Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread bill.zhou
+1 Regards Bill Venkata Gollamudi wrote > Hi All, > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. >

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for nextversion (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread Jay
+1. i think it's natural for that big changes will made. another reason is,carbon is stable enough after many bug fixed. Regards Jay -- Original -- From: "Lion.X";; Date: Sat, Nov 26, 2016 09:47 AM To:

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread Lion.X
+1 I think it is a good choice because the new features add into next version are disruptive changes in carbon architecture. Regards, Lionx -- View this message in context:

Re: [Improvement] Use Trie in place of HashMap to reduce memory footprint of Dictionary

2016-11-25 Thread Xiaoqiao He
Hi Liang, Kumar Vishal, I has done a standard benchmark about multiply data structures for Dictionary following your suggestions. Based on the test results, I think DAT may be the best choice for CarbonData. *1. Here are 2 test results:*

Re: Using DataFrame to write carbondata file cause no table found error

2016-11-25 Thread Ravindra Pesala
Hi, In Append mode , the carbon table supposed to be created before other wise load fails as Table do not exist. In Overwrite mode the carbon table would be created (it drops if it already exists) and loads the data. But in your case for overwrite mode it creates the table but it says table not

Re: Using DataFrame to write carbondata file cause no table found error

2016-11-25 Thread ZhuWilliam
When I change the SaveMode.Append to Override,then the error is more weird: INFO 25-11 20:19:46,572 - streaming-job-executor-0 Query [ CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS DEFAULT.CARBON2 (A STRING, B STRING) STORED BY 'ORG.APACHE.CARBONDATA.FORMAT' ] INFO 25-11

[jira] [Created] (CARBONDATA-450) Increase Test Coverage for Core.reader module

2016-11-25 Thread SWATI RAO (JIRA)
SWATI RAO created CARBONDATA-450: Summary: Increase Test Coverage for Core.reader module Key: CARBONDATA-450 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-450 Project: CarbonData

Re: Using DataFrame to write carbondata file cause no table found error

2016-11-25 Thread ZhuWilliam
Here is the error: ERROR 25-11 18:13:40,116 - Data loading failed. table not found: default.carbon1 AUDIT 25-11 18:13:40,118 - [allwefantasy][allwefantasy][Thread-98]Data loading failed. table not found: default.carbon1 INFO 25-11 18:13:40,119 - Finished job streaming job 148006882 ms.0

Re: Hive create table error

2016-11-25 Thread william
It works. Thanks On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Sea <261810...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi, william > > > please set your mysql charset latin-1 > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: "william";; > 发送时间: 2016年11月25日(星期五) 晚上6:00 > 收件人:

Re: Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for nextversion (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread Liang Chen
Hi Thanks you participated in discussion. Currently, CarbonData has been formally deployed by many users. Just like i mentioned in the previous post, take 1.0.0,it would be helpful to reduce maintenance cost through distinguishing the major different version. Regards Liang cenyuhai wrote >

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Good idea. Generally speaking minor version is bug fix, major is breaking API and command change. Regards JB⁣​ On Nov 25, 2016, 10:00, at 10:00, sujith chacko wrote: >+1 > >Thanks, >Sujith > >On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta"

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread sujith chacko
+1 Thanks, Sujith On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta" wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Manish Gupta > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Regards > > Kumar Vishal > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41