I created https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7003 that adds a first
version.
I included planned connectors mentioned in [1] that currently has an owner
assigned to this section. Did not include connectors that have already been
completed and connectors for which corresponding JIRAs do not have an
+1 for using the term connectors.
JB, thanks for agreeing to add content to this section.
- Cham
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:48 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> I like this idea and also the first option. I agree with making it clear
> that things about IO are language specific.
>
> And +1 to calling it
Agree, I think connector is a more meaning name for users.
IO is more the Beam "internal" wording.
I will update this section as I have new connectors ( :) ) on the fly.
Regards
JB
On 26/10/2018 04:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> My $0.02
>
> "IO" has an established meaning in Beam dev argot but
My $0.02
"IO" has an established meaning in Beam dev argot but I think on the web
page I would use the word "connector" or something more universal.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM Chamikara Jayalath
wrote:
>
> (1) Add a top level IO roadmap.
>
I like this, but it is important on the roadmap t
(Forwarding to dev list from the PR on roadmap.)
Given that we now have a main roadmap Webpage with some content, we were
wondering if there should be a section on IO related efforts. We already
have following Webpage on current and upcoming IO transforms.
https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/
