hi folks, I am trying to build the latest apr from cvs on windows and the
win32 instructions do not work.
I am using vs6.0
when I run
C:\downloads\tomcat\apr-util>msdev aprutil.dsw /MAKE "apriconv - Win32
Debug" "apr - Win32 Debug" "libapr - Win32 Debug" "gen_uri_delims - Win32
Debug" "xml - Win3
From: "Brian Pane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:54 PM
> Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote:
> >
> ...
>
> >>In subversion svn_string_t was introduced, because it wasn't in APR.
> >>It does (AFAIK) exactly what brian describes.
> >
From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:46 PM
> [narrowing down the to: list back to APR]
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:44:14AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote:
> > > In subversion svn_string_t was introduced,
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > +* Add a string "class" that combines a char* with a length
> > > + and a reference count. This will help reduce the number
> > > + of strlen and strdup operations during request processing.
> >
> > This doesn't belong in Apac
Ian Holsman wrote:
On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote:
...
In subversion svn_string_t was introduced, because it wasn't in APR.
It does (AFAIK) exactly what brian describes.
is there any reason NOT to introduce this into the APR now?
we could then slowly migrate strings to this
I'm i
> From: Karl Fogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 December 2001 19:42
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > +* Add a string "class" that combines a char* with a length
> > > > + and a reference count. This will help reduce the number
> > > > + of strlen
[narrowing down the to: list back to APR]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:44:14AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote:
> > In subversion svn_string_t was introduced, because it wasn't in APR.
> > It does (AFAIK) exactly what brian describes.
> >
> is there any
On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 07 December 2001 17:22
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP
> >
> >
> >
> > > +* Add a string "class" tha
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 December 2001 17:22
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP
>
>
>
> > +* Add a string "class" that combines a char* with a length
> > + and a reference count
Hi,
Why are apr_pool_alloc_init()/apr_pool_alloc_term() and
apr_initialize()/apr_terminate() not symmetrically implemented?
I'm referring to the fact that apr_initialize() creates
a pool (the 'global' pool) and apr_pool_alloc_term() destroys
this pool.
Any reason why apr_pool_alloc_init() [me wou
10 matches
Mail list logo