Hey Mike,
unordered list , Since I'm parsing the data from the Asterix HTTP API which
returns results using JSON, therefore the JSON encoder at the sending end
has already converted the unordered list to JavaScript Array.
the thing with the existing UI is that UI's result is generated by the
serv
Sounds like a bug in the underlying http UI?! It would be nice to
preserve the multiple-result-area approach that the existing web UI uses
in that case, somehow... It's interesting that this hasn't come up
before - we should have test cases for the basic UI for that, I would think?
On 6/16/
There are some newer scalar data types that we support that might be
useful for at least some "unsigned integer use cases" - namely, the
binary type (which is like strings but is just bits).
On 6/16/16 4:10 PM, Ildar Absalyamov wrote:
I guess my point was not to use unsigned integers int the
Kaveen and I talked about this earlier today actually, the result (from
*DB) for the two above queries is actually fine and parseable JSON. It's
just a labeling issue as the result is shown as if it were 3 records rather
than 3 lists.
A more vexing question however that came up is what to do about
FYI, my email in the past about upgrading Maven on Ubuntu no longer works
for 3.3.9. I've found another PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~andrei-pozolotin/+archive/ubuntu/maven3
Request: In the future, can we have announcements to the list and
discussion at least a few days *before* committing changes
@Ian & @Chris: Can you provide some helpful hints in the direction of
parsing returned ADM? (Since you are kind of addressing that as we
speak for other reasons?)
@Kaveen: Off to a cool start! In terms of the sorts of things that can
come back, *conceptually*, the return clause of a query
I guess my point was not to use unsigned integers int the case when int64 is
not enough, but to allow using say uint32 instead of int64.
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 16:03, Ian Maxon wrote:
>
> My 0.2c is that int64 is big enough if size was the consideration. Usually,
> the times that I have wished I
My 0.2c is that int64 is big enough if size was the consideration. Usually,
the times that I have wished I had unsigned integers in Java, were not
related to size constraints, but rather when I had to implement something
that required a lot of bitwise operations, since signedness makes that more
co
Things like Spark and Flink don’t do that as well, but because they need
integration with proper Java types.
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 15:45, Yingyi Bu wrote:
>
>>> Is there any database or SQL implementation supporting that?
> Ok, it turns out MySQL supports that, while Postgres, MS SQL and Hive
>> Is there any database or SQL implementation supporting that?
Ok, it turns out MySQL supports that, while Postgres, MS SQL and Hive do
not have that.
Best,
Yingyi
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Yingyi Bu wrote:
> >> I guess part of the reason why we do that is because Java used to lack
> n
>> I guess part of the reason why we do that is because Java used to lack
native support of unsigned integers.
Is there any database or SQL implementation supporting that?
FYI:
http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/53050/why-arent-unsigned-integer-types-available-in-the-top-database-platforms
Be
Hi devs,
As I was generating various data distributions for statistics experiments one
thing kept bothering me.
All Asterix integer types (int8, int16, int32, int64) are signed. However
majority of real use cases does not require negative integer values. Seems like
we are waisting half of the d
oh I see, Thank you Yingyi,
I did update the VPS with the fixes for Q1, the only way to fix Q2 and the
new query is to write a little parser since that output isn't valid json.
cheers,
Kaveen
On 16 June 2016 at 22:59, Yingyi Bu wrote:
> Any valid ADM (asterix data model) instance can be a resu
Any valid ADM (asterix data model) instance can be a result row.
ADM: https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/aql/datamodel.html
A single curly bracket means a record constructor. A record consists of
fields, where each field is an name-value pair.
Therefore,
{
[1,2,3],
[2,3,4],
[5,6
Hey Yingyi,
I fixed that issue, didn't update the VPS yet. One question Can there be
results which returns arrays?
for example
{
[1,2,3],
[2,3,4],
[5,6,7]
}
if that's so, if you have some time can you give me an AQl query which
will produce something like that.
thanks in advance,
K
Awesome! Thanks, Kaveen!
Best,
Yingyi
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kaveen Rodrigo
wrote:
> Yikes, Thanks Yingyi,
>
> I never expected the results array to contain values, I'll get on it
>
> On 16 June 2016 at 21:48, Yingyi Bu wrote:
>
> > Very cool!!
> > It seems that there is an assumpti
Yikes, Thanks Yingyi,
I never expected the results array to contain values, I'll get on it
On 16 June 2016 at 21:48, Yingyi Bu wrote:
> Very cool!!
> It seems that there is an assumption that returned results are records?
>
> For example, you can try the following query:
> Q1:
> for $m in dat
Very cool!!
It seems that there is an assumption that returned results are records?
For example, you can try the following query:
Q1:
for $m in dataset Metadata.Dataset
return $m.DatasetName;
Q2:
1+1;
Best,
Yingyi
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Kaveen Rodrigo
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I h
Hello all,
I have been working on the WebUI for AsterixDB during the last month, and I
would like to get some input from you guys. There are a couple of visual
tweaks to be applied but the base features are pretty much done.
http://173.82.2.197:19006/
please excuse the slow performance of my doc
19 matches
Mail list logo
