Re: Support for extension point during service execution

2017-11-29 Thread Tal Liron
@ariatosca.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Support for extension point during service execution > > We half do. :) Actually, this has become a major topic of discussion > recently on other lists. There's some room to discuss exactly what and how > is available to the ctx proxy. Ri

RE: Support for extension point during service execution

2017-11-29 Thread D Jayachandran
@ariatosca.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Support for extension point during service execution We half do. :) Actually, this has become a major topic of discussion recently on other lists. There's some room to discuss exactly what and how is available to the ctx proxy. Right now it's both too unrestricted and too

RE: Support for extension point during service execution

2017-11-28 Thread D Jayachandran
@ariatosca.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Support for extension point during service execution Hi DJ, The question here is why use ARIA's orchestrator at all? It sounds like you have your own orchestration engine. This is an intended use case for ARIA (and indeed was used in the OPEN-O project

Re: Support for extension point during service execution

2017-11-24 Thread Tal Liron
Hi DJ, The question here is why use ARIA's orchestrator at all? It sounds like you have your own orchestration engine. This is an intended use case for ARIA (and indeed was used in the OPEN-O project). There are a few ways to use ARIA here: 1) You can use the ARIA's Python API and access all

Support for extension point during service execution

2017-11-24 Thread D Jayachandran
Hi Team, We are looking at an execution point during a service execution through a plugin. With this the execution will not go through the workflow runner (install/uninstall) defined by the orchestrator but the services instance context object will be provided to the plugin which will take