The simpler (like Google) the better in my opinion. Usage of EndNote in
our research group is viewed as a lifesaver for managing PubMed
references, switching Journal bibliographic formats with a click of a
button, and reordering references while working on a paper. The user
interface doesn't
sorry, some messages aren't going to both lists; Rob and I were
discussing simple (google like) vs. complex (library GUI like) search
interfaces.
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:54 AM, Dr Robert Sanderson wrote:
That's fine, so long as we have both options.
Sure, that's all I'm arguing for :)
Nice to see
backend will have some clever relevance ranking system, you need to have
multiple fields to allow for precise searches.
That's fine, so long as we have both options.
Sure, that's all I'm arguing for :)
Rob
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
,'-/.http://ww
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:29 AM, Dr Robert Sanderson wrote:
Certainly. But as you say, you often know what you're looking for.
So you need a more advanced search interface than just a google like
single query box.
We need both.
Sure. There's plenty of relevance ranking algorithms available for
th
On Feb 24, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Dr Robert Sanderson wrote:
Web searches are looking for data that you do not know. One presumes that
the opposite is true when you are searching within your own database of
citations.
I don't think this is necessarily the case. Often I do know generally what I
nee
On Feb 24, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Dr Robert Sanderson wrote:
Web searches are looking for data that you do not know. One presumes
that the opposite is true when you are searching within your own
database of citations.
I don't think this is necessarily the case. Often I do know generally
what I need
Can we arrange it so that we have a default type of search, but that we can
make some type of configurable search interface so that particular sources
can have different types of controlled or uncontrolled searches?
I'm personally of the opinion that we need to learn not from library
database
On Feb 24, 2005, at 5:15 AM, Van-Couvering,EJ (pgr) wrote:
First, I take it from the design docs that we propose, in phase one,
to only allow access to OoBib from within OoWriter. I would like to
urge that we rethink that decision and somehow allow the database GUI
to be opened standalone. I h
