Re: CVE-2016-0718

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:48 AM, David Dillard > wrote: > > Did anyone see > > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2016-0718? "Expat > > allows context-dependent attackers to

Re: Mailing list semantics

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Mario Brandt wrote: > [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics > [x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > same here [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics

Re: Re[2]: IRIX errno for apr_stroff, apr_atoi64

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Rainer M. Canavan wrote: > William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Any chance you could review the man page of these functions on IRIX and > > report back, specifically return value and error exceptions? MAX is a > > valid value.

Re: APR a Safe C library?

On 08/28/2015 06:04 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: Hi all, Not sure if this is the right place to ask or not, so sorry if it isn't. I am currently using the APR library in conjunction with the Active MQ CPP connector, so that I can produce and consume topics over an Active MQ bus. Recently I have

Apache Portable Runtime 1.5.2 released

The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime Project are proud to announce the General Availability of version 1.5.2 of the Apache Portable Runtime library. APR 1.5.2 resolves an important issue on the Windows platform that can result in vulnerabilities in APR

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/28/2015 09:19 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/28/2015 09:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Yeah, that's it, at least from what I can see. If I add a sleep(1) right after the send_msg, we pass. To cover the potential regression concern, I'll backport the new test to 1.5.1 and confirm

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2 autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1) libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1) +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2 autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1) libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1) +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/28/2015 08:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Hmmm... seeing a regression on OSX 10.10.3 w/ Xcode 6.3.1: % ./testall -v testpoll testpoll: /Line 816: expected 0, but saw 4 FAILED 1 of 23 Failed TestsTotal Fail

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

% === testpoll 23 1 4.35% Investigating. PS: OSX sets HAVE_KQUEUE 1 Cool :) I'll fire up Lion and FreeBSD... On Apr 25, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

? On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/28/2015 08:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Under FreeBSD 10, I see no issue w/ testpoll. So it's looking like an OSX issue and not kqueue per-se. Fails on FreeBSD 9 (also kqueue)... Note that this is a new test I added

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

consistently on Lion but it is failing 15-20% of the time. On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/28/2015 08:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Under FreeBSD 10, I see no issue w/ testpoll. So it's looking like an OSX issue and not kqueue per-se. Fails on FreeBSD

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/28/2015 04:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but [ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/27/2015 08:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/27/2015 4:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build apr tests libdll pass httpd-2.4.12 build regression Win Vista, VS 2008 x86, zip, retro build apr tests libdll pass httpd-2.4.12 build

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build apr tests libdll pass httpd-2.4.12 build

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

[X] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA * Windows 7, VS2012 x64, .zip distro, cmake tested successfully (apr tests passed, httpd appeared to worked fine) * Solaris 10 5/08, Sun cc, 32-bit (apr tests passed) * Solaris 10 5/08, Sun cc, 64-bit (apr tests passed, httpd 2.4.8-dev build from 2013 compiled against

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 04/22/2015 06:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Coming up shortly...

[VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2 autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1) libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1) +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 04/23/2015 11:54 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: warnings in test suite with Sun compiler on Solaris 10, some of which is from relatively new code (not researched, maybe the API is defined in a way that this compiler will never

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 04/23/2015 12:09 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/23/2015 09:33 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Should we add https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643 from PR 55418? looks reasonable to me (not tested) I had tested

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 04/23/2015 09:33 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: (subject says it all) Should we add https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643 from PR 55418? looks reasonable to me (not tested) Also https://bz.apache.org

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+? PR 57191. As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done this time around, even if it's

Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

(subject says it all)

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+? PR 57191. As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done this time around, even if it's

Re: apr_socket_create in short connect

On 04/15/2015 04:11 AM, GHui wrote: I use apr_socket_create in a short connect. And it takes up more and more memory as the program runs. Any help will be appreciated. --GHui The normal way to handle that is to create a pool for data that must be maintained only for the life of that

Re: svn commit: r1671390 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x: ./ poll/unix/poll.c

On 04/05/2015 03:03 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/05/2015 09:00 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Sun Apr 5 13:00:33 2015 New Revision: 1671390 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1671390 Log: Merge r1671389 from

Re: svn commit: r1671390 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x: ./ poll/unix/poll.c

On 04/05/2015 09:00 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Sun Apr 5 13:00:33 2015 New Revision: 1671390 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1671390 Log: Merge r1671389 from trunk: poll() implementation of apr_pollset_poll(): Return APR_EINTR as appropriate. (APR_SUCCESS was returned

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on apr-trunk

On 04/04/2015 02:46 PM, build...@apache.org wrote: The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-trunk/builds/97 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build:

Re: svn commit: r1671296 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES build/dbd.m4 configure.in

On 04/04/2015 03:23 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Sat Apr 4 19:23:03 2015 New Revision: 1671296 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1671296 Log: build: Correctly use AC_(PATH|CHECK)_TOOL to support cross compilation. PR: 56866 Submitted by: Timothy Gu timothygu99 gmail.com

Re: svn commit: r1668866 - /apr/apr-util/branches/1.5.x/README.cmake

On 04/02/2015 04:04 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: traw...@apache.org [mailto:traw...@apache.org] Sent: dinsdag 24 maart 2015 13:47 To: comm...@apr.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1668866 - /apr/apr-util/branches/1.5.x/README.cmake Author: trawick Date: Tue Mar 24

Re: svn commit: r1667901 - /apr/apr/trunk/test/abts_tests.h

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Yann Ylavic yla...@apache.org wrote: The strange thing is that it does not occur in 1.5.x for me (same code

Re: svn commit: r1667901 - /apr/apr/trunk/test/abts_tests.h

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: Jeff, On 3/20/15 7:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com mailto:ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Yann Ylavic

Re: svn commit: r1667901 - /apr/apr/trunk/test/abts_tests.h

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Yann Ylavic yla...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:40 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote: Author: ylavic Date: Thu Mar 19 23:40:51 2015 New Revision: 1667901 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1667901 Log: Follow up to r1667900: revert spurious

Re: Question about patches

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Christophe JAILLET christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Hi, I would like to have details about the way patches should be submitted and backported within APR. The process seems to be different than the one from httpd. In

Re: Skiplist duplicates

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: It seems that the implementation is not that broken actually. One can still have the add semantic with insert() in 1.5.x by using the

Re: Time for APR 1.5.2 ?

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: My list of things that could/should be done before rolling is too long :( Perhaps others can take a look? Note that my short summaries may be inaccurate! and: * Review trunk and 1.6.x HEAD for things that could

Re: Time for APR 1.5.2 ?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Subj sez it all. Yeah. I'll go through patch submissions and other new complaints in the next couple of days before getting started. Others could

Re: Skiplist duplicates

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: No, it's a design error. There's not much helping that... once it ships, that's our implementation. Might caution us to provide more careful code review before n.n.0 releases on new features. S if

Re: Skiplist duplicates

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:30 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:19:40 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: After doing some additional research, I think that the current

Re: Time for APR 1.5.2 ?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Subj sez it all. Yeah. I'll go through patch submissions and other new complaints in the next couple of days before getting started. Others could/should do the same. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Re: apr_getnameinfo get localhost

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:26 AM, GHui ugi...@gmail.com wrote: I used the function apr_getnameinfo to get remote hostname. But it return localhost. I don't know why this happend. Any help will be appreciated. --GHui Please show code, such as where the second parameter to apr_getnameinfo()

Re: Possible issue in apr/file_io/unix/filestat.c with clank35+ and optimization level above -O0

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:06 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: A user found a possible issue in apr-1.5.1/file_io/unix/filestat.c. [1] It seems the following code snippet will could be an potential issue in case apr is build with clang35 and optimization level is above -O0 ---

Re: Win8 phone support

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, César c_deoli...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello all, After several research on your website and Google, i didn't manage to figure out if libAPR is fully supported on Windows 8 Phone OS. By looking at the mailing list history, it seems it is the case, but i would like

Re: Compiler errors

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Stefan Kueng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, using apr 1.5.1, but happens also with apr 1.5.0. When compiling with the lastest Windows SDK for Win 8.1 and with _WIN32_WINNT defined as = 0x0502, apr_atomic.c fails to compile. The attached patch fixes this

Fwd: Apache Portable Runtime Utility 1.5.4 released

FYI... -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeff Trawick traw...@apache.org Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:57 PM Subject: Apache Portable Runtime Utility 1.5.4 released To: annou...@apache.org The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime Project are proud

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.4

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES files: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.4

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: +1: CentOS6 and OSX 10.9.5 Thanks for testing :) On Sep 16, 2014, at 7:47 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES files: http

Re: apr-util tr 1.5.4 plans

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Timothy Gu timothyg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jeff, On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Timothy, As for myself (and probably others), I try to go through the bug db when preparing for a new release to see what can

Re: apr-util tr 1.5.4 plans

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:45 PM, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Right now, apr 1.5.3 appears broken on Win32 VC6 and Android, and we have several other good fixes in CHANGES over these past 9 months. If nobody else offers, I'd like to go ahead and TR 1.5.4 during the week of Sept 15th, giving

Re: svn commit: r1610988 - /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/test/testskiplist.c

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:55 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Wed Jul 16 12:55:29 2014 New Revision: 1610988 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1610988 Log: Fix gcc -Wparentheses warnings Modified: apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/test/testskiplist.c err, I forgot to update

Windows R/W lock comment

I'm getting filtered when I try to respond to the original thread. This is an important issue: If a writer holds the lock for a significant time (e.g., refreshing a table from a database), do all would-be readers spin-loop, or is it a hybrid spin-then-sleep solution? We should know this for

Re: apr_indexof, apr_ftoa, etc

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Graf László gr...@datatrans.hu wrote: Hello, I would like to know if you intend to introduce more, in my oppinion, useful methods in apr_strings.h. It would be an individual developer's prerogative to choose to work on more string functions. I don't recall

ABI compatibility tracker for APR

http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/apr.html -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/ http://edjective.org/

Re: [PATCH] Fix apr_file_trunc for buffered files on Unix

Hi Stefan, Are you able to update test/testfile.c to include testcases like those you provided in your post? (abbreviated reply to try to make it past the SPAM filters :( :( :( )

Re: svn commit: r1597797 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES include/apr_skiplist.h tables/apr_skiplist.c

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:20 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Tue May 27 14:20:29 2014 New Revision: 1597797 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1597797 Log: apr_skiplist_add()... idea from yann Modified: apr/apr/trunk/CHANGES apr/apr/trunk/include/apr_skiplist.h

fix a technicality with struct sockaddr_un in 1.6.x branch???

Index: include/apr_network_io.h === --- include/apr_network_io.h (revision 1603975) +++ include/apr_network_io.h (working copy) @@ -267,13 +267,17 @@ #endif #if APR_HAVE_SA_STORAGE /** Placeholder to ensure that the size of

Re: Building apr on win32

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: Hello, I'm trying to build apr on win32 from the command-line and I'm running into some resistance. I'm using Visual Studio 12 on Windows 8.1. I have installed the Windows SDK as well to try to help,

Re: Building apr on win32

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: Jeff, On 6/13/14, 12:08 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: Hello

ApacheCon Call For Papers closes June 25

Dear Apache Portable Runtime enthusiast, As you may be aware, ApacheCon will be held this year in Budapest, on November 17-23. (See http://apachecon.eu for more info.) The Call For Papers for that conference is still open, but will be closing soon. It has been a number of years since we had a

Re: my messages get queued

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Helmut Tessarek tessa...@evermeet.cxwrote: Hello, My messages get queued, but never really processed: May 9 20:26:54 atvie01s sendmail[25243]: s49IQQtF025239: to=dev@apr.apache.org, delay=00:00:26, xdelay=00:00:26, mailer=esmtp, pri=152179,

Re: apr_sockaddr_info_copy() in 1.6.x?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to add these too? http://svn.apache.org/r1587045 http://svn.apache.org/r1587543 Regards, Yann. Sure, I'll make it so. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/

Re: Sorting an apr_array

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 28.04.2014 13:06, Nick Kew wrote: I find myself wanting to sort an APR array. As it stands I can hack it using the array innards from apr_tables.h: qsort(arr-elts, arr-nelts, arr-elt_size, my_compare); Any

Re: UDS in APR (Was: Re: permissions)

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: BTW: What about: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=745763 A major concern is that the layout/size of the apr_sockaddr_t in 1.x can't change since it isn't an opaque type: From 745763: @@

Re: svn commit: r1587750 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./ include/apr_errno.h

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 16 Apr 2014, at 1:22 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Tue Apr 15 23:22:29 2014 New Revision: 1587750 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1587750 Log: Revert the following, since it introduces a

Re: svn commit: r1587750 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./ include/apr_errno.h

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 25 Apr 2014, at 12:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Would you like to apply this to v1.6? Not personally... I don't recall the use case, only that it didn't belong in 1.5.x. You should maintain the 1.6

Re: make_tools_dir target in Makefile.in

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Hello, the target make_tools_dir (.PHONY) causes gen_test_char to be always rebuilt whenever make is called. I came up with the following patch : Index: Makefile.in

Re: make_tools_dir target in Makefile.in

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Index: Makefile.in

Re: apr_socket_opt_set always sets TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT to 1

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Brian J. France br...@brianfrance.comwrote: Just ran into a issue where httpd can only set TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT to 1. apr_socket_opt_set will always set the option value to either 0/1, so even adding a directive in httpd to allow tweaking the value it can't get it

Re: No v1.6.x branch?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: Hi all, I notice there is no APR v1.6.x branch, would the right thing to do to be to create one from the head of the v1.5.x branch? 1.5.x HEAD is the place to branch from. For example, see

Re: No v1.6.x branch?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 21 Apr 2014, at 2:48 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: 1.5.x HEAD is the place to branch from. For example, see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=887002 ((Copied from apr/apr/branches/1.4.x

Apache Portable Runtime 1.5.1 released

Apache Portable Runtime library 1.5.1 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime Project are proud to announce the General Availability of version 1.5.1 of the Apache Portable Runtime library. APR 1.5.1 is a bug fix release, primarily resolving issues

Re: No v1.6.x branch?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 21 Apr 2014, at 3:00 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think so; regardless, the concern about maintaining another branch that isn't being released is pretty simple to resolve: Identify what

Re: No v1.6.x branch?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 21 Apr 2014, at 3:16 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: r1588878, and soon if practical, given we've just released v1.5.1. What does that commit have to do with having just released 1.5.1? The commit

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.1

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: *http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1* autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.1

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:38 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2014-04-16 01:46, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: *http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.1

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: *http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1* autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.1

[X] Release APR 1.5.1 as GA Tested successfully: .tar.bz2, Windows 7, MinGW (32-bit, autoconf-based build) .zip, Windows 7, MS Visual Studio 2012 (64-bit, cmake+nmake build) -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/ http://edjective.org/

Re: New apr_sockaddr_info_copy() function

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, sent to Jeff only, again... On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Same patch attached. Thanks! (r1587543) -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/

Re: svn commit: r1561041 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./ include/apr_errno.h

:) On Jan 24, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:46 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Fri Jan 24 15:46:47 2014 New Revision: 1561041 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1561041 Log: Merge r1561040 from trunk: Using UDS, we

[VOTE] Release APR 1.5.1

Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: *http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.1* autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.0) libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.0) +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.1 as

Re: New apr_sockaddr_info_copy() function

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose the following/attached patch which adds the apr_sockaddr_info_copy() function to network_io. Committed to APR trunk as r1587045... If you are able, could you submit a patch to add a testcase

Re: apr_os_proc_mutex_get() segfault

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Hi, when using the following code : pthread_mutex_t *mymutex; apr_proc_mutex_t *apmutex = NULL; apr_os_proc_mutex_t osmutex = {0}; apr_proc_mutex_create(apmutex, NULL, APR_LOCK_PROC_PTHREAD, p);

Anything waiting for apr 1.5.1?

Maybe I'll actually do something this time :) -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/ http://edjective.org/

Re: APR-UTIL 1.5.3 rpmbuild error: File not found by glob: apr_dbd_pgsql*

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:52 PM, WR - Widyachacra Rajapaksha | විද්‍යාචක්‍ර widyacha...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Devs, I'm trying to build apr-util-1.5.3.tar.bz2 which I downloaded from your site. I'm getting the bellow error while building the RPM using rpmbuild -tb apr-util-1.5.3.tar.bz2

Re: Incorrect apt-util-1.pc using --with-expat=builtin

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Rhys Ulerich rhys.uler...@gmail.comwrote: I've noticed atop APR Utils 1.5.3 that when I configure using --with-expat=builtin I see the following within the installed ${prefix}/lib/pkgconfig/apr-util-1.pc: Libs: -L${libdir}

Re: Configuration to cross-compile APR for target (QNX on armle-v7 platform) on host (windows)

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Sathish Kumar sathishkc2...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I've been trying to cross-compile APR lib (1.4.6) on windows host for the target platform (QNX6.5.0 on armle-v7). Can anyone of you let me know the configuration (or config file to be changed) to do before

Re: APR Util Question

) joel.l...@ftr.com *From:* Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 5:00 PM *Cc:* dev@apr.apache.org *Subject:* Re: APR Util Question On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Lamb, Joel joel.l...@ftr.com wrote: Jeff I'm not sure I specified where apr

Re: APR Util Question

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 01 Feb 2014, at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building the RPMs in order to leave the system-provided libraries and anything depending

Re: APR Util Question

*From:* Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 4:25 PM *Cc:* dev@apr.apache.org *Subject:* Re: APR Util Question On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Lamb, Joel joel.l...@ftr.com wrote: Dev Team I couldn't find a list for support or questions, so I

Re: APR Util Question

46804 (260) 461-2168 (o) (260) 403-3095 (c) (260) 461-2124 (f) joel.l...@ftr.com *From:* Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 4:49 PM *Cc:* dev@apr.apache.org *Subject:* Re: APR Util Question On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Lamb, Joel joel.l

Re: svn commit: r1561041 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./ include/apr_errno.h

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:46 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Fri Jan 24 15:46:47 2014 New Revision: 1561041 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1561041 Log: Merge r1561040 from trunk: Using UDS, we sometime try ops not supported on UDS. Make this a known (and therfore handable)

Re: svn commit: r1559721 - in /apr/apr-util/branches/1.5.x: CMakeLists.txt README.cmake

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:57 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Mon Jan 20 14:57:53 2014 New Revision: 1559721 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1559721 Log: Fix FILEOS tag in DLLs for cmake-based build. (libaprutil.rc needs WINNT defined.) AFAICT the traditional Windows

Re: [Patch] Fix for concurrent/race condition in apr_dir_make_recursive()

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 21.01.2014 02:18, Branko Čibej wrote: On 21.01.2014 01:55, Branko Čibej wrote: I've added a test case to testdir.c to exercise this code in parallel. r1559873, original patch (with slightly tweaked comments) and test

Was your APR patch ignored?

If it was posted only to the mailing list, make sure there is a bug opened for it at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/

Re: apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 17.01.2014 16:59, Jeff Trawick wrote: We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a critical functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.) Others I'm interested in pushing along

Re: Was your APR patch ignored?

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: If it was posted only to the mailing list, make sure there is a bug opened for it at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ To clarify something that somebody just e-mailed me directly about: There's nothing inherently wrong

apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?

- blocking sockets in some applications, including httpd. [Jeff Trawick] *) Windows cmake build: Fix incorrect installation of some .pdb files. [Jeff Trawick] *) apr_skiplist: Add compatibility with C++ applications. [Jeff Trawick] *) When using shmget-based shared memory, the ID

Re: CMake build doesn't define 'WINNT', but apr headers check for it anyway

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: Hi, On Windows apr_arch_misc.h checks for the ‘WINNT’ define, which was unconditionally defined on Windows before the CMake build. But now it is no longer defined. This enables some additional dynamic load

Re: Event and atomics, round II

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I cc to APR's dev list so to propose a patch regarding apr_atomic_dec32()platform dependent return values. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:25

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >