Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

Stefan, Can you please explain why on WIN2K, both 1.5.X and CVS HEAD both work fine? (and we see the failure only on nagoya?). If this was the problem, then we'd see failures on both platforms. Thanks, -- dims --- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for coming back contardicting my

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:44 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: peterreilly2003/09/10 08:44:01 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java Log: Another typo! Hmm. Seems I can't spell my own name. :-) Thanks Conor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23090] New: - AbstractFileSet copy-constructor makes shallow copy

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23090. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs S tyleTest.java

typo - sort of - * TestCases fuer style / xslt task. + * TestCases for style / xslt task. Jan, you can savely put ü into CVS (but javac may need an encoding attribute). Stefan Thanks - but that shouldn´t. It wasn´t a typo error - more a I18N one :-) Usually I write all in

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java

bodewig 2003/09/11 03:41:53 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java Log: 2003 Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/XSLTLiaison2.java Index: XSLTLiaison2.java

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

bodewig 2003/09/11 03:47:16 Modified:docs external.html xdocsexternal.xml Log: Add pointer to JWare/AntXtras Revision ChangesPath 1.134 +54 -0 ant/docs/external.html Index: external.html

cvs commit: ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/modules/edit DragTree.java

bodewig 2003/09/11 03:50:23 Modified:src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/acs package.html src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/modules/edit DragTree.java Log: Fix javadoc errors. Submitted by: Lajos Pajtek lajospajtek at yahoo dot com Revision ChangesPath

Re: antidote diff

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Lajos Pajtek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This cvs diff should fix the remaining javadoc warnings in antidote. committed, thanks. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: antidote diff

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: though since the last changes seem to have been February there is probably a lot of scope for the interested coder!? Antidote has had two or three phases of increased development efforts with longer breaks of inactivity in between. The

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please explain why on WIN2K, both 1.5.X and CVS HEAD both work fine? 1.5.x works on both platforms as most bugs in Ant are cross-platform, too. Maybe you've picked up a CVS HEAD version after Peter Reilly has committed a

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

Stefan, In case you are not yet tired of this :) - Am using the same ant jars (Ant version 1.6alpha compiled on September 6 2003) picked up from nightly build area fails on nagoya (SunOS) and works on win2k. - Checked in your suggested fix

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

It seems like a never-ending stream of these types of things. Obviously Stefan is very quick to apply these, but I'm wondering if it'd be better to just put a link to the Ant wiki pages and let folks self-maintain a list of these add-ons/extras. On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 06:47 AM,

RE: cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

It seems like a never-ending stream of these types of things. Obviously Stefan is very quick to apply these, but I'm wondering if it'd be better to just put a link to the Ant wiki pages and let folks self-maintain a list of these add-ons/extras. Seems to be a good idea. :-) But then we

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23070] - Delete task can't delete a directory based on a name pattern

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23070. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

conor 2003/09/11 07:04:16 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Task.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs CallTarget.java Java.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23042] - Incorrect method comments in org.apache.tools.ant.Task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23042. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23042] - Incorrect method comments in org.apache.tools.ant.Task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23042. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: antidote diff

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 02:12 am, Jack Woehr wrote: If I were attack the GUI in that fashion (tossing it back into NetBeans) would that be acceptable or would that cross some guideline? IMHO, I don't think development should be tied to a single IDE. You can, of course, use the features of your

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTProcess.java

conor 2003/09/11 07:41:08 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/style testNewerStylesheet.xsl src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTProcess.java Log: Fix new style test so that it pases on Linux. There appeared to be a clock granularity problem where the output

Re: antidote diff

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: though since the last changes seem to have been February there is probably a lot of scope for the interested coder!? Antidote has had two or three phases of increased development efforts with longer breaks of

Re: antidote diff

Conor MacNeill wrote: IMHO, I don't think development should be tied to a single IDE. Well, this is true, but a .java file GUI-edited under NetBeans is hand-editable. You just don't hand-code inside the areas delineated by guard comments. I hand-edit Netbeans projects all the time. It's just

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23106] New: - Regexp Mapper: Empty selection groups return string null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23106] - Regexp Mapper: Empty selection groups return string null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc

Hi ant, Current javadoc task support only SUN's javadoc. However there are another javadoc engine like gjdoc which is GNU's javadoc altenative. If ant supports gjdoc, it would be helpful for diffusion of gjdoc. In the past, I refactored rmic for other than SUN's rmic implementation. This is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23106] - Regexp Mapper: Empty selection groups return string null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14619] - Mapper with type regexp takes 'null' for empty sub-RegExp's

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14619. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23090] - AbstractFileSet copy-constructor makes shallow copy

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23090. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23107] New: - condition checksum always sets property to true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In case you are not yet tired of this :) should I? 8-) - Am using the same ant jars (Ant version 1.6alpha compiled on September 6 2003) picked up from nightly build area fails on nagoya (SunOS) and works on win2k. Just to be

Re: antidote diff

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgive me, Stefan, I believe we have a misunderstanding. Yes, we had. Use NetBeans to maintain the GUI classes. As long as it doesn't prevent the GUI to be altered using a different IDE, I'm totally on the fence here. Never use

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23107] - condition checksum always sets property to true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

-noinput option

Can someone please point me to the bug report for the -noinput option? Thanks Darins

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23090] - AbstractFileSet copy-constructor makes shallow copy

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23090. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[patch] it's ant-antidote, not jakarta-ant-antidote

This patch fixes the WHAT-IS-THIS-P file that tells where ant-antidote is located at. Index: src/antidote/WHAT-IS-THIS-P === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/src/antidote/WHAT-IS-THIS-P,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23119] - Pass Ant parameters from target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23119. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.