On 7/10/06, David Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would this work? The Add/Edit citation has text input box with these options-
"Custom Short title / Abbreviation (for this citation)"
"Custom Short title / Abbreviation (use for all subsequent citations)"
(The first option is available in Ib
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:12 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:32 PM, David Wilson wrote:
> > I have looked up my style manual - 'The Chicago Manual of Style; 15th
> > edition"
>
> Ugh (sound of sinking in the stomach).
>
> OK, fair enough. I did just come across this reading throug
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:32 PM, David Wilson wrote:
I have looked up my style manual - 'The Chicago Manual of Style; 15th
edition"
Ugh (sound of sinking in the stomach).
OK, fair enough. I did just come across this reading through the
documentation for the new op cit. BibTeX package.
The onl
I have looked up my style manual - 'The Chicago Manual of Style; 15th edition"
===
Section 16:39 Abbreviations.
A frequently mentioned work may be cited either parenthetically in the text or
in subsequent notes by means of an abbreviation, with full citation provided
in a note at
On Jul 10, 2006, at 7:33 PM, David Wilson wrote:
All other citations are footnote citation. This practise is is followed
because otherwise the text would have a couple of hundred very short
footnotes of the type - "Táin LL 183"
But does that really matter, or is this more a convenience for au
I have been thinking about the options needed for the Insert/ Edit Citation
panel.
Yet another history complexity.
This one is from my thesis. Whilst the thesis citation style is Chicago
footnotes, the thesis is principally an examination of two texts and I
followed the convention of listin