Sounds good! Let's try it out. I sent one post suggestion via the form,
let's see how the notification goes for people who are subscribed to the
spreadsheet.

I'll create a PR with the description of the new process next week.

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think this is a good idea.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a good plan to me, but I haven't been the one monitoring this
>> spreadsheet (or twitter for that matter). Spam is a concern, but
>> everything is moderated so I think we try it out and see if the volume is
>> really high enough to be an issue.
>>
>
> I agree with Robert. Google forms supports form validation. We can
> eliminate most botspam with that. Rest of it can be handled with moderation.
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:46 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I like having easier notifications. It would be great if the
>>> notifications had the content also. I get notifications on the spreadsheet,
>>> but since I have to click through to look at them there is a little bit of
>>> friction.
>>>
>>> 1. Is it still easy to add the other columns to record LGTM and when
>>> they have been sent?
>>> 2. Risk of spam?
>>>
>>> Kenn
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:56 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to propose some improvements to the existing process of
>>>> proposing tweets for the Apache Beam Twitter account.
>>>>
>>>> Currently the process requires people to request edit access, and then
>>>> add tweets on the spreadsheet [1]. I use it a lot because I know the
>>>> process well, but I think this may limit newcomers from proposing changes,
>>>> and can make things difficult for them.
>>>> I am proposing to use a Google Form (see example[2]), which will
>>>> populare the same spreadsheet. The advantages of this is that it will be
>>>> open for everyone, and it will be easier to subscribe to notifications
>>>> every time someone adds a new tweet proposal.
>>>>
>>>> The review process by the PMC would remain in place as-is.
>>>>
>>>> What does everyone think?
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Aizhamal
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://s.apache.org/beam-tweets
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSepI3zVZNmA9RUAzAnhH45IZU48uCt0qmPPYyZOEZCFONQZ6w/viewform
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to