--On Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:24 PM +0100 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
David Reid wrote:
Tarballs available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/
Test report!
RC4 is still installing prefix/bin/apr-config , so
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:38:06AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
3) It only implements accept apr-0 or apr-1, but unless projects do extra
compatibility work, and make sure to *never* expose the apr ABI in their own
ABI, they will want accept apr-0 only or accept apr-1 only.
Yes, this is the key
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:45:31PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
OK, so big decision -
1) we delay 1.0.0 until we fix this
2) we aim for a 1.0.1 with this fixed in like 2 weeks or so... (This
would
also, inevitably, include some other stuff we don't have in 1.0.0)
I vote (2).
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
-dnl APR_FIND_APR([srcdir [, builddir, implicit-install-check]])
+dnl APR_FIND_APR([srcdir [, builddir, implicit-install-check]],
+dnl [min-version], [max-version])
+dnl where min-version and max-version specify the
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 05:34:33AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
-dnl APR_FIND_APR([srcdir [, builddir, implicit-install-check]])
+dnl APR_FIND_APR([srcdir [, builddir, implicit-install-check]],
+dnl [min-version],
--On Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:38 AM +0100 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) It doesn't update configure.in / Makefile.in to name apr-config
apr-MAJOR-config in the build directory.
Well, that doesn't matter to our external projects. (And, huh, it's already
named like that for me when
--On Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:34 AM -0700 Noah Misch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The minimum version field does need to accept two digits. A project could
use an API added in APR 1.X, in which case e.g. APR_FIND_APR(,,, 1.4, 3)
would be appropriate and necessary. No?
If a project wants that
At 10:09 AM 7/15/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:34 AM -0700 Noah Misch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The minimum version field does need to accept two digits. A project could
use an API added in APR 1.X, in which case e.g. APR_FIND_APR(,,, 1.4, 3)
would be appropriate
--On Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:01 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
APR_FIND_APR returns only the first apr found - what 'list of found
apr's' do you suggest the author validate against to determine where
apr-1(.1) lives?
They shouldn't. The granularity is at the major
--On Thursday, July 15, 2004 6:15 PM +0100 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, actually, it does. It allows you to build a project against an
external, built, but uninstalled apr.
William Rowe indicated in IRC that he finds the feature very useful, so
I'm not going to scrap it when I've
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
David Reid wrote:
Tarballs available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/
Test report!
RC4 is still installing prefix/bin/apr-config , so making it impossible
to
install apr 0 and apr 1 side-by-side.
Known issue,
At 04:24 PM 7/14/2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
David Reid wrote:
Tarballs available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/
Test report!
RC4 is still installing prefix/bin/apr-config , so making it impossible
to
install apr
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
David Reid wrote:
Tarballs available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/
Test report!
RC4 is still installing prefix/bin/apr-config , so making it
impossible
to
install apr 0 and apr 1 side-by-side.
13 matches
Mail list logo
