Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Thank you, Fancis.

I have marked 1.25 as released in JIRA

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 7:28 PM Francis Chuang 
wrote:

> Hey Andrei,
>
> I added the 1.25.0 release to the reporting tool.
> I also added you to the administrator role in jira. Can you see if you
> can mark 1.25.0 as released?
>
> Francis
>
> On 23/08/2020 8:29 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
> > There are two things to be done by PMCs (unfortunately I can't due to
> > restricted access):
> >
> > 1. Add release date 2020-08-22 for 1.25 to Apache Report Helper [1]
> > 2. Mark version 1.25 as released in JIRA [2]. Release date 2020-08-22
> >
> > If someone has access to those systems please help me finalize 1.25
> >
> > [1] https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?calcite
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CALCITE/versions/12348564
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 3:49 PM Michael Mior  wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Andrei!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Michael Mior
> >> mm...@apache.org
> >>
> >> Le sam. 22 août 2020 à 15:08, Andrei Sereda  a écrit
> :
> >>>
> >>> INFRA-20681 was resolved.
> >>>
> >>> I have published the artifacts to SVN dist area.
> >>>
> >>> Will update static site and send an announcement shortly.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hello,
> 
>  I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0
>  artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up
> >> the
>  resolution please let me know.
> 
>  [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681
> 
>  On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda 
> >> wrote:
> 
> > 1.25 branch has been merged.
> >
> > Master is unlocked now. I have also sent separate notification.
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:07 PM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
> >
> >> You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
> >> master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
> >> vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on
> master.
> >> And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you
> tweak
> >> the release notes or whatever.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
> >>> I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0
> >> release.
> >>> Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist
> >> repository
> >> which
> >>> prevents me from finalizing the release.
> >>>
> >>> That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not
> >> optimal. I
> >> will
> >>> merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25
> >> next
> >> week
> >>> independently.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  Andrei,
> 
>  Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master
> >> branch
> >> closed?
> 
>  (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as
> >> soon as
>  the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if
> >> necessary,
>  can happen later.)
> 
>  Julian
> 
>  On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda  >>>
> >> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and
> >> given
> >> their
> > comments and votes.
> >
> > The tally is as follows.
> >
> > 4 binding +1s:
> >   * Francis Chuang
> >   * Michael Mior
> >   * Haisheng Yuan
> >   * Julian Hyde
> >
> > 7 non-binding +1s:
> >   * Enrico Olivelli
> >   * Rui Wang
> >   * chunwei
> >   * Ruben Q L
> >   * Anton Haidai
> >   * xzh
> >   * Andrei Sereda
> >
> > No 0s or -1s.
> >
> > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to
> >> release
> >> Apache
> > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
> >
> > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
> >
> > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
> > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
> >
> > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over.
> >> Separate
> > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
> >
> > Andrei
> 
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Francis Chuang]

Hey Andrei,

I added the 1.25.0 release to the reporting tool.
I also added you to the administrator role in jira. Can you see if you 
can mark 1.25.0 as released?


Francis

On 23/08/2020 8:29 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:

There are two things to be done by PMCs (unfortunately I can't due to
restricted access):

1. Add release date 2020-08-22 for 1.25 to Apache Report Helper [1]
2. Mark version 1.25 as released in JIRA [2]. Release date 2020-08-22

If someone has access to those systems please help me finalize 1.25

[1] https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?calcite
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CALCITE/versions/12348564

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 3:49 PM Michael Mior  wrote:


Thanks Andrei!

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

Le sam. 22 août 2020 à 15:08, Andrei Sereda  a écrit :


INFRA-20681 was resolved.

I have published the artifacts to SVN dist area.

Will update static site and send an announcement shortly.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:


Hello,

I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0
artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up

the

resolution please let me know.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda 

wrote:



1.25 branch has been merged.

Master is unlocked now. I have also sent separate notification.

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:07 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:


You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on master.
And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you tweak
the release notes or whatever.

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda 

wrote:



is there any reason to keep master branch closed?

I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0

release.

Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist

repository

which

prevents me from finalizing the release.

That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not

optimal. I

will

merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25

next

week

independently.

Sorry for the inconvenience.





On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde 

wrote:



Andrei,

Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master

branch

closed?


(Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as

soon as

the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if

necessary,

can happen later.)

Julian

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda 


wrote:


Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and

given

their

comments and votes.

The tally is as follows.

4 binding +1s:
  * Francis Chuang
  * Michael Mior
  * Haisheng Yuan
  * Julian Hyde

7 non-binding +1s:
  * Enrico Olivelli
  * Rui Wang
  * chunwei
  * Ruben Q L
  * Anton Haidai
  * xzh
  * Andrei Sereda

No 0s or -1s.

Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to

release

Apache

Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.

Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.

I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
reflect 1.25.0 changes.

Please refrain from modifying master until release is over.

Separate

notification will be sent once commits are allowed.

Andrei

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

There are two things to be done by PMCs (unfortunately I can't due to
restricted access):

1. Add release date 2020-08-22 for 1.25 to Apache Report Helper [1]
2. Mark version 1.25 as released in JIRA [2]. Release date 2020-08-22

If someone has access to those systems please help me finalize 1.25

[1] https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?calcite
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CALCITE/versions/12348564

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 3:49 PM Michael Mior  wrote:

> Thanks Andrei!
>
> --
> Michael Mior
> mm...@apache.org
>
> Le sam. 22 août 2020 à 15:08, Andrei Sereda  a écrit :
> >
> > INFRA-20681 was resolved.
> >
> > I have published the artifacts to SVN dist area.
> >
> > Will update static site and send an announcement shortly.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0
> > > artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up
> the
> > > resolution please let me know.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 1.25 branch has been merged.
> > >>
> > >> Master is unlocked now. I have also sent separate notification.
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:07 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
> > >>> master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
> > >>> vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on master.
> > >>> And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you tweak
> > >>> the release notes or whatever.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
> > >>> > I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0
> > >>> release.
> > >>> > Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist
> repository
> > >>> which
> > >>> > prevents me from finalizing the release.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not
> optimal. I
> > >>> will
> > >>> > merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25
> next
> > >>> week
> > >>> > independently.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Sorry for the inconvenience.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Andrei,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master
> branch
> > >>> closed?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as
> soon as
> > >>> > > the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if
> necessary,
> > >>> > > can happen later.)
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Julian
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda  >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and
> given
> > >>> their
> > >>> > > > comments and votes.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > The tally is as follows.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > 4 binding +1s:
> > >>> > > >  * Francis Chuang
> > >>> > > >  * Michael Mior
> > >>> > > >  * Haisheng Yuan
> > >>> > > >  * Julian Hyde
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > 7 non-binding +1s:
> > >>> > > >  * Enrico Olivelli
> > >>> > > >  * Rui Wang
> > >>> > > >  * chunwei
> > >>> > > >  * Ruben Q L
> > >>> > > >  * Anton Haidai
> > >>> > > >  * xzh
> > >>> > > >  * Andrei Sereda
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > No 0s or -1s.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to
> release
> > >>> Apache
> > >>> > > > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
> > >>> > > > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over.
> > >>> Separate
> > >>> > > > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Andrei
> > >>> > >
> > >>>
> > >>
>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Michael Mior]

Thanks Andrei!

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

Le sam. 22 août 2020 à 15:08, Andrei Sereda  a écrit :
>
> INFRA-20681 was resolved.
>
> I have published the artifacts to SVN dist area.
>
> Will update static site and send an announcement shortly.
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0
> > artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up the
> > resolution please let me know.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> >> 1.25 branch has been merged.
> >>
> >> Master is unlocked now. I have also sent separate notification.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:07 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
> >>
> >>> You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
> >>> master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
> >>> vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on master.
> >>> And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you tweak
> >>> the release notes or whatever.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
> >>> > I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0
> >>> release.
> >>> > Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist repository
> >>> which
> >>> > prevents me from finalizing the release.
> >>> >
> >>> > That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not optimal. I
> >>> will
> >>> > merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25 next
> >>> week
> >>> > independently.
> >>> >
> >>> > Sorry for the inconvenience.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Andrei,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master branch
> >>> closed?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as soon as
> >>> > > the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if necessary,
> >>> > > can happen later.)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Julian
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
> >>> their
> >>> > > > comments and votes.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The tally is as follows.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > 4 binding +1s:
> >>> > > >  * Francis Chuang
> >>> > > >  * Michael Mior
> >>> > > >  * Haisheng Yuan
> >>> > > >  * Julian Hyde
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > 7 non-binding +1s:
> >>> > > >  * Enrico Olivelli
> >>> > > >  * Rui Wang
> >>> > > >  * chunwei
> >>> > > >  * Ruben Q L
> >>> > > >  * Anton Haidai
> >>> > > >  * xzh
> >>> > > >  * Andrei Sereda
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > No 0s or -1s.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
> >>> Apache
> >>> > > > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
> >>> > > > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over.
> >>> Separate
> >>> > > > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Andrei
> >>> > >
> >>>
> >>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

INFRA-20681 was resolved.

I have published the artifacts to SVN dist area.

Will update static site and send an announcement shortly.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0
> artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up the
> resolution please let me know.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
>> 1.25 branch has been merged.
>>
>> Master is unlocked now. I have also sent separate notification.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:07 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
>>
>>> You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
>>> master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
>>> vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on master.
>>> And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you tweak
>>> the release notes or whatever.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
>>> > I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0
>>> release.
>>> > Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist repository
>>> which
>>> > prevents me from finalizing the release.
>>> >
>>> > That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not optimal. I
>>> will
>>> > merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25 next
>>> week
>>> > independently.
>>> >
>>> > Sorry for the inconvenience.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Andrei,
>>> > >
>>> > > Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master branch
>>> closed?
>>> > >
>>> > > (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as soon as
>>> > > the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if necessary,
>>> > > can happen later.)
>>> > >
>>> > > Julian
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda 
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
>>> their
>>> > > > comments and votes.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The tally is as follows.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 4 binding +1s:
>>> > > >  * Francis Chuang
>>> > > >  * Michael Mior
>>> > > >  * Haisheng Yuan
>>> > > >  * Julian Hyde
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 7 non-binding +1s:
>>> > > >  * Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >  * Rui Wang
>>> > > >  * chunwei
>>> > > >  * Ruben Q L
>>> > > >  * Anton Haidai
>>> > > >  * xzh
>>> > > >  * Andrei Sereda
>>> > > >
>>> > > > No 0s or -1s.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
>>> Apache
>>> > > > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
>>> > > > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over.
>>> Separate
>>> > > > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Andrei
>>> > >
>>>
>>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Hello,

I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0
artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up the
resolution please let me know.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> 1.25 branch has been merged.
>
> Master is unlocked now. I have also sent separate notification.
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:07 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
>
>> You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
>> master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
>> vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on master.
>> And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you tweak
>> the release notes or whatever.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>> >
>> > > is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
>> > I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0 release.
>> > Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist repository
>> which
>> > prevents me from finalizing the release.
>> >
>> > That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not optimal. I
>> will
>> > merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25 next
>> week
>> > independently.
>> >
>> > Sorry for the inconvenience.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Andrei,
>> > >
>> > > Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master branch
>> closed?
>> > >
>> > > (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as soon as
>> > > the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if necessary,
>> > > can happen later.)
>> > >
>> > > Julian
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda 
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
>> their
>> > > > comments and votes.
>> > > >
>> > > > The tally is as follows.
>> > > >
>> > > > 4 binding +1s:
>> > > >  * Francis Chuang
>> > > >  * Michael Mior
>> > > >  * Haisheng Yuan
>> > > >  * Julian Hyde
>> > > >
>> > > > 7 non-binding +1s:
>> > > >  * Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >  * Rui Wang
>> > > >  * chunwei
>> > > >  * Ruben Q L
>> > > >  * Anton Haidai
>> > > >  * xzh
>> > > >  * Andrei Sereda
>> > > >
>> > > > No 0s or -1s.
>> > > >
>> > > > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
>> Apache
>> > > > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
>> > > >
>> > > > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
>> > > > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over. Separate
>> > > > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
>> > > >
>> > > > Andrei
>> > >
>>
>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Julian Hyde]

You can "git push origin calcite-1.25.0-rc0:master" and then re-open
master. I don't think there's any reason to wait. Since the release
vote has passed, we know that 68b02dfd4 is going to end up on master.
And we don't mind if people make intervening commits before you tweak
the release notes or whatever.

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
> > is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
> I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0 release.
> Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist repository which
> prevents me from finalizing the release.
>
> That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not optimal. I will
> merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25 next week
> independently.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:
>
> > Andrei,
> >
> > Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
> >
> > (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as soon as
> > the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if necessary,
> > can happen later.)
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their
> > > comments and votes.
> > >
> > > The tally is as follows.
> > >
> > > 4 binding +1s:
> > >  * Francis Chuang
> > >  * Michael Mior
> > >  * Haisheng Yuan
> > >  * Julian Hyde
> > >
> > > 7 non-binding +1s:
> > >  * Enrico Olivelli
> > >  * Rui Wang
> > >  * chunwei
> > >  * Ruben Q L
> > >  * Anton Haidai
> > >  * xzh
> > >  * Andrei Sereda
> > >
> > > No 0s or -1s.
> > >
> > > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release Apache
> > > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
> > >
> > > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
> > >
> > > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
> > > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
> > >
> > > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over. Separate
> > > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
> > >
> > > Andrei
> >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

> is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
I didn't want to make master branch too out of sync with 1.25.0 release.
Unfortunately I was not yet given permissions for SVN dist repository which
prevents me from finalizing the release.

That being said, keeping master frozen for too long is not optimal. I will
merge existing release branch today and hopefully finalize 1.25 next week
independently.

Sorry for the inconvenience.





On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:

> Andrei,
>
> Now the release is final, is there any reason to keep master branch closed?
>
> (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as soon as
> the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if necessary,
> can happen later.)
>
> Julian
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their
> > comments and votes.
> >
> > The tally is as follows.
> >
> > 4 binding +1s:
> >  * Francis Chuang
> >  * Michael Mior
> >  * Haisheng Yuan
> >  * Julian Hyde
> >
> > 7 non-binding +1s:
> >  * Enrico Olivelli
> >  * Rui Wang
> >  * chunwei
> >  * Ruben Q L
> >  * Anton Haidai
> >  * xzh
> >  * Andrei Sereda
> >
> > No 0s or -1s.
> >
> > Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release Apache
> > Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.
> >
> > Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
> >
> > I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
> > reflect 1.25.0 changes.
> >
> > Please refrain from modifying master until release is over. Separate
> > notification will be sent once commits are allowed.
> >
> > Andrei
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Julian Hyde]

Since the release vote has passed, Andrei as release manager can declare the 
master branch open for commits. Publishing the artifacts and making the release 
announcement can go on in parallel.

> On Aug 13, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> 
> Hi Haisheng,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> There is a parallel discussion [1] about letting committers have write
> access to SVN dist repository. Seems like most people are on the same page
> (ie +1).
> If approved, I should be able to finalize the release soon myself.
> 
> Andrei.
> 
> 
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raf959fc1e4e5d143ce220589de9cb798c51d39b9e1faf4b682bda9ba%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:02 PM Haisheng Yuan  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andrei,
>> 
>> Let's unblock the release as soon as possible.
>> I can help publish the artifact.
>> 
>> Can you cat build/stagingRepositories/nexus.txt and send me the content in
>> your local repo?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Haisheng
>> 
>> On 2020/08/13 14:47:05, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>>> It can also be configured per project.
>>> 
 Do you know if SVN access can be configured per project ?
 Yes it can, if the PMC agrees to it, the dist area can be opened up to
>>> all project committers - a few PMCs have done this.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>>> 
 Inquired with INFRA-20681
  seems like only
>> PMCs
 can commit to dist SVN:
 
> Are committers (which are not PMCs) allowed to commit to SVN dist
>> repo ?
> ..., nope, by default its PMC members only
 
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andrei Sereda 
>> wrote:
 
> Can someone from PMC pls publish the release ?  Or maybe contact INFRA
> about svn permissions for committers vs PMCs ?
> 
> I would like to avoid blocking calcite development for too long.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:33 PM Chunwei Lei 
> wrote:
> 
>>> Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should
>> give
>> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future.
>> I am
>> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra
>> is
>> set up, but it's worth a look.
>> 
>> I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
>> (We can add some notes about it at least~~)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> Chunwei
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang <
>> francischu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe
>> this
>>> is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is
>> not a
>>> PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
>>> 
>>> Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should
>> give
>>> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the
>> future. I
>> am
>>> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's
>> infra is
>>> set up, but it's worth a look.
>>> 
>>> Francis
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
>>> 
>>> On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
 Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
 
 On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <
>> zabe...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 
> Hi Andrei,
> 
> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
> 
> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the
>> svn
>> repo.
> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it
>> through.
> 
> Best,
> Stamatis
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda >> 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
>>  ? I
>> don't
>>> have
>> permissions for that svn repo.
>> 
>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Andrei.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda >> 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still
>> want to
>>> validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Andrei.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda
>> 
> wrote:
>>> 
 Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
 
 On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <
>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
 
 wrote:
 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Hi Haisheng,

Thanks for your reply.

There is a parallel discussion [1] about letting committers have write
access to SVN dist repository. Seems like most people are on the same page
(ie +1).
If approved, I should be able to finalize the release soon myself.

Andrei.


[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raf959fc1e4e5d143ce220589de9cb798c51d39b9e1faf4b682bda9ba%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E


On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:02 PM Haisheng Yuan  wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
>
> Let's unblock the release as soon as possible.
> I can help publish the artifact.
>
> Can you cat build/stagingRepositories/nexus.txt and send me the content in
> your local repo?
>
> Thanks,
> Haisheng
>
> On 2020/08/13 14:47:05, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> > It can also be configured per project.
> >
> > > Do you know if SVN access can be configured per project ?
> > > Yes it can, if the PMC agrees to it, the dist area can be opened up to
> > all project committers - a few PMCs have done this.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > > Inquired with INFRA-20681
> > >  seems like only
> PMCs
> > > can commit to dist SVN:
> > >
> > > > Are committers (which are not PMCs) allowed to commit to SVN dist
> repo ?
> > > > ..., nope, by default its PMC members only
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can someone from PMC pls publish the release ?  Or maybe contact INFRA
> > >> about svn permissions for committers vs PMCs ?
> > >>
> > >> I would like to avoid blocking calcite development for too long.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:33 PM Chunwei Lei 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should
> give
> > >>> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future.
> I am
> > >>> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra
> is
> > >>> set up, but it's worth a look.
> > >>>
> > >>> I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
> > >>> (We can add some notes about it at least~~)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Chunwei
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang <
> > >>> francischu...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe
> > >>> this
> > >>> > is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is
> not a
> > >>> > PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should
> give
> > >>> > committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the
> future. I
> > >>> am
> > >>> > not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's
> infra is
> > >>> > set up, but it's worth a look.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Francis
> > >>> >
> > >>> > [1]
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
> > >>> > > Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > >>> zabe...@gmail.com>
> > >>> > > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> Hi Andrei,
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the
> svn
> > >>> repo.
> > >>> > >> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it
> > >>> through.
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Best,
> > >>> > >> Stamatis
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda  >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>> Hello,
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
> > >>> > >>>  ? I
> > >>> don't
> > >>> > have
> > >>> > >>> permissions for that svn repo.
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> > >>> Andrei.
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda  >
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> >  Hi All,
> > >>> > 
> > >>> >  I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still
> want to
> > >>> >  validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> > >>> > 
> > >>> >  Regards,
> > >>> >  Andrei.
> > >>> > 
> > >>> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda
> 
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <
> > >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> Andrei,
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed
> > >>> Stamatis’s
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Haisheng Yuan]

Hi Andrei,

Let's unblock the release as soon as possible.
I can help publish the artifact.

Can you cat build/stagingRepositories/nexus.txt and send me the content in your 
local repo?

Thanks,
Haisheng

On 2020/08/13 14:47:05, Andrei Sereda  wrote: 
> It can also be configured per project.
> 
> > Do you know if SVN access can be configured per project ?
> > Yes it can, if the PMC agrees to it, the dist area can be opened up to
> all project committers - a few PMCs have done this.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> 
> > Inquired with INFRA-20681
> >  seems like only PMCs
> > can commit to dist SVN:
> >
> > > Are committers (which are not PMCs) allowed to commit to SVN dist repo ?
> > > ..., nope, by default its PMC members only
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> >> Can someone from PMC pls publish the release ?  Or maybe contact INFRA
> >> about svn permissions for committers vs PMCs ?
> >>
> >> I would like to avoid blocking calcite development for too long.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:33 PM Chunwei Lei 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
> >>> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
> >>> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
> >>> set up, but it's worth a look.
> >>>
> >>> I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
> >>> (We can add some notes about it at least~~)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Chunwei
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang <
> >>> francischu...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe
> >>> this
> >>> > is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is not a
> >>> > PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
> >>> >
> >>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
> >>> > committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I
> >>> am
> >>> > not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
> >>> > set up, but it's worth a look.
> >>> >
> >>> > Francis
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> >>> >
> >>> > On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
> >>> > > Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <
> >>> zabe...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Hi Andrei,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn
> >>> repo.
> >>> > >> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it
> >>> through.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Best,
> >>> > >> Stamatis
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> Hello,
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
> >>> > >>>  ? I
> >>> don't
> >>> > have
> >>> > >>> permissions for that svn repo.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Thanks,
> >>> > >>> Andrei.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda 
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >  Hi All,
> >>> > 
> >>> >  I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
> >>> >  validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> >>> > 
> >>> >  Regards,
> >>> >  Andrei.
> >>> > 
> >>> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > 
> >>> > > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <
> >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> >>> > >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Andrei,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed
> >>> Stamatis’s
> >>> > >> key.
> >>> > >> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I
> >>> imported
> >>> > the
> >>> > >>> file,
> >>> > >> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Julian
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> 
> >>> > 
> >>> >  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> >>> > >>> before
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >>> release announcement.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> I see my signing key in KEYS
> >>> > >>> $ curl -s
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
> >>> > >> |
> >>> > >> grep
> >>> > >>> sereda
> >>> > >>> sig 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

It can also be configured per project.

> Do you know if SVN access can be configured per project ?
> Yes it can, if the PMC agrees to it, the dist area can be opened up to
all project committers - a few PMCs have done this.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Inquired with INFRA-20681
>  seems like only PMCs
> can commit to dist SVN:
>
> > Are committers (which are not PMCs) allowed to commit to SVN dist repo ?
> > ..., nope, by default its PMC members only
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
>> Can someone from PMC pls publish the release ?  Or maybe contact INFRA
>> about svn permissions for committers vs PMCs ?
>>
>> I would like to avoid blocking calcite development for too long.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:33 PM Chunwei Lei 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
>>> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
>>> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
>>> set up, but it's worth a look.
>>>
>>> I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
>>> (We can add some notes about it at least~~)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Chunwei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang <
>>> francischu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe
>>> this
>>> > is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is not a
>>> > PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
>>> >
>>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
>>> > committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I
>>> am
>>> > not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
>>> > set up, but it's worth a look.
>>> >
>>> > Francis
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
>>> >
>>> > On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
>>> > > Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <
>>> zabe...@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi Andrei,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn
>>> repo.
>>> > >> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it
>>> through.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Best,
>>> > >> Stamatis
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda 
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Hello,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
>>> > >>>  ? I
>>> don't
>>> > have
>>> > >>> permissions for that svn repo.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>> > >>> Andrei.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> >  Hi All,
>>> > 
>>> >  I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
>>> >  validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
>>> > 
>>> >  Regards,
>>> >  Andrei.
>>> > 
>>> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <
>>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Andrei,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed
>>> Stamatis’s
>>> > >> key.
>>> > >> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I
>>> imported
>>> > the
>>> > >>> file,
>>> > >> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Julian
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 
>>> > 
>>> >  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
>>> > >>> before
>>> > >> the
>>> > >>> release announcement.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I see my signing key in KEYS
>>> > >>> $ curl -s
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
>>> > >> |
>>> > >> grep
>>> > >>> sereda
>>> > >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
>>> > >> SIGNING
>>> > >> KEY) <
>>> > >>> ser...@apache.org>
>>> > >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
>>> > >> SIGNING
>>> > >> KEY) <
>>> > >>> ser...@apache.org>
>>> > >>>
>>> >  * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
>>> > >> git:
>>> > >>> an
>>> > >>> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>>> > >>> Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging
>>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Inquired with INFRA-20681
 seems like only PMCs
can commit to dist SVN:

> Are committers (which are not PMCs) allowed to commit to SVN dist repo ?
> ..., nope, by default its PMC members only



On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Can someone from PMC pls publish the release ?  Or maybe contact INFRA
> about svn permissions for committers vs PMCs ?
>
> I would like to avoid blocking calcite development for too long.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:33 PM Chunwei Lei 
> wrote:
>
>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
>> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
>> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
>> set up, but it's worth a look.
>>
>> I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
>> (We can add some notes about it at least~~)
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Chunwei
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe this
>> > is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is not a
>> > PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
>> >
>> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
>> > committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
>> > not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
>> > set up, but it's worth a look.
>> >
>> > Francis
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> > On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
>> > > Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <
>> zabe...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Andrei,
>> > >>
>> > >> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
>> > >>
>> > >> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn
>> repo.
>> > >> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it
>> through.
>> > >>
>> > >> Best,
>> > >> Stamatis
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda 
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hello,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
>> > >>>  ? I don't
>> > have
>> > >>> permissions for that svn repo.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks,
>> > >>> Andrei.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda 
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> >  Hi All,
>> > 
>> >  I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
>> >  validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
>> > 
>> >  Regards,
>> >  Andrei.
>> > 
>> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 
>> > >> wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <
>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Andrei,
>> > >>
>> > >> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed
>> Stamatis’s
>> > >> key.
>> > >> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported
>> > the
>> > >>> file,
>> > >> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
>> > >>
>> > >> Julian
>> > >>
>> > >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 
>> > 
>> >  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
>> > >>> before
>> > >> the
>> > >>> release announcement.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I see my signing key in KEYS
>> > >>> $ curl -s
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
>> > >> |
>> > >> grep
>> > >>> sereda
>> > >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
>> > >> SIGNING
>> > >> KEY) <
>> > >>> ser...@apache.org>
>> > >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
>> > >> SIGNING
>> > >> KEY) <
>> > >>> ser...@apache.org>
>> > >>>
>> >  * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
>> > >> git:
>> > >>> an
>> > >>> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>> > >>> Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by
>> > >> your
>> > >> +1) ?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <
>> > >> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>> > 
>> > >> wrote:
>> > 
>> >  +1 (binding)
>> > 
>> >  Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran
>> > >>> tests
>> > >> on
>> >  Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
>> > 
>> >  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
>> > >>> before

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Can someone from PMC pls publish the release ?  Or maybe contact INFRA
about svn permissions for committers vs PMCs ?

I would like to avoid blocking calcite development for too long.


On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:33 PM Chunwei Lei  wrote:

> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
> set up, but it's worth a look.
>
> I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
> (We can add some notes about it at least~~)
>
>
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang 
> wrote:
>
> > Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe this
> > is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is not a
> > PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
> >
> > Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
> > committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
> > not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
> > set up, but it's worth a look.
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> >
> > On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
> > > Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Andrei,
> > >>
> > >> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
> > >>
> > >> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn
> repo.
> > >> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it through.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Stamatis
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
> > >>>  ? I don't
> > have
> > >>> permissions for that svn repo.
> > >>>
> > >>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Andrei.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda 
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hi All,
> > 
> >  I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
> >  validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> > 
> >  Regards,
> >  Andrei.
> > 
> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 
> > >> wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Andrei,
> > >>
> > >> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s
> > >> key.
> > >> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported
> > the
> > >>> file,
> > >> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
> > >>
> > >> Julian
> > >>
> > >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> 
> > 
> >  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> > >>> before
> > >> the
> > >>> release announcement.
> > >>>
> > >>> I see my signing key in KEYS
> > >>> $ curl -s
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
> > >> |
> > >> grep
> > >>> sereda
> > >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> > >> SIGNING
> > >> KEY) <
> > >>> ser...@apache.org>
> > >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> > >> SIGNING
> > >> KEY) <
> > >>> ser...@apache.org>
> > >>>
> >  * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> > >> git:
> > >>> an
> > >>> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > >>> Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by
> > >> your
> > >> +1) ?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <
> > >> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > 
> > >> wrote:
> > 
> >  +1 (binding)
> > 
> >  Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran
> > >>> tests
> > >> on
> >  Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
> > 
> >  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> > >>> before
> > >> the
> >  release announcement.
> > 
> >  * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> > >> git:
> > >>> an
> >  empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > 
> >  Julian
> > 
> > 
> > > On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > >>> zabe...@gmail.com>
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > If I remember well the site preview is not 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Chunwei Lei]

> Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
set up, but it's worth a look.

I cannot agree more. Thank you for pointing out, Francis.
(We can add some notes about it at least~~)



Best,
Chunwei


On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:22 AM Francis Chuang 
wrote:

> Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe this
> is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is not a
> PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].
>
> Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give
> committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am
> not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is
> set up, but it's worth a look.
>
> Francis
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
>
> On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:
> > Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrei,
> >>
> >> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
> >>
> >> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn repo.
> >> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it through.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Stamatis
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
> >>>  ? I don't
> have
> >>> permissions for that svn repo.
> >>>
> >>> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Andrei.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi All,
> 
>  I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
>  validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Andrei.
> 
>  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 
> >> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Andrei,
> >>
> >> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s
> >> key.
> >> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported
> the
> >>> file,
> >> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 
> 
>  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> >>> before
> >> the
> >>> release announcement.
> >>>
> >>> I see my signing key in KEYS
> >>> $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
> >> |
> >> grep
> >>> sereda
> >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> >> SIGNING
> >> KEY) <
> >>> ser...@apache.org>
> >>> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> >> SIGNING
> >> KEY) <
> >>> ser...@apache.org>
> >>>
>  * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> >> git:
> >>> an
> >>> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> >>> Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by
> >> your
> >> +1) ?
> >>>
> >>>
>  On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <
> >> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  +1 (binding)
> 
>  Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran
> >>> tests
> >> on
>  Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
> 
>  * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> >>> before
> >> the
>  release announcement.
> 
>  * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> >> git:
> >>> an
>  empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> 
>  Julian
> 
> 
> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> >>> zabe...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> >
> > If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is
> >> normal
>  that
> > links are broken.
> > I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we
> >> should
> > remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid
> >> confusion.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda  >>>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
>  uploaded.
> >>
> >> Meanwhile here are the release notes:
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Francis Chuang]

Can someone please push the release artifacts for Andrei? I believe this 
is the same issue we had with the last release, where the RM is not a 
PMC member and doesn't have write access to SVN [1].


Once this release is done, we should consider whether we should give 
committers write access to SVN to avoid these issues in the future. I am 
not sure if this is possible or if this is just the way ASF's infra is 
set up, but it's worth a look.


Francis

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E


On 13/08/2020 8:51 am, Andrei Sereda wrote:

Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis 
wrote:


Hi Andrei,

I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.

Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn repo.
I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it through.

Best,
Stamatis

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:


Hello,

Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
 ? I don't have
permissions for that svn repo.

I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.

Thanks,
Andrei.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:


Hi All,

I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.

Regards,
Andrei.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 

wrote:



Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde 
wrote:


Andrei,

Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s

key.

But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the

file,

your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.

Julian


On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 

wrote:





* Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it

before

the

release announcement.

I see my signing key in KEYS
$ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS

|

grep

sereda
sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE

SIGNING

KEY) <

ser...@apache.org>
sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE

SIGNING

KEY) <

ser...@apache.org>


* There are several files in the source distro that are not in

git:

an

empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by

your

+1) ?




On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <

jhyde.apa...@gmail.com



wrote:


+1 (binding)

Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran

tests

on

Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.

* Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it

before

the

release announcement.

* There are several files in the source distro that are not in

git:

an

empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.

Julian



On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <

zabe...@gmail.com>

wrote:


If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is

normal

that

links are broken.
I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we

should

remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid

confusion.


Best,
Stamatis


On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda 


wrote:



Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /

uploaded.


Meanwhile here are the release notes:









https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md


I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have

missed

something.

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan <

hy...@apache.org>

wrote:



+1 (binding)

Environment:
Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
- Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
- Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022

CALCITE-4115

CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite

changes,

those can be updated after release.

- Haisheng

On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda 

wrote:

Hi all,

I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
candidate 0.

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.

You can read the release notes here:


https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html


The commit to be voted upon:












https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555


Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555

Tag:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:








https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0

(revision 40922)

RAT report:


https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt


Site preview is here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/

JavaDoc API preview is here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api

The hashes of the 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis 
wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
>
> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
>
> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn repo.
> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it through.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
> >  ? I don't have
> > permissions for that svn repo.
> >
> > I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrei.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
> > > validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andrei.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Andrei,
> > >>>
> > >>> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s
> key.
> > >>> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the
> > file,
> > >>> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
> > >>>
> > >>> Julian
> > >>>
> > >>> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > 
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> > before
> > >>> the
> > >>> > release announcement.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I see my signing key in KEYS
> > >>> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
> |
> > >>> grep
> > >>> > sereda
> > >>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> SIGNING
> > >>> KEY) <
> > >>> > ser...@apache.org>
> > >>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> SIGNING
> > >>> KEY) <
> > >>> > ser...@apache.org>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> git:
> > an
> > >>> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > >>> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by
> your
> > >>> +1) ?
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> +1 (binding)
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran
> > tests
> > >>> on
> > >>> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> > before
> > >>> the
> > >>> >> release announcement.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> git:
> > an
> > >>> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Julian
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > zabe...@gmail.com>
> > >>> >> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is
> > >>> normal
> > >>> >> that
> > >>> >>> links are broken.
> > >>> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we
> > >>> should
> > >>> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid
> > >>> confusion.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Best,
> > >>> >>> Stamatis
> > >>> >>>
> > >>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda  >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>>  Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
> > >>> >> uploaded.
> > >>> 
> > >>>  Meanwhile here are the release notes:
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > >>> 
> > >>>  I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have
> > >>> missed
> > >>>  something.
> > >>> 
> > >>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan <
> hy...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>> > +1 (binding)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Environment:
> > >>> > Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> > >>> > - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> > >>> > - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022
> CALCITE-4115
> > >>> > CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
> > >>> changes,
> > >>> > those can be updated after release.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > - Haisheng
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> > >>> >> Hi all,
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > >>> >> candidate 0.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> You can read the release notes here:
> > >>> >>
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Stamatis Zampetakis]

Hi Andrei,

I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.

Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn repo.
I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it through.

Best,
Stamatis

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
>  ? I don't have
> permissions for that svn repo.
>
> I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
> > validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrei.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andrei,
> >>>
> >>> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s key.
> >>> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the
> file,
> >>> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
> >>>
> >>> Julian
> >>>
> >>> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > 
> >>> >>
> >>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> before
> >>> the
> >>> > release announcement.
> >>> >
> >>> > I see my signing key in KEYS
> >>> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS |
> >>> grep
> >>> > sereda
> >>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
> >>> KEY) <
> >>> > ser...@apache.org>
> >>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
> >>> KEY) <
> >>> > ser...@apache.org>
> >>> >
> >>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git:
> an
> >>> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> >>> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your
> >>> +1) ?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> +1 (binding)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran
> tests
> >>> on
> >>> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> before
> >>> the
> >>> >> release announcement.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git:
> an
> >>> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Julian
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabe...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is
> >>> normal
> >>> >> that
> >>> >>> links are broken.
> >>> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we
> >>> should
> >>> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid
> >>> confusion.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Best,
> >>> >>> Stamatis
> >>> >>>
> >>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>>  Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
> >>> >> uploaded.
> >>> 
> >>>  Meanwhile here are the release notes:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> >>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> >>> 
> >>>  I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have
> >>> missed
> >>>  something.
> >>> 
> >>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan 
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> > +1 (binding)
> >>> >
> >>> > Environment:
> >>> > Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> >>> > - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> >>> > - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
> >>> > CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
> >>> changes,
> >>> > those can be updated after release.
> >>> >
> >>> > - Haisheng
> >>> >
> >>> > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >>> >> Hi all,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> >>> >> candidate 0.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> You can read the release notes here:
> >>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The commit to be voted upon:
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> 
> >>> >>
> >>>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Tag:
> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> >>> >>
> >>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Hello,

Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
 ? I don't have
permissions for that svn repo.

I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org.

Thanks,
Andrei.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
> validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Andrei,
>>>
>>> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s key.
>>> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the file,
>>> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> >>
>>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
>>> the
>>> > release announcement.
>>> >
>>> > I see my signing key in KEYS
>>> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS |
>>> grep
>>> > sereda
>>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
>>> KEY) <
>>> > ser...@apache.org>
>>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
>>> KEY) <
>>> > ser...@apache.org>
>>> >
>>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>>> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>>> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your
>>> +1) ?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 (binding)
>>> >>
>>> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests
>>> on
>>> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
>>> >>
>>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
>>> the
>>> >> release announcement.
>>> >>
>>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>>> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>>> >>
>>> >> Julian
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is
>>> normal
>>> >> that
>>> >>> links are broken.
>>> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we
>>> should
>>> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid
>>> confusion.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best,
>>> >>> Stamatis
>>> >>>
>>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>>  Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
>>> >> uploaded.
>>> 
>>>  Meanwhile here are the release notes:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> >>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
>>> 
>>>  I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have
>>> missed
>>>  something.
>>> 
>>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> 
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > Environment:
>>> > Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
>>> > - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
>>> > - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
>>> > CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
>>> changes,
>>> > those can be updated after release.
>>> >
>>> > - Haisheng
>>> >
>>> > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
>>> >> candidate 0.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>>> >>
>>> >> You can read the release notes here:
>>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
>>> >>
>>> >> The commit to be voted upon:
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> 
>>> >>
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>>> >>
>>> >> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>>> >>
>>> >> Tag:
>>> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>>> >>
>>> >> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>>> >>
>>> 
>>> >>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>>> >> (revision 40922)
>>> >>
>>> >> RAT report:
>>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
>>> >>
>>> >> Site preview is here:
>>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
>>> >>
>>> >> JavaDoc API preview is here:
>>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
>>> >>
>>> >> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> 
>>> >>
>>> 

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their
comments and votes.

The tally is as follows.

4 binding +1s:
 * Francis Chuang
 * Michael Mior
 * Haisheng Yuan
 * Julian Hyde

7 non-binding +1s:
 * Enrico Olivelli
 * Rui Wang
 * chunwei
 * Ruben Q L
 * Anton Haidai
 * xzh
 * Andrei Sereda

No 0s or -1s.

Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release Apache
Calcite 1.25.0 has passed.

Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.

I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better
reflect 1.25.0 changes.

Please refrain from modifying master until release is over. Separate
notification will be sent once commits are allowed.

Andrei

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Hi All,

I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to validate
RC0 please do so before Wednesday.

Regards,
Andrei.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
>
>> Andrei,
>>
>> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s key.
>> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the file,
>> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> >>
>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
>> the
>> > release announcement.
>> >
>> > I see my signing key in KEYS
>> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS |
>> grep
>> > sereda
>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
>> KEY) <
>> > ser...@apache.org>
>> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
>> KEY) <
>> > ser...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your
>> +1) ?
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests
>> on
>> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
>> >>
>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
>> the
>> >> release announcement.
>> >>
>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>> >>
>> >> Julian
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal
>> >> that
>> >>> links are broken.
>> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
>> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Stamatis
>> >>>
>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>>  Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
>> >> uploaded.
>> 
>>  Meanwhile here are the release notes:
>> 
>> 
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
>> 
>>  I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have
>> missed
>>  something.
>> 
>>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan 
>> >> wrote:
>> 
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Environment:
>> > Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
>> > - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
>> > - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
>> > CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
>> changes,
>> > those can be updated after release.
>> >
>> > - Haisheng
>> >
>> > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
>> >> candidate 0.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>> >>
>> >> You can read the release notes here:
>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
>> >>
>> >> The commit to be voted upon:
>> >>
>> >
>> 
>> >>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>> >>
>> >> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>> >>
>> >> Tag:
>> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>> >>
>> 
>> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>> >> (revision 40922)
>> >>
>> >> RAT report:
>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
>> >>
>> >> Site preview is here:
>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
>> >>
>> >> JavaDoc API preview is here:
>> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
>> >>
>> >> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>> >>
>> >
>> 
>> >>
>> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
>> >> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
>> >>
>> >> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> >>
>> >
>> 
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
>> >>
>> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
>> >> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde  wrote:

> Andrei,
>
> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s key.
> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the file,
> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
>
> Julian
>
> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > 
> >>
> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
> the
> > release announcement.
> >
> > I see my signing key in KEYS
> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS | grep
> > sereda
> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
> KEY) <
> > ser...@apache.org>
> > sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
> KEY) <
> > ser...@apache.org>
> >
> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your
> +1) ?
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests on
> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
> >>
> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
> the
> >> release announcement.
> >>
> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal
> >> that
> >>> links are broken.
> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Stamatis
> >>>
>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
> >> uploaded.
> 
>  Meanwhile here are the release notes:
> 
> 
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> 
>  I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have missed
>  something.
> 
>  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan 
> >> wrote:
> 
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Environment:
> > Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> > - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> > - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
> > CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
> changes,
> > those can be updated after release.
> >
> > - Haisheng
> >
> > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> >> candidate 0.
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >>
> >> You can read the release notes here:
> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> >>
> >> The commit to be voted upon:
> >>
> >
> 
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >>
> >> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >>
> >> Tag:
> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> >>
> >> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> >>
> 
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> >> (revision 40922)
> >>
> >> RAT report:
> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> >>
> >> Site preview is here:
> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> >>
> >> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> >> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> >>
> >> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> >>
> >
> 
> >>
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> >> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> >>
> >> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> >>
> >
> 
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> >>
> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> >> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> >>
> >> N.B.
> >> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> >>
> >> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the
> tests
> >> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> >> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Julian Hyde]

Andrei,

Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s key. But 
your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the file, your 
key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg. 

Julian

> On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before the
> release announcement.
> 
> I see my signing key in KEYS
> $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS | grep
> sereda
> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
> ser...@apache.org>
> sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
> ser...@apache.org>
> 
>> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your +1) ?
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests on
>> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
>> 
>> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before the
>> release announcement.
>> 
>> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal
>> that
>>> links are broken.
>>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
>>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Stamatis
>>> 
 On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>>> 
 Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
>> uploaded.
 
 Meanwhile here are the release notes:
 
 
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
 
 I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have missed
 something.
 
 On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan 
>> wrote:
 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Environment:
> Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
> CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite changes,
> those can be updated after release.
> 
> - Haisheng
> 
> On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
>> candidate 0.
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>> 
>> You can read the release notes here:
>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
>> 
>> The commit to be voted upon:
>> 
> 
 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>> 
>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>> 
>> Tag:
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>> 
>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>> 
 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>> (revision 40922)
>> 
>> RAT report:
>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
>> 
>> Site preview is here:
>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
>> 
>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
>> 
>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>> 
> 
 
>> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> 
> 
 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
>> 
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
>> 
>> N.B.
>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
>> 
>> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
>> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
>> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
>> 
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before the
release announcement.

I see my signing key in KEYS
$ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS | grep
sereda
sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
ser...@apache.org>
sig  C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
ser...@apache.org>

> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your +1) ?


On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests on
> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
>
> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before the
> release announcement.
>
> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis 
> wrote:
> >
> > If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal
> that
> > links are broken.
> > I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
> > remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> >> Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
> uploaded.
> >>
> >> Meanwhile here are the release notes:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> >>
> >> I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have missed
> >> something.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> Environment:
> >>> Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> >>> - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> >>> - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
> >>> CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite changes,
> >>> those can be updated after release.
> >>>
> >>> - Haisheng
> >>>
> >>> On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>  Hi all,
> 
>  I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
>  candidate 0.
> 
>  Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> 
>  You can read the release notes here:
>  https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> 
>  The commit to be voted upon:
> 
> >>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> 
>  Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> 
>  Tag:
>  https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> 
>  The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> 
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>  (revision 40922)
> 
>  RAT report:
>  https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> 
>  Site preview is here:
>  https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> 
>  JavaDoc API preview is here:
>  https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> 
>  The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> 
> >>>
> >>
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
>  *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> 
>  A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> 
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> 
>  Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>  https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
>  https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> 
>  N.B.
>  To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> 
>  If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
>  using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
>  "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> 
>  Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> 
>  The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>  least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> 
>  [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
>  [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>  [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> 
>  Here is my vote:
> 
>  +1 (non binding)
> 
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Julian Hyde]

+1 (binding)

Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests on 
Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.

* Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before the 
release announcement.

* There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an empty 
‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.

Julian


> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis  wrote:
> 
> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal that
> links are broken.
> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.
> 
> Best,
> Stamatis
> 
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> 
>> Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built / uploaded.
>> 
>> Meanwhile here are the release notes:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
>> 
>> I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have missed
>> something.
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan  wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> Environment:
>>> Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
>>> - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
>>> - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
>>> CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite changes,
>>> those can be updated after release.
>>> 
>>> - Haisheng
>>> 
>>> On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
 candidate 0.
 
 Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
 
 You can read the release notes here:
 https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
 
 The commit to be voted upon:
 
>>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
 
 Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
 
 Tag:
 https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
 
 The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
 (revision 40922)
 
 RAT report:
 https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
 
 Site preview is here:
 https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
 
 JavaDoc API preview is here:
 https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
 
 The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
 
>>> 
>> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
 *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
 
 A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
 
 Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
 https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
 
 N.B.
 To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
 
 If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
 using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
 "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
 
 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
 
 The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
 least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
 
 [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
 [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
 
 
 Here is my vote:
 
 +1 (non binding)
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Stamatis Zampetakis]

If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal that
links are broken.
I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.

Best,
Stamatis

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built / uploaded.
>
> Meanwhile here are the release notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
>
> I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have missed
> something.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Environment:
> > Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> > - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> > - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
> > CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite changes,
> > those can be updated after release.
> >
> > - Haisheng
> >
> > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > > candidate 0.
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > >
> > > You can read the release notes here:
> > > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted upon:
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > >
> > > Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > >
> > > Tag:
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > >
> > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > (revision 40922)
> > >
> > > RAT report:
> > > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> > >
> > > Site preview is here:
> > > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> > >
> > > JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> > >
> > > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > >
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > > *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > >
> > > N.B.
> > > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> > >
> > > If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> > > using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> > > "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> > >
> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> > > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is my vote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built / uploaded.

Meanwhile here are the release notes:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md

I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have missed
something.

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Environment:
> Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
> CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite changes,
> those can be updated after release.
>
> - Haisheng
>
> On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > candidate 0.
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >
> > You can read the release notes here:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> >
> > The commit to be voted upon:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >
> > Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >
> > Tag:
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> >
> > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > (revision 40922)
> >
> > RAT report:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> >
> > Site preview is here:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> >
> > JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> >
> > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> >
> > N.B.
> > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> >
> > If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> > using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> > "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Here is my vote:
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Haisheng Yuan]

+1 (binding)

Environment: 
Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
- Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
- Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115 CALCITE-4129 
CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite changes, those can be updated 
after release.

- Haisheng

On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda  wrote: 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> candidate 0.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> 
> You can read the release notes here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> 
> The commit to be voted upon:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> 
> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> 
> Tag:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> 
> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> (revision 40922)
> 
> RAT report:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> 
> Site preview is here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> 
> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> 
> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> 
> N.B.
> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> 
> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> 
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> 
> Here is my vote:
> 
> +1 (non binding)
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Michael Mior]

+1 (binding)

Checked hash and compiled and ran tests. I will note though that all
links in the email to https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
are broken.

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

Le sam. 8 août 2020 à 23:22, Andrei Sereda  a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> candidate 0.
>
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>
> You can read the release notes here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
>
> The commit to be voted upon:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>
> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>
> Tag:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> (revision 40922)
>
> RAT report:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
>
> Site preview is here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
>
> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
>
> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
>
> N.B.
> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
>
> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (non binding)

回复： [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[953396112]

+1 (non binding)


Local Calcite build with tests enabled on MacOs: Ok
Calcite-based system test suite: Ok


MacOs (Catalina 10.15.6)
Java version(1.8.0_191)


xzh





--原始邮件--
发件人:
"dev"   
 
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html.
 
  On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:47 AM Rui Wang https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
)

 - OK
 Spotted checked a few JARs in the Maven repository - OK

 Environment (OpenJDK:latest docker container):
 Gradle 6.3 (via gradlew)
 Oracle Linux Server 7.8
 openjdk 14.0.2 2020-07-14
 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed 
mode, sharing)

 My vote is: +1 (binding)

 Francis

 On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:
  +1 (non-binding)
 
  platform: ubuntu16 + java8
 
  run tests locally on: ok
  verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
  check sha512: ok
  verify signature by gpg: ok
 
 
  one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 
does not belong
 to
  "breaking changes" in the release note. That 
change happened in
core/test
  (a testing related change).
 
 
  -Rui
 
 
 
  On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli <
  eolive...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  +1 (non binding)
  run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
  run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 
1.24 without any
 change
 
  Enrico
 
  Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 
Andrei Sereda
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
 
  The commit to be voted upon:
 
 
 

   
  
 
 
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
 
  Its hash is 
68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
 
  Tag:
  
https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
 
  The artifacts to be voted on are located 
here:
 

  
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
  (revision 40922)
 
  RAT report:
 
 https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
 
  Site preview is here:
  
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
 
  JavaDoc API preview is here:
  
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
 
  The hashes of the artifacts are as 
follows:
 
 
 

   
  
 
 
a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
  *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
 
  A staged Maven repository is available 
for review at:
 
 
 

   
  
 
 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
 
  Release artifacts are signed with the 
following key:
  
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
  https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
 
  N.B.
  To create the jars and test Apache 
Calcite: "./gradlew build".
 
  If you do not have a Java environment 
available, you can run
 the
tests
  using docker. To do so, install docker 
and docker-compose, then
  run
  "docker-compose run test" from the root 
of the directory.
 
  Please vote on releasing this package as 
Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
 
  The vote is open for the next 72 hours 
and passes if a majority
  of
   at
  least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
 
  [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache 
Calcite 1.25.0
  [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about 
it, but I'm okay with the
   release
  [ ] -1 Do not release this package 
because...
 
 
  Here is my vote:
 
  +1 (non binding)
 
 
 

   
  
 



-- 
Best regards,
Anton.

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Anton Haidai]

Hello,

Local Calcite build with tests enabled on Linux: *OK*
Calcite-based system (Zoomdata) test suite: *OK*

Vote:
+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
> - Local Calcite build with tests (Windows10 + JDK8): OK
> - Calcite-based application test suite: OK
>
>
> Le lun. 10 août 2020 à 07:13, chunwei  a écrit :
>
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > - run tests locally: ok
> > - verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
> > - check sha512: ok
> >
> > Environment:
> > - java version 1.8.0_151
> > - MacOS Mojave 10.14.6
> >
> > BTW, It shows 404 when I open
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:47 AM Rui Wang  wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> > > > presume it can be done after the vote ?
> > >
> > > Absolutely! It does not affect current vote.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> > >
> > > > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> > > > "breaking changes" in the release note.
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> > > > presume it can be done after the vote ?
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:39 PM Francis Chuang <
> > francischu...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for making this release available for voting, Andrei!
> > > > >
> > > > > Verified GPG Signature - OK
> > > > > Verified SHA512 - OK
> > > > > Ran tests per HOWTO (./gradlew check) - OK
> > > > > Quickly skimmed release notes
> > > > > (
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > > > )
> > > > >
> > > > > - OK
> > > > > Spotted checked a few JARs in the Maven repository - OK
> > > > >
> > > > > Environment (OpenJDK:latest docker container):
> > > > > Gradle 6.3 (via gradlew)
> > > > > Oracle Linux Server 7.8
> > > > > openjdk 14.0.2 2020-07-14
> > > > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
> > > > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed mode, sharing)
> > > > >
> > > > > My vote is: +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Francis
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > platform: ubuntu16 + java8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > run tests locally on: ok
> > > > > > verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
> > > > > > check sha512: ok
> > > > > > verify signature by gpg:  ok
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong
> to
> > > > > > "breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in
> > > > core/test
> > > > > > (a testing related change).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Rui
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 (non binding)
> > > > > >> run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
> > > > > >> run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any
> change
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Enrico
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > >> ha
> > > > > >> scritto:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > > > > >>> candidate 0.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> You can read the release notes here:
> > > > > >>>
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The commit to be voted upon:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Tag:
> > > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > > > >>> (revision 40922)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> RAT report:
> > > > > >>>
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Site preview is here:
> > > > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > > > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > > > > >>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> > > > > >>>
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Ruben Q L]

+1 (non binding)
- Local Calcite build with tests (Windows10 + JDK8): OK
- Calcite-based application test suite: OK


Le lun. 10 août 2020 à 07:13, chunwei  a écrit :

> +1 (non-binding).
>
> - run tests locally: ok
> - verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
> - check sha512: ok
>
> Environment:
> - java version 1.8.0_151
> - MacOS Mojave 10.14.6
>
> BTW, It shows 404 when I open
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:47 AM Rui Wang  wrote:
>
> > > I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> > > presume it can be done after the vote ?
> >
> > Absolutely! It does not affect current vote.
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> > > "breaking changes" in the release note.
> > >
> > > I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> > > presume it can be done after the vote ?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:39 PM Francis Chuang <
> francischu...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for making this release available for voting, Andrei!
> > > >
> > > > Verified GPG Signature - OK
> > > > Verified SHA512 - OK
> > > > Ran tests per HOWTO (./gradlew check) - OK
> > > > Quickly skimmed release notes
> > > > (
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > > )
> > > >
> > > > - OK
> > > > Spotted checked a few JARs in the Maven repository - OK
> > > >
> > > > Environment (OpenJDK:latest docker container):
> > > > Gradle 6.3 (via gradlew)
> > > > Oracle Linux Server 7.8
> > > > openjdk 14.0.2 2020-07-14
> > > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
> > > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed mode, sharing)
> > > >
> > > > My vote is: +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Francis
> > > >
> > > > On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > platform: ubuntu16 + java8
> > > > >
> > > > > run tests locally on: ok
> > > > > verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
> > > > > check sha512: ok
> > > > > verify signature by gpg:  ok
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> > > > > "breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in
> > > core/test
> > > > > (a testing related change).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 (non binding)
> > > > >> run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
> > > > >> run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any change
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Enrico
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda
> > >  > > > >
> > > > >> ha
> > > > >> scritto:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > > > >>> candidate 0.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> You can read the release notes here:
> > > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The commit to be voted upon:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Tag:
> > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > > >>> (revision 40922)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> RAT report:
> > > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Site preview is here:
> > > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > > > >>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > > > >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> N.B.
> > > > >>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[chunwei]

+1 (non-binding).

- run tests locally: ok
- verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
- check sha512: ok

Environment:
- java version 1.8.0_151
- MacOS Mojave 10.14.6

BTW, It shows 404 when I open
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html.

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:47 AM Rui Wang  wrote:

> > I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> > presume it can be done after the vote ?
>
> Absolutely! It does not affect current vote.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:
>
> > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> > "breaking changes" in the release note.
> >
> > I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> > presume it can be done after the vote ?
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:39 PM Francis Chuang 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for making this release available for voting, Andrei!
> > >
> > > Verified GPG Signature - OK
> > > Verified SHA512 - OK
> > > Ran tests per HOWTO (./gradlew check) - OK
> > > Quickly skimmed release notes
> > > (
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > )
> > >
> > > - OK
> > > Spotted checked a few JARs in the Maven repository - OK
> > >
> > > Environment (OpenJDK:latest docker container):
> > > Gradle 6.3 (via gradlew)
> > > Oracle Linux Server 7.8
> > > openjdk 14.0.2 2020-07-14
> > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
> > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed mode, sharing)
> > >
> > > My vote is: +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Francis
> > >
> > > On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > platform: ubuntu16 + java8
> > > >
> > > > run tests locally on: ok
> > > > verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
> > > > check sha512: ok
> > > > verify signature by gpg:  ok
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> > > > "breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in
> > core/test
> > > > (a testing related change).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (non binding)
> > > >> run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
> > > >> run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any change
> > > >>
> > > >> Enrico
> > > >>
> > > >> Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda
> >  > > >
> > > >> ha
> > > >> scritto:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > > >>> candidate 0.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You can read the release notes here:
> > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The commit to be voted upon:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Tag:
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > > >>> (revision 40922)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> RAT report:
> > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Site preview is here:
> > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > > >>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> > > >>>
> > > >>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > > >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > > >>>
> > > >>> N.B.
> > > >>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the
> > tests
> > > >>> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> > > >>> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
> at
> > > >>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Rui Wang]

> I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> presume it can be done after the vote ?

Absolutely! It does not affect current vote.


-Rui

On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM Andrei Sereda  wrote:

> > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> "breaking changes" in the release note.
>
> I'm happy to change release notes to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. I
> presume it can be done after the vote ?
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:39 PM Francis Chuang 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for making this release available for voting, Andrei!
> >
> > Verified GPG Signature - OK
> > Verified SHA512 - OK
> > Ran tests per HOWTO (./gradlew check) - OK
> > Quickly skimmed release notes
> > (
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> )
> >
> > - OK
> > Spotted checked a few JARs in the Maven repository - OK
> >
> > Environment (OpenJDK:latest docker container):
> > Gradle 6.3 (via gradlew)
> > Oracle Linux Server 7.8
> > openjdk 14.0.2 2020-07-14
> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
> > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed mode, sharing)
> >
> > My vote is: +1 (binding)
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > platform: ubuntu16 + java8
> > >
> > > run tests locally on: ok
> > > verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
> > > check sha512: ok
> > > verify signature by gpg:  ok
> > >
> > >
> > > one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
> > > "breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in
> core/test
> > > (a testing related change).
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non binding)
> > >> run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
> > >> run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any change
> > >>
> > >> Enrico
> > >>
> > >> Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda
>  > >
> > >> ha
> > >> scritto:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > >>> candidate 0.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > >>>
> > >>> You can read the release notes here:
> > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> > >>>
> > >>> The commit to be voted upon:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > >>>
> > >>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > >>>
> > >>> Tag:
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > >>>
> > >>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > >>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > >>> (revision 40922)
> > >>>
> > >>> RAT report:
> > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> > >>>
> > >>> Site preview is here:
> > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> > >>>
> > >>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > >>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> > >>>
> > >>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > >>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> > >>>
> > >>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> > >>>
> > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> N.B.
> > >>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> > >>>
> > >>> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the
> tests
> > >>> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> > >>> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > >>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> > >>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is my vote:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (non binding)
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Francis Chuang]

Thanks for making this release available for voting, Andrei!

Verified GPG Signature - OK
Verified SHA512 - OK
Ran tests per HOWTO (./gradlew check) - OK
Quickly skimmed release notes 
(https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md) 
- OK

Spotted checked a few JARs in the Maven repository - OK

Environment (OpenJDK:latest docker container):
Gradle 6.3 (via gradlew)
Oracle Linux Server 7.8
openjdk 14.0.2 2020-07-14
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed mode, sharing)

My vote is: +1 (binding)

Francis

On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:

+1 (non-binding)

platform: ubuntu16 + java8

run tests locally on: ok
verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
check sha512: ok
verify signature by gpg:  ok


one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
"breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in core/test
(a testing related change).


-Rui



On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli  wrote:


+1 (non binding)
run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any change

Enrico

Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda 
ha
scritto:


Hi all,

I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
candidate 0.

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.

You can read the release notes here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html

The commit to be voted upon:



https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555


Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555

Tag:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
(revision 40922)

RAT report:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt

Site preview is here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/

JavaDoc API preview is here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:



a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87

*apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:



https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/


Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS

N.B.
To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".

If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
"docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.

The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Here is my vote:

+1 (non binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Rui Wang]

+1 (non-binding)

platform: ubuntu16 + java8

run tests locally on: ok
verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
check sha512: ok
verify signature by gpg:  ok


one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
"breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in core/test
(a testing related change).


-Rui



On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli  wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
> run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
> run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any change
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda 
> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > candidate 0.
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >
> > You can read the release notes here:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> >
> > The commit to be voted upon:
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >
> > Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> >
> > Tag:
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> >
> > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > (revision 40922)
> >
> > RAT report:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> >
> > Site preview is here:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> >
> > JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> >
> > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> >
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> >
> > N.B.
> > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> >
> > If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> > using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> > "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Here is my vote:
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Enrico Olivelli]

+1 (non binding)
run tests locally on Fedora + JDK14
run tests of HerdDB just by switching from 1.24 without any change

Enrico

Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 05:22 Andrei Sereda  ha
scritto:

> Hi all,
>
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> candidate 0.
>
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>
> You can read the release notes here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
>
> The commit to be voted upon:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>
> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>
> Tag:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> (revision 40922)
>
> RAT report:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
>
> Site preview is here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
>
> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
>
> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
>
> N.B.
> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
>
> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (non binding)
>

[VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[Andrei Sereda]

Hi all,

I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
candidate 0.

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.

You can read the release notes here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html

The commit to be voted upon:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555

Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555

Tag:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
(revision 40922)

RAT report:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt

Site preview is here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/

JavaDoc API preview is here:
https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
*apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS

N.B.
To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".

If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
"docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.

The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Here is my vote:

+1 (non binding)