At 01:12 PM 11/13/2002, Brane wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> If we plug in some ./configure style choices for the 'non-unix' platforms,
>>that earns my wholehearted +1. In this case, it's nothing less than you
>>can do when using ./configure on unix to a GNU distro of iconv.
>This last is
At 01:16 PM 11/13/2002, Greg Hudson wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 11:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This has been mentioned before -- at least by myself, perhaps by
>> others, too -- but the Subversion folks would *really* like to see APR
>> grow a gimme-a-temp-directory function.
>
>Would gimme-a
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 11:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This has been mentioned before -- at least by myself, perhaps by
> others, too -- but the Subversion folks would *really* like to see APR
> grow a gimme-a-temp-directory function.
Would gimme-a-temp-file be a better interface? Like mkstemp()
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Greg,
if there is a way to plug in code into apr, apr-util, httpd, or any other
ASF project after the fact, then I'm +1 on choices (GNU? MS? Sun?
Who cares???)
However, if we choose to 'distribute' code, e.g. binary builds, and those
would (by virtue of our choices)
This has been mentioned before -- at least by myself, perhaps by
others, too -- but the Subversion folks would *really* like to see APR
grow a gimme-a-temp-directory function.
The following is the code portion from Python2.2's tempfile module
whereby a list of places to try as valid temp directori
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, if we choose to 'distribute' code, e.g. binary builds, and those
> would (by virtue of our choices) require a GPL distribution, that's not only
> earning a non-technical -1, but an outright outrageous position for the
> Chairman of t
Greg,
if there is a way to plug in code into apr, apr-util, httpd, or any other
ASF project after the fact, then I'm +1 on choices (GNU? MS? Sun?
Who cares???)
However, if we choose to 'distribute' code, e.g. binary builds, and those
would (by virtue of our choices) require a GPL distributi
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Branko Cibej wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> >*optionally* using iconv should be no problem. It just gets hairy when you
> >require the thing. I don't see a reason that patches for optional linkage
> >would be rejected...
>
> Well, I had done exactly that
