On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:23 PM, pt wrote:
1. An external reference database / research tool that could be used
with
both Word and Writer. It should be able to store not jsut metadata but
full-text articles, notes, webpage snapshots other supporting data.
Right. I think this is slowly being
I read through the exchange and I think you put your position very well and
the response was rather defensively or evasive.
David
On Saturday 15 July 2006 10:52 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for
the new bib support in Word 2007*:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:38 AM, David Wilson wrote:
I read through the exchange and I think you put your position very
well and
the response was rather defensively or evasive.
I think it's worth paying close attention to what they've done not just
for interoperability's sake, but also
On Sunday 16 July 2006 9:47 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
And I think with some caveats, they will have met these goals. I am
particularly intrigued by their no-local-database approach, where the
editing forms are only editing XML data embedded in the file package.
This is something we need to
So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for
the new bib support in Word 2007*:
1) they won't support footnote/endnote citations in v1
2) seems (?) they don't support first/subsequent distinctions in author-year
3) they think it perfectly fine to have styles implemented in