Applied, and live. Thanks!!
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 3:02 PM Daniel Brownridge
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I've focused on updating the content of the current site to make it a
> little more friendly to new comers who are currently presented with dead
> links.
>
> So here is a patch to the current
Hi Greg,
I've focused on updating the content of the current site to make it a
little more friendly to new comers who are currently presented with dead
links.
So here is a patch to the current static website. It only affects
index.html.
Created by:
$ svn diff index.html >
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bloodhound/site/
It is read-only, but I can override that to apply any patches you send to
dev@
Cheers,
-g
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, 01:17 Daniel Brownridge
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Untill we can get live back it might be a good idea tput some more basic
> info on
Hi Gary,
Untill we can get live back it might be a good idea tput some more basic
info on the landing page and remove the dead links etc.
How is the website (bloodhound.apache.org) hosted / updated / where does
the code live?
Happy to take on maintenance if that helps would just need some help
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 7:59 AM Nikolay Tsanov wrote:
>...
> The choice of a version control system goes far beyond the tech stack, it
> defines the governance at the technology layer of the Bloodhound
> architecture
>
No. Governance is defined by Apache rules of peer conduct. The version
Hi,
It is certainly good to see some interest in getting things going again. I
should probably have said something sooner but Greg did summarise the situation
pretty well.
>From the point of view of where code is submitted, I totally understand the
>desire to use git rather than subversion
I fully agree with Daniel and the top ten priorities he suggested. I
haven't looked at Gary's code either (assuming this is the repo at
https://github.com/apache/bloodhound-core), this is the first thing I will
do, and I will share my feedback as soon as I can.
Nikolay Tsanov
+1-819-635-7198
On
I just wanted to say thank you to Greg and Shane for providing all the
detailed information so far. It feels like we're not quite dead (I mean
in the Attic) yet, but will be soon if we don't do something.
In the interests of maintaining momentum here ,which seems to be
gathering, I'll keep
@Greg Stein , thank you for the timely and commendably
thorough response. As far as the development part of the community is
concerned, to top priority concern that should be dealt with is, as you
defined it:
"- if we want to evolve this, then I'd suggest making svn read-only and
carrying forward
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:08 AM Nikolay Tsanov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Two questions:
> 1. Is the verdict to send Bloodhound to the attic already rendered and you
> are simply letting us know about it, or there is still room for discussions?
> 2. If the debate is still open, how many commits are
I'll try to provide as much context as I can, since it seems there are
some folks interested in joining Apache Bloodhound!
On 2023/08/19 13:22:15 Nikolay Tsanov wrote:
Dear Greg and Shane (and everyone else who could weigh in),
I would like to kindly reiterate my question of Fri, Aug 18, 2023
Dear Greg and Shane (and everyone else who could weigh in),
I would like to kindly reiterate my question of Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at
9:29 AM ET: can we make GitHub (https://github.com/apache/bloodhound) our
main development repository and if so, what are your expectations in terms
of number of pull
Hi Gregg and Shane,
I share the concern expressed by by dan...@freshnewpage.com and I second
the suggestion made by s...@szasz.hu : can we make GitHub our main
development repository?
Thanks,
Nikolay Tsanov
+1-819-635-7198
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:29 AM Szabolcs Szasz wrote:
> Couldn't just
That would certainly work for me!
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023, 14:37 Szabolcs Szasz, wrote:
> Couldn't just the mirror on GitHub become the official dev hub, while
> jettisoning all the other (admin, hosting etc.) burden?
>
> Sz.
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, 13:56 Daniel Brownridge >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
Couldn't just the mirror on GitHub become the official dev hub, while
jettisoning all the other (admin, hosting etc.) burden?
Sz.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, 13:56 Daniel Brownridge
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have previously expressed interest in helping with the project.
>
> I've struggled a bit to get
Hi all,
I have previously expressed interest in helping with the project.
I've struggled a bit to get started. I found the Apache initiation
rituals a bit challenging.
If someone could help me out with that and give me access to the repos
I'd like to be involved.
Thanks,
Daniel
*Daniel
Hi Greg,
Two questions:
1. Is the verdict to send Bloodhound to the attic already rendered and you
are simply letting us know about it, or there is still room for discussions?
2. If the debate is still open, how many commits are required per what
period of time in order to keep Bloodhound off the
There has been near-zero commit activity for many years. The mailing list
is empty. There are a few people "around", but inactive.
Note that a move to the Attic will not cause any problems with the 0.8
release. That will always be available for download. The Attic is simply a
marker that future
Hi Shane,
Could you please elaborate on the material metrics for "real engagement and
energy" that would rescue Bloodhound from the attic? I have been using
version 0.8 for my personal needs since 2015 and the lack of active
contributions on my end is, among other reasons, due to the fact that it
19 matches
Mail list logo
