Hello, community,
I found information that Google is working on supporting Dataflow runner
for cross-language
(https://beam.apache.org/roadmap/connectors-multi-sdk/)
Is there any more information about the expected release of this feature?
Thanks
Sounds good! Let's try it out. I sent one post suggestion via the form,
let's see how the notification goes for people who are subscribed to the
spreadsheet.
I'll create a PR with the description of the new process next week.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> I think this is
Hello, community,
I found information that Google is working on supporting Dataflow runner for
cross-language
(https://beam.apache.org/roadmap/connectors-multi-sdk/)
Is there any more information about the expected release of this feature?
Thanks
Hi Henry,
I submitted a pull request related to the Beam Katas that can be found here
(https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11761) and included you as a reviewer. I
updated all of the related metadata, generated the course, and tested through
it to ensure it worked as expected (and the placehold
Hi All,
Was digging into https://github.com/apache/beam-wheels after being reminded
of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9388 (I recall the original
conversation -->
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4a7d34e64a34e9fe589d06aec74d9b464d252c516fe96c35b2d6c9ae%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
Hello everyone,
Julian and I have created this pr[1] to create a page with the model sheet,
and links to the mascot image files. Can someone please review?
Thanks!
Aizhamal
[1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11780
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:14 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
wrote:
> @Ismael, th
Please note https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11777 - another bug we
found while trying to upgrade to 2.21
Other than that things look good.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:14 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> +1 (again, validated with new whl files.)
>
> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:08 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:55 PM Luke Cwik wrote:
>
>> The 2.22 release is also being worked on. Rather allow that release pick
>> up anything that isn't critical.
>>
>
> +1. The question is whether this will result in broken installs (e.g.
Thanks, Tyson.
I noticed a few links could be corrected, fixes inline.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:13 PM Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> Why
>
> Google has a Fixit week to improve Engineering Excellence and we want to
> use it to improve Apache Beam!
> What
>
> For the week of 2020-06-08 you will see an
+1 (again, validated with new whl files.)
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10015? Is this a
blocker?
+Kenneth Knowles +Reuven Lax -- since
you are both tagged on the JIRA.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:09 PM Kyle Weaver wrote:
> > We *really* need to automate the building an
Why
Google has a Fixit week to improve Engineering Excellence and we want to
use it to improve Apache Beam!
What
For the week of 2020-06-08 you will see an increased focus from Google
engineers on improving Engineering Excellence. We’re asking the community
to join in and commit as much, or as li
> We *really* need to automate the building and deploying of artifacts,
rather than have so many manual steps...
Agreed. Luckily building wheels is one of only a couple steps that aren't
automated yet. Partially related:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9388.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:5
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:55 PM Luke Cwik wrote:
> The 2.22 release is also being worked on. Rather allow that release pick
> up anything that isn't critical.
>
+1. The question is whether this will result in broken installs (e.g. if we
don't exclude Flink 1.10.1 and the user tries to use it wit
The 2.22 release is also being worked on. Rather allow that release pick up
anything that isn't critical.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> We *really* need to automate the building and deploying of artifacts,
> rather than have so many manual steps...
>
> The new set of w
We *really* need to automate the building and deploying of artifacts,
rather than have so many manual steps...
The new set of wheels look good now. Verified all the hashes and signatures
and source tarball contents as well. Ran a couple of test pipelines.
I noticed https://github.com/apache/beam/
Hey Ted! Welcome =)
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:34 AM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> Done. And welcome!
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:32 AM Ted Romer wrote:
>
>> Hi, this is Ted Romer at Google ... I'd like to get permission to join
>> the JIRA project so that I can assign
>> https://issues.apache.org/ji
Nevermind, uploading the wheels to dist.apache.org is part
of ./sign_hash_python_wheels.sh, which I forgot to run. Wheels should be up
to date now, PTAL.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:27 PM Kyle Weaver wrote:
> > -1, the wheel files seem to be built against the wrong commit.
>
> Thanks for catching
Thanks
On Thu, 21 May 2020, 23:04 Kyle Weaver, wrote:
> Hi Chandan, sorry about that. Does this link work?
>
>
> https://join.slack.com/t/seasonofdocs/shared_invite/enQtNTc0NDgyOTQ5Nzc4LTliZjVlZjRmNmU5ZmFiNmViNmNiMTM5NTdlNTJiYzIzZTk3MDlhMjM3NzE2MzIxNzIxNmZiMmMzNzRmZTI4NmU
>
> On Thu, May 21, 202
Done. And welcome!
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:32 AM Ted Romer wrote:
> Hi, this is Ted Romer at Google ... I'd like to get permission to join the
> JIRA project so that I can assign
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10055 to myself.
>
> My JIRA username is "tedromer".
>
> Thanks!
> Te
Hi Chandan, sorry about that. Does this link work?
https://join.slack.com/t/seasonofdocs/shared_invite/enQtNTc0NDgyOTQ5Nzc4LTliZjVlZjRmNmU5ZmFiNmViNmNiMTM5NTdlNTJiYzIzZTk3MDlhMjM3NzE2MzIxNzIxNmZiMmMzNzRmZTI4NmU
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:32 PM Chandan Prakash <
b18...@students.iitmandi.ac.in> wrot
Hi, this is Ted Romer at Google ... I'd like to get permission to join the
JIRA project so that I can assign
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10055 to myself.
My JIRA username is "tedromer".
Thanks!
Ted
Thanks,
The link to join slack channel is expired .I am new to slack ,so , it will
be helpful for me if I get the slack URL .
On Thu, 21 May 2020, 22:13 Kyle Weaver, wrote:
> Hi Chandan,
>
>
> Thank you for the introduction and your interest to work on Apache Beam
> documentation with Season o
> -1, the wheel files seem to be built against the wrong commit.
Thanks for catching that Robert. I had to rebuild the wheels after some
cherry picks. I validated that the wheels in gs://beam-wheels-staging are
up to date. They then must not have overwritten the wheels on
dist.apache.org properly,
Hi Chandan,
Thank you for the introduction and your interest to work on Apache Beam
documentation with Season of Docs. To participate in the program you need
to follow the guides here [1] [2]. If you are new to the program, we
suggest:
1.
Start by studying our proposed project ideas and e
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:02 AM Maximilian Michels wrote:
> > This is still confusing to me - why would the messages be dropped as
> late in this case?
>
> Since you previously mentioned that the bug is due to the pane info
> missing, I just pointed out that the WriteFiles logic is expected to
>
Hi folks,
Sorry about that. This link should give public access now.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11PXOBUbeldgPqz6OlTswCal6SxyX76Bb_ZVKBdwsd7o/edit?usp=sharing
Have a great weekend!
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:01 AM Maximilian Michels wrote:
> +1 for making the notes publicly available. T
Would it make sense to combine it with the Apache Beam release calendar?
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles
On 20.05.20 19:27, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> +1 a calendar would be nice.
>
> On Tue, May 19, 20
Thanks Matthias!
We realized we want this to be a much more community-driven process.
That's why we are planning to be more transparent to give everyone a
chance to get involved in the summit. Given that we now have more time,
this will be much more feasible.
Cheers,
Max
On 18.05.20 20:00, Matth
+1 for making the notes publicly available. This list is free to join by
anyone.
On 21.05.20 00:17, Austin Bennett wrote:
> Should the link/meeting notes be publicly available? Not just available
> to individuals plus all of @google?
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:06 PM Brittany Hermann
Since the current RC has been -1ed maybe we can include BEAM-9887 as
part of the next RC, no?
It is definitely not a blocker but a nice to have.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:26 AM Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> -1, the wheel files seem to be built against the wrong commit. E.g.
>
> unzip -p
> apache_be
30 matches
Mail list logo
