working again.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
what to tackle
first.
Regards,
Pepijn
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
.
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
+1 (non binding). Good work!
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
you want to squeeze in before the build drops, please let me
know.
I would really like to see BUILDR-535 resolved but I don't have time
to investigate before then. So if you feel like doing it then go for
it ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
New 'run' local task.
http://buildr.apache.org/more_stuff.html#run
* Added: BUILDR-518 Load _buildr.rb or .buildr.rb from same directory as
Buildfile
if they exist (Peter Donald)
* Added: BUILDR-519 Load repositories.release_to from build settings
(Peter Donald)
* Fixed
', '2.0.0'
spec.add_dependency 'xml-simple', '1.0.12'
spec.add_dependency 'minitar', '0.5.3'
spec.add_dependency 'jruby-openssl', '= 0.7' if spec.platform.to_s
== 'java'
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
end
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
think of anything better off the top of my
head.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
://github.com/apache/buildr
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
) so you will need get him to ok the
donation (just get him to add a note to the jira issue as he is
already a buildr committer).
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Chris Dean ctd...@sokitomi.com wrote:
Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org writes:
Well if you could add a link to the github project then that would
great. The way I can just merge it, run the tests and makes it much
easier to work over it :)
Sure thing
a ticket for ruby 1.9 compatibility. Should I
add
a comment to that ticket or open a new bug under IDE integration?
Cheers,
Chiaming Hsu
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
the path is handled on *nix or
perhaps on the MRI. You could possible guard the spec with an if
Buildr::Util.win_os? if that is the case.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
are updated
* Fixed: BUILDR-569 Buildr fails under JRuby 1.6.0.RC1 due to read-only
$? variable
* Fixed: BUILDR-570 Buildr does not work with Rubygems 1.5.x
* Fixed: Scaladoc task would cause build to exit prematurely
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
should do the right thing and be compatibile with Maven.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
I think all the issues have been addressed. If I missed anything then
just raise another issue - thanks!
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
,
Peter Donald
-585 TypeError : can't dup NilClass when merging jars
* Fixed: BUILDR-586 ScalaTest uses deprecated ant task (Martin Partel)
* Fixed: BUILDR-584 eclipse plugin should use absolute path
* Fixed: BUILDR-587 ScalaTest uses deprecated reporter parameters
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Actually looks like a bug was found. I need to apply BUILDR-591 before
the release.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
Hi,
+1
I ran all my builds using the new buildr and everything seems to be
working all good.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:40 AM
at it before the release.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
Sorry about the jira spam. I just moved all the resolved issues to
closed. I expected Jira to ask if you did not want to send out emails
(our local setup does this) so didn't mean to spam the list. Hopefully
it has finished now ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
/browse/BUILDR-592
I applied a variant of this patch. If you could check it still works
for you that would be great. Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
/realityforge/buildr-ipojo
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
on the console and exit. For the :install
phase of gem package I think it would be best to let people manage it in a
way that makes sense in their environment. We could add documentation to
fill this gap.
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
week or so. So unless any bugs pop up I
would prefer to keep it at 1.8.6 and if not roll back to 1.8.5.
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
/realityforge/buildr-bnd) and packaged it as a gem.
As it got settled down, documented and tested I eventually merged it
back into mainline of buildr. This allowed me to do several releases
of buildr-bnd as a gem without being tied to the release cycle of
buildr.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
but others may disagree ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
I have added everything I wanted to for this release.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
I have added the set of addons for now. I have a whole slew of others
I may add in after the release.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Peter Donald pe
I need to send out, so I will not be
able to produce anything in the near future.
great ;)
Anytime you do manage will be appreciated.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
that it works for Scala projects (the new version brings in
support for 2.9.1).
Cheers,
Antoine
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 20:00, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
It looks good so far but I plan on putting it through a larger suite
of tests of Monday.
Thanks for the good work!
On Fri
.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
in missing method
`partition_dependencies`.
* Fixed: Fix the extension of the gwt plugin so that it can be
required as an addon.
* Fixed: Fix the undefined default_web_xml variable in the
add_web_facet method on the idea project.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
$ buildr _1.4.8_ clean
(in /home/boisvert/tmp/buildr-example, development)
$
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.orgwrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.8/dist/
Specifically:
http
://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.8/dist/
Thanks!
Peter Donald
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Tammo van Lessen tvanles...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm perhaps to late, I haven't seen the thread earlier. I just tried
the new build on win7 and discovered two issues:
First, the verbosity level
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
Hi,
I identified and fixed the problems that you reported. Both are
unfortunately in some of our dependencies. I have fixed the problems are
re-uploaded the release proposal. If you could try the current version
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
Hi,
It looks like the easiest option is to downgrade the library across the
board until we can fix it on windows. So I have made the change and
re-upped the release.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11
. I did't release we still had release
specific documentation on our website and thought it had been reduced
to just HTML+PDF so I removed the task. However I have just reverted
that change now that I realize/you pointed out we still have rdocs
going up.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
It looks like there was an intermittent bug that bit some people in the last
release so I thought I would start the release process for a new release
with the required fix.
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.9/dist/
Specifically:
, Alex Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
How does one go about testing/replicating the issue that was fixed? Just
wondering if I can help confirm that it was fixed.
alex
On Thursday, November 8, 2012, Peter Donald wrote:
It looks like there was an intermittent bug that bit
The vote passed with 3 +1's (3 binding) and no -1.
Pushing the release to the mirrors ...
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
can do is to increase
awareness ... I think your approach to giving a talk is a good idea.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
the generate task have all the maven
generate taks as dependencies
There would then be a process of updating all the addons to use this
new approach.
Thoughts?
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
run the tests locally and they all seem fine - I will look
into the failures in about 10 days and then start a release vote if no one
has any objections.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
to go for it.
If you do go ahead then feel free to further refine the release scripts. I
think I have got most of the things in place. However if you could also
address BUILDR-634 at the same time that would be great ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
, I'll see if I can get started this weekend and tackle BUILDR-634.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Alex Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com
wrote:
HA! Looks like our emails crossed. I'm +1
to place
generated files at the top level.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Antoine Toulme anto...@lunar-ocean.com wrote:
It looks like the site is missing images ?
Oops - it looks like they were there but had bad permissions. Fixed now.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Antoine Toulme anto...@lunar-ocean.com wrote:
+1 for the release, thanks for the hard work!
Great. So I have kicked off the start of the release but it looks like
we can't update the website through the old mechanisms. So I have
started the process of
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
and try to get the fix
out there. If anyone else has time before then - feel free to press
the go button.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
to
the command line application.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
/6326113
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
I was thinking about starting the ball rolling for a release this
weekend. In particular, I would like to see BUILDR-666 released as
soon as possible. This has managed to speed up a whole bunch of our
builds. Any objections?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
going forward.
However, we don't yet use Ruby 2 in any of our projects so it is quite
possible that I have missed some things. If anyone is using Ruby 2 and
wants to give the current trunk version a go under that version of
ruby and report back any failures then that would be
Thanks,
Peter Donald
for myself and others (I'm sure there aren't that many
yet..) containing the modifications.
I am jumping on a plane and heading out bush in a few hours but
hopefully will be back in range next week. I would love to have a look
at it then :)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
as in earlier versions of ruby.
* Fixed: Make Archive-related operations (e.g. zip.merge) deterministic
using
OrderedHash.
* Change: Update to TestNG 6.8.5.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (only minimally tested on Ubuntu 13.04 with Ruby 1.8.7 and JRuby 1.7.4)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.14/dist/
Specifically:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.14/dist/buildr-1.4.14.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.14/dist/buildr-1.4.14.zip
The documentation generated
and looked at the docs all over and it seems like a lot of the
installation documentation is out of date. I think that after this
release is out I may try and clean it up to simplify the way people
use buildr.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
-war/src/main/webapp/css
global.css reset.css style.css
Any idea what could cause this? Unfortunately I can't trace it right now...
Tammo
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.orgwrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http
Hi,
Further experimentation has found a few more problems with the new
asset extension so will need to rollback part of it to behave as it
did previously.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
Hi,
I have just staged another version of Buildr 1.4.15 that I
] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Hi,
Apache now seems to have relatively mature support for using git as
the primary source control system. From what I recall most people
seemed to prefer Git - does anyone object to moving our primary
mechanism to git?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
to a wider
audience of developers. You have my vote of course.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
Hi,
The infrastructure team just announced [1] that they now support
improved integration with GitHub. In a nutshell this means
* Any Pull
this).
You also need to add g...@git.apache.org to your allow list on the ML,
or the github stuff won't get through
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Components: Git
Reporter: Peter Donald
Assignee: Daniel Gruno
Please migrate Buildr git repository (git://git.apache.org/buildr.git) to be
read-write and update the github mirroring to use this repository. The
following svn paths should be made read-only;
https
the move.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
Hi,
Apache now seems to have relatively mature support for using git as
the primary source control system. From what I recall most people
seemed to prefer Git - does anyone object to moving our primary
Hi,
Buildr has a doap file but we have recently moved to git as our
primary source control system so I am not sure how to reference a file
directly. The file is available via github at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/buildr/master/doap.rdf
if that is acceptable?
--
Cheers,
Peter
Hi,
It has been a long time since the last release. So I would
like to put out a release with the accumulated fixes.
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.16/dist/
Specifically:
? (See the documentation as part of the change for a how
to use details)
[1]
https://github.com/apache/buildr/commit/baa269bb3243a7615e05bb95f6c799f112adafec
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
artifactId*/artifactId
/exclusion
/exclusions
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
when running GWT in
a project that has no source directory.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
I should note that there may not be a huge number of changes but this
is mostly about trying to get back into a more regular release
cadence.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
A few bugs were reported ... and fixed. A new candidate has been pushed up.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.18/dist/
Specifically:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.18/dist/buildr-1.4.18.tgz
http://people.apache.org
Issues addressed and next candidate pushed.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
Actually I am going to pull the current release as the issue
BUILDR-699 is a show stopper. I would also like to see BUILDR-694
addressed in the next release.
On Thu, Jun 19
was returning
HTTP Not Modified status.
* Fixed: Fix bug introduced in 1.4.18 version of custom_pom addon where
poms are created for artifacts that have a classifier.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
that had not changed since last update check and HTTP was returning
HTTP Not Modified status.
* Fixed: Fix bug introduced in 1.4.18 version of custom_pom addon where
poms are created for artifacts that have a classifier.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
that jumps out at me?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
is never going to allow direct access to the github
projects but l think it would be easier if there was a simple web page
on the Apache side to interact with them it would be much easier.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
my guess is that as soon as we
fix the version problem this will go away too.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
descriptors in location compatible with ejb-jars.
* Fixed: Ensure that the 'source_paths' property in the pmd addon does not
contain arrays or nils.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org wrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.20/dist/
Specifically:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.20/dist/buildr-1.4.20.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.20/dist
Hi,
I was likewise away ... but I believe the problem has been fixed
properly in buildr 1.4.20
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Philippe Caruana
j...@target2sell.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
Sorry I was away (a much needed break).
Le 23/08/2014 05:49, Peter Donald a écrit
, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.21/dist/
Specifically:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.21/dist/buildr-1.4.21.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.21/dist/
Specifically:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.21/dist/buildr-1.4.21.tgz
http
:
+1 for me. Sorry I didn't have time to test things this time around.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Peter Donald pe...@realityforge.org
wrote:
Sounds like a plan. I just updated the version of Antwrap and updated
the
version at http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.21
/apache/buildr/compare/BUILDR-705
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
and
ipr.sql_dialect_mappings
* Added: Support specification of the target project to which the
gwt compilation artifacts are added as an asset, by using
:target_project option.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
t;https://github.com/apache/buildr/blob/master/CHANGELOG>
>
> I believe it would be a good time to run a release. With your permission,
> I’ll get started on rolling out a RC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
the historic versions as released and archived
all the versions from 2014 and earlier.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
the bug that allowed unintended sharing has been fixed.
> * Fixed: Fix bug in IDEA module generation that resulted in dependencies
> in IDEA module
> using shared references to compile dependencies.
> * Change: Update the checkstyle addon to use checkstyle 6.12.1.
>
>
> To learn more about Buildr and get started:
> http://buildr.apache.org/
>
> Thanks!
> The Apache Buildr Team
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
om> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like the site publication doesn’t work. I tried to run “rake publish”
>> but the site is not updating.
>>
>> I am looking into the situation and might pull infra in if needed, I’ll let
>> you know when things clear up.
>>
>> Antoine
>
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
drop support for more features - i.e.
Scala if need be.
A few people still use JDK7 to run Buildr so we could probably just
disable support for scala when JDK7 is present and still allow use of
all the other Buildr features on those platforms.
> With version 1.5, we can make the jump.
Sounds g
Does that make sense?
It makes sense however we are stuck supporting jruby-1.6.7.2 as we use
buildr for several 2.x rails apps so I would like to support that as
well ... assuming it is not too much work.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
t;
>
> To learn more about Buildr and get started:
> http://buildr.apache.org/
>
> Thanks!
> The Apache Buildr Team
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
ldr assumes no
transitive dependencies.
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
stream
> JDK7 for 1.4.x and 1.5.x
> JDK8 for 1.5.x and going forward
Seems reasonable.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
