Hi,
i have updated the Java and C++ UNO runtime reference documentation on
api.openoffice.org.
The C++ reference has currently a problem with the new introduced styles
for the generated docu. When browsing the C++ docu the whole api project
page is affected by the new and C++ docu only
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 17:18 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote:
Hi all
[snipped]
Here are the propositions
- addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
- extensions.openoffice.org (already 3
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote:
Hi all
[snipped]
Here are the propositions
- addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
- extensions.openoffice.org (already 3 votes)
- scripting.openoffice.org (already 0 vote) -i leave it in case
We are actually discussing on
Hi,
Laurent Godard wrote:
- extensions.openoffice.org (already 3 votes)
-1,
We already have a cvs module named 'extensions' in the 'util' project.
This situation (a module in one project is named like another project)
is prone to cause confusion. Unfortunately we already have at least one
Hi Thomas,
I have taken the time to put a rudimentary C++ example together that
uses the prei-installed GetProductname macro and gets its return value
to insert the string into a freshly opened document.
Note that I have cut done the complete thing and left out all kinds of
checks (for NULL
Hi Christian,
I have taken the time to put a rudimentary C++ example together that
uses the prei-installed GetProductname macro and gets its return value
to insert the string into a freshly opened document.
Note that I have cut done the complete thing and left out all kinds of
checks (for NULL
Hi Andrew,
that's nice to read. :-)
BTW: I forgot to mention that you can use -env:UserInstallation=...
also for not yet existing user installations. OOo2.0 will just create
one in this case at the desired location. You will get the startup
wizard though. But we're working on this.
Ciao,
Hi Laurent,
thanks for the proposal.
Laurent Godard wrote:
Here are the propositions
- addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
- extensions.openoffice.org (already 3 votes)
- scripting.openoffice.org (already 0 vote) -i leave it in case
As Jürgen said, scripting is too special. IMHO the
From: Joerg Barfurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:45:05 +0200
-1,
We already have a cvs module named 'extensions' in the 'util' project.
Another example is external, which is even worst.
--
Pavel Janík
In case you're wondering what's the reason for this spate
From: Laurent Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:14:36 +0200
Hi,
- addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
I'd prefer addons...
--
Pavel Janík
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are
different.
-- Larry McVoy
Hi Mathias
As Jürgen said, scripting is too special. IMHO the same is true for
addon because this is the technical term for a special API in OOo. I
think extensions is great. It is not taken in OOo until now, but
people coming from the the Mozilla world immediately will understand
what this
Dear OpenOffice.org community,
This is the 2-weekly announcement of current issues regarding the
OOo API project which I want to hightlight to the community.
*** =
*** Todays Issue: Contributing to the OOo API Project
***
12 matches
Mail list logo