[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-1317:
---
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Sample implementation of Promises API from OSGi R6 Asynchronous
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1318:
---
Summary: Basic implementation of the Async service
Key: ARIES-1318
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1318
Project: Aries
Issue Type: New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward closed ARIES-1317.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch committed in revision 1678227.
Sample implementation of Promises API from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward closed ARIES-1318.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Submitted in revision 1678229.
Basic implementation of the Async service
This could realistically be supported by having parallel packages inside the
bundle with implementations for each version of the spec. The code can detect
which version is available at runtime by trying to load the relevant types, and
then can load the appropriate implementation.
Regards,
Tim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13821523#comment-13821523
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-1134:
-
Hi Albert,
I can absolutely understand why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13820281#comment-13820281
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-1134:
-
I would like to formally -1 this commit
Mark, could you please revert this commit?
I have outlined the issues with the proposed solution in the JIRA item
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1134) where the patch was
submitted. In brief there are two problems:
The version ranges are wrong. o.a.aries.jpa.container and
Mark,
As per my email about r1541023, could this be reverted please?
Regards,
Tim
On 12 Nov 2013, at 12:08, mnutt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mnuttall
Date: Tue Nov 12 12:08:14 2013
New Revision: 1541023
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541023
Log: (empty)
Modified:
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1128:
---
Summary: Begin adding OSGi Blueprint 1.1 support to Aries Blueprint
Key: ARIES-1128
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1128
Project: Aries
Issue
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1129:
---
Summary: Support for the blueprintNullProxy
Key: ARIES-1129
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1129
Project: Aries
Issue Type: New Feature
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1130:
---
Summary: Blueprint itest failures when using the latest code
Key: ARIES-1130
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1130
Project: Aries
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward updated ARIES-1129:
Attachment: blueprintNullProxy.patch
This patch makes the necessary changes to Aries Proxy
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1099:
---
Summary: Aries Proxy explodes when using Logback
Key: ARIES-1099
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1099
Project: Aries
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-1099.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Aries Proxy explodes when using Logback
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1093:
---
Summary: Aries proxy doesn't work properly on uninstall/reinstall
Key: ARIES-1093
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1093
Project: Aries
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward updated ARIES-1093:
Description:
There are a couple of problems with the Aries Proxy code if you do
install/uninstall
deployed the new snapshot parent pom? I'm
sure you have it on your local system, but is it in apache nexus?
david jencks
On May 7, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Timothy Ward
timothyjw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Anyone have any idea what's going on here?
It appears to be my fault, but I
local system, but is it in apache nexus?
david jencks
On May 7, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Anyone have any idea what's going on here?
It appears to be my fault, but I can't reproduce the failure, even with a
fresh checkout...
Tim
deployed the new snapshot parent pom? I'm
sure you have it on your local system, but is it in apache nexus?
david jencks
On May 7, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Timothy Ward
timothyjw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Anyone have any idea what's going on here?
It appears to be my fault
] [VOTE] Apache Aries release parent-1.1.0
To: dev@aries.apache.org
Hi Tim,
On 6 May 2013 20:42, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
General consensus is that we should upgrade the maven-compiler-plugin to
3.1.
I will start to ripple changes through trunk so that it is possible
.
Holly
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Changing the version of the maven-compiler plugin really needs to be done
in default-parent (which is where we define most of the top-level compiler
config). This new version of default
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1064:
---
Summary: Advertise blueprint extender capability as defined in the
OSGi enterprise r5 spec
Key: ARIES-1064
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1064
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-1064.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added the Provide-Capability entry described in the Enterprise R5 spec
This is a known bug in Gemini blueprint. I'm sure that the Eclipse team would
love a patch, I don't think they do a huge amount of maintenance on their
blueprint implementation at the moment with the whole
SpringSource/VMware/Pivotal thing happening.
Regards
Tim Ward
---
Apache
...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 10:22:20 -0700
To: dev@aries.apache.org; timothyjw...@apache.org
have you explicitly deployed the new snapshot parent pom? I'm sure you have
it on your local system, but is it in apache nexus?
david jencks
On May 7, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Timothy Ward
this, but it will mean that you can't build all Aries modules
completely from source using JDK7. If we're happy to tell people that they
have to use JDK6 for parts of the dependency tree then this would be an
option.
Holly
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Timothy Ward timothyjw
://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 23:44:55 +0900
From: tangy...@cn.fujitsu.com
To: dev@aries.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release parent-1.1.0
after confirming poms, +1
Timothy Ward wrote:
This is a vote for the release
confirming poms, +1
Timothy Ward wrote:
This is a vote for the release of the aries parent poms at
version 1.1.0. This is a significant fix, and is the first step in
getting Aries building properly with JDK 7. Individual projects
will
need to be updated to use these poms before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward updated ARIES-958:
---
Fix Version/s: util-1.1.1
BundleManifest.fromBundle(IFile) fails to parse OSGI headers when
I'm not sure I see the need for a Java7 parent yet. We're not planning to start
targeting binaries for Java 7, we still want to support Java 6 (and possibly
Java 5 for some people). What we need to do is to update the Java 5 and Java 6
parents so that they can compile successfully when using a
.
Thanks
--Tang
Timothy Ward wrote:
I'm not sure I see the need for a Java7 parent yet. We're not planning to
start targeting binaries for Java 7, we still want to support Java 6 (and
possibly Java 5 for some people). What we need to do is to update the Java
5 and Java 6 parents so
that would be very easy to do.
On 2 May 2013 12:30, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
Having thought I was doing the whole release with Java 7, it turns out
that an update reset my JAVA_HOME. I can't build with Java 7 either.
Looks like maybe we need a new parent release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-958.
Resolution: Fixed
BundleManifest.fromBundle(IFile) fails to parse OSGI headers when bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-1006:
---
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Compilation error with JDK7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13648407#comment-13648407
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-1006:
-
I'm going to use this JIRA to start working
This is a vote for the release of the aries parent poms at version 1.1.0. This
is a significant fix, and is the first step in getting Aries building properly
with JDK 7. Individual projects will need to be updated to use these poms
before they can be successfully built using Java 7.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13648445#comment-13648445
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-1006:
-
Hi Tang,
Thanks for the verification
advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 23:44:55 +0900
From: tangy...@cn.fujitsu.com
To: dev@aries.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release parent-1.1.0
after confirming poms, +1
Timothy Ward wrote
This is a vote for the release of the aries util bundle 1.1.1. This is a micro
increment to aries util 1.1.0, including a bug fix for a significant issue in
the SingleServiceTracker.
The staging area is available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-162/
Tags:
A discussion thread for any comments about the Aries Util 1.1.1 release.
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-1005.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk, will be included in the next util release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward updated ARIES-1005:
Fix Version/s: util-1.1.1
BundleHookBundleTracker throws Exception when close()-method
,
Jeremy
On 2 May 2013 09:40, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote for the release of the aries util bundle 1.1.1. This is a
micro increment to aries util 1.1.0, including a bug fix for a significant
issue in the SingleServiceTracker.
The staging area is available
I'm afraid that I'm a little short on time for debugging this, but it seems to
help if you tell the Java 7 compiler to ignore the missing bootstrap class path
jars (Animal Sniffer should save us from anything nasty anyway).
The following in the default-parent compiler plugin configuration makes
:42:00 +0100
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1
To: dev@aries.apache.org
I'd +1 if we know the binaries built with Java 6 test ok with Java 7
JRE. But I can't see that would be very easy to do.
On 2 May 2013 12:30, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
Having
Nobody looks to be doing this, but since nobody has objected either I'll get
going with it :)
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
From: timothyjw...@apache.org
To:
How do I get permission to create new Versions in JIRA? I can do the rest of
the release stuff, but it would be nice to track what went in...
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward updated ARIES-1024:
Fix Version/s: util-1.1.1
SingleServiceTracker fails to track services properly when using
Hi Christian,
I think this is a good idea, and I was already planning to do this in the next
few weeks. There's actually an OSGi standard namespace for extenders called
osgi.extender
which we should use, and chapter 135.2 of the R5 enterprise specification
declares that the blueprint extender
Hi Santhosh,
The quick answers to your questions are yes, yes and yes.
1. Is it possible to co-exist Aires bundle(blue print) with an existing
spring application?
This is absolutely possible, particularly if you don't want the Spring
container to interact with Aries in any way. If you
I know a number of people have had errors building with JDK 7 in the past. I
thought all the problems had been fixed, but this may not be the case.
Regards,
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
Thanks Brett,
I'm hoping to pull this support in for an Aries JPA container/context 1.1
release shortly after the JPA 2.1 spec vote finishes. Thanks for getting things
going!
Regards
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action
in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Subject: Re: aries pull request: ARIES-1047 JPA 2.1 support
From: dk...@apache.org
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:20:36 -0400
To: dev@aries.apache.org; timothyjw...@apache.org
On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:07 AM, Timothy Ward timothyjw
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1026:
---
Summary: JPA Temporary classloader cannot traverse the OSGi
ClassLoader Graph
Key: ARIES-1026
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1026
Project: Aries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13595785#comment-13595785
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-1023:
-
Hi,
Could you include the full blueprint xml
Timothy Ward created ARIES-1024:
---
Summary: SingleServiceTracker fails to track services properly
when using a filter
Key: ARIES-1024
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1024
Project: Aries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-1024.
-
Resolution: Fixed
SingleServiceTracker fails to track services properly when using a filter
Does anyone feel like testing this out?
I'd love to see a 1.1.1 release of util including ARIES-1024 in time for
EclipseCon (March 25th)
Regards,
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
+1
Thanks Holly!
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:59:25 +0100
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Samples and itests release candidate
From:
All three build fine for me, all the relevant manifest data checks out too.
+ 1
Tim
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:57:27 +0100
Subject:
I have checked out the tag, it builds fine, the poms look fine and so does the
manifest.
+1
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 07:55:52 +0200
Hi,
I've done my usual manifest checking. All seem fine except for the proxy über
bundle which is missing a version range for its import of
org.osgi.util.tracker.
+1 for all of the other bundles. It's nice to have a 1.0 blueprint :)
Tim
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:00:28 +0200
Subject: Re:
/
tx:transaction method=* value=Required /
/bean
service ref=serviceBean
interface=de.nierbeck.test.blueprint.jpa.MyService /
No much voodoo magic there, still I did receive those
TransactionRequiredExceptions. Any thoughts? regards, Achim
Am 26.07.2012 22:40, schrieb Timothy Ward
These methods throw a TransactionRequiredException because the JPA spec defines
that they must when called outside a transaction.
Regards,
Tim
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:49:42 +0200
Subject: Re: Aries JPA container managed with no active transactions
From: gno...@gmail.com
To:
Hi,
I have checked everything builds, all the poms and manifests.
+1
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:09:28 +0100
Subject: Re: [VOTE]
Both build fine for me, poms look fine.
+1
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins)
---
From: david.bosscha...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:12:05 +0100
Subject: Re:
Hi,
All four build fine, and the poms/manifests for three of them are fine.
Unfortunately the manifest for jmx-bundle doesn't use version ranges in most of
its imports:
Import-Package: javax.management,javax.management.openmbean,org.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-872:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
PersistenceDescriptorParserImpl doesn't accept namespace prefixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-872.
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied. This should get included in the upcoming 1.0 release of the JPA
I have not checked the signatures, but have built the three bundles as well as
checking over the poms and the manifests.
I have noticed two things:
1. The proxy impl bundle should have better JavaDoc on the WovenProxy interface
to say Yes this class is exported. No it is not API. Your bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13410178#comment-13410178
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-832:
Hi,
I'm pretty convinced that there is a big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13410362#comment-13410362
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-832:
From the stack trace it looks like the real
The EJB code is pretty stable, but it is built against the 4.0.0-beta-1 release
of OpenEJB. This may be seen as a problem when it comes to doing the actual
release...
Regards,
Tim
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action
have committed the change.
Thanks
Emily
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
Have I missed something here? The weaving code should support Java 5 as
well as Java 6 and 7, but there's no version code for it in the util that's
just been
Hi,
Have I missed something here? The weaving code should support Java 5 as well as
Java 6 and 7, but there's no version code for it in the util that's just been
committed.
Also this value can be calculated and cached in a static init block so that the
method can just return a constant
that returns true for bundles installed via the application
module, and false otherwise.
Alasdair
On 7 February 2012 10:26, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm not certain that I see the check I describe as particularly expensive,
the following code would be enough
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-628:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Support JTA attributes by annotations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13201222#comment-13201222
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-628:
I have added basic support, using a simple
Hi Emily,
Seems to be a difference in packaging between the blueprint used in the
Transactions itests and the Application itests. Not a big issue to fix.
Regards,
Tim Ward
---
Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate
Enterprise OSGi in Action
Hi,
I like the principle behind this change, and think it probably is a good way to
go. It's lightweight, and results can be cached. There is one negative point
that affects this (and in fact almost all) filtering, wihch is that the the
weaving code is built around the fact that we weave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-703:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
JDKProxyManager cannot proxy blueprint beans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13199740#comment-13199740
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-703:
It's not possible to absolutely solve this problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13199749#comment-13199749
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-703:
The code committed under revision 1240203 should
Affects Versions: proxy.impl-0.4
Reporter: Timothy Ward
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Fix For: proxy.impl-0.4
The new interface proxying code is able to create very fast dynamic proxy
classes for arbitrary sets of interface (like a better JDK proxy). With a small
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-743:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Subclass cannot be created by ProxySubclassGenerator when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-821.
Resolution: Fixed
Allow mixtures of interfaces and classes in proxys
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward closed ARIES-821.
--
Allow mixtures of interfaces and classes in proxys
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-808.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.4
Code fixed as per discussion. Unit tests refactored
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13188766#comment-13188766
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-808:
If I interpret your last comment correctly, would
Hi everyone,
There seems to be a misunderstanding here. The JNDI core bundle does not depend
on the proxy or blueprint APIs.
The bundle David is talking about is the JNDI uber bundle, which by definition
depends on everything because it *is* everything. The proxy API is used by the
JNDI URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13186821#comment-13186821
]
Timothy Ward commented on ARIES-808:
Hi Brian,
Having reviewed the patch I have
it optional so
that the aries jndi-bundle (the uber bundle) can resolve without
aries-blueprint being there. It should function as long as you don't
use the blueprint-specific features...
Cheers,
David
On 16 January 2012 09:36, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone
, 16 Dec 2011 09:42:14 +
Subject: Re: Weaving Hook puzzle
To: dev@aries.apache.org
Many thanks, Tim. That worked just fine!
David
On 14 December 2011 14:28, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi David,
This is a known issue with ASM in OSGi. We override ClassWriter
Hi David,
This is a known issue with ASM in OSGi. We override ClassWriter in the proxy
code to get around this (as recommended by the ASM doc). See the following for
details:
\proxy\proxy-impl\src\main\java\org\apache\aries\proxy\impl\common\OSGiFriendlyClassWriter.java
in
You can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-796.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.4
PropertyPlaceHolder does not really like JPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-801:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Aries Proxy cannot proxy abstract classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-799:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
Aries Repository Generation does not respect blueprint collection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward resolved ARIES-799.
Resolution: Fixed
Aries Repository Generation does not respect blueprint collection semantics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Ward reassigned ARIES-796:
--
Assignee: Timothy Ward
PropertyPlaceHolder does not really like JPA elements
201 - 300 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
