Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-12-01 Thread Liang Chen
Hi Thanks for all of your comments, will change the current master-SNAPSHOT version to 1.0.0 Regards Liang Venkata Gollamudi wrote > Hi All, > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. >

RE: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-28 Thread Jihong Ma
major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0) Hi Agree with JB's point. For next version, will use native SparkSession to instead CarbonContext, so it would be better if next version number cloud use 1.0.0 for distinguishing major API changes. Please find the detail discussion

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-27 Thread Vimal Das Kammath
+1 -vimal On Nov 23, 2016 9:39 PM, "Venkata Gollamudi" wrote: > Hi All, > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. >

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread bill.zhou
+1 Regards Bill Venkata Gollamudi wrote > Hi All, > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. >

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread Lion.X
+1 I think it is a good choice because the new features add into next version are disruptive changes in carbon architecture. Regards, Lionx -- View this message in context:

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Good idea. Generally speaking minor version is bug fix, major is breaking API and command change. Regards JB⁣​ On Nov 25, 2016, 10:00, at 10:00, sujith chacko wrote: >+1 > >Thanks, >Sujith > >On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta"

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-25 Thread sujith chacko
+1 Thanks, Sujith On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta" wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Manish Gupta > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Regards > > Kumar Vishal > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread Aniket Adnaik
+1 for changing to major version given the list of items being covered in the release. Agree with Jacky's comment on IUD, lets correct it to Update/Delete support instead of IUD. Best Regards, Aniket On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Jacky Li wrote: > +1, > and comments

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread Jacky Li
+1, and comments inline > 在 2016年11月24日,上午12:09,Venkata Gollamudi 写道: > > Hi All, > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. >

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread Naresh P R
+1 Regards, Naresh On Nov 24, 2016 11:30 PM, "Ravindra Pesala" wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 10:37 PM manish gupta > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Regards > > Manish Gupta > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread Ravindra Pesala
+1 On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 10:37 PM manish gupta wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Manish Gupta > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Regards > > Kumar Vishal > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Raghunandan

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread manish gupta
+1 Regards Manish Gupta On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal wrote: > +1 > > -Regards > Kumar Vishal > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Raghunandan S < > carbondatacontributi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 2:30 PM, Liang Chen

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread Raghunandan S
+1 On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 2:30 PM, Liang Chen wrote: > Hi > > Ya, good proposal. > CarbonData 0.x version integrate with spark 1.x, and the load data > solution > of 0.x version is using kettle. > CarbonData 1.x version integrate with spark 2.x, the load data solution

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-24 Thread Liang Chen
Hi Ya, good proposal. CarbonData 0.x version integrate with spark 1.x, and the load data solution of 0.x version is using kettle. CarbonData 1.x version integrate with spark 2.x, the load data solution of 1.x version will not use kettle . That would be helpful to reduce maintenance cost through

CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

2016-11-23 Thread Venkata Gollamudi
Hi All, CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of defects fixed and with number of performance improvements.