/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: Internally in ant

Re: QName in DynamicAttributeNS

2006-06-13 Thread Peter Reilly
The intention of DynamicAttribute.setAttributeNS() was to support namespaces in attributes - and it does not work! Peter On 6/13/06, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/13/06, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The prefix for elements (as against attributes) are retained

Re: QName in DynamicAttributeNS

2006-06-13 Thread Peter Reilly
I guess that it only got exercises with simple examples: I tried the echoxml: project xmlns:abc=a.b.c xmlns:def=d.e.f echoxml abc:hello abc:a=abc def:b=def world /abc:hello /echoxml /project and got: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? abc:hello a=abc

Re: how to access a MacroDef?

2006-06-12 Thread Peter Reilly
(taskType); project.log( +Task: + taskType, Project.MSG_DEBUG); return task; } It works for normal macros. Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-06-2006 12:20 Please respond to Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org To Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org cc Subject Re

Re: how to access a MacroDef?

2006-06-12 Thread Peter Reilly
[i]; rtc.setAttribute(P.k,P.v); } T.execute(); } Cheers, Wolfgang. Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12-06-2006 17:08 Please respond to Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org To Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org cc Subject Re: how to access a MacroDef

Re: how to access a MacroDef?

2006-06-07 Thread Peter Reilly
Since macro defs are tasks, it would be better to use the project.createTask() method, and not try to use the internal (although exposed trough the public classes and methods) mechanizes of Ant. macrodef name=atest sequential echoThis is the atest macro/echo

Re: # character causes problem parsing -lib paths

2006-05-10 Thread Peter Reilly
this functionality using 1.3? thanks paul -Original Message- From: ext Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:52 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: # character causes problem parsing -lib paths I have just checked. This is a problem - the ant launcher

Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

2006-04-28 Thread Peter Reilly
[+1] Yes Peter On 4/28/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] Do you agree that we should do it ? [+1] Yes [ ] No -Matt __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the

Re: Manual StyleSheet (was something else)

2006-04-28 Thread Peter Reilly
+1, There is already a stylesheet included in each manual page (stylesheets/style.css) and one (stylesheets/antmanual.css) included in some pages. On 4/28/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] What do you guys think of introducing in

Re: Spring cleanup ?

2006-04-24 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On 4/24/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Stephane, this sounds like a good idea. Regards, Antoine Stephane Bailliez wrote: Hi all, As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup going on in the code, I think it would be

Re: # character causes problem parsing -lib paths

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Reilly
I have just checked. This is a problem - the ant launcher code does some conversion of file names to URLs. The '#' character is not converted The only work-around (at the moment) is to use symbolic links. I have made a change to ant SVN to fix this. Peter On 4/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: svn commit: r395206 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, Can someone on a windows system check that this works there? i.e. the -lib option to ant Peter On 4/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: peterreilly Date: Wed Apr 19 03:50:02 2006 New Revision: 395206 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395206view=rev Log:

Re: svn commit: r395206 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi Antoine, Thanks for checking. I had made a mistake! I had forgot to commit the other file that I changed - Launcher.java (assuming that it only had changes with printf statements!). Can you test now? I have tested by moving ant-contib.jar into ~/# and running with ant --execdebug -f x.xml -lib

Re: [VOTE] removal of the test task based upon the org.apache.testlet framework

2006-04-18 Thread Peter Reilly
[+1] Yes Peter On 4/17/06, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [x] Yes [ ] No - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of dependency to xslp

2006-04-13 Thread Peter Reilly
[x] Yes [ ] No On 4/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Do you want to remove from ant the usage of xslp, a library containing an XML transformation engine, the site where this transformation engine could be downloaded from no longer exists. XSL:P : used to live

Re: javac on java1.5

2006-03-23 Thread Peter Reilly
#1 would not be backwardly compatible ! I am not too sure about #2. In the ant build file we had to deal with this issue for a while, it may be as well to get other project 1.5 aware. Also new projects would have to set things so that 1.5 (and higher) would work. Peter On 3/23/06, Steve

Re: javac on java1.5

2006-03-23 Thread Peter Reilly
Perhaps this could be in the gump definition of a project? Peter On 3/23/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: #1 would not be backwardly compatible ! I am not too sure about #2. In the ant build file we had to deal with this issue for a while, it may

Re: JUnitTask - Question

2006-03-23 Thread Peter Reilly
One can use the configured form of the add method. public void addConfiguredCommandline(Commandline c) { } Ant will set the attributes / elements on Commandline c before calling addConfiguredCommandline(Commandline c) Peter On 3/23/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 14 Mar

Re: svn commit: r384261 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/defaults.properties

2006-03-14 Thread Peter Reilly
I agree with Stefan, we cannot have and etc in defaults.properties I tried this before by making the and implementation class implement both the condition and and the file selector and but it was not a scalable solution. Peter On 3/12/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 08

Re: javadoc's packagenames attribute

2006-02-23 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 for option 2. Peter On 2/21/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, you can tell javadoc what to document by passing in either package names or source files. Our task supports both notions and provides several options to specify the packages, the most common one is to

Re: [VOTE] Kevin Jackson

2005-11-22 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On 11/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2005 07:30 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: [VOTE] Kevin Jackson I would like to propose Kevin

Re: [VOTE-REPOST] Promote the Antunit Antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 , +1 (commiter please) Peter

Re: [VOTE] Promote the svn antlib out of the sandbox

2005-11-11 Thread Peter Reilly
[ X] Yes [ X] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No Peter On 11/11/05, Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shall the SVN antlib be promoted? [ X] Yes (i.e. +1) [ ] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No I suppose I could become an committer when I start

Re: Voting on sandbox libs

2005-11-10 Thread Peter Reilly
Also fine with me. Peter On 11/10/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Stefan (and others), fine with me. Cheers, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, I've thought about the three-way votes needed here again and think it is easiest to vote in two phases. First

subversion commit

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, since we moved to subversion, I have been very inactive on the committing front. I tryed today to commit but could not. I have done a svn co --username peterreilly https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk ant-core which worked fine. When I tryed to commit, the following came up

Re: subversion commit

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks very much. That worked fine! Peter On 10/24/05, Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: Hi, since we moved to subversion, I have been very inactive on the committing front. I tryed today to commit but could not. Is there some trick I need to do?? You

Re: svn commit: r328083 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Reilly
First time in months and I caused a conflct! Peter On 10/24/05, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ha, I wondered why I got weird conflicts. Thought my eols got screwed up, didn't know Peter was modifying at the same time! :) -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mbenson Date:

Re: Quick question about properties

2005-10-13 Thread Peter Reilly
At one stage, the import task behaved as if it was added at the end of the build file. This was an unexpected consequence (bug!) of the initial implementation. This was changed (I think) in 1.6.1 or 1.6.2, so that the import behaved as if it was inline. I have just checked the manual for the

Re: task namespaces

2005-09-12 Thread Peter Reilly
To allow easy use, the nested elements caused by java reflection on objects are placed in two namespaces - the default ant namespace (antlib: org.apache.tools.ant) and the namespace of the object that holds the nested element. For example, the if task from ant-contrib extends ConditionBase, so it

Re: antlib loading in typedef

2005-08-31 Thread Peter Reilly
I was thinking of having another attribute (like antlib=antlib:org.smartfrog.tools.ant) to set the uri and resource. It may be a good idea however to do this by default with just the uri attribute - if the user has not specified the resource/filename. Peter Steve Loughran wrote: Why do

Re: AW: [VOTE] migrate to svn

2005-08-31 Thread Peter Reilly
I too keep forgetting +1 Peter Matt Benson wrote: Sorry I kept forgetting... Here's my +1. -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I´m just getting the results of the vote. But I´m not sure which action from the bylaws to use. An Adoption of New Codebase needs 2/3 majority of

Re: typedef onerror default

2005-08-31 Thread Peter Reilly
Steve Loughran wrote: Why is the onerror default of typedef fail and not failall? It was for BC reasons. i.e. this is the behaviour for 1.5 when resource was used. Peter The effect is that a typedef like this typedef resource=checkstyletask.properties

Re: Ant task

2005-08-08 Thread Peter Reilly
I do not know if the will be interned, it probally will be, but the code is misleading, so am replacing it with a .equals(locals.get(0)) Peter Kev Jackson wrote: Alexey Panchenko wrote: Hi all, jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Ant.java: 383:if (locals.size()

Re: Subversion migration?

2005-08-03 Thread Peter Reilly
If you check old mails, I think that Stefan has already proposed a layout. It needs to incorporate the antlibs directories (already in svn). Also, antidote is no longer supported, and should not be placed in svn - unless someone wants to maintain it. Peter Henri Yandell wrote: To accompany

Re: Bug in tar-section

2005-07-28 Thread Peter Reilly
From the ant manual: Early versions of tar did not support path lengths greater than 100 characters. Modern versions of tar do so, but in incompatible ways. The behaviour of the tar task when it encounters such paths is controlled by the /longfile/ attribute. If the longfile attribute is set

Re: javac

2005-07-12 Thread Peter Reilly
It may be better to give more memory to the compiler. With enough memory a hugh number of files can be compiled. The default memory is only I think 64M. This can be done in a number of ways - - use the env variable ANT_OPTS to specify the memory for Ant's jvm example: export

Re: javac

2005-07-12 Thread Peter Reilly
into the same problems. But, we want to have all the builds made using ant. Jean Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It may be better to give more memory to the compiler. With enough memory a hugh number of files can be compiled. The default memory is only I think 64M. This can be done

Re: Ant 1.6.5 released

2005-06-02 Thread Peter Reilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Thanks for the update. Can you explain the specific bug with move task or point me where I can read about it ? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34962 Peter - To

1.6.5 and javadoc with external files and directories with spaces on windows.

2005-05-31 Thread Peter Reilly
There was some discussion last week about bug 27814. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27814 Basicly, because of invalid doc for javadoc, ant generates external files containing invalid filenames for the javadoc. - a:\a dir with spaces\subdir\file.name javadoc does like this

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27814] - javadoc task does not encode baskslashes when generating file list by useexternalfile

2005-05-26 Thread Peter Reilly
Jesse Glick wrote: I guess +0 from me on merging it. Important only to some people, of course. Could wait for 1.7. As I understand it, it affects people who set useexternalfile=true when running javadoc on a source tree containing spaces in the name on Windows - the task breaks with a

Re: installation instructions for ant under jpackage

2005-05-26 Thread Peter Reilly
Steve Loughran wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: There have been some comments on the jpackage.org mailing list to the effect that our manual doesn't really have correct installation instructions for that environment, although elsewhere on our site we do link to them. I have rewritten the install

Re: Can Ant know ANT_HOME?

2005-05-26 Thread Peter Reilly
Jesse Glick wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote re. ${ant.home}: Keep in mind that it is our wrapper script that sets the property. picky_mode It is actually set by Laucher.java as well if not already set. /picky_mode Peter If you launch ant any other way (IDE, script of your own, embedded),

Re: installation instructions for ant under jpackage

2005-05-26 Thread Peter Reilly
Steve Cohen wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: There have been some comments on the jpackage.org mailing list to the effect that our manual doesn't really have correct installation instructions for that environment, although elsewhere on our site we do

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >