Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 19/02/18 9:23 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: On 19/02/18 1:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: We have 3 pre-defined formatters all of which are capable of receiving this streamed sysout/syserr data. Each of these do _not_ hold on to this sysout/syserr data in-memory

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 19/02/18 1:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading the manual

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this > task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this > task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading > the manual first, before reviewing the PR, since the

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 17/02/18 12:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading the manual

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this > task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this > task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading > the manual first, before reviewing the PR, since the

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

I just realized that the manual that I linked in my mail isn't accessible to everyone. So here's an alternative link to the same https://home.apache.org/~jaikiran/temp_workspace/manual/Tasks/junitlauncher.html -Jaikiran On 15/02/18 7:21 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I'm now done with the initial

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

From a release point of view - I know we are currently sorting out some regressions and issues that have been uncovered by the latest release. So if it makes things easier from a stability point of view, we can wait to merge this only after we have done another release which addresses only the

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading the manual first, before reviewing the PR, since the manual will give an overall idea of

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 2018-01-27, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Here's an update on where this effort now stands. As of yesterday, I > have the basic minimal functionality that I had planned for this (new) > task ready. There are other enhancements that this task will need as > we go along but at this point, this should be

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

One minor but important detail - this feature/task will only be available in the 1.10.x releases (whichever release we decide to include this in) and won't be available in 1.9.x releases of Ant. -Jaikiran On 27/01/18 8:40 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Here's an update on where this effort now

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

Here's an update on where this effort now stands. As of yesterday, I have the basic minimal functionality that I had planned for this (new) task ready. There are other enhancements that this task will need as we go along but at this point, this should be usable. While working on this new

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

Thank you. I'm moving ahead with the new proposed task. Hopefully I should be able to have something functional in a few days. -Jaikiran On 14/12/17 5:14 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-14, Jaikiran Pai wrote: With that context, I would like to explain what I have attempted so far and

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

FWIW, I'm for a separate task. It may simplify dropping tasks that become mired in legacy (who needs Jasper from Tomcat 4 nowadays?) Or maybe we should start an ant-legacy antlib? :-) Gintas 2017-12-14 12:44 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > On 2017-12-14, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

On 2017-12-14, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > With that context, I would like to explain what I have attempted so > far and I would like inputs on whether I should follow this path > and/or if there are other suggestions on how we should go ahead. As > you are probably aware, the JUnitTask (the Ant task

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

After sending this mail, the more I think of it, I am not too sure introducing a new task (junitlauncher) is serving any useful purpose. Of course it does allow me to keep the task implementation simpler without using the existing JUnitTask as an entry point of the call. But that is an