+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:18:41 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Merge Ivy and Ant Dev Lists
Hi,
it seemed as if the discussion favored a joined mailing lists of Anf
(and antlibs)
+1 for asking people to re-subscribe
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 10:56:59 AM
Subject: Re: ivy-dev list migration
On Dec 5, 2007 8:55 AM, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for updating makepom and merging svn revision r601489 into this beta release.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 8:53:30 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 7:34:11 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt)
I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1
You can download
Hi,
The LatestConflictManagerTest fails on my fresh copy of svn trunk. However, it
doesn't fail on gump. Anyone an idea?
I get the following exception when running in Eclipse (all tests fail with
similar error, except the first one)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: invalid micro ivy format:
for the pattern, are you sure you
cleaned your build before running (you say you have a fresh copy, so I
don't see how it cold be an issue... but anyway).
Xavier
-Original Message-
From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:28 PM
To: dev@ant.apache.org
I've found it. The Pattern.toString() method doesn't return the String pattern
on JDK 1.4. Maybe this is different on JDK 1.5+?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 11:37:23 PM
, it works :-). But the problem
is only for tests, so we know we have one test failing with jdk 1.4 for
2.0 beta 1, doesn't sound like a showstopper issue for me.
Xavier
-Original Message-
From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:46 PM
To: Ant
: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 3:41 PM
To: ant-dev
Subject: ivy.xsd outdated
The ivy.xsd on the site is not up-to-date:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/schemas/ivy.xsd
(it doesn't support the global exclude element)
Can someone update this?
Can't you? All you
The ivy.xsd on the site is not up-to-date:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/schemas/ivy.xsd
(it doesn't support the global exclude element)
Can someone update this?
Maarten
Be a better friend, newshound,
Hi,
In the ArtifactRevisionId.newInstance(...) methods, the extra attributes of the
module are automatically added to the extra attributes of the module artifacts.
Any idea what could be the reason for this?
Maarten
-
From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 5:04 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: extra attributes on publication artifacts
No tests are failing if I remove it. The corresponding svn commit log
where this code has been added is this (svn revision 515753
Why not delay the circular dependency check untill the resolve is finished?
Maybe the module causing the circular dependency gets evicted so there might be
no problem at all?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
it is useful to use them in patterns. Try removing this piece
of code and see if a test case is failing, I wouldn't be surprised we
have a test case for that.
Xavier
-Original Message-
From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 4:41 PM
To: ant-dev
Subject
I didn't detect this error because I'm running tests with Java 1.4 where the
validation of Ivy files doesn't work because the standard XML parser doesn't
support XML Schema validation. I've added Xerces to the test classpath to avoid
this in the future, I hope it won't give problems with more
It seems there is a trick to view the site before it has being rsync'ed by
using a HTTP proxy:
http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007
The download page is working now :-)
I've played a bit with the download.cgi file, but I don't know what was the
magical change that made things work, maybe someone else did a change as well???
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List
@ant.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:02:01 AM
Subject: Re: ivy download page
On Dec 14, 2007 10:58 PM, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The download page is working now :-)
I've played a bit with the download.cgi file, but I don't know what
was
the magical change that made things
I'd prefer having the site in SVN too...
btw, the rights on the /www/ant.apache.org/ivy directory aren't correct, I
can't create new files in it. Could you update that?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent:
I receive the following error when compiling the latest Ivy sources from SVN.
Xavier: could this be introduced somewhere with your recent changes?
java.lang.RuntimeException: problem during retrieve of org.apache.ivy#ivy:
java.lang.ClassCastException
at
Xavier,
why did you change the way the attributes are processed in the
XmlSettingsParser class?
For instance, before your commit, it was like this:
String propFilePath = ivy.substitute((String) attributes.get(file));
After your commit, it is like this:
String propFilePath = (String)
Strange,
I tested it with a sun jdk 1.4.2 (I can't check the patch level from here) and
it was working ok, so I assumed it would work for all sun 1.4.2 VM's :-(
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008
, 2008 12:43 PM, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 12:14 PM, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Strange,
I tested it with a sun jdk 1.4.2 (I can't check the patch level
from
here) and it was working ok, so I assumed it would work for all sun
1.4.2 VM's
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:35:49 AM
Subject: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer
Hi All,
Nicolas Lalevée has contributed a lot of patches to Ivy and IvyDE [1 to
This should be fixed before we release the new beta
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Patrick Woodworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:27:26 PM
Subject: Ivy build broken on Java 1.4
As of r629224 the Ivy build appears broken when using JDK
I've just committed a fix, it should be ok now.
Thanks for reporting.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Patrick Woodworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:27:26 PM
Subject: Ivy build broken on Java 1.4
As of r629224 the Ivy build appears
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:15:13 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2.
Compared to
Hi,
after my changes to fix IVY-716, the following methods on DependencyResolver
are no longer used:
String[] listTokenValues(String token, Map otherTokenValues);
OrganisationEntry[] listOrganisations();
ModuleEntry[] listModules(OrganisationEntry org);
RevisionEntry[]
Can't we just deprecate the id attribute on the settings task and use the
settingsId attribute instead?
ivy:settings settingsId=my.settings /
instead of
ivy:settings id=my.settings /
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List
On 29/03/2008, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Dominique Devienne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Maarten Coene
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can't we just deprecate the id attribute on the settings task and
use
I like the enumeration syntax, like descriptor=required | otpional, it's much
more readable and it will probably allow us to have less attributes on some of
the tasks.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent:
It was hardcoded to 0600 in Scp.java before I made this change. To keep it BC,
I defaulted it to the same value. As far as I could see, the umask wasn't used.
Since this attribute is only used for publishing modules, not for module
retrieval, I think we should at least keep publish in the
Btw, in the manual for chmod, they use the mode terminology for this kind of
information.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2008 9:19:57 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r644541 - in /ant/ivy
: r644541 - in /ant/ivy/core/trunk: CHANGES.txt
doc/resolver/ssh.html src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/ssh/Scp.java
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/ssh/SshRepository.java
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Btw, in the manual for chmod
Are we going to use confluence as a replacement for our current website
(http://ant.apache.org/ivy), or only as a replacement for our wiki
(http://wiki.apache.org/ivy/) ?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent:
PROTECTED]
wrote:
Le mercredi 23 avril 2008, Maarten Coene a écrit :
Are we going to use confluence as a replacement for our current website
(http://ant.apache.org/ivy), or only as a replacement for our wiki
(http://wiki.apache.org/ivy/) ?
The vote is only for the wiki. We didn't discussed
+1 for an IvyDE release.
I'd prefer a beta release instead of an alpha release though...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:19:40 PM
Subject: Re: Releasing IvyDE
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at
Why not always use the server timestamp for the artifacts as we already do for
the Ivy files?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:51:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Ivy] How to add a new option to
.
Gilles
2008/5/29 Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why not always use the server timestamp for the artifacts as we already do
for the Ivy files?
Why not, indeed, I see no specific reason.
Xavier
Maarten
I suggest you do the following:
1. create a JIRA issue for this
2. modify BasicURLHandler.java to always set the modification date on the
downloaded file
3. check if this change has the effect you wanted
4. if test results are ok, attach a patch to your JIRA issue for
BasicURLHandler.java
I've installed it using the update site on my Eclipse 3.4 without a problem.
I've only used it for some very basic things and I didn't had any problem so
far
So, here is my +1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List
Yes,
I changed that recently. IvyAntSettings is now a DataType again...
They should use the IvyConfigure task instead.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:37:03 AM
Subject: Ivy svn breaks ant-contrib
Just a wild guess, but maybe you could use IvyAntSettings again (like your
original code was), but instead of calling the execute method you can register
it yourself as Reference in the Project, something like:
IvyAntSettings settings = new IvyAntSettings();
settings.setXXX...
I agree,
The goal is to have one single instance of HttpClient here to be able to reuse
the connections.
At the moment, the HttpClientHandler isn't a singleton, so the easiest way for
me was to make it static.
But maybe we can wait to see if the change solves the problem. If it doesn't,
we
Xavier,
I've looked at the code, and I can't remember writing such a thing and I can't
remember using it.
The svn history logs indicates I've added the code, so I can only think of 3
options:
- there must be something wrong with my memory
- there went something wrong importing the svn history
I only have a failing ChainResolverTest.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 6:44:35 PM
Subject: Re: Ivy Broken unit test
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL
Xavier,
I think this is an excellent idea :-)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 1:04:45 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r683187 -
The tests are still running ok for me on Windows
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 11:38:57 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r683187 -
/ant/ivy/core/trunk/test/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/IvyTaskTest.java
Xavier,
you've merged that fix into the 2.0.x branch. Does this mean it will be
included in the 2.0.0 final release?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:03:06 AM
Subject:
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:56:25 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-rc1 Release
I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-rc1
You can download it from this URL:
If you want this issue to be fixed, please do
- vote for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-736, or
- attach a patch to this issue, or
- attach a junit test to this issue, or
- do all of the things above :-)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Wardrip, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Indeed, and an error (or warning) could be thrown if you Ivy module defines an
artifact having a different name than the module name.
I think there was a JIRA issue as well for supporting more than 1 artifact...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant
I've applied your patches into SVN and the 2.0.x branch.
They won't be included into RC1 because we already created the release, the RC1
announcement will be sent very soon...
If we will create a RC2 is not certain at the moment and it will be discussed
later on this mailing list.
Maarten
Looks fine to me...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:42:17 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Ivy 2.0.0-rc1 announcement
Hi,
The vote for Ivy 2.0.0-rc1 is now over (I'll send another
I'm a bit confused here, you talk about the SFTP resolver, but your log shows
only http URLs?
Could you try it again with Ivy RC1, it contains some improvements for such
kind of urls with strange characters.
oh and please post such kind of questions to the ivy-user mailinglist in the
future...
, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Please open a new Ivy JIRA issue.
I don't think we should open an issue for that. Well, maybe we can open an
issue for consistency, but mark it as invalid. Indeed I don't think
accepting something which is not valid XML makes any sense, it's just too
much work
Type: Improvement
Components: classpath container
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.alpha1
Reporter: Maarten Coene
IvyDE doesn't specify the ${basedir} property when resolving the
dependencies.
This means that it's not possible to resolve jar files in a [project]/lib
directory
Hi,
Ivy-2.0.0-RC1 is out for some time now. What will be the next step?
- create a new RC2 release containing some (or all) of the bugfixes which have
been committed into SVN trunk and maybe some open issues which aren't fixed yet
- create a 2.0.0 final release based on RC1
I'm in favor for a
We are also still using JDK1.4.
Well probably upgrade to Java 6 next year after we have solved some
incompatibilities between JDK1.4 and JDK6
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:02:40 PM
Subject:
Please do, I'll try to make a new release within the next couple of days...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:23:40 AM
Subject: Re: Next step in Ivy 2.0 release process
Hi all,
I've started creating Ivy 2.0.0 RC2 a couple of days ago, but I have some delay
:-(
I'm almost finished I think, just need to create the eclipse bundle before I
start a vote.
Because I don't have time today and tomorrow to finish it, I'll post the
download link now so you could
with this release is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
The bundle version is 2.0.0.cr2.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene,
Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 release manager
, Maarten Coene a écrit :
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0
You can download it from this URL:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/ivy/staging/2.0.0-rc2/
A maven 2 staging repo with this release is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo
Almost forgot to vote myself, so here is mine +1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ant-dev dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:53:50 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 Release
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0
The vote is over for the Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 release. With 4 binding +1, the vote has
passed.
I'll proceed to make the release official in the coming days.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY
Download the 2.0.0-rc2 release files at:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/download.cgi
More information can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene (2.0.0-rc2 release manager
that would be cool indeed...
But I think we can release Ivy-2.0 final within 2 or 3 weeks if no serious bugs
are reported against RC2.
Maybe we should only announce the final release on ant.apache.org ?
WDYT?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Sounds good to me
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:15:48 PM
Subject: IvyDE 2.0 roadmap
I would like to discuss about the next release of IvyDE.
The last release of IvyDE
I'm getting an error when trying to update the already installed IvyDE plugin.
I'm using Eclipse 3.4.0 and tried both
http://people.apache.org/~hibou/staging/updatesite and
http://people.apache.org/~hibou/test-updatesite/
This is the information I could find in the Eclipse .log file
!ENTRY
+1
I did some basic testing with Eclipse 3.5M3 and everything seems to work fine
:-)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 10:17:00 AM
Subject: [VOTE] IvyDE 2.0.0.beta1 Release -
Ivy 2.0.0 RC2 is out for some time now. I think that none of the reported
issues agains RC2 are critical enough to block a 2.0.0 final release.
However, I would like to include the following trivial changes in the 2.0.0
final release (without making a new RC3 release):
-
Yes,
I'll do the merge when I'm finished with the 2.0.0 release...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Gilles Scokart gscok...@gmail.com
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:33:14 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r727546 -
/ant/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0/build-release.xml
Yes,
I was working on it untill I got the flue and after that I just didn't find the
time to continue the work.
But I hope I can finish it this week so we can start the vote.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Scheper, Erik-Berndt erik-berndt.sche...@sogeti.nl
To: dev@ant.apache.org
I'm not convinced that this is the proper way to solve your problem.
If they are not conflicts, they shouldn't get logged as conflict. Could you
give us more info and an example of your log?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Robey Pointer robeypoin...@gmail.com
To: dev@ant.apache.org
is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene, Ivy 2.0.0 release manager
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 5:29:01 AM
Subject: Re: patch (ivy): log conflict results at verbose
On 6 Jan 2009, at 12:14, Maarten Coene wrote:
I'm not convinced that this is the proper way to solve your problem.
If they are not conflicts, they shouldn't get logged
the bundle version has to be '2.0.0.final'.
I think the release should be rebuild with the correct version.
Nicolas
Le 8 janv. 09 à 00:15, Maarten Coene a écrit :
I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0
You can download it from this URL:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/ivy/staging/2.0.0
here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo/
A staging eclipse update site with this release is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene, Ivy 2.0.0 release manager
Since there are only 2 binding votes so far, here is my +1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene maarten_co...@yahoo.com
To: ant-dev dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 11:51:17 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0 Release (2nd attempt)
I have built a new release
The vote has ended for the Ivy 2.0.0 release.
With 3 binding +1 and no vetoes, the release is accepted.
I'll finish the release process within the next couple of days.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
information can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene
==
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
It's not a synchronization problem, I think I did something wrong uploading the
site, but I don't know how to fix it (yet)...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Scheper, Erik-Berndt erik-berndt.sche...@sogeti.nl
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:26:34 AM
to this new version.
Issues should be reported to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY
Download the 2.0.0 release at:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/download.cgi
More information can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene
The site should be ok now
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Scheper, Erik-Berndt erik-berndt.sche...@sogeti.nl
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:26:34 AM
Subject: [ivy] javascript syntax error upon loading ivy home page
Hi,
When I load the ivy home page
How do I mention the Ivy 2.0.0 release on the ant homepage?
I guess I have to add it to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/antnews.xml ?
But what do I have to do next?
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe,
announcement, but you want to add more I think ;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maarten Coene [mailto:maarten_co...@yahoo.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009 00:08
An: ant-dev
Betreff: Announcing Ivy 2.0.0 release on Ant homepage
How do I mention the Ivy 2.0.0 release on the ant homepage?
I
I'm fine with your change, I don't think you need a vote for it.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2009 6:41:13 PM
Subject: Should I open a vote ? (Re: svn commit: r740252 -
I don't know about vfs, but Ivy doesn't fail any longer if you have
httpclient-2.x in your classpath.
In that situation, Ivy will use the default JDK URL classes...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Hans Dockter m...@dockter.biz
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent:
Creating a 2.0.1 release is ok for me. I'm willing to create the release if
no-one else volunteers...
I've taken a quick look at the changes in JIRA, I think IVY-970 contains the
biggest change, but I think we can include it in the new release (or is it too
risky?)
And maybe we should also try
Hi,
I would like to change the Ivy retrieve behaviour regarding conflict handling
when multiple artifacts are retrieved to the same file.
At the moment, Ivy has some kind of retrieve-conflict-manager which selects the
best artifact, based on the revision of the conflicting modules.
This
Maarten Coene maarten_co...@yahoo.com
Hi,
I would like to change the Ivy retrieve behaviour regarding conflict
handling when multiple artifacts are retrieved to the same file.
At the moment, Ivy has some kind of retrieve-conflict-manager which
selects
the best artifact, based
I've updated the RetrieveEngine to throw an error if multiple artifacts of the
same module are mapped to the same filename.
The behaviour when multiple artifacts of different modules are mapped to the
same filename hasn't been changed.
Could you review this change and are you ok to include
Hi all,
it's time to make a new Ivy release.
I volunteer to be release manager, but we should discuss the following first:
- what will be the new Ivy version: 2.0.1 or 2.1.0
- what changes will we include in this new release?
- will we create a release candidate first?
My answers to these
, March 18, 2009 8:54:55 PM
Subject: Re: New Ivy release
Gilles Scokart
2009/3/17 Maarten Coene maarten_co...@yahoo.com
Hi all,
it's time to make a new Ivy release.
I volunteer to be release manager, but we should discuss the following
first:
Cool, thanks,
- what will be the new Ivy
here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene,
Ivy 2.1.0-rc1 release manager
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
FYI, the release notes and changes of this release can be seen here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/core/branches/2.1.x/RELEASE_NOTES
These release notes are also included in the binaries...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene maarten_co...@yahoo.com
To: ant
Hi all,
With 4 binding +1 and 1 non binding, I'm pleased to announce that this vote has
passed successfully.
I'll continue with the release process within the next couple of days.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
regenerating and committing the Ivy site takes a lot of time at the moment.
I wondered if we could speed that up by cleaning up the history part of the
site. For instance, is it really necessary we still have the documentation of
ivy-2.0.0-alpha1 online?
Maarten
website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Yes, basic authentication should still be ok
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Hans Dockter m...@dockter.biz
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Ivy] webdav support
On Feb 11, 2009, at 9:46 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
I
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo