Proposal to include CASSANDRA-14482 (ZSTD Support) in 4.0 release

2018-12-10 Thread Sushma Devendrappa
Hi, I am checking to see if we can include CASSANDRA-1448 in 4.0 release which provides ZSTD compressor for Cassandra. Currently changes are under review, implementation has unit test coverage similar to other compressors, also tested in Instagram’s shadow clusters. Implementation structure is

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-10 Thread Dinesh Joshi
I agree with this. I generally am on the side of freedom and responsibility. Limiting edits to certain fields turns people off. Something I want to very much avoid if we can. Dinesh > On Dec 10, 2018, at 6:14 PM, Murukesh Mohanan > wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 10:51, Benedict Elliott

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-10 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 10:51, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > > On 10 Dec 2018, at 16:21, Ariel Weisberg wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > RE #1, does this mean if you submit a ticket and you are not a contributor > > you can't modify any of the fields including description or adding/removing > >

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-10 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
On 10 Dec 2018, at 16:21, Ariel Weisberg wrote: > > Hi, > > RE #1, does this mean if you submit a ticket and you are not a contributor > you can't modify any of the fields including description or adding/removing > attachments? Attachment operations have their own permissions, like comments.

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-10 Thread Ariel Weisberg
Hi, RE #1, does this mean if you submit a ticket and you are not a contributor you can't modify any of the fields including description or adding/removing attachments? RE #2, while bugs don't necessarily have a priority it's helpful to have it sort logically with other issue types on that

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-10 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
New questions. This is the last round, before I call a proper vote on the modified proposal (so we can take a mandate to Infra to modify our JIRA workflows). Thanks again to everyone following and contributing to this discussion. I’m not sure any of these remaining questions are critical,

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-10 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
The “Impact” field idea sounds like a good potential follow-up discussion. I’d prefer not to complicate this process when we’re seemingly nearing consensus, particularly as I’m not personally sure what form such a field would take. But it would be a relatively small modification, if you want