everything works fine again. I'm aware that the release announcement
for 2.8.2 only went out earlier this week, so just checking if we would
consider doing a Camel 2.8.3 release right after the CXF 2.4.4 release is
out. For the Apache ServiceMix project, this would definitely be highly
appreciated
I can help to do the release of camel 2.8.3 :)
On Fri Oct 28 16:23:01 2011, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
Over at the ServiceMix project, we are finalizing things for doing a
ServiceMix 4.4.0 release. The original plan was to use CXF 2.4.2 and Camel
2.8.1 because of an issue with the CXF
L.S.,
That's awesome - thanks a lot!
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Willem Jiang willem.ji...@gmail.comwrote:
I can help to do the release of camel 2.8.3
Hi Gert,
+1 for a new Camel 2.8.3 release.
I would propose to remove the repository/ tag for CXF.
It doesn't make sense to use a version range for the CXF feature, but
still specify a CXF version in the repository/ tag.
I would prefer to document for the users that they have to install
,
+1 for a new Camel 2.8.3 release.
I would propose to remove the repository/ tag for CXF.
It doesn't make sense to use a version range for the CXF feature, but still
specify a CXF version in the repository/ tag.
I would prefer to document for the users that they have to install the cxf
feature
://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofréj...@nanthrax.netwrote:
Hi Gert,
+1 for a new Camel 2.8.3 release.
I would propose to remove therepository/ tag for CXF.
It doesn't make sense to use a version range for the CXF
