Hi,
+1
No problem, I think we can remove this feature and update the documentation
as per your suggestion.
Regards,
Ravindra
On 8 June 2017 at 14:28, Erlu Chen wrote:
> Hi, Ravindra.
>
> users can learn how to use carbondata through QUICK START document.
>
> users
Hi, Ravindra.
users can learn how to use carbondata through QUICK START document.
users should know how it works and this script just simply steps to get a
existing CarbonSession.
This is carbon API usage, I think community will send much time on
maintenance this script
which will do more harm
Hi,
carbon-spark-shell was added to simplify the usage for first time users. I
don't see any problem now of this feature to be removed. It is also simple
code to be maintained. In case in future if this feature need to be
modified because of spark compatible issues we can discuss again.
Regards,
Thanks for correct my mistake.
Yes, Just carbon-spark-shell, I think carbon-spark-sql is more helpful than
carbon-spark-shell, because it providing a method to interact with
carbondata via sql command, rather than carbon api.
Based on what I mentioned above, I think carbondata can still keep
e should
> keep
> this script.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards.
> Chenerlu.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-
> mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-
> Whether-Carbondata-should-keep-carbon-sql-shell-script-tp14077.html
> Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list
> archive at Nabble.com.
>
.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Whether-Carbondata-should-keep-carbon-sql-shell-script-tp14077.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.