On Apr 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Matt Price wrote:
should it be a little more extensive here? so for instnace: I am
extremely disorganized, and in the absence of a satisfactory
bibliogrpahic solution have dealt with various bibs in the last few
years. On one paper I use one bib, for another
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:18:27PM -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Matt Price wrote:
sorry, I didn't mean URI's, I meant the metadata work atthe ODF TC.
OIC.
There's nothing yet, but so long as we agree on allowing standard
embedded metadata, I believe
On Wed, 5-Apr-2006 10:27 -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
If I ping a server and give a list of isbns and dois and an
optional username, problem solved; no?
Yes and no, It depends on the quality of the bibliographic data.
[...]
OK, fair enough. But we need to design the system to enable what
On Apr 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Matthias Steffens wrote:
However, when I'm writing a paper, 95% of the cited references do
already exist in my bibliographic database and I want to use these
(and not a copy from somewhere else) since I know that I've verified
my own entries for correctness
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 8:49 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 12:26 AM, David Wilson wrote:
You can use Xforms in OOo but it is harder to use than Base forms
which are of
the point and click type, to link database fields to form fields.
So what kind of form functionality
On Wed, 5-Apr-2006 15:29 -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Ideally, multiple identifiers would be stored and sent to the
bibliographic database which could then decide what to do.
Yes, ideally. But I'm not sure how practical that is (to get
implemented).
The database would need to perform
On Thursday 06 April 2006 4:24 am, Matthias Steffens wrote:
On Wed, 5-Apr-2006 10:27 -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Yes, that's a very nice feature. However, when I'm writing a paper, 95%
of the cited references do already exist in my bibliographic database
and I want to use these (and not a
I may be crazy, but has anyone considered building a 'proof-of-
concept' _application_ that works similarly to the way intended for
OOo? Yes, developing it outside OOo, but using the future file
format as much as possible (obviously not doing the rich formatting
etc, but getting the
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Matej is just asking for the ability to regenerate the complete list,
rather than only allow appending and deleting individual items. That's
probably sensible in general.
Certainly, all used references should be (in the original format-agnostic
shape) included in ODT
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
where possible to define citation keys. In some cases (dois, isbns,
etc.) this is easier than others, but the pay-off will be large. If my
citation key in the document is identified with urn:isbn:32343545
it's trivial to grab the associate bib record from many sources. If
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Matthias Steffens wrote:
I'd also perhaps default to my database and user account, with
options to ping other servers if data is missing.
Yes, exactly!
Wouldn't that solve the problems with the best balance of concerns?
Yes.
So do the two yes responses
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, James Howison wrote:
I may be crazy, but has anyone considered building a
'proof-of-concept' _application_ that works similarly to the way
intended for OOo? Yes, developing it outside OOo, but using the
future file format as much as possible (obviously not doing
12 matches
Mail list logo
