Awesome.
+1
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:35:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There are some ideas here previously described by Mo DeJong.
Additionally:
. there is a way to avoid a warning for a certain platform:
set apr_iconv_inbuf_const to 1 in hints.m4 for platforms
where the parm is
Sam TH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The easiest way would probably be to use c++ to test this, since in
c++ cast from a char ** to a const char ** is illegal, and generates
and error.
c++ is cool, but we can't require it so we'd have to see if it failed
due to no c++, then back down to the c
. we *know* that versions of glibc 2.2 have const char **
instead of char ** so make that work without any hints.m4
stuff (which would have to look at the glibc version)
Why not check for GCC and simply add -Werror to the compile?
This should get RedHat 7.0 compiling cleanly, but I
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
+1 a.s.a.p.
ok, i'm planning todo it later this evening.
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. we *know* that versions of glibc 2.2 have const char **
instead of char ** so make that work without any hints.m4
stuff (which would have to look at the glibc version)
Why not check for GCC and simply add -Werror to the compile?
On 7 Feb 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. we *know* that versions of glibc 2.2 have const char **
instead of char ** so make that work without any hints.m4
stuff (which would have to look at the
Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Feb 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. we *know* that versions of glibc 2.2 have const char **
instead of char ** so make that work without any
well, in practice it isn't so excellent :( the template for
AC_TRY_COMPILE() doesn't even compile without warnings
int main() {
configure:4111: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
So we write our own macro that does compile without warnings.
What was checked in doesn't work
to see the files that will change and the line number/name change:
http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/apr_rename.txt
feel free to shout if anything looks wrong, i won't commit for a few
hours.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
+1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
i'll drink to that :)
Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
used (Or is that the one you sent last week)? This is going to break
Subversion a bit, and maybe I
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding _POSIX_SOURCE:
Trivia on _POSIX_SOURCE from Tru64...
/*
* If user defines _POSIX_SOURCE and if _POSIX_C_SOURCE is not defined,
* define _POSIX_C_SOURCE to be 1. (_POSIX_SOURCE maps to the POSIX 1003.1
* standard from 1990).
*/
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:59:47PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
+1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
i'll drink to that :)
Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
used (Or is that the one you
On Thursday, February 8, 2001, at 12:59 AM, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
+1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
i'll drink to that :)
Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
used (Or is that the one you sent last
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Garrett Rooney wrote:
on lines 278 and 283 you replace put with pupt for apr_os_exp_time_put
and apr_os_thread_put. i assume that's wrong, since i can't for the
life of me figure out what pupt would mean ;-)
whoops! you're right, i'll fix that and pupt the changes back
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on lines 278 and 283 you replace put with pupt for apr_os_exp_time_put
and apr_os_thread_put. i assume that's wrong, since i can't for the
life of me figure out what pupt would mean ;-)
good for you
if sleeping child cooperates I'll fix it up Real
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What was checked in doesn't work -- I now get warnings again on
my platform, and mine is the one with the correct prototypes.
Hmmm... I get no warnings on a system of each flavor (Tru64 and
RedHat 6) and got no warnings. What warnings do
16 matches
Mail list logo
