Re: Cross-compilation failure due to gen_test_char

2013-11-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Arsen, On 20.11.2013 23:36, Arsen Chaloyan wrote: My understanding is the tool needs to be compiled natively no matter what the target platform is. correct - are you up to provide a patch to the configure script? we need to do something with vars like CC_FOR_BUILD etc. - but unfortunately

Re: Which of y'all are working on un-APR-izing gen_test_char, and how will the rest of us know if it is stalled and needs help?

2013-11-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, On 05.11.2013 22:51, Graham Leggett wrote: On 05 Nov 2013, at 11:04 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: TIA! (ping) If nobody in the gen_test_char-with-traditional-Windows-build sub-thread knows what I'm talking about, please let me know. Maybe I am confusedabout the planned

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

2013-10-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather than pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature detection and headers buys us anything in compiling code which should 'just work' on any compiler still in use in this

APR/APU docs redirect to 0.9.x

2013-06-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, I just found that from: http://apr.apache.org/docs/ if you click 'apr' or 'apr-util' these will redirect to the 0.9 docu ... shouldnt we redirect to recent APR 1.4 / APU 1.5 ? I think this is important since when I google for a function I always get there ... Gün.

Re: build-outputs.mk and generated headers

2013-06-04 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Bert, On 03.06.2013 16:10, Bert Huijben wrote: +1 this is a problem with cross compiling. Spend a few hours multiple times to get an x64 build working on a Win32only the problem is that usally gen_test_char.c includes the APR/APU headers for no real reason, an thwn will fail because target

Re: build-outputs.mk and generated headers

2013-06-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Graham, On 31.05.2013 23:34, Graham Leggett wrote: I have been putting together an apr_escape API based on the escaping and unescaping functions in httpd's util.c. So far so good. This code depends on the generation of a file called test_char.h, which is generated at build time by a small bit

Re: 1.4.next next weekend or so?

2013-04-26 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 26.04.2013 21:18, Jeff Trawick wrote: I can RM... coool! I was recently on hunting an old NetWare-only with apr_pool_parent_get() bug with Rainer, and he finally suggested a patch like this: Index: dbd/apr_dbd.c === ---

time for APU 1.5.2?

2013-03-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi all, since the APU 1.5.1 apr_password_validate() bug is now fixed (thanks Rainer!), and our main site http://apr.apache.org/ still lists: The recommended releases of the several Apache Portable Runtime libraries are * APR 1.4.6, released Feb 14, 2012 * APR-util 1.5.1, released

Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient

2012-09-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 20.09.2012 08:53, schrieb Michael Felt: Yes, unfortunately? or fortunately! hehe, I would say fortunately since that makes it no regression and therefore your issue might not be something to hold back 1.5.1 ;-) Gün.

Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient

2012-09-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Michael, Am 20.09.2012 10:34, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 20.09.2012 08:53, schrieb Michael Felt: Yes, unfortunately? or fortunately! hehe, I would say fortunately since that makes it no regression and therefore your issue might not be something to hold back 1.5.1 ;-) of course this doesnt

Re: which apr-util is really desired for the 2.2.X branch

2012-09-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Michael, Am 20.09.2012 17:48, schrieb Michael Felt: this was about what to use with httpd today. And you answered that, if I understood correctly - package both httpd 2.2.X and httpd 2.4.X with apr-1.4.6 and apr-util-1.4.1 - because these exist officially. yep - though with 2.2.x you dont

Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient

2012-09-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 20.09.2012 18:52, schrieb Michael Felt: On the dev (x104) system, running as root - testbuckets succeeds; rerunning on x054, as root, testbuckets also succeeds. great! So, only testxlate is (still) standing in the way. IIRC this test needs some data files - any chance you missed to copy

Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient

2012-09-19 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Michael, Am 16.09.2012 16:34, schrieb Michael Felt: make check of apr-util-1.5.1 returns: ... testdate: SUCCESS testmemcache: SUCCESS testxml : SUCCESS testxlate : |/bin/sh[17]: 10879096 Segmentation fault(coredump) Programs failed: testall make[1]:

Re: Incorrect value of APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES on win32

2012-05-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Am 28.04.2012 16:25, schrieb Olivier Teuliere: When cross-compiling a program for win32 (on linux, using mingw32), the linking with apr-2 (svn version as of today) failed with the following error: /some/path/lib/libapr-2.a(apr_strings.o): In function `apr_strtoff@16':

Re: A bug with httpd-2.4.2 Win-x64

2012-04-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Bing, you did hit the apr list - I think this should go to the httpd list instead ... ;-) Am 16.04.2012 14:32, schrieb Bing Swen: After building the httpd-2.4.2 x64 binaries with VS2010, I encountered a runtime error in the module libhttpd.dll, which alerts that a heap corruption

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.1

2011-12-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 14.12.2011 04:25, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: I'll check in these files for potential inclusion in a 1.4.2, as folks decided this mostly works now. But we really can't persist this mess for Netware or Win32 going on to APR 2.0. Seems overtime for Guenter and I, or other fresh blood, to get

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.20 as GA

2011-09-13 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 13.09.2011 18:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick: [ ] Release apr 0.9.20 as GA +1 NetWare no regression from 0.9.19

Re: [Vote] Release apr-util 1.3.11

2011-04-19 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 15.04.2011 12:29, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 19:55 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: [ ] Release apr-util 1.3.10 as GA I vote for that particular version without testing :-) Qt [ ] Release

Re: [vote] reset to apr-util 1.5.0-dev?

2011-04-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 15.04.2011 03:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: In order to disambiguate what was released by external entities from what the ASF APR Project has voted upon and released, I'd suggest that we best serve our users by 'skipping' apr-util 1.4.x, and at minimum, 1.4.0. sorry, but can you please

Re: [vote] reset to apr-util 1.5.0-dev?

2011-04-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 15.04.2011 04:09, schrieb Dongsheng Song: [X] Bump to apr-util 1.5.0 for the next pre-2.0 release Use apr-utils 1.3 with apr 1.4, I felt very strange. /me too. I think it's reasonable to bump apr-util to 1.5, and used with apr 1.5. ha, and exactly this will then *not* happen with your

Re: Patch for IPv6 on Windows before Vista

2011-04-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 12.04.2011 21:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Sobs...@hisoftware.cz wrote: Hello, while experimenting with httpd and IPv6 on WinXP, I found out that it's not working well. In short, the code

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-04-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 11.04.2011 21:14, schrieb Jeff Trawick: how about changing the _ex to _internal? sure, sounds better ... Gün.

Re: To tag apr 1.4.3/-util 1.3.11?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd. Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2 with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly on the tasks of rebuilding a VM to which I had lost the admin password

Re: signal.h on Windows

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.04.2011 17:29, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: oh, and another bad thingy I found with APR on Windows is that ugly redefining of all the SIG* defines in apr_private.h - it simply doesnt work as it should, that means it only depends on the order of includes: if signal.h is included before

Re: svn commit: r1088023 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES build/apr_rules.mk.in configure.in include/apr.h.in test/Makefile.in

2011-04-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Jeff, Am 02.04.2011 15:50, schrieb traw...@apache.org: +dnl If building static APR, both the APR build and the app build +dnl need -DAPR_DECLARE_STATIC to generate the right linkage from +dnl APR_DECLARE et al. +dnl If building dynamic APR, the APR build needs APR_DECLARE_EXPORT +dnl and the

Re: svn commit: r1088023 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES build/apr_rules.mk.in configure.in include/apr.h.in test/Makefile.in

2011-04-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 02.04.2011 16:39, schrieb Jeff Trawick: If you want both static and dynamic: * two builds in two passes of APR * further hacks to allow the two builds to be co-resident in the install location, since apr-2-config needs to know whether or not to spit out APR_DECLARE_STATIC in CPPFLAGS (and

Re: svn commit: r1088023 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES build/apr_rules.mk.in configure.in include/apr.h.in test/Makefile.in

2011-04-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 02.04.2011 16:59, schrieb Guenter Knauf: no, something which is kinda /me giving up on teaching configure to do it right . http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/mingw/MWGNUmakefile http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/mingw/MWGNUmakefile.inc with that makefile you have both static and dynamic

Re: svn commit: r1088023 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES build/apr_rules.mk.in configure.in include/apr.h.in test/Makefile.in

2011-04-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 02.04.2011 20:29, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: On 4/2/2011 10:27 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: *if* we want to do it 'right' in one pass then I believe we would need to build with APR_DECLARE_STATIC and then get the DDL linked with a .def file (which is close to what is done on Linux

Re: svn commit: r1088023 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES build/apr_rules.mk.in configure.in include/apr.h.in test/Makefile.in

2011-04-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 02.04.2011 23:54, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: When the compiler has the insight that it is binding against relocatable, loadable sections, it has a chance to change all references to a vtable in mutable heap, and leave the actual binary images alone. Failure to do this for data pointers is

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 28.03.2011 20:24, schrieb Guenter Knauf: and that seems to work - it skips the useless testing for *mingw* and sets the right typedef in apr.h, and the warning is then also gone; but not sure if its the right patch ... with this one and all the other recent fixes apr-1.4.x looks now pretty

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Jeff, Am 30.03.2011 00:29, schrieb traw...@apache.org: Author: trawick Date: Tue Mar 29 22:29:05 2011 New Revision: 1086790 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086790view=rev Log: fix linkage of apr_parser_create_ex() on Windows Submitted by: Carlo Braminicarlo.bramix libero.it PR:

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf: are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ... 1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then it should be moved to a public header 2. if you look into apr_xml.c you can find: APR_DECLARE(apr_xml_parser

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: 1 error generated. What is *that* about? :) On the wargs, I believe we are replacing that code; I'm creating a VC10environment for validation right now so I can better understand if the proposed fix forenviron allocs is going to be the

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 30.03.2011 01:20, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Hi, Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: 1 error generated. What is *that* about? :) un-important; with un-important I mean here that also with gcc where the includes are fine and pre-preocessing and compile of export*.c work still

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 30.03.2011 01:59, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: On 3/29/2011 6:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 3/29/2011 6:24 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 30.03.2011 01:20, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Hi, Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: 1 error generated. What is *that* about? :) un

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, Am 30.03.2011 02:19, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 30.03.2011 01:59, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: One more thought, I am very curious how your results differ if ./buildconf is done on unix rather than in the wild west universe of mingw. pretty much same ... http://people.apache.org/~fuankg

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 30.03.2011 01:56, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: This bit looks more important; checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes grep: /home/Administrator/apr/bldapr-1.4.x/libtool: No such

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-28 Thread Guenter Knauf
Jeff, I found another serious prob with MinGW APR checking build system type... i686-pc-mingw32 checking host system type... i686-pc-mingw32 checking target system type... i686-pc-mingw32 Configuring APR library Platform: i686-pc-mingw32 checking for working mkdir -p... yes APR Version:

Re: apr 1.3.x branch is dead, right?

2011-03-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick: I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort to maintain the branch. But that's just me. Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise

Re: svn commit: r1085937 - in /apr/apr: branches/1.3.x/configure.in branches/1.4.x/configure.in branches/1.5.x/configure.in trunk/configure.in

2011-03-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 27.03.2011 16:32, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM,fua...@apache.org wrote: Author: fuankg Date: Sun Mar 27 13:57:28 2011 New Revision: 1085937 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085937view=rev Log: Set APR_HAS_OS_UUID=1 for Windows builds. trunk

Re: svn commit: r1085978 - in /apr/apr/trunk: build/apr_hints.m4 configure.in

2011-03-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Jeff, can you please take a look at this commit and verify this is what you suggested, and that I did it right? If ok, should I proceed and apply all these to build/apr_hints.m4 across all branches? Gün. Am 27.03.2011 18:24, schrieb fua...@apache.org: Author: fuankg Date: Sun Mar 27

APR_WANT_IOVEC in apr_want.h

2011-03-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
I was just looking at this part again (BZ#50146): #ifdef APR_WANT_IOVEC #if APR_HAVE_IOVEC #if APR_HAVE_SYS_UIO_H #include sys/uio.h #endif #else struct iovec { void *iov_base; size_t iov_len; }; #endif /* apr_want is included at several layers; redefining APR_HAVE_IOVEC * now to

Re: svn commit: r1085985 - /apr/apr/trunk/configure.in

2011-03-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 27.03.2011 23:36, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: On 3/27/2011 11:50 AM, fua...@apache.org wrote: Author: fuankg Date: Sun Mar 27 16:50:30 2011 New Revision: 1085985 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085985view=rev Log: Fixed mingw platform identifier to catch all cross compilers. +++

Re: [PATCH] tweak recent oracle-dbd-on-big-endian fix

2011-03-23 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 23.03.2011 20:27, schrieb Jeff Trawick: The type is available with 10.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.2 (and probably for eons). from 8.1.5 oratypes.h (2000-03-15): #define ub2 unsigned short #define sb2 signed short Gün.

Re: svn commit: r1084621 - in /apr/apr/trunk/xml: apr_xml.c apr_xml_expat.c apr_xml_internal.h apr_xml_libxml2.c

2011-03-23 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 23.03.2011 18:53, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM,n...@apache.org wrote: Author: niq Date: Wed Mar 23 16:01:12 2011 New Revision: 1084621 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1084621view=rev Log: Decouple apr_xml from reliance on Expat Build with expat and it's

Re: NW oddness

2011-03-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, Am 21.03.2011 01:40, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Just noticed; https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/xml/expat_config.hnw It seems awfully strange to have in our apr source tree, as expat is now a dependency built separately from apr. Because it's useful to others to know

Re: NW oddness

2011-03-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 21.03.2011 16:07, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Just a few thoughts, it does look out of place in its current path. moved to bin. Gün.

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Jeff, Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick: * ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on 1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and running the test suite and using gcc as another perspective on the Windows code * provide at least some help in

Re: FYI on my MinGW goals

2011-03-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 21.03.2011 20:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW), That's odd, it's in kernel32.dll. A broken

Re: buildconf fails for APU with MinGW

2011-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 15.02.2011 00:13, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Hi all, before we get out next version I really would like to get soem configure whoes fixed with the 1.4.x/1.3.x branches ... currently APU buildconf fails for me with MinGW in APR's genbuild.py: $ ./buildconf Looking for apr source in /projects/apr

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Bill, Am 15.02.2011 04:17, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: What you are proposing is overkill, handling textual information as a binary overkill?? I just ask for changing a svn format in the repo for a handful of files which need on _all_ platforms to be LF - isnt the svn:eol-style setting

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 16.02.2011 16:48, schrieb Guenter Knauf: proposal: change all *.sh, *.m4, buildconf* and configure* scripts to 'svn:eol-style LF' result: a svn checkout will allways treat these files with LF format regardless of what svn thinks is native for the platform, and this seems correct to me. side

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, Am 16.02.2011 21:56, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: another observation on this topic: http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt this config file suggests that we should treat *.ds? files as CRLF, and this is pretty much same as what I suggested for the autoconf files ... though at least

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, Am 17.02.2011 00:11, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Text is text, scripts are text, mixed conventions make .diff's nearly unparsable, all of which are technical rationals. ok, thanks. Might I suggest, since you are working with an MSYS toolchain, that youfirst investigate why MSYS .sh

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 17.02.2011 01:13, schrieb Branko Čibej: On 17.02.2011 00:55, Guenter Knauf wrote: beside that even if all would work fine I dont know (yet) if subversion can be configured to use LF as native on windows platform, It's not, and not likely to be, until Windows conventions change. *but* you

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-15 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 15.02.2011 14:28, schrieb Jonathan Leffler: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:03, Guenter Knauffua...@apache.org wrote: if you checkout apr/apu/httpd from Windows platform you might end up with buildconf + configure + friends with CRLF format due the fact that these are marked 'svn:eol-style

svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, if you checkout apr/apu/httpd from Windows platform you might end up with buildconf + configure + friends with CRLF format due the fact that these are marked 'svn:eol-style native' ... see also BZ #46175 since these are shell scripts I believe they always need LF line endings regardless

buildconf fails for APU with MinGW

2011-02-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi all, before we get out next version I really would like to get soem configure whoes fixed with the 1.4.x/1.3.x branches ... currently APU buildconf fails for me with MinGW in APR's genbuild.py: $ ./buildconf Looking for apr source in /projects/apr-1.4.x/apr Creating

Re: svn:eol-style for autoconf stuff

2011-02-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, Am 15.02.2011 00:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: The answer is to use the correct tool on the correct platform, not to break the line endings for everyone vainly attempting to maintain the files in the text editors of the other platforms. please elaborate who are those 'everyone' folks,

Re: Apache APR build from SVN with MinGW /c/Users/zdavatz/software/apr/xml/expat/configure: No such file or directory

2011-02-09 Thread Guenter Knauf
Zeno, Am 09.02.2011 10:45, schrieb Zeno Davatz: This time configure failed with: checking Expat 1.0/1.1... no adding -L/usr/local/lib to LDFLAGS setting INCLUDES to -I/usr/local/include checking Expat 1.95.x in /usr/local... no removed -L/usr/local/lib from LDFLAGS nulling INCLUDES

compile APR with MinGW

2011-02-07 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, I've just tried to compile APR-HEAD with latest MSYS/MinGW, and so far buildconf + configure worked (tried with recent snapshot, not yet tested from SVN); compilation though breaks then in waitio.c: /bin/sh /home/Administrator/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O0

maybe time for 1.4.3 ?

2010-12-09 Thread Guenter Knauf
1.4.2 was released April 3, 2010, and we had since then some fixes ... Gün.

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-15 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 13.10.2010 18:54, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick: After 3+ days: 2 binding votes in favor (need at least one more) 3 non-binding votes in favor no votes opposed +1 for NetWare as .18 already since non-configure build isnt affected by expat whoes ... :-) I

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-0.9.19 and/or apr-util-0.9.18

2010-10-13 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.10.2010 23:47, schrieb Rainer Jung: OK, done so far. First build tests on Solaris look good. I can even do an out of tree build. Building the tests might be broken for Windows and Netware, although I'm not aware of any obvious problem. no, all build fine for NetWare, great! All I

Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 06.10.2010 21:26, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote: Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is the trunk for that tree now. Counting up the opinions posted on the list... [ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk jorton, rjung, minfrin,

Re: why do we need this pain?

2010-10-06 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 06.10.2010 21:40, schrieb Sander Temme: Please make Reply-To default to the list. It's a discussion list, with discussions taking place on-list. So responses should go to the list. ok, since we are 3 now who would like to have it changed, and the rest seems not to care about, how can we

Re: apr-util 1.5.x - trunk

2010-10-06 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 06.10.2010 18:20, schrieb Joe Orton: 1) The tip of development for the apr-util tree is what is currently branches/1.5.x. Yes, most of that code also exists in the apr tree. apr-util releases and branches do not come from the apr tree, they come from the apr-util tree. but here's the whole

Re: why do we need this pain?

2010-10-06 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 07.10.2010 01:36, schrieb Mike Meyer: For the record - I'm against the change. RFC 2823 says the Reply-To header is an originator field, and the list is *not* the originator of the message. the list *is* the originator since it sends the mail to me, and not you personally, so this is

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick: does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x (whether they have time or not)? /me asking dumb question: is it much more work than just copying over from 1.3 ? Gün.

why do we need this pain?

2010-10-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi all, with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the list, so if you just hit reply then post goes to list as it should be - why the heck is that not true for the d...@apr list?? sure, I only need to take care of it, and hit 'reply to list', but too often I forget about

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-01 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 01.10.2010 15:22, schrieb Jeff Trawick: Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours to release. +/-1 [+1] Release apr-util 1.3.10 as GA with either patched APR 1.4.2 or yet unreleased APR 1.4.x

Re: intent to TR apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday

2010-09-30 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 01.10.2010 02:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:47 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:42 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Yep, looks like NetWare fixes for expat are in 1.5.x but not 1.3.x. I will probably wait for Günter to say something on the

Re: intent to TR apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday

2010-09-30 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 01.10.2010 04:38, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Hmmm? apr-util-1.4 isn't released. We are shipping this from www.apache.org/dist/apr/ ??? I know, but if I now modify 1.4 apr then I can no longer build 1.4 apu with any apr ... Joe, cant you just also update 1.4 apu right now? Gün.

Re: intent to TR apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday

2010-09-30 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 01.10.2010 04:44, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Gun - let's simply fix 1.3 and 1.5.x - tell me you are done - and I will svn rm the expat/ from 1.4 branch, cp it from the 1.5.x branch. but let's do thatwith builds already fixed instead of patching 2x, ok? I am done. Gün.

Re: conditional in apr_thread_proc.h

2010-09-02 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Rüdiger, Am 02.09.2010 08:27, schrieb Ruediger Pluem: I agree that we should fix this. But as I understand the versioning rules, this could be only done in trunk and 1.5 (not released), as otherwise we would change the API/ABI on platforms with APR_HAVE_STRUCT_RLIMIT undefined, correct?

conditional in apr_thread_proc.h

2010-09-01 Thread Guenter Knauf
while checking for missing prototypes I just came over this in apr_thread_proc.h: #if APR_HAVE_STRUCT_RLIMIT /** * Set the Resource Utilization limits when starting a new process. * @param attr The procattr we care about. * @param what Which limit to set, one of: * PRE *

how can this work?

2010-09-01 Thread Guenter Knauf
in poll/unix.poll.c (which is also compiled for win32) we have: /* Poll method pollcb. * This is probably usable only for WIN32 having WSAPoll */ static apr_status_t impl_pollcb_create(apr_pollcb_t *pollcb, apr_uint32_t size,

Re: Thread handle leak in APR

2010-08-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Prathima, Am 20.08.2010 09:04, schrieb Prathima Dandapani -X (pdandapa - HCL at Cisco): Steps used to compile Apache is as follows. Run Setenv.cmd from the Windows-Server-2003-R2-Platform-SDK installed directory Run vcvars32.bat from VC++ installed directory. AFAICT this is the wrong

Re: scan-build on apr/trunk

2010-08-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 31.07.2010 16:03, schrieb Stefan Fritsch: On Saturday 31 July 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: http://p6m7g8.net/~pgollucci/sb/ I might take a stab at some of these next week. $ ./buildconf $ scan-build ./configure $ scan-build make -j12 One more issue found by gcc: Error handling in

Re: [Patch] apr trunk doesn't install apu.h

2010-08-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 06.06.2010 21:13, schrieb Rainer Jung: Subject says it all, more in the patch log message at: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/apr-trunk-fix-broken-installation-of-apu_h.patch On the long term apu.h might go completely, but until now it is still referenced in a lot of installed

Re: [Patch] apr trunk doesn't install apu.h

2010-08-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 03.08.2010 08:44, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: On 8/3/2010 1:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: fine so far, but also bad since shouldnt we at least make sure that APR itself builds without apu.h? There are still a bunch of headers which want to include apu.h - is it ok that I change them all

Re: How to check current version of APR on Centos

2010-03-23 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Ravi, Ravi Roy schrieb: I hope that I am writing to right list for APR related question, please forgive me in case my question is stupid, but I can not find the real answer anywhere after googling a lot. I have installed Apache Http Server 2.2.x on Centos 5.3 where APR is also installed

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.4.2?

2010-01-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi all, Jeff Trawick schrieb: On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: BTW. while I was on that found that in httpd's roll.sh the gpg signing part looks wrong to me - therefore I kept the way how the signing user is handled same as was before in apr's release.h

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.4.2?

2010-01-24 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Jeff. Jeff Trawick schrieb: (I hope this doesn't start another long hash format thread) perhaps Guenter would want to update the apr roll script (if there is one) to massage the md5 sums as appropriate for future releases :) apr-1.4.2.tar.bz2: 4B 00 E8 F7 0C 06 78 93 D0 75 57 79 62 65 6B

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.4.2?

2010-01-24 Thread Guenter Knauf
Guenter Knauf schrieb: BTW. while I was on that found that in httpd's roll.sh the gpg signing part looks wrong to me - therefore I kept the way how the signing user is handled same as was before in apr's release.h; but I believe it should be fixed for httpd's roll.sh: --- roll.sh.orig

Re: svn commit: r892141 - in /apr/apr/trunk/include: apr.hnw arch/netware/apr_private.h

2009-12-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb: Guenter Knauf wrote: -#include ndkvers.h -#if (CURRENT_NDK_THRESHOLD 70906) -#define getpass_r getpassword -#endif can you please explain too me why you think that NetWare doesnt need this check / define any longer, and why you removed it? It's

Re: svn commit: r892141 - in /apr/apr/trunk/include: apr.hnw arch/netware/apr_private.h

2009-12-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb: Guenter Knauf wrote: I didn't say that. Refer to the prior commit message when this API was added, this seemed to be a reasonable assumption. well, I admit that my commit message might be a bit misleading; but if you look at the revision: http

Re: [discuss] Releasing pre-release APR

2009-12-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb: In light of current events, here's a policy statement I'd like to propose for consideration (just a discussion item at this point); The APR project strongly discourages any release of the APR software with modifications of the API. This includes shipping

Re: svn commit: r892141 - in /apr/apr/trunk/include: apr.hnw arch/netware/apr_private.h

2009-12-19 Thread Guenter Knauf
Bill, wr...@apache.org schrieb: Author: wrowe Date: Fri Dec 18 05:20:42 2009 New Revision: 892141 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892141view=rev Log: Netware changes; always include netware.h/library.h for whatever local functions or types would be aliased, in a public manner, and

Re: [VOTE] APR versioning rules w.r.t. released snapshots

2009-12-15 Thread Guenter Knauf
Joe Orton schrieb: Snapshots of the APR and APR-util 1.4.x trees have been distributed by as part of the httpd 2.3.4 alpha release. Should the APR project treat those snapshots as releases for versioning purposes? In other words, should we ensure future APR/APR-util releases maintain

Re: Prepared to tag apr 1.4.0 [NOT -util!]

2009-12-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb: I see good responses to the list from Branko, Joe and Jeff (and thanks for the bugfix Branko), so I'll proceed with this tonight, we'll have the usual 72hr vote, and then let's start this discussion over about the much larger changes in apr-util 1.4 ;) I think

Re: Netware support

2009-11-13 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Laurent, Laurent Charmet schrieb: I wish to know if Apr 1.3.x compile on Netware, yes. or if a .nlm is available, yes, its part of the httpd 2.2.x distros. or a faq/wiki to compile Apr for Netware. no, not really; there comes a docu with httpd. but this is now a little bit outdated since I

Re: apr 1.4: testpoll crash on OSX 10.6

2009-10-18 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Ruediger Pluem schrieb: 1. The crash: We simply should not execute the lines 389 and 390 if descs is NULL. Similar situations occur in various other parts of the test suite. We use ABTS_PTR_NOTNULL and continue afterwards and continue to use the pointer that failed

need some info about unsetenv on other platforms

2009-10-13 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, I was just looking into the setenv / unsetenv stuff in APR, and found that we assume that unsetenv doesnt have a return value on all platforms. I have searched a bit, and found these: http://linux.die.net/man/3/setenv http://www.manpagez.com/man/3/unsetenv/ from that it seems that there are

Re: need some info about unsetenv on other platforms

2009-10-13 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Jonathan Leffler schrieb: POSIX has a different view on the correct behaviour: NAME unsetenv - remove an environment variable SYNOPSIS |^[CX javascript:open_code('CX')] [Option Start] #include stdlib.h

test function looks a bit strange ...

2009-10-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, in abts.c we have: void abts_ptr_notnull(abts_case *tc, const void *ptr, int lineno) { update_status(); if (tc-failed) return; if (ptr != NULL) return; tc-failed = TRUE; if (verbose) { fprintf(stderr, Line %d: Expected NULL, but saw %p\n, lineno, ptr);

Re: [PATCH-REVIEW] shm.c

2009-09-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Guenter Knauf schrieb: can you perhaps review and verify if this patch fixes the Sun Studio warnings in shm.c? http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/shm.c.diff whole file apr/shmem/unix/shm.c: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/shm.c Maybe I did something wrong, but at least

[PATCH-REVIEW] shm.c

2009-09-28 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Jeff, Jeff Trawick schrieb: IMO we should just let it be; users/developers can set CFLAGS to suppress it if desired. personally I dislike to globaly suppress warnings since at some point we might hide also real problems - and if we can fix it then I think we should do ...; as I showed with

Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

2009-09-17 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Jim Jagielski schrieb: At least netware does... apr_ldap_rebind_init which is in apu... looking for more. yes, thats probably because we did never split apr/apr-util into separate libs but shipped all the time an aprlib which has apr-util linked in statically; and I think it doesnt make much

  1   2   >