Re: [VOTE][APE] Proposal for Enhancing Geometry Processing in AsterixDB with JTS instead of ESRI Library

2024-07-31 Thread Till Westmann
Nice proposal: +1 On 2024/07/30 00:59:46 Ian Maxon wrote: > Sounds good to me. +1 > > On Jul 29, 2024 at 16:12:09, Suryaa Charan Shivakumar > wrote: > > > Hello AsterixDB Dev Community, > > > > I hope this message finds you well. I am excited to share a proposal aimed > > at advancing our geome

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.3 (RC0)

2024-04-01 Thread Till Westmann
+1 > On Apr 1, 2024, at 12:17, Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please verify and vote on the latest release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. > > This release includes compatibility with the new Database keyword and level. > > The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: > >

Re: [VOTE][APE] Query Plan Cache

2023-12-08 Thread Till Westmann
+1 On 2023/12/07 22:37:55 Mike Carey wrote: > +1 > > We really need this! > > On 12/7/23 2:21 PM, Glenn Justo Galvizo wrote: > > Every time a query is issued to AsterixDB, the query must undergo > > compilation. If the same query is run repeatedly, this query must be > > recompiled each and ev

Re: [VOTE][APE] Compute-Storage Separation (Cloud Mode Deployment)

2023-12-02 Thread Till Westmann
+1 > On Dec 2, 2023, at 11:23, Glenn Justo Galvizo wrote: > > +1 from me as well. > >> On Dec 2, 2023, at 10:27, Ian Maxon wrote: >> >> +1 >> On Dec 1, 2023 at 12:28:23, Murtadha Al-Hubail wrote: >>> >>> Each AsterixDB cluster today consists of one or more Node Controllers (NC) >>>

Re: [VOTE] Changing COPY FROM syntax

2023-10-27 Thread Till Westmann
+1 this is much nicer On 2023/10/26 05:05:01 Mike Carey wrote: > PS - I assume the semantics will be UPSERT-based? (Vs. one-time or > INSERT-based?) > > On 10/24/23 10:16 AM, Wail Alkowaileet wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm proposing to change the current syntax for COPY FROM. The current > > syn

Re: [APE] Support COPY TO

2023-10-26 Thread Till Westmann
Agreed (+1) - this functionality will significantly reduce the pain of moving data in and out of object storage. > On Oct 25, 2023, at 10:04 PM, Mike Carey wrote: > > +1 -- Now maybe users will stop trying to retrieve huge results and > wondering why the UI is choking! :-) This capability is

Re: Update of minimum Java version to 17

2023-10-03 Thread Till Westmann
+1 - we should move AsterixDB to Java 17 > On Oct 3, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > +1, there is a lot of good stuff in 17 and we have been running many > things with it. Being able to use all the language features like records > will be great. > > On Oct 3, 2023 at 11:01:14, Mike Car

Re: Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.1

2023-09-11 Thread Till Westmann
+1 On 2023/09/11 18:57:08 Ian Maxon wrote: > The vote passes with 3 +1's and no 0's or -1's. > > +1s: > > Peeyush > Murtadha > Wail > > Thanks for the votes everyone. > > Vote thread permalink: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zkxdsg7hl9m0h6xtxckk6lk532vltwlh > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8.1 and Hyracks 0.3.8.1

2023-05-03 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact: - Signature

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

2023-04-13 Thread Till Westmann
And another late +1. On 12 Apr 2023, at 23:34, Ian Maxon wrote: The vote passes with 3 binding +1's. On Apr 12, 2023 at 22:01:21, Mike Carey wrote: +1 for APE1 (!) On 4/12/23 2:17 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: Based on the discussion in https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thre

[RESULT] [VOTE] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

2023-03-19 Thread Till Westmann
The vote for accepting the APE proposal process passed with 7 binding +1 votes from Till Westmann Taewoo Kim Ian Maxon Mike Carey Ahmed Eldawy Glenn Justo Galvizo Preston Carman and no other votes. Vote threads: https://lists.apache.org/thread/n76f1sx6ch2ssv2o7h2q6scc56730ktc https

Re: [VOTE] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

2023-03-10 Thread Till Westmann
And here is my +1. On 10 Mar 2023, at 10:54, Till Westmann wrote: Hi, There seems to be a positive sentiment towards the APE proposal [1]. Let’s move on to a VOTE. Please vote [ ] +1 adopt the APE proposal [ ] 0 modify the proposal because ... [ ] -1 do not adopt the proposal because

[VOTE] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

2023-03-10 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, There seems to be a positive sentiment towards the APE proposal [1]. Let’s move on to a VOTE. Please vote [ ] +1 adopt the APE proposal [ ] 0 modify the proposal because ... [ ] -1 do not adopt the proposal because ... This procedural vote follows the common format of majority rule, th

Re: [DISCUSS] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

2023-03-05 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, there were no comments on this proposal so far and I’m wondering why that is. Do you think that the proposal is a) obviously great or b) obviously useless or c) you didn’t have time to read it or c) it needs some improvement or d) it just adds overhead or e) ... Please let us know what yo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.8 (RC1)

2022-05-04 Thread Till Westmann
[X] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.8 [ ] 0 No strong feeling either way [ ] -1 do not release one or both packages because ... Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Sourc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.7.1 (RC1)

2022-02-25 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the Driver jar binary artifact: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7.1 and Hyracks 0.9.7.1 (RC0)

2021-12-11 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact: - Signature

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept donation of AsterixDB JDBC Driver

2021-08-31 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, The vote - to accept the donation of the JDBC driver for AsterixDB [0] to the Apache Software foundation and - to add the driver to the AsterixDB code base passes with 5 binding +1 votes from - Mike Carey - Heri Ramampiaro - Ian Maxon - Taewoo Kim - Till Westmann and 2 non-binding +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept donation of AsterixDB JDBC Driver

2021-08-26 Thread Till Westmann
And here is my +1. On 22 Aug 2021, at 23:56, Till Westmann wrote: > And here is the IP clearance status page: > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/asterixdb-jdbc-driver > > On 22 Aug 2021, at 23:51, Till Westmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Couchbase would

Re: [VOTE] Accept donation of AsterixDB JDBC Driver

2021-08-22 Thread Till Westmann
And here is the IP clearance status page: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/asterixdb-jdbc-driver On 22 Aug 2021, at 23:51, Till Westmann wrote: > Hi, > > Couchbase would like to donate a JDBC driver for AsterixDB to the Apache > Software foundation. > > [ ] +1 accep

[VOTE] Accept donation of AsterixDB JDBC Driver

2021-08-22 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, Couchbase would like to donate a JDBC driver for AsterixDB to the Apache Software foundation. [ ] +1 accept the donation and add the driver to the AsterixDB code base [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 do not accept the donation because... The vote will be open for 7 days. Please vote, Till

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC1)

2021-07-09 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact: - Signatures

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.6 and Hyracks 0.3.6 (RC0)

2020-10-13 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact: - Signatures

Re: Parquet binary files in the code-base

2020-09-22 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Wail, Could you provide a bit of context how those binary files are used? Cheers, Till On 23 Sep 2020, at 0:24, Ian Maxon wrote: I think generally we try to avoid it where possible but it's hard to sometimes. IMO, as long as the file is small and changes very rarely, it's fine. If it's not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC4)

2020-07-31 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact: - Signatures

Re: UDF Lifecycle

2019-11-17 Thread Till Westmann
It seems that it's be nice if we had a step (similar to the initialization step) in the deployment lifecycle as well. And I guess that we'd need to corresponding clean-up step for un-deployment as well. Does that make sense? If so, should we file an improvement for this? Cheers, Till On 17 No

Re: HEADS UP: storage block compression to be enabled by default

2019-10-11 Thread Till Westmann
Good question. We could also consider to change the test to run uncompressed to maintain some test coverage for the uncompressed case. Thoughts? Cheers, Till On 11 Oct 2019, at 9:48, Wail Alkowaileet wrote: Should we remove [1] and [2]? [1] is now similar to [3] except for the buffer cache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC2)

2019-07-22 Thread Till Westmann
If we're creating a new RC to fix the notice, it would be nice if we could also move back to the naming convention that we had for the 0.9.4 release ("apache-asterixdb-0.9.4.zip") instead of the convention that we used for 0.9.4.1 ("asterix-server-0.9.4.1-binary-assembly.zip"). Cheers, Till O

Re: Code review steps

2019-06-09 Thread Till Westmann
't we add reviewers only if the self-review > is done? :-) > > Best, > Taewoo > > >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:51 AM Mike Carey wrote: >> >> +1 ! >> >>> On 6/6/19 6:07 PM, Till Westmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I

Code review steps

2019-06-06 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I've proposed an addition to our code review steps on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ASTERIXDB/Code+Reviews The only change from the steps we've been doing so far is the use of a "+1" code review by the author of a change to indicate that the self-review is done (avoiding the

Re: GSoC 2019

2019-05-28 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Stephen, I've just moderated your e-mail for dev@asterixdb.apache.org. I've also allowed all e-mails from this address to the list in the future. However, it would be best if you subscribed to the list to ensure that you also see all replies to your messages. Cheers, Till On 26 May 2019,

Re: Mailing list is down for UCI?

2019-04-25 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Xikui, Your message reached the list. Cheers, Till On 25 Apr 2019, at 18:10, Xikui Wang wrote: > Hi Devs, > > This is a test message, as we found the mailing list seems stopped working > for those who are using the UCI email address... > > Best, > Xikui

[DRAFT][REPORT] Apache AsterixDB April 2019

2019-04-09 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, Here's the report that I submitted to the board. If there are corrections/additions please let me know, they can still be incorporated in the next few days. Cheers, Till -- Description: Apache AsterixDB is a scalable big data management system (BDMS) that provides storage, management, and

Re: Hyracks Jobs - Missing CLI

2019-04-09 Thread Till Westmann
yword queries on semi-structured documents. In addition to the examples contained in the repository, are there any API tutorials or any supporting documentation? Regards, Ígor Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 03:07, Till Westmann escreveu: Hi Igor, Yes, there was a cli, but it has been removed in 20

Re: Recent change on removing statement as request body

2019-04-08 Thread Till Westmann
Just one request: please bring the results of your f2f meeting back to the list. Thanks, Till On 8 Apr 2019, at 9:20, Chen Li wrote: Qiushi and Chen Luo: please do a F2F meeting to discuss this issue and make a plan. Please include me in the meeting. On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:05 PM Till

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019

2019-04-07 Thread Till Westmann
query plan, with a stretch goal of picking split points dynamically.> Does this seem like a good project for Google summer of Code? If not, are there other projects or suggestions that might be more fitting?> Thanks,> - Stephen Ermshar> On 2019/03/11 02:48:06, "Till We

Re: Recent change on removing statement as request body

2019-04-07 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Chen, We could revert the change, but I'd prefer to fix the issues that we have in the (incompletely) documented API. I think that the solution for multiple statements should be the "multi-statement" parameter. However I thought that the default value for this parameter was "true", so I'm n

Re: Hyracks Jobs - Missing CLI

2019-04-07 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Igor, Yes, there was a cli, but it has been removed in 2012 [1] (before I started to contribute to the project). The applications that use Hyracks today (the biggest ones being Apache AsterixDB and Apache VXQuery [2]) are more tightly integrated and use Hyracks' APIs to communicate with Hyracks

Google Summer of Code 2019

2019-03-10 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, Google Summer of Code 2019 is getting started and I'm wondering if there are projects we'd like to mentor (and who would like to do that). Cheers, Till

Re: Important to Use a Separate Disk for Logging on SSDs

2019-02-21 Thread Till Westmann
I think that mailing lists can be configured to allow attachments, but apparently this list is not configured that way. Gerald's suggestion sounds good :) Cheers, Till On 21 Feb 2019, at 10:29, Gerald Sangudi wrote: > I believe the Apache mailer does not allow attachments, or at least images >

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-10 Thread Till Westmann
Agreement! On 1/4/19 11:32 AM, Till Westmann wrote: > Hi, > > I think that we should opt for a coordinated move of our repositories from > git-wip-us to gitbox. To give us some time to prepare I suggest that we aim > for a move on Monday, Jan 14. > A

[DRAFT][REPORT] Apache AsterixDB January 2019

2019-01-04 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, Here’s a proposal for a board report. Thoughts/additions for the report? Cheers, Till — Description: Apache AsterixDB is a scalable big data management system (BDMS) that provides storage, management, and query capabilities for large collections of semi-structured data. Activity: - Deve

[DISCUSS] Migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-04 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I think that we should opt for a coordinated move of our repositories from git-wip-us to gitbox. To give us some time to prepare I suggest that we aim for a move on Monday, Jan 14. At the same time I would also like to request the removal of incubator-asterixdb-hyracks.git as we don’t use it a

Test failures in feeds: change-feed-with-filter-on-meta

2019-01-01 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Devs, recently (at least Dec 25 until today) we’ve seen a few failures of change-feed-with-filter-on-meta. Some examples of failures of this test in different contexts are https://asterix-jenkins.ics.uci.edu/job/asterix-integration-tests/1459/ https://asterix-jenkins.ics.uci.edu/job/asterix

Re: The CI job

2018-11-21 Thread Till Westmann
e to unblock the job. >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 3:25 PM Till Westmann wrote: >> >> Interesting. >> Do you know how the snapshots were deployed before Oct 6? >> >>> On 18 Nov 2018, at 14:22, Ian Maxon wrote: >>> >>> Now the site's ba

Re: The CI job

2018-11-18 Thread Till Westmann
, at 17:38, Till Westmann wrote: Hi, I’m wondering at what frequency the the CI job that builds our docs [1] should running and if is still is running. How can I find out? Thanks, Till [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/sqlpp/manual.html

The CI job

2018-11-17 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I’m wondering at what frequency the the CI job that builds our docs [1] should running and if is still is running. How can I find out? Thanks, Till [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/sqlpp/manual.html

Re: Getting on the Mailing List

2018-10-17 Thread Till Westmann
scription address. I > believe that is what I did. Is there something I am not seeing? > > Thanks, > > Miles Hong > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:44 AM Till Westmann wrote: > >> Hi Miles, >> >> to subscribe to the mailing list please follow the instruction

Re: Getting on the Mailing List

2018-10-17 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Miles, to subscribe to the mailing list please follow the instructions at https://asterixdb.apache.org/community.html . Cheers, Till

Re: Requesting node X to shutdown to ensure failure?

2018-09-30 Thread Till Westmann
node runs CC and NC. Best, Taewoo On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Till Westmann wrote: Yes, and after 10 * 8000 ms = 80s have passed without a heartbeat the node is considered dead. This seems to align with the log messages: 21:51:54.203 [Worker:ClusterController] INFO

Re: Requesting node X to shutdown to ensure failure?

2018-09-30 Thread Till Westmann
o On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Till Westmann wrote: Hi Taewoo, I’m little confused as we seem to have 2 cc logs. The "Requesting node 2 to shutdown …" message is logged, when nodes are considered to be dead as they have missed too many heartbeats. And you can see in the

Re: Requesting node X to shutdown to ensure failure?

2018-09-30 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Taewoo, I’m little confused as we seem to have 2 cc logs. The "Requesting node 2 to shutdown …" message is logged, when nodes are considered to be dead as they have missed too many heartbeats. And you can see in the later logs that indeed more than 80s passed without receiving a heartbeat.

Re: [VOTE] Release AsterixDB 0.9.4 and Hyracks 0.3.4 (RC2)

2018-09-30 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the AsterixDB Installer binary artifact: - Signatur

Rename COLL_* aggregate functions into STRICT_*

2018-06-08 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, There are 2 kinds of aggregation functions in SQL++ right now: 1) those with the prefix ARRAY_ (which share SQL's behavior or ignoring NULL) and 2) those with the prefix COLL_ (which return NULL, if one of the values is NULL). To reduce the confusion about which functions implement a stri

Re: Question About Dataset Granule Locking

2018-02-25 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Chen, We used to support dataset level locks and lock escalation on the NCs but we stopped doing that at some point. IIRC we did that as there was no reason to escalate. However, the interfaces didn’t change. AFAIK the only way to lock a dataset today is to acquire the lock on the metadata

Travel Assistance applications open

2018-02-14 Thread Till Westmann
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that travel assistance applications for ApacheCon NA 2018 are now open! We will be supporting ApacheCon NA Montreal, Canada on 24th - 29th September 2018 TAC exists to help those that would like to attend ApacheCon events, but are

Re: Counting character positions inside a string

2018-01-30 Thread Till Westmann
Sounds good to me. +1 Cheers, Till On 29 Jan 2018, at 18:54, Dmitry Lychagin wrote: All, We would like to change how string functions count character positions inside a string. Currently string functions position(), substring() and some others assume that the first character is at position

Re: Documentation on NCService

2018-01-29 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Steven, AFAIK the NCService is intended to be run as a daemon on each node with the sole purpose of managing the lifecycle of NCs as directed by the CC. The lifecycle of the NCService itself should be managed by an operating system service like sysvinit or systemd. Thus termination using a sign

Re: PLEASE READ: Automatic formatting of sources

2018-01-29 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Ted, just to follow up on this. We’ve been using a shared code format for a few years, so most of the code is formatted consistently. And we’ve also had a style checker for a while that checked the changed code against the style. However, one problem that we’ve still seen repeatedly is that di

Re: Result Deletion Parameter

2018-01-16 Thread Till Westmann
+1 On 16 Jan 2018, at 15:50, Murtadha Hubail wrote: Hi all, Currently, AsterixDB supports three types of result delivery methods namely IMMEDIATE, DEFERED, and ASYNC. In the IMMEDIATE case, the result files are deleted as soon as the result is sent to the query requester. However, in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.3 and Hyracks 0.3.3 (RC0)

2018-01-13 Thread Till Westmann
+1 to all artifacts. Checked the source artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok - Source files have Apache header - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) - Can compile from source Checked the binary artifacts: - Signatures and hashes correct —

Commit messages (again)

2017-12-10 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, in June we started to be more systematic about our commit messages to make it easier for a release manager to provide useful release notes - by being able to point to the issues the were addressed in a specific release [1]. However, now many of the commit messages start with "[NO ISSUE]" and

Re: algebricks-examples

2017-11-29 Thread Till Westmann
7, at 5:50 PM, Till Westmann wrote: Hi, we still have the algebricks-examples module and I believe that it’s largely unused. Is that correct? If nobody has a strong attachment to it, I’d like to remove it [1]. Cheers, Till [1] https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2180/

Re: SPARSOBJECT type tag

2017-11-29 Thread Till Westmann
The question is if we still think that those future thoughts will become reality anytime soon. Otherwise we might just remove them to reduce confusion. Cheers, Till On 28 Nov 2017, at 17:23, Wail Alkowaileet wrote: > I had the same question. As Mike mentioned "They were future thoughts" > > http

Re: Change in merge policy syntax

2017-11-27 Thread Till Westmann
+10 I’ve been hoping that we’d move from the (("key"="value"),(…)) syntax to an JSON-like syntax that aligns with our data model for years - but it never seemed to be the right time. I hope that this is the first step and that we’ll move to this syntax for other parameters as well. Cheers, Till

algebricks-examples

2017-11-27 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, we still have the algebricks-examples module and I believe that it’s largely unused. Is that correct? If nobody has a strong attachment to it, I’d like to remove it [1]. Cheers, Till [1] https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2180/

Re: Temporary Datasets

2017-11-20 Thread Till Westmann
Good question - we might. If we take it out now, we could break future applications if we reintroduce it. Now I’m torn between not keeping unused stuff and compatibility. In this case I’m leaning slightly towards compatibility … Cheers, Till On 20 Nov 2017, at 12:41, Ian Maxon wrote: Are we go

Re: Temporary Datasets

2017-11-20 Thread Till Westmann
+1 Till On 20 Nov 2017, at 12:05, Mike Carey wrote: +1 to remove them and then re-create them later - based on the state of the AsterixDB storage world and cluster dynamics at that time.  (I think we'll have a better chance of getting them perfect if we re-do them then - I don't remember tha

Re: MultiTransactionJobletEventListenerFactory

2017-11-16 Thread Till Westmann
If there are a number of issue with supporting multiple transaction ids and no clear benefits/use-cases, I’d vote for simplification :) Also, code that’s not being used has a tendency to "rot" and so I think that it’s usefulness might be limited by the time we’d find a use for this functionality.

Changes to exception handling

2017-11-07 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I’d like to propose some changes to our guidelines for exception handling. The main motivation is to separate a) internal errors that are not useful to users and can’t be addressed by them (aka bugs) from b) external errors that inform the user of errors in the input (queries/data/…), th

Re: Java version issue?

2017-11-03 Thread Till Westmann
, Taewoo Kim wrote: Yes. What Till says is correct. So, a user has a freedom to choose whatever Java version. https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/install-java-jre-mac-os.html Best, Taewoo On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann wrote: I think that it’s not a macOS issue. AFAIK Apple

Re: Java version issue?

2017-11-03 Thread Till Westmann
t at some point when he was trying it (out of curiosity?). On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Till Westmann wrote: We’re only testing AsterixDB on Java 8, so running on Java 9 is uncharted territory. Here it seems that a class is missing from the class path. This class is probably available in

Re: Java version issue?

2017-11-03 Thread Till Westmann
We’re only testing AsterixDB on Java 8, so running on Java 9 is uncharted territory. Here it seems that a class is missing from the class path. This class is probably available in JRE 9, but maybe not on the default class path. Somebody with more Java 9 exposure than I had would probably know

Re: Adapting TimSort into AsterixDB/Hyracks

2017-10-28 Thread Till Westmann
I largely agree with Xikui. This one [2] seems to clearly state in its header that it’s published by Oracle under the GPL (which is category X [3] and cannot be included in Apache products). It would be interesting to understand the provenance of the Spark version to understand if/why it is not d

Re: Weekly status

2017-10-28 Thread Till Westmann
Did you mean to send this to asterixresea...@ics.uci.edu? Cheers, Till On 27 Oct 2017, at 9:24, abdullah alamoudi wrote: Hi Everyone, I will not be able to attend this week's meeting. Here is my status: 1. Make Active job resume attempt on the same suspend/resume thread This prevents Meta

Re: PrimaryIndexOperationTracker

2017-10-23 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I think that it’s actually quite common to have multiple iodevices. Even if there is only one disk, configuring multiple iodevices can improve performance - especially if a significant part of the data fits into memory (and disk IO is not the limiting factor). And the reason for that seems to

Integration tests failing

2017-10-12 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, it seems that the integration tests [1] have been failing forever (with "forever" being the history that Jenkins keeps - right now the last run is from Sep 25). I was wondering if somebody would volunteer to look at the failures in more detail and maybe categorize the failures to formulate a

Re: Missing BAD change

2017-09-23 Thread Till Westmann
t > asf commit . > > Cheers, > Abdullah. > >> On Sep 23, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Till Westmann wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> apparently something went wrong with one of the recent BAD changes [1]: >> The Gerrit review has been merged, but the change is not in the

Missing BAD change

2017-09-23 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, apparently something went wrong with one of the recent BAD changes [1]: The Gerrit review has been merged, but the change is not in the ASF git repository [2] (or the GitHub mirror [3]). How can we fix this? Thanks, Till [1] https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2012/ [2] https://git-wip

Re: Problem after updating to 0.9.3

2017-09-22 Thread Till Westmann
While we have this step in the instructions [1] before the IDE setup, we might want to make is more explicit why it is there and should be done before the IDE setup :) Cheers, Till [1] http://asterixdb.apache.org/dev-setup.html On 22 Sep 2017, at 17:59, abdullah alamoudi wrote: Using comman

Re: Time to deprecate AQL?

2017-09-07 Thread Till Westmann
I think this seals it :) > On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:49, Gerald Sangudi wrote: > > :-) > > On Sep 7, 2017 11:44 AM, "Michael Carey" wrote: > > As AsterixDB evolves, and additional features are added - e.g., DISTINCT > aggregate support, or properly implemented query-bodied functions, > supporting

Re: License issue when using esri geometry api

2017-09-04 Thread Till Westmann
1). I wanted to ask with Ahmed about it and get back. I have no idea when they will release so I asked a question[1] though I didn't get an answer for that. Thank you. Sincerely, Riyafa [1] https://github.com/Esri/geometry-api-java/issues/140 On 29 July 2017 at 10:58, Till Westmann wrote:

Re: Error when building on a new machine

2017-08-24 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Riyafa, I think that the class that is failing to load is a class that should be generated during the maven build. Did you build with maven or with your IDE? Cheers, Till On 24 Aug 2017, at 12:58, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote: Dear all, I pushed my code to the branch "geometry" in github[1

Small SQL++ syntax change

2017-08-21 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, the fix for ASTERIXDB-2050 will introduce a small SQL++ syntax change. Specifically, it will become necessary to end DDL statements with a semi-colon. This was already true for queries and will be true for all statements. Cheers, Till [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-20

Re: License issue when using esri geometry api

2017-07-28 Thread Till Westmann
://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1895 On 27 Jul 2017, at 10:13, Mike Carey wrote: +1 on option 1 for now, I would say (from afar :-)), until ESRI finishes resolving stuff on their end. Aloha, Mike On 7/27/17 6:23 AM, Till Westmann wrote: Hi, I’m sorry for the late reply on the subject

Re: License issue when using esri geometry api

2017-07-27 Thread Till Westmann
ed that 3 or 4 are what we'll need to do! (Sigh.) On 6/25/17 5:57 AM, Till Westmann wrote: Hi Riyafa, I think that the problem is bigger than the failing test. The JSON license itself is not acceptable for inclusion in an Apache artifact [4]. So we cannot use the ESRI API as-is, if

Re: License issue when using esri geometry api

2017-06-25 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Riyafa, I think that the problem is bigger than the failing test. The JSON license itself is not acceptable for inclusion in an Apache artifact [4]. So we cannot use the ESRI API as-is, if we want the GeoJSON functionality be a non-optional part of AsterixDB. Here are a few options I see: 1)

Commit messages (again)

2017-06-25 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I’ve been looking at our last 10 commits to find out how we’re doing wrt to the goal of producing commit messages that will help the release manager to provide useful release notes. Out of those commit messages 5 [0,3,5,6,8] looked good, 2 listed no issue [2,7], 3 [2,7,9] gave no or incomplet

Re: Parse GeoJSON data into a record in AsterixDB

2017-06-21 Thread Till Westmann
Glancing at RFC 7946 [1] it seems that arbitrary nesting is not allowed. If I glanced correctly, there are 1) geometry objects and 2) feature objects that can contain a geometry and 3) feature collections that can contain multiple features. So I believe that recursion should not be a problem. Howe

Re: Commit messages

2017-06-17 Thread Till Westmann
update those before committing. I hope that this works for everybody (didn't get too much feedback) as it will help us to produce better release notes for AsterixDB's users. Cheers, Till [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ASTERIXDB/Formatting [2] https://issues.apache.org/

Re: Commit messages

2017-06-15 Thread Till Westmann
Yes, works better for me. Are there other opinions/concerns on the subject? Thanks, Till On 15 Jun 2017, at 15:46, Yingyi Bu wrote: How about ING? Best, Yingyi On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Till Westmann wrote: Ok, we could also do "TXN" -> "TX" and "

Re: Commit messages

2017-06-15 Thread Till Westmann
MVN - MTD (metadata) - PERF (performance monitoring etc.) - REPL - RPC (cc/nc message) - RTM (runtime) - STAT (statistics etc.) - SITE - STR - SQL - TEST - TXN (transaction) - TYPE (data model) - UDF (user defined function) - UI On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Till Westmann wrote: But the first

Re: Commit messages

2017-06-15 Thread Till Westmann
6/14/17 9:15 AM, Till Westmann wrote: Hi, some of us had a discussion with an SDSC team last week that is running an AsterixDB instance. Their customer perspective on AsterixDB highlighted a few areas of improvement to ease the consumption of AsterixDB. One thing that I’d like to follow up

Re: Cannot call git gerrit submit because of error

2017-06-14 Thread Till Westmann
group on Gerrit now, try uploading again. On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Till Westmann wrote: I can confirm that the ICLA is on file. Till On 14 Jun 2017, at 7:42, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote: Hi, Yes. I have signed the ICLA. Thanks Riyafa On 14 June 2017 at 20:04, Ian Maxon wrote: Hav

Commit messages

2017-06-14 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, some of us had a discussion with an SDSC team last week that is running an AsterixDB instance. Their customer perspective on AsterixDB highlighted a few areas of improvement to ease the consumption of AsterixDB. One thing that I’d like to follow up on are release notes. So far we didn’t

Re: Cannot call git gerrit submit because of error

2017-06-14 Thread Till Westmann
I can confirm that the ICLA is on file. Till On 14 Jun 2017, at 7:42, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote: > Hi, > > Yes. I have signed the ICLA. > > Thanks > Riyafa > > On 14 June 2017 at 20:04, Ian Maxon wrote: > >> Have you signed an ICLA with Apache? If you have all that needs to be >> done is for so

Re: Support GeoJSON in AsterixDB

2017-06-13 Thread Till Westmann
Hi, I’m sorry for the late comment on this. I think that we should not directly parse GeoJSON into WKB initially. As GeoJSON is valid JSON we’d need to a) determine if it’s GeoJSON every time we parse some JSON and b) do this independent of the users intention (maybe it’s just some JSON that ge

Re: REST API JSON output

2017-06-06 Thread Till Westmann
There is a way but JSON is the default, so that’s not the problem. However, there’s a bug for UUID printing that needs fixing [1]. Cheers, Till [1] https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1805/ On 6 Jun 2017, at 9:29, Steven Jacobs wrote: > Hi all, > Is there a way to specify JSON output from t

Re: Modules that could be removed?

2017-05-31 Thread Till Westmann
dev/null for old code. I believe that committing changes, that causes this repo to be broken *must* be treated as -1 Jenkins bit. On May 31, 2017, at 16:41, Yingyi Bu wrote: +1. Best, Yingyi On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Till Westmann wrote: I read this discussion that Ildar’s su

Re: Modules that could be removed?

2017-05-31 Thread Till Westmann
I read this discussion that Ildar’s suggestion to move asterix-experiments to a different repo would be a solution that works for everybody. Did I read that correctly or did someone disagree with such an approach? Cheers, Till On 31 May 2017, at 16:14, Mike Carey wrote: This should be decided

  1   2   3   >