Re: Review Request 33094: Use nanoseconds to calculate poll timeout when doing group commit

, Matteo Merli

Re: Review Request 33061: BOOKKEEPER-841: Bookie should calculate ledgers map writing a new entry log file

/bookie/EntryLogTest.java 488f4bf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33061/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Matteo Merli

Re: Review Request 33061: BOOKKEEPER-841: Bookie should calculate ledgers map writing a new entry log file

, Matteo Merli

Re: Review Request 40223: BOOKKEEPER-438: Move ledger id generation out of LedgerManager

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40223/#review106374 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matteo Merli On Nov. 12, 2015, 9:53 a.m

[VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.2 Release Candidate 0

This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.2. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12333529=Html=12311293 *** Please download, test and vote by November 16th 2015, 10:00 GMT. Note that we are voting upon the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Matteo Merli

, at 06:31, Rakesh R rake...@huawei.com wrote: Welcome Matteo Merli, thanks for all your great work and congratulations! Best Regards, Rakesh -Original Message- From: Sijie Guo [mailto:si...@apache.org] Sent: 07 July 2015 10:46 To: dev@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc: Matteo

[VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.2 Release Candidate 1

This is the second release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.2. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12333529=Html=12311293 *** Please download, test and vote by November 21th 2015, 10:00 GMT. Note that we are voting upon the

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.3.2 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version 4.3.2. This is the second release of Apache BookKeeper as an Apache Top Level Project. The BookKeeper project is made up of a distributed logging service called BookKeeper and a distributed publish/subscribe system build

Re: Moving Hedwig to a contrib package

+1  I agree with Ivan Matteo On Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:53 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: +1 I'd go even further and just remove it from the tree. There are no new contributions going into it. The hedwig src for 4.3 is pretty much the same as the hedwig src for 4.2

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.2 Release Candidate 0

ldn't compile. > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > >> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.2. >> >> It fixes the following issues: >> >> https:/

Re: [Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1403]

Rithin, I've assigned you the Jira On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:48 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Good catch! > This is the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-881 > > Enrico > > > Il Mer 8 Giu 2016 20:09 Rithin Shetty ha scritto: > > > We

Re: Improve Write performance with Relax durability.

I was interested in trying something in this area, but never actually got to do it. A few random notes: 1. My suspicion, with no backing data at this point, is that simply skipping the fsync for "non-durable" ledgers might not give a big improvement, just a bit less latency for

Re: Review Request 33096: Configurable LedgerStorageImplementation

'd better to not to change it if it isn't > > a problem. Reverted to original logic - Matteo ------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33096/#review84268 -

Re: flushing entries on bookkeeper to disk

Hi Arun, what is your use case for waiting until the entries are "flushed" into the entry logs? Once the ledger.addEntry() operation completes, the entries are guaranteed to have been written and fsynced on the journal device, from where they will be recovered in case the bookie crashes before

Re: [jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-903) MetaFormat BookieShell Command is not deleting UnderReplicatedLedgers list from the ZooKeeper

Arun, I've added you to Jira. On Thursday, March 10, 2016 1:46 AM, Arun M. Krishnakumar wrote: Hi Sijie, Could you please add 'arunm...@gmail.com' as well to this role ? I will likely need to go through the same process shortly. Thanks, Arun > On Mar 10, 2016,

Re: flushing entries on bookkeeper to disk

command. I am interested in the second part.) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Arun M. Krishnakumar < > > > > > arunm...@gmail.com>

Re: Release 4.4.0

Flavio, I think there are some substantial improvements in some areas, here are few examples of non bug-fix changes: BOOKKEEPER-841: Bookie should calculate ledgers map writing a new entry log file (Save a lot a read IO on bookie restart with at lot of data stored) BOOKKEEPER-889: BookKeeper

Re: Github commits

I usually do that but forgot on that one PR. OTOH, it might be good to extend the merge script (dev/bk-merge-pr.py) to automatically leave a comment on the Jira with info on the committer, reviewers, etc.. Matteo On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:07 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Yup. We

Re: [VOTE] Remove Hedwig from source tree

+1 On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:23 AM Robin Dhamankar wrote: > +1 > On Mar 8, 2016 10:22 AM, "Uma gangumalla" wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Uma > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > > Since Hedwig has

Re: flushing entries on bookkeeper to disk

port patch? Can you please share it?? > What kind of operations can be performed on that port?? > > Thanks, > JV > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Matteo Merli <mme...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Sijie, > > we have a similar tool in our in

Re: Release 4.4 pending Jiras

, > Arun > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I think we are very close to the release 4.4 and there are still just 4 > > jiras pending, with pull requests available ( > > https://github.co

Re: addEntry() is susceptible to spurious wakeups?

Probably SyncCounter was introduced before CountdownLatch was available in jdk. I think it should be good to switch to countdown latch. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:28 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > I am mostly concerned about this logic in block() which makes us >

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.4.0 Release Candidate 0

y 13, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1. > > > > verified the binary package. run local bookies. > > verified the source package. build is good > > verified the signatures. > > verified LICENSE. > > >

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.4.0 Release Candidate 0

Here are the vote results +3 from PMC members (Flavio, Sijie, Uma) +2 (Matteo, Enrico) No -1s. I'll proceed shortly with the release. Matteo On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 8:56 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from me as well > > Checked tests / packages / signat

[VOTE] BookKeeper 4.4.0 Release Candidate 0

This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.4.0. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293=12325566 *** Please download, test and vote by May 10th 2016, 10:00 GMT. Note that we are voting upon the source

Re: BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

Sijie, I think I don't have write access to wiki. Can you add me? I'll update the release process page On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:16 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > +1, go for it. Could you also update the wiki page for release process? > > - Sijie >

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.4.0 Release Candidate 0

rote: > +1 (non binding) > > Ran unit tests on Linux/Oracle jdk 1.8.0_77 > > Ran internal Majordodo Unit tests > > -- Enrico > > 2016-05-05 18:49 GMT+02:00 Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>: > > > This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKe

BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

Hi all, we should have all the changes planned for 4.4 release already merged in master and build seems to be good. If there are no objections or suggestions for Jiras that you think should be considered for 4.4 inclusion, I will prepare a release candidate to submit for voting. Thanks, Matteo

Re: BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

teswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> ha > > > scritto: > > > > > > > +1. > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >

Yahoo open-sources Pulsar, Pub-sub Messaging at Scale

We've just open-sourced Pulsar! This is a pub-sub messaging solution with the necessary Yahoo scale, performance, and feature requirements to provide messaging as a hosted service, supporting a million topics. Pulsar uses BookKeeper as the building block for the messages durable storage. You can

Re: [Discuss] 64 bits ledger id

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:45 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > - Ledgers are unique across multiple clusters. Useful if storage tiers with > different stores are employed. > For this you could combine the ledgerId with another 64bit id, that could encode the rest of the

Re: Next Community Meeting?

+1 On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM Yiming Zang wrote: > SGTM +1 > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > jujj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds good. > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:41 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: >

BookKeeper Meetup on Nov 15th

Hi all, we're in the process to organize a BookKeeper meetup for the next Tue. November 15th. The event will be held in the Yahoo offices in Sunnyvale. We would like to see if there is anyone, other than the usual suspects, interested in talking about any BookKeeper related topic (eg: use

Re: New BookKeeper Proposal "Allow Reads outside the LAC Protocol"

In this commit from the Yahoo branch we did a similar thing https://github.com/yahoo/bookkeeper/commit/92e2f906f83d997b5cf5ffd2bcfcdbe53ca3bd04 The idea there was to have a CLI tool to dump the content of a ledger, reading all the entries (or a subset of them) without triggering the ledger

Re: Next community meeting and notes

https://goo.gl/iyRA6G On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:05 AM Bobby Evans wrote: > What is the URL. I can never find it > > > - Bobby > > On Thursday, April 6, 2017, 5:02:53 AM CDT, Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Anyone on the Hangout ? > > 2017-04-05 14:19

Re: Publish SNAPSHOT artifacts on Maven Central

+1 On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:06 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I wonder if we can start publishing the 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT binaries on > Maven Central. > > This will help projects which want to try the upcoming version without > dealing with custom local Maven Repositories. > > I

Re: Issues in ZK event handling logic for BookiesChanged event

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM Charan Reddy G wrote: > But due to the limitation of ZK (which is well documented thing in ZK > https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.5/zookeeperProgrammers.html#ch_ > zkWatches), "Because watches are one time triggers and there is latency

Re: Time Based Release for onwards releases.

> > > > >Transparency - There will be a published cut-off date (AKA feature > > >freeze) for the release and people will know about it in advance. > > Hopefully > > >this will remove the contention around which features make it. > > >4. > > > > > >Quality - we've seen issues pop up in release candidates due to > > >last-minute features that didn't have proper time to bake in. More > > time > > >between feature freeze and release will let us test more, document > > more and > > >resolve more issues. > > > > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: BookKeeper website menus not working

That's true, though I would swear that it was working just a couple of hours ago. :) -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Edward Ribeiro <edward.ribe...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI, the 'Documentation', 'Get Involved' and 'Project Info'

Re: [DISCUSS] Slack Channel for BookKeeper

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Is there an apache "team" in slack? it would save having to have > multiple teams open if a person is involved in multiple projects. This > would be especially useful for people who use slack in the browser. It > would also

Re: [website] branch asf-site

Sure, make sure to place it under the "content/" folder which is where gitpubsub is expecting it to be. -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I created a blank branch 'asf-site' for enabl

Re: [VOTE] Slack Channel for BookKeeper

+1 -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 non binding > > Enrico > > Il gio 27 lug 2017, 20:02 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Start a vote thread f

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.5.0, release candidate #0

ttps://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/402 > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/4.5.0-rc0/ > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebookkeeper-1012/ > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.5.0 > > -- > Jvrao >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.5.0, release candidate #0

] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/402 > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/4.5.0-rc0/ > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebookkeeper-1012/ > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.5.0 > > -- > Jvrao > --- > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: Issue in GarbageCollectorThread compaction logic

My understanding is that fsync() forces the IO on the metadata even if the file size has not changed, for example to update the access timestamp. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:47 PM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Let me try to consolidate the discussion. > > 1. We need to

Re: Issue in GarbageCollectorThread compaction logic

>> >> >> >>> Anyway just trying broaden the discussion and if we have any doubt if >>> java does fdatasync all the time. >>> >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> &g

Re: Next community meeting and notes

I think there has been some confusion. Some of us "met" last Thursday, since it was 2 weeks from the previous call. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:46 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I have just created the wiki page for next meeting > > >

Re: Issue in GarbageCollectorThread compaction logic

ut the scenario in question is for EntryLogger.logChannel and > in GarbageCollectorThread.doCompactEntryLogs codepath. Here we just keep > adding entries to the EntryLogger.logChannel and flush it before deleting > the compacted entrylog. > > Thanks, > Charan > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:35 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Issue Tracking - Jira or Github Issues

To add more context, this topic was discussed recently at ApacheCon. See this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWurOHvm5WM Relevant portion start at 18:00. In short, they are saying that the ASF is trying to leverage Github more and more in the future. Matteo On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:48 PM

Re: [VOTE] Use Github Issues for Issue Tracking

+1 Having issues and PR in one tool is a great plus. If this proposal is accepted, we should also ask INFRA to allow to assign issues/PRs to committers/contributors and to create labels that fit our workflow. On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:03 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > My vote on

Re: [GitHub] bookkeeper issue #116: BOOKKEEPER-1008 Move to Netty4.1

> Kishore is seeing epoll compatibility issues with nio on netty 4.1. What do you guys mean by incompatibility? Netty can have the event loop to work either with the regular JDK nio select or by using JNI to call epoll directly, but it should be either everything goes with NIO or everything goes

Re: HerdDB a distributed JVM-embeddable database built on Apache BookKeeper

wiki on GitHub > http://eolivelli.blogspot.it/2017/09/herddb-distributed-jvm-embeddable.html > > The code is open source and you can find it as usual on GitHub > https://github.com/diennea/herddb > > Any contribution will be welcome ! > > Cheers > > Enrico Olivelli > -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/% > > 3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail. > > gmail.com%3E > > > > But we never formally called a vote, so here's the vote. > > > > The bylaws don't actually cover votes like this, so lets use lazy > > majority, active committers. > > > > -Ivan > > > -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.5.1 released

per.apache.org/docs/4.5.1/overview/releaseNotes/ > > We would like to thank the contributors that made the release possible. > > Regards, > > The BookKeeper Team > -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.1, release candidate #0

hanks, > > Sijie Guo > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1518 > > [2] > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.7.1-rc0/ > > [3] > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1030/ > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.7.1-rc0 > > > -- Matteo Merli

Re: Journal Corruption when disk is full

pad each > write to the journal out to the expected block size (i don't think we > queried the actual size), which would ensure that you didn't try to > rewrite a block, which could corrupt data if you failed in the middle > of a rewrite. Of course, there's no guarantee that these t

Re: OrderedScheduler & OrderedExecutor in bookkeeper client

operation is submitted to > a ledger, it only ever operates on a single thread. > If you look at LedgerHandle now, you have to jump around 4 files to > deduce which thread methods like handleBookieFailure or > sendAddSuccessCallbacks are called on, and even then you can't even be > sure, so we wrap everything in synchronized when we don't really need > to. > > -Ivan > -- Matteo Merli

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.2, release candidate #0

gt; > >> > sha ea072c8f8b9d20651b513036c09f264ca5c7ec6e > > > >> > > > > >> > BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this > > release: > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS > > > >> > > > > >> > Please download these packages and review this release candidate: > > > >> > > > > >> > - Review release notes > > > >> > - Download the source package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow > > the > > > >> > instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service. > > > >> > - Download the binary package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow > > the > > > >> > instructions to run the bookkeeper service. > > > >> > - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things > you > > > >> think > > > >> > it is important to a release. > > > >> > > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > > majority > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Sijie Guo > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1628 > > > >> > [2] > > > >> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.7.2-rc0/ > > > >> > [3] > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1031/ > > > >> > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.7.2-rc0 > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- Matteo Merli

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

> > Sijie Guo > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1330 > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/ > > bookkeeper-4.7.0-rc1/ > > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapachebookkeeper-1029/ > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.7.0 > > > > > -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: OrderedScheduler and OrderedSafeExecutor

, 2018 at 11:16 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > > > While profiling the allocations of a BookKeeper client (from current > > master) writing entries, I've noticed that there are mult

OrderedScheduler and OrderedSafeExecutor

ght be worth to refactor OrderedScheduler or OrderedSafeExecutor to avoid that overhead. Thoughts? Matteo -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Re: Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

re time to find out potential issues before getting closer to Pulsar release timeline. Matteo -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

to call out Ivan Kelly & Jia Zhai for giving a big push of porting many of the changes into BookKeeper and the BookKeeper community for being very receptive and helpful in getting this load of changes back into mainline. Matteo -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>

[DISCUSSION] PIP 24: Simplify memory settings

created by that instance. -- Matteo Merli

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP 24: Simplify memory settings

be very slow so not to be useful in practice -- Matteo Merli

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.7.3, release candidate #0

+1 * Check binary, checksums, and ran a localbookie * Source, checked rat and compiled with tests -- Matteo Merli On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:53 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.7.3, > as follows: >

Re: Cutting 4.9.1

Thanks Enrico for calling this out. Let me try to get a fix today for this. Otherwise let's go ahead with 4.9.1. Thanks, Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:01 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Matteo and Ivan, > I see this issue marked for 4.9.1 > https://githu

Re: Cutting 4.9.1

Hi Enrico, looked into it but haven't found root cause yet. Please proceed with release. -- Matteo Merli On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:43 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > News? > > Enrico > > Il lun 18 mar 2019, 17:18 Matteo Merli ha scritto: >> >> Thanks Enrico for

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.9.0, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) (MacOS 10.14) Verified: * Signatures * Source package build * Binary with localbookie * Client library jars in Maven -- Matteo Merli On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:21 PM Jia Zhai wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Environment: macOS 10.14.2 > > > - verified 4 pa

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 4.9.2, release candidate #0

ures and checksums > > Checked RAT/Spotbugs on JDK8 > > Built on JDK8 + Linux, run tests > > Run "standalone" mode and localbookie (with JDK8) > > Compared tarballs with 4.9.1 onces, no significant changes (I have used > > 'meld') > > > > Thank you Mat

Re: [DRAFT] BookKeeper Board Report of May

+1 -- Matteo Merli On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:47 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here is a draft for BookKeeper board report of May. Please take a look. > > If there is no objections, I will submit it today. > > --- > > > ## Description: > > B

Re: [DISCUSSION] Preparing for BK 4.9.2

If that's ok, then I'll start preparing for 4.9.2. -- Matteo Merli On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:51 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il ven 3 mag 2019, 19:01 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to check for opinions on starting a BK 4.9.2 release.

[VOTE] Release 4.9.2, release candidate #0

eeper/tree/v4.9.2-rc0 -- Matteo Merli

[DISCUSSION] Preparing for BK 4.9.2

://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2022 Complete list of changes currently marked for 4.9.2: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues?q=label%3Arelease%2F4.9.2+is%3Aclosed Thoughts? Anything else that should go in? -- Matteo Merli

Re: Contributing Splunk changes back to OSS

+1 from me on Gradle. The advantages in having very fast (and correct) incremental builds are very nice. I wouldn't expect major problems in setting up for Apache releases since several other ASF projects are already using it. Based on feedback on this, I'd also like to later start a similar

Re: Unbounded memory usage for WQ > AQ ?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:15 PM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > > > otherwise the write will timeout internally and it will get replayed to a > new bookie. > If Qa is met and the writes of Qw-Qa fail after we send the success to the > client, why would the write replayed on a new bookie? I

Re: Unbounded memory usage for WQ > AQ ?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 8:27 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hi Matteo, > in this comment you are talking about an issue you saw when WQ is greater > that AQ > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2497#issuecomment-734423246 > > IIUC you are saying that if one bookie is slow the client

Re: Cutting BookKeeper 4.13.1 or 4.14.0 release?

Andrey, there are several PRs that would be good to get into 4.14. We shouldn't just push everything out to 4.15. Just a couple of examples: * https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2710 * https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2698 -- Matteo Merli On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:55 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.0, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Checked: * Signatures * Source package structure, and compile * Binary package * Running standalone bookie and client -- Matteo Merli On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:23 PM Andrey Yegorov wrote: > > I do not hear voices against it so I assume everyone is ok with this

[DISCUSS] Release 4.14.1

to be included in the imminent Pulsar 2.8.0 release, I think we should release a patch ASAP in order to unblock that release. If there are no objections, I'll move forward with the patch release. Thanks, Matteo -- Matteo Merli

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.14.1

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 6:00 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Before rushing to a release, isn't it better to wait for a couple of > weeks in order to see > if other people in the community find other problems on 4.14.0 As it is, the 4.14.0 release cannot be used by Pulsar. At the same time, there

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

The vote is now closed and the release was approved with 6 +1s (4 binding and 2 non-binding); Binding votes: * Matteo * Jia * Sijie * Enrico Non-Binding votes: * Yong * Hang Thank you. Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:47 AM hangc wrote: > > +1（non-b

[VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

ase-4.14.1-rc0 [5] f7a94422e44a7da6a5a8667853ad468bb0194642 Thank you, Matteo -- Matteo Merli

Re: Cutting BookKeeper 4.13.1 or 4.14.0 release?

+1 We should do 4.14, carrying all the fixes that are there in master as well. -- Matteo Merli On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:57 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:22 AM Yunze Xu > wrote: > > > Hello, > > About 10 days ago I found a heap memory

Re: Skip replicating ledger after bookkeeper server starts up again

is that this check is done before starting replicating a ledger. If the copy process gets started, it will then continue until done. A potential improvement here would be to even break the copy of 1 ledger. Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 6:47 AM zhangao wrote: > > Maybe the idea

[VOTE] Release 4.14.4, release candidate #0

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Matteo -- Matteo Merli

Re: [DISCUSS] Bookkeeper 4.14.3 release

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:18 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > +1 > > Especially if we have to deliver the upgrade of log4j2 BK 4.14 is including log4j 1.2.x, which has other vulnerabilities, though not the log4shell one.

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.3 release candidate #1

+1 Verified: * Checksums * Building * Starting standalone bookie Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:42 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > I think if the issue with Java 11 is in that test, we shouldn't block > the release as this was probably already there before. >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.3 release candidate #2

+1 Verified: * Checksums * Building * Starting standalone bookie -- Matteo Merli On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 4:26 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > - verified signatures and digests > - built from source, on JDK8 + Ubuntu > - verified Apache RAT check >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.3 release candidate #1

I think if the issue with Java 11 is in that test, we shouldn't block the release as this was probably already there before. We should instead make sure the BK CI is using Java 11 to run the tests, to avoid this kind of issue. Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 7:08 AM Yong Zhang

[DISCUSS] Bookkeeper 4.14.3 release

There are few fixes in the 4.14 that would be good to release soon. Given that the timeline for 4.15 can be quite long, I'd propose to release one more patch release right now. Let me know if there are other fixes to include. Matteo -- Matteo Merli

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 4.14.4, release candidate #0

Closing this vote with 3 binding and 2 non-binding +1s : Binding +1s: * Matteo * Enrico * Jia Non-Binding +1s: * Nicolò * Andrey Thanks everyone, Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:16 AM Jia Zhai wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > - verified packages checksum an

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.4, release candidate #0

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 2:27 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Matteo, > Are you preparing the release notes ? > Which are the contents of the release ? Added PR for release notes: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2986

Re: [Discuss] Optimize write cache: ①Two write caches become multi-cache blocks; ②All data directories share write cache resources;

tively > low. Idle, so that the full utilization of the write cache is not used; > > So I made the following changes: > 1.Two write caches become multi-cache blocks; > 2.All data directories share write cache resources; > > For BP and PR : > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/iss

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.0, release candidate #2

+1 Verified: * Checksums * Building * Starting standalone bookie Thanks, Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:53 AM Andrey Yegorov wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > The vote has been out for 5 days - any feedback? > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:08 PM Andrey Yegorov

Re: [VOTE] BP-57 Add a public API for creating embeddable servers

+1 (binding) Very good addition! -- Matteo Merli On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 4:38 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Up > > We need 1 more binding vote from a PMC member > > Enrico > > Il Mar 27 Set 2022, 11:36 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > > > +1 (non binding) > &

Re: [VOTE] BP-62: Streamline batch add requests

+1 -- Matteo Merli On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:05 AM Hang Chen wrote: > This is the vote for BP-62. > > ### Motivation > The bookie server process add-entry requests pipeline: > - Get one request from the Netty socket channel > - Choose one thread to process the written

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.0, release candidate #2

+1 binding * Checked signatures * Check localbookie and local perf tool -- Matteo Merli On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 7:06 AM Hang Chen wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for version 4.16.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-841) Bookie should calculate ledgers map writing a new entry log file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Merli updated BOOKKEEPER-841: Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-841-Bookie-should-calculate-ledgers-map-w.patch Updated

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-850) Use nanoseconds to calculate poll timeout when doing group commit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14490478#comment-14490478 ] Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-850: - Needs the method

  1   2   3   >